Might Kamala Harris be a Manchurian Candidate?
The Wars of the Social Engineers, Part 4
"The reason why the sun never sets on the British Empire is because God doesn't trust the British in the dark." -Anonymous
Some more active conversation about topics such as this can be found at the RTE Locals channel. Other articles on Theosophy and social engineering can be found here.
Warning: This is not an article for people with poor vocabularies or short attention spans. It is twice as long as any article I've published, even after taking into account that I exported a quarter of it into another piece. It may take readers unfamiliar with the broader scope of my work at RTE many hours to wade through the links that justify some of the content. What I thought would be a one or two day project turned into a complex three-week expedition. Sorry, not sorry. I will leave this free to view/read for 48 hours after which a hefty portion of it will go under the paywall, so share it quickly.
This is not a partisan mission. I have neither cast a ballot for Donald Trump, nor endorsed him. I have never voted for either major party in a national election.
This is an extremely serious article that begins with questions that may at first seem impertinent and unimportant. While I sometimes lay the groundwork with a bit of humor, this is only because my failing is in not knowing how to navigate the political asylum without noticing something funny here and there about the inmates running it. I humbly ask the reader for willingness to suspend any sense of outrage or of whatever we call the feeling of not wanting to wade through the absurdities of the Political Uncanny Valley.
What if the Anglo-Saxon Empire, run out of the City of London, found a way to choose and control American leadership loyal to the Crown without it being as obvious as "another old white dude who, like the Windsor family, is descended from Charlemagne"?
What if Victoria's Secret is that the "Great Game" was won by the Prussian-English Queen when she one-upped Catherine the Great by figuring out a way to pf*ck not only all of Russia, but in fact the entire rest of the world all at once?
If you're not sure what I'm talking about, just chalk it up for the moment as another failure of the educational system, and know that I'll catch you up on world events. I'm just here to help. This article will zoom in and back out while moving backward and forward in time. In the meantime, I'll take a few victory laps over theories that I published that turned out to be largely true. There are 13 models waiting for us at the finish line. Buckle up. If you're not the sort who can handle Victoria's challenge, turn back now.
A Summary: Comparing Models
In this article, you are challenged to examine a great deal of evidence, and then consider which of two models of reality the evidence best fits.
Model 1: There is the "incumbent" model of history that we are led to believe through a combination of textbooks, mostly written by organizations within the British Empire, reinforced by Hollywood and the social pressure of crowd adherence. I don't need to explain it. You know what most people think. It's the version of modern history that we are required to hear about [for reinforcement].
Model 2: I have come to believe an alternate model, which is that the British Empire never died. It went invisible, by design, and is still run out of the City of London and various outposts around the world, with local headquarters often tucked away on difficult-to-invade islands with names like Singapore, Taiwan, the Bahamas, etc. This is the Military Occult Banking Syndicate (MOBS). And understand that the existence of an invisible British Empire does not exclude the participation by oligarchs of all stripes or people who fit the categorization of "People Who Run the World Theory X," for most values of X. If you desire perfect information to seriously examine a model, you are likely pushing up against some form of dissonance.
The MOBS act ruthlessly, sometimes organizing mass murder, and often experimenting on even their own people in pursuit of better tools of control. They are more than aware of the history of the hashshashin (Order of the Assassins, literally 'drugged boys'), and have refined programs such as MK ULTRA in pursuit of turning human assets into killers. Many of the program managers, including CIA director Allen Dulles, sought to turn human assets into Manchurian candidates—political leaders who could act as puppet rulers. We should ask what evidence we would see if such a program succeeded.
Fools dismiss Model 2 as "conspiracy theory" despite admissions by powerful people like Cecil Rhodes, David Rockefeller, Warren Buffett, and George Soros that there are occult organizations sculpting the world as they deem fit (for some definition of "fit"). The word 'conspiracy' means 'together breathing' as in a meta-organism. The existence of such an organism is the topic of the book The Aquarian Conspiracy, which describes the circumstance of various organizations involved in the process of shaping the world, not necessarily aware of the existence of the others. And it would take a willful reading of history (for those with the fortitude to read history) not to see the parallel paths of oligarchs and occult organizations.
There is a stained glass window at the London School of Economics, a university organized by the Fabian Society that seemed in tune with the proposed direction of Cecil Rhodes. The image is known as 'Hammering out a new world,' and features Fabians such as Sidney Webb, Edward R. Pease, and one whom we will talk about a great deal in this article: Annie Besant. In addition to being a Fabian, Besant founded the Malthusian League, but was more importantly a leader of the Theosophical Society, which seems to have been involved in a host of large scale social engineering projects, up to the United Nations.
In this article, we examine evidence consistent with Kamala Harris being a Manchurian candidate, including,
Evidence of association with the Theosophical Society,
Evidence of political direction consistent with the Fabians of the British MOBS,
Evidence of organized theatrical Hegelian engineerings, including plenty of kayfabe,
Commitment to a political (and politicized) identity built on archetypes,
Proximity to psychiatrists and known centers for MK ULTRA programs,
Unexplained gaps in history and personal relationships,
Unusual behavior, including speech patterns consistent with mantras, sometimes spoken at inappropriate moments,
Single-mindedness.
Some of these details are not specific to the Manchurian candidate, but to the art of building the illusion of the candidate to be sold to the audience.
Much of the evidence we examine here has not been discussed by the mainstream media, or even the larger alternative media outlets. But it should have been. I was able to find all of it through a computer terminal from my home office. I did so by following Model 2 as a guide. As a consequence of Mathew's law, more broadly applied to mainstream (MOBS operated) conglomerate media, this is a big problem already for the incumbent model.
Going Back to the Roots: Besant Nagar and the British Empire
"My grandfather was one of the original Independence fighters in India." -Kamala Harris
Before I proceed, I would like to thank all my new Indian and Pakistani subscribers who have encouraged me to continue to dig deeper into India's history. It is heartening to know how many people are ready for the blinders to be removed.
Shyamala Gopalan was born in Madras, India, in 1938. Her father, PV Gopalan was a well-to-do career civil servant who began his career working for the British Raj. PV moved his family variously between Madras, Delhi, Calcutta, Bombay, and also Southern Africa.
While no one of these intra-India moves is quite the distance that Leon Trotsky and some of his comrades traveled to go to work in the City of London (from where the Theosophy-led sabotage of Tsar Nicholas II was engineered) they each involved up to 2000 miles of travel. This sort of moving around indicates purpose. And it is noteworthy that they began and ended in Madras.
The Gopalan family settled in the Besant Nagar neighborhood in Adyar, which is home to the Theosophical Society headquarters. In 1938, Adyar was still a sparsely populated "suburb" on the Madras map. The neighborhood was named after the Theosophical Society leader Annie Besant who trained British intelligence asset Mohandas Gandhi in the history and practice of Hinduism. I hear that it's a lovely place with a nice beach named for a British home wrecker.
Is it mere coincidence that out of the whole of the Indian subcontinent, Kamala Harris's family lived within walking distance of where Madame Blavatsky and Colonel Henry Olcott planted the international headquarters of the New World Order (NWO)-promoting Theosophical Society, in Adyar?
Shyamala's grandmother, Rajam, reportedly traveled around India promoting birth control. Shortly after its "independence", India became the first country in the developing world to create a state-sponsored "family planning" program.
This part shouldn't be hard unless Team Trump doesn't actually want to get to the roots of Kamala's position or family background for some reason. The social engineers of elections have a few generally solid issues they mold around.
Besant, founder of the Malthusian League, brought the notion of family planning to India. It was in Theosophical Society founder Madame Blavatsky's The Secret Doctrine that the foundations for family planning were laid. If Rajam was not instructed by Besant herself, it is highly likely that she was inducted into the organized cause by one of Besant's agents. As Besant served as President of the Indian National Congress whose members largely took control of the newly "independent" government. These programs received state funding under the third Indian Prime Minister Indira Gandhi, whose father, first Prime Minister Jawarhalal Nehru, was closely mentored by Besant.
Madras is now known as Chennai. The social engineers love to change the names of people, cities, and corporations as a way of confusing the breadcrumb trails of history. When they can't keep you from connecting the British East India Company to slave colonies and the killing of hundreds of millions around the world, they spin up a new organization or corporation, like Unilever, then stock it with funds to buy up British East India Company (or British South Africa Company) assets. That way when a Unilever family scion, propped up by George Soros, promotes an "alternative" to the standard NWO model, most people miss it.
White washing. Get the joke?
By royal charter of King James II, the Madras Corporation was established to govern that southeast corner of India. Its first governor was none other than Elihu Yale, who later moved to the U.S. where he founded Yale University, Britain's greatest educational foothold in America, which is definitely not a school that sifts for social engineers. After the independence of India, Madras was renamed Chennia, and now the Greater Chennai Corporation exists as the second oldest corporation in the world behind the City of London.
Chennai is also the home of Kollywood, one of the three cinema production centers of India (along with Bollywood and Tollywood), and the Theosophists dominated much of the development of the Kollywood industry under the leadership of effective recruit Radha Burnier. Theosophical social engineers always need fresh crops of actors to recruit and sell their product. Surely that is why L Ron Hubbard invested in a big Scientology center in Hollywood. Those actors play important roles when the social engineers need to pull off their next big illusion.
To put it plainly, Kamala's mother immigrated not simply from India, but from the Indian social engineering outpost headquarters of the British Empire's new network: the Military Occult Banking Syndicate (MOBS). Prior to leaving for graduate school in California, Shyamala attended Lady Irwin College, which was funded by Lord and Lady Irvin, friends of many of Besant's trainees, as well as the All India Women's Conference, founded by Besant confidante Margaret Cousins.
More evidence emerges of the mission when we follow the family to Zambia. Just as it seems that the British Empire chose to become invisible in India by transferring responsibility to the MOBS social engineers, a parallel task took shape in Africa under Cecil Rhodes. The primary difference is that history documents with complete certainty that Rhodes advocated for the British Empire to adopt occult robes in order to more invisibly perpetuate its reach. He also wanted to foster "philosopher-kings" in America who would be loyal to the British MOBS conglomerate (hence Rhodes scholars).
PV served as advisor to Kenneth Kaundi, the first president of "independent" Zambia.
Kaundi enjoyed literature on Mohandas Gandhi, and brought Zambia into the so-called "Non-Aligned Movement" (NAM). NAM was conjured by Nehru and Nehru's Defense Minister and Theosophist VK Krishna Menon. Menon was friends with Countess Mountbatten whose husband oversaw the Partition of India. Forming NAM as the second largest organization of nations (next to the United Nations) required a bootstrapping of relationships through invisible hands of the British Empire, most often using Theosophically trained agents.
The Zambian leader also concocted a plan to transfer a full quarter of Zambia's land to Rolls Royce Guru Maharishi Mahesh Yogi! While Maharishi Mahesh Yogi was not himself affiliated with Theosophy, he, his transcendental meditation, and the rest of the Rolls Royce gurus have long been championed by Theosophists working in alignment with the invisible MOBS network of the British Empire. And the Yogi's increasingly apparent connections to the British Empire, including through the Beatles, Mick Jagger, Buckminster Fuller, and Justin Trudeau, further establish the connection between all three—certainly in the sense of "spins of spins".
On a related side note, Canadian Author Ann Diamond claims to have been part of an MK ULTRA program at McGill University (which is definitely not a school for training social engineers) that included Mick Jagger and Leonard Cohen as participants.
Where would an African school teacher-turned-president even come up with a notion like handing his people's lands over to a wealthy Indian guru? In 2021, Stephen Chan wrote (unironically, I think),
China had already been building the Tazara Railway to give Zambia a transport route to the sea that was not dependent on the white south, instead reaching the Indian Ocean at Dar es Salaam. It never worked to its intended capacity, but China retained a high respect for Kaunda. Chairman Mao delayed announcing the grand Chinese Three World Theory – basically a conflation of non-alignment and Chinese leadership – till 1974 to coincide with a visit to Beijing by Kaunda. They wanted to associate the theory with the African “philosopher king”. When Kaunda died on 17 June 2021, he was nowhere mourned outside Zambia as much as in China, where the official tributes and the newspaper editorials were fulsome.
In his time, Kaunda was hailed as a philosopher king not just by China but many others too, including the Fabian wing of Britain’s Labour Party. Kaunda had been influenced by the ideas of moral economy advanced by economic historian R.H. Tawney and ideas of the welfare state advanced by theorist Harold Laski. He was also moved by the doctrine of pacific resistance advanced by Gandhi. Kaunda’s deployment of this approach was paraded as being principled in the face of white southern aggression but, in reality, Zambia had no armed forces that could have offered equal battle with those of Rhodesia and especially South Africa. As with much of Kaunda’ principles, it was finally boiled down to pragmatism.
Pragmatism, or good old Fabian social engineering, as praised by the Marxist eugenicist Harold Laski, Menon's personal tutor when he was young.
After Shyamala had left the nest to study at university in the United States, PV helped manage refugees during the Rhodesian (named for Cecil Rhodes) and Zimbabwean conflicts in which communist Russia and communist China each armed one of the sides in what otherwise might simply be described as more "color revolutions of the British Empire."
A task such as refugee management can be easily encoded as humanitarian. If you want to believe that about the British Empire, which regularly drug Indian workers such as silk weavers out into the street for humiliating beatings, you have that right. But Rhodes was financed by Baron Nathan de Rothschild. The Baron was the sort of man who held back funds from JP Morgan who wanted to consolidate railroad networks in the U.S. over the lack of law-and-order stability that resulted from an infamous gunfight in Tombstone, Arizona. The oligarch class does not invest until conditions are favorable.
Political Uncanny Valley
"I guess the most surprising discovery was how long Gandhi remained loyal to the ideal of the British Empire, even in India." -Arthur L. Herman
Surprise is relative to the model. Reaction time of understanding is relative to the level of surprise, and resistance to dissonance.
Elections are growing weirder at a rate that calls into question mainstream media narratives about cosmological constants. Questions must be asked. Questions like, "Why is almost nobody talking about what would be called a coup in a shithole country if it weren't happening in France?"
While I remain skeptical of the runaway claims by artificial intelligence gurus about "summoning the demon" of general artificial intelligence, the ability for A.I. to change the political landscape concerns me deeply. How can we ever again know for certain that politicians lie when their lips move if we don't actually know whether we're seeing their lips move?
It's not funny because it's true.
The Economist may mislead you, but they're not lying. Or are they?
How much work do we have to do these days to be certain?
Now we're not only seeing fake A.I. generated images, but we're seeing real images retouched by A.I. to make audiences doubt the existence of [the unpresented] real documentation.
How much work do you really want to do to keep up with an election season? What's it all worth?
Note that the partisan political attacks during this particular election are more vague than ever. This allows for the faithful in partisan camps to just fill in the details in their own minds.
"Donald Trump is the most grave threat we will face to our democracy in our lifetime, and potentially in American history." -Cassidy Hutchinson
"Kamala is quite literally a communist." -Elon Musk (and a lot of other people)
Does anyone else find it suspicious that so many early Theosophists referred to each other as "comrades"? Never mind…
One of the people calling Kamala a communist did so while posting a video of Kamala talking about snatching patents. The short snippet makes Kamala's intent vague, but if Kamala were going to end intellectual property, that might be the one great thing I've ever heard from her! Intellectual property has enabled intense capital accumulation among the elites.
But I'm not sure that I trust any interpretation from either side given that Kamala's husband, Doug Emhoff, used to make money suing people over copyright infringement.
If you process all this as "fascism vs. communism", you're probably just data for a nudge unit. Welcome to your virtual reality. Here's your chip, citizen.
Ideological labels have always confused voters. This enables the capture of government to take place in front of our faces because such a large portion of the population stops at "Ideology A/B/C" without asking deeper questions or taking notes.
If electoral democracy actually existed (which it doesn't), did somebody just ruin it? (Probably.)
If liars lie about lying liars, do political lobbyists stop writing the bills?
Is your noodle cooking yet?
Really, stop and think about it all for a moment. Have the past few elections moved a little closer, one or two steps at a time, to some sort of Political Uncanny Valley (PUV)?
Sure, there are some pundits who have asked similar questions. They sound a little smarter than the "standard boring pundit unit" plugged into any particular consolidated information gatekeeping media outlet. But, after a little while, didn't "New and Improved Pundit" in the "alt media" also begin to reveal itself as PUV?
Ultimately, isn't that why it's all PUV, now?
Did anyone at all actually believe, deep down inside, that Biden's campaign was anything other than cover for the prepared mission of Queen Kamala, the Identitarian of Joy who found herself in this position without ever winning a state primary?
You with me?
Good. Let's have a discussion. It's about Kamala, but it's also about everything all at once, and that makes this a challenge. We may have one shot to spot the glitches in the Matrix as the new software loads, and the cyberneticists are still hunting for bugs you can eat.
Marvel at Marvel's Political Universe
"Propaganda is the executive arm of the invisible government." -Edward Bernays
Fun fact: Netflix co-founder and former CEO Marc Randolph is the grand-nephew of Edward Bernays, and the great-grand nephew of Sigmund Freud. I just wanted to put that out there.
Now, let's take in some good news.
Before we move forward, take a moment to soak up the following. I'll break it into parts to make this easier.
Don't worry! It's not…a political advertisement. This is not propaganda aimed at young, formative minds. Really, it's not. I pinky swear.
Okay, this is some sort of comic book promoting a politician. It's real. I checked. You can buy it on Amazon. Let's continue…
In the advertisement, Kamala is sold as "bi-racial", elevating the importance of one version of her identity. We will talk more about identity building later.
They said "Advertisement" twice, so there is definitely nothing unethical about aiming this level of politics at young minds that haven't graduated past comic books.
This isn't just about Kamala.
Justin Trudeau attended McGill University, which is part of the WEF's Global University Leaders Forum network.
I didn't read them, so you don't have to.
I also didn't look through each full series, so I can't tell you if they feature any Republican men who aren't into dudes.
It appears (from what I could find) that vaccine investor and promoter Dolly Parton, who has multiple butterfly tattoos and an active sex life outside of her marriage to a military man, is the only person with two editions.
Why are we talking about a comic book?
Because we really have moved into a world in which that Matrix-level perception of reality is governed by media first aimed at children, whether through Netflix, comic books, or smartphones. This fact may be more important (maybe far more important) than who gets elected in November.
Politics is downstream from culture, and culture is downstream from education. What gets fed into the minds of children shapes the way the masses participate in the building of the Matrix. That's how the Cybernetic machinery works:
Traumatize children to destabilize their brains and personalities,
Feed them fantasy and fiction while telling them it's [pretty close to] reality,
Hook them on all sorts of drugs that dampen the will to struggle out of virtual captivity,
Educate them into insect-like specialization (eusocial structure of the Rockefellers),
Steer perception with Hegelian dialectic, engineering the illusion of consent at each step,
Never let them see the other side of the information and economic firewall.
Ultimately, this is the reason why so many of us have this disquieting feeling that we do not really know much about Kamala. Who she actually is has largely been written out of the equation. The whole goal is to raise an empty vessel that can be decorated in any way for the purposes of winning or losing elections—or even spurring political chaos.
It's devilish alchemy.
What is education downstream from?
From however the children get raised. The entire structure of society.
There are feedback loops, which is why it's a Cybernetic system. The ante is the outcome, which is the ante, which is the outcome.
Welcome to the new economy of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. It's about control. This is how you ensure full employment. It's all a game of cosplay, see?
Why stop at a single Kamala comic when we can extend the cosplay to a whole new Marvel series.
The character is Muslim and looks more like Kamala's sister, Maya, but we all recognize the identity priming. Younger superheroes allow for new narratives. They're sexier and know how to fly and chew bubblegum at the same time. It's aspirational.
"But we should have a Muslim female superhero. There are so many white male superheroes, and…"
And see what all those lame fictional heroes did to white male American culture?
Fine, have it your way. Jump right in. Maybe it's best for all of us if the civil war happens between warring parties of cosplayers shouting "Shazam!" while waiting for that moment lightning shoots from their fingertips. Just…waiting…chewing bubblegum…
Leaping Past the Comic Books in a Single Bound
Who is this woman who might be the next "leader of the free world"?
It occurred to me this week that I have never written much more than a Mathew's law article and a tweet or two about Kamala Harris. She is now reportedly the favorite to be the next POTUS after predictably being thrust in as a Biden replacement (a Biden replacement replacement?) very late in the game. More than that, I knew less about Kamala than just about any major American politician who has run for the top office since before that forty year span in which they were all mentored by founders of the Trilateral Commission (yes, even Obama).
For all the obvious reasons, I do not put much stock in election polling. But the betting markets do show the ComicCop neck-in-neck with OrangeMan in a contest that started somewhere around the 8th inning, or maybe closer to the 8th century?
(Yes, I replaced that image after the very predictable Kennedy announcement. Cue victory lap.)
Despite nearly-four-years of vaccine wars and a shocking border experiment, already financially struggling Americans are getting beat up. That's been going on since the 60s no matter which party has held power. If you're not in the upper quintiles, you're running a Red Queen's race, at best. And let's be real: a lot of the people in those two upper quintiles are the well-educated, hard working immigrants (or their children) who are both glad to be Americans, and also pawns in a game of East-West brain drain.
Notice those down trends starting around the time the WHO said "panic"? That's the result of inflation, which is itself the result of the greatest wealth transfer (theft) in the history of the world. This is certainly not what the Democratic Party has claimed to be fighting for. And they can't even blame the portion on Trump that Trump is responsible for because their own outrage machine was used to fuel the spending decisions.
The voters don't care. They don't care largely because of the intricately sculpted media matrix that used their data to break their communities with propaganda flooding. People…or global citizens or whatever the social engineers want everyone to call themselves…pulled themselves up from their trauma by forming…or more likely joining…new groups that are likely managed for the purpose of curated information, targeting them, tailored to fit their biases..
Welcome to the new normal. Is it getting better, yet?
It was always true that it was easier to recognize the political atmosphere than the facts, and Gell-Mann amnesia means most people (even if they have time, which most don't) won't figure out their need to self-navigate. As a result, what matters most during a national election is the ways in which people make noise.
I spent several years explaining to friends—some of whom will probably never speak to me again—that the left elected Trump just like they elected [Dubya] Bush. They did it by being mean loudly. Yes, that was by design of the social engineers. Stop misunderestimating them.
But what is worse is the fact that the outrage machine isn't even based on principles. It clearly just follows those actors that we're told are the policy makers as they memory hole the principles deployed in the last episode of Reality Show politics.
Judging purely from my albeit limited vantage point, the Democrats have grown a little wiser in containing their expressions of outrage over the past few years. The Trump derangement syndrome seems at least somewhat toned down. Their strategy has turned closer to simply "socially isolate the others." Meanwhile, the MAGA crowd has rapidly grown meaner.
If nobody stops to draw the maps (as I started doing last year), almost nobody outside of the gamemaker's inner circle will recognize the process amidst the information flood. It is hierarchical and compartmentalized. Transhumanists like Elon Musk sell it to you as, "simulations within simulations." This leads us to a political system that is completely engineered theater, set to the tune of whatever it was voters were paying attention to on the tv-now-interwebz while their brains were still maturing.
Yeah, that's what I've been trying to explain. And even if it's not AOC, you'll find the same corps of social engineers behind them. And if you don't bother to connect the dots, the hands inside the British East India Company's brown leather gloves will elude you.
I'm not the cynical one. I'm just pulling the curtain back so that you can see just how cynical are the social engineers designing the costumes.
No, wait, I am cynical—positively so.
But you're here to see what I might write about Kamala, so I'll try to relate what I've learned in 24 hours and change.
The Origins of Kamala
"You may be the first to do many things." -Shyamala Gopalan (to her daughter Kamala, as the story goes)
I had previously assumed that Kamala sprang fully grown from the head of Progressive Zeus.
I wasn't all that far off. Kamala means lotus in Sanskrit. It is at once both feminine and effective in playing a role. Kamala's middle name, Devi, is the sanskrit word for 'goddess'. Kamala's sister Maya's middle name is Lakshmi, as in She who springs forth from the lotus.
The Hindu goddess Lakshmi, the supreme goddess of Vishnuism, is associated with Maya, which is magic or illusion in the sense of an orchestrated false reality. In Hindu lore, Maya is the consort of Vishnu, who transforms the universe. If you wanted to conjure a highly educated (partially) Indian family as a New World Order Façade, these are names you would use.
Many good Hindus would be understandably upset if this pair of women turn out to be social engineers on behalf of European pagans, or Anglicans, or whatever the great puppet masters might be. Many African-Americans would be offended to have their identity borrowed for the purpose.
In 1964, Kamala was born to immigrant parents: Jamaican Economist Donald J. Harris and Indian-born Biomedical Scientist Shyamala Gopalan. We are told that Donald and Shyamala met at UC Berkeley, shared a passion for the civil rights movement, got married in 1963, had two children together while earning their doctoral degrees, then split up in 1971.
That Donald J is Kamala's daddy did not escape my notice. It's fine. Just giggle and move on.
That's a good looking young couple. Healthy, well-educated, and graceful. If eugenicists wanted to build a new family power dynasty around a pair of young minorities within largely Anglo-America, they could not have done much better. They had two cute little girls, too.
Neither of the girls' parents remarried after a bitter custody dispute in which Donald's identity as a black man was used against him. Shyamala won custody, and continued forward as a single mother while distance grew between the girls and their father.
Donald is apparently descended from an Anglican church founder and the owner of a vast slave pool. His studies took him to the University of London, which has educated the descendants of slave holders since 1836. Oh, I'm just kidding, folks. They let other people in, too.
Donald earned a PhD at UC Berkeley, which is definitely not a school for training social engineers, then ascended to a faculty position at Stanford University, which is also definitely not a school for training social engineers. He also served as a visiting fellow at Cambridge University, which couldn't possibly be a school for training social engineers of the British Empire, and at the Delhi School of Economics.
Wikipedia's page for the Delhi School of Economics fails to mention its founder, Vijayendra Kasturi Ranga Varadaraja Rao, a student of John Maynard Keynes, possibly to reduce the size of the article, but perhaps to reduce the number of node connections among British-educated Indians from Madras.
Donald is a "Post-Keynesian", the branch of economics from which Modern Monetary Theory (MMT) emerged. These are the people who have no worry about runaway price inflation due to a government or central bank inflating the fiat currency supply at faster rates. Just don't ever read up on the equation of exchange. Don't do it. I said don't do it.
MMT sprang from chartalism (which may seem a bit like charlatanism), mixing together ideas from economic theorists as dissimilar as Adam Smith, Karl Marx, and John Stuart Mill, in an alchemy that justifies increasing monetary consolidation, such as that which drove the formation of the European Economic Community, an economic goal of the Nazi Party which had to wait a few decades.
Most of the problems these social engineers want to inflate-tax from you to spend on are externalities for which the ruling class is most responsible. Giving those people the ability, who already seem to spend at will, the ability to also spend more to the point of full employment and whatever other forms of moral hazard they can dream up, seems literally insane. Its achievability is an illusion. But remember: You are the cause. It's all your fault. To the degree the final solution of fiat money results in destabilization, it fails because you didn't believe hard enough.
If MMT is to be delivered, it will likely come in the form of a Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) that would allow for taxation to take place per currency transaction. And that definitely lacks any sort of moral hazard. Nobody could imagine central planners rigging the code of policy process in favor of the oligarch class. Who could imagine such a thing? It would be like modern open-air slavery where the slaves are encouraged to spend as fast as possible at the company store because their money loses value as the second hand rotates around the clock.
As the Oprah-approved version of the story goes, Shyamala raised her children into "strong, black women." Why not strong, Indian women, as named, if they were more Indian than black, and their black father departed the family structure? Is there a political promotion at play?
At left is of course Shyamala. The woman on the right is psychiatrist Lenore Pomerance whose husband Rafe has been called, "the original climate change warrior," which is usually a good sign that somebody hails from a banking family involved in social engineering. Rafe's great-grandfather, Henry Morgenthau Sr., was made U.S. ambassador to the Ottoman Empire just in time to express outrage over the Armenian genocide.
As Shyamala raised the two girls as a single mother, we are told that she frequently took them to Rainbow Sign, which was a black cultural center near their home in Berkeley. Many have suspected the Rainbow Sign of being an intelligence front. The "Rainbow" designation was used in the late 60s and early 70s by U.S. intelligence social engineers to mark their projects. For instance, the Rainbow Family was given the appearance of an organic utopian camping crowd with lots of drum circles, but was one of the several CIA-orchestrated drug dealing operations designated to follow the Tavistock creation of the Grateful Dead and then Phish.
As the name would imply, Rainbow Sign was a radical place devoted to queer and transgender ideology, while at the same time playing host to the Black Panthers, which has looked more and more over the years to be a social engineering project of the intelligence agencies. A few quick notes before moving on:
The Black Panthers are said to have taken inspiration from the Nation of Islam, which later morphed into a Neo-Theosophy organization following L Ron Hubbard's Dianetics under the leadership of Louis Farrakhan. Farrakhan claims to have been taken aboard an alien mothership while in Mexico, where he was told it was his destiny to take the reins of the movement.
Black Panther, Marxist, prison abolitionist, and Kamala supporter Angela Davis called the mostly black flock at Jonestown, some of whom were held in sexual captivity, to tell them to stay strong en route to being subject to the mass murder orchestrated by Jim Jones at the British colony. Davis owned guns used in the murders at the Marin County Civic Center. The Weathermen, who were definitely not just another intelligence chaos operation, later detonated explosives at the scene of the crime.
The Dalit Panthers organized in 1972 in Maharashtra to push back against the caste system that was really only ossified after the British Empire arrived (caste is a Portuguese word, and people moved more freely between the so-called castes of India before society was reorganized into more rigid hierarchy "pointing upward" toward the British Raj).
Stop here for a moment and whether there is anything left at all about the "radical 60s and 70s" that doesn't look designed by the MOBS intelligence networks, with all its cross-promotion of symbolism, even down to the outer walls of the movie theaters in the districts where they operated most.
The Black Panthers received political support by famous people like Jane Fonda, who spoke in support of Jim Jones, and also organized the first all-transgender casting of the Vagina Monologues.
Shyamala took Kamala and Maya to Rainbow Sign where they met numerous politically-involved black Americans, such as Maya Angelou. Angelou said a lot of poetic things. Some of them I agree with. But they were always said artfully, whether or not they were accurate.
Of course, Castro never had called himself white, so he was O.K. from the git. Anyhow, America hated Russians, and as black people often said, "Wasn't no Communist country that put my grandpappa in slavery."
-Maya Angelou
This is so destructively misleading, but clever and hard to unwind that it surely sticks in the minds of young people who haven't experienced enough of life to find the inspiration to dig into history to sort out the politics. Hopefully, unwinding one of these propaganda verses will reveal the deception:
The United States of America was [unfortunately] born with a slavery problem. Slavery was an evil that the entire continent of Europe had done away with centuries before communism was devised.
Corporations came along and reintroduced slavery, which was scandalous in Christian Europe, but the average European had no say in the matter.
Corporations became magnets for the Kunlangeta (psychopaths), to which we owe today's corporate culture. Corporations gave rise to the modern Military Occult Banking Syndicate (MOBS).
When the U.S. did tackle the slavery problem, the bankers of Europe were on hand to finance both sides of the war—a move probably designed to turn the U.S. back into a de facto [corporate] European colony.
Russia, which was the British Empire's chief rival in the "Great Game" of Eurasian empire, sent its Pacific Fleet led by Rear Admiral Andrei Popov, to patrol the West coast of the U.S. as an act of brotherhood. This occurred on the back of the 1861 Edict of Emancipation which gave 23 million serfs the full rights of citizens in Russia. The British Empire was highly concerned over two strong Northern rivals who had better positions to participate in and influence the future of Pacific trade. And those rivals looked to be moving toward economic liberation, barring outside interference.
Lincoln partially financed the war through bonds and introduction of an income tax. This may be the primary motivation for his assassination, the investigation into which seemed amateurishly botched by the trio of investigators that included eventual Theosophical Society co-founder Colonel Henry Olcott. This may also have set the U.S. up as a target for capture by the European corporatist MOBS.
Meanwhile, the British were getting rich, expanding their sphere of control, and practicing the art of social engineering in China while piling up 70 million bodies.
The British-led MOBS then invented communism and Theosophy, and exported them to Russia. Let the era of color revolutions begin!
The City of London comes in later, helps establish the Federal Reserve after many of its opponents just sort of happened to be on the same boat that hit an iceberg under mysterious circumstances (suspiciously "predicted" in advance by Theosophists Madame Blavatsky and William T. Stead), and begins to profit from the now-accepted system of income taxation, reintroduced with the payroll tax through two World Wars.
At that point, the British Empire began doing what the British Empire did to conquer the world, with a few hundred million bodies in its wake: divide, and install puppets. It's what we now refer to somewhat blindly as "The Cold War." And the U.S. was reset after World War 2 with intelligence agencies largely run by Jesuits like the Dulles brothers who were loyal to their larger European network devoted to bringing about the New World Order remote controlled from the Old World MOBS.
Is that deception the one they call [Queen] Victoria's Secret?
Too bad the ole Empress of India isn't around to tell us, and Leslie Wexner's pet Jeffrey Epstein isn't, either.
"You don't have to think about doing the right thing.
If you're for the right thing, then you do it without thinking."
-Maya Angelou
We want for good intentions to be enough, but it just isn't so. We do need to think through who is muddying our minds, steering us into conflict with people who would otherwise become cooperative allies. Take it from the British expert insider in social engineering:
"Who controls the past controls the future: who controls the present controls the past."
-George Orwell
If you cannot identify your enemy, you are subject to being directed to fight one another. This is what Hegelian dialecticalism is all about.
Understand that I don't blame Angelou. She was the subject of the systems of trauma-based mind control cooked up between the moment psychiatry was invented and the Tavistock Institute began leading what became MKULTRA programs once exported to the CIA. To varying degree, almost all of us were. All of that is misunderstood by the vast majority of Americans of all racial backgrounds, religions, and ideologies. And that is the hidden evil at the center of social engineering.
So, who controls the past?
Politics is downstream from culture, and culture is downstream from education. Nearly every one of us were fooled through our Prussian schooling, in tandem with history books written to the purposes of the British and German (Anglo-Saxon, like the Windsors) intelligence agencies. The textbook publisher MacMillan was run by Fabian British Prime Minister Harold Macmillan. The Penguin and Random House publishing empires were folded together under the control of Bertelsmann, which housed the larger portion of the corporate Nazi propaganda apparatus.
And if you're still under any illusions that the Nazi Party was not an operation run by the British Empire, using the Theosophical Society and its other tools, do the reading, build your own relationship map, and consider who wrote the history after the MOBS-arranged World Wars.
A poet like Angelou was intelligent enough to be taken in and developed into a tool for the Empire, believing all along that she was fighting the Evil Empire when she was really just a pawn of the Charlemagniacs.
Now we must wonder, were Kamala and Maya exposed to these tools of the MOBS Monarchy by chance, or was their mother steered toward the den of social engineers and their project pawns for a purpose?
Note that the Rainbow Sign also supported transgender artists, long before it was cool—long before anyone outside of the social engineering networks could possibly have guessed that we would be living through a sudden explosion in interest among young people in gender transition.
In other news, Kamala was the name of "the Ugandan Giant", a character from professional wrestling who passed away in 2020. That's too bad because the spectacle of Hulk Hogan throwing down with the Ugandan Giant on election day would have been an epic circus voters could spend some of their bread on.
He changed the world, and then departed, like magic. Just like magic.
Identifying the Real Joy of Identity
"That little girl was me." -Kamala Harris, repeatedly
The Kamala Harris ticket is the most blatantly identity-oriented presidential ticket in history. More than that, it is the most theosophical ticket in history:
All the racial identities you could ask for in a diversity marketing ad,
Gender equality,
Zionist,
Family planning,
LGBTQ, which couples with family planning as a population control mechanism in the West,
Religious…gooeyness,
Pop culturized.
Understand that a lot of these "values" relate to things that I support, except that the how and why are just as important as the what. In principle, I couldn't care less about a person's sexuality, for instance, but I have great worries that trauma-based mechanisms have been put in place that are resulting in divergent sexuality in a way that is not healthy, and that can later be used to steer politics toward authoritarian outcomes. Some people might label me "pro-choice" because I believe that the problem of unwanted pregnancies should not be solved at the level of state medicalization, but at the levels of culture and education. If the goal is a world of healthy people, living great lives, checklisting the attributes of a utopian world opens us up to being led by parasocial conmen, which is precisely what I believe the theosophists do for their part in the MOBS complex.
Identity politics is just a culture war strategy to confuse the masses who do not understand the ways in which their educations were sabotaged, or what the "utopian" end goal really looks like.
Kamala's campaign, including their propaganda outlets, have been smart enough to recognize how many Americans have begun to grow suspicious of the "first [identity] to do X" mantras. So, they've taken steps to tell you, dear information consumer, that Kamala is running because she believes that she is the best person [now that the rapidly dimming Biden is out of the way] for the job. You can skip past the following (from Slate), if you already know how it reads (you do):
For feminists like me, this is uncomfortable: For one thing, I’m psyched about the prospect of the first female president. I wish the whole country were shouting it from the rooftops! No, I don’t think a few individual women in positions of power are the solution to sexism, but it also seems obviously true that it’s good when power is more equally shared between women and men. Progress is not linear and it is often hard to measure; these “firsts” are not evidence of problems solved, but they are symbols of changing times. Plus, identity matters—at least, it has certainly mattered to the chain of men, all but one of them white, who have held the presidency, as well as for the American public that has put them in office.
And yet I also believe there is something shallow, and sometimes incredibly counterproductive, about a focus on identity. It flattens more than it layers on, and it is certainly damaging to progressive movements when identity is wielded as a cudgel or a gotcha. Donald Trump’s four years in office were such a shock to the system, and such a victory for racism and sexism that the politics of identity on the left went into overdrive. A lot of good came out of this: movements against racial injustice and sexual abuse; a broader shared vocabulary with which to talk about power and fairness. But, as inevitably happens with well-meaning but extremely zealous social movements, there were excesses, especially in the ever-evolving linguistic demands that often obscured more than they clarified, the quickness to abandon other principles in the name of the cause, and the ritual shaming of the less-than-perfect. Zoom out, and Harris’s identity-hesitancy becomes more heartening than disappointing. She’s not denying who she is or saying it doesn’t matter. She’s not ignoring identity-based constituencies, or the ways in which identity shapes people’s lives. She is instead embodying the recalibration of the role of identity politics in American politics—and that’s a very good thing.
In an interview last month with CNN’s Dana Bash, Harris was pretty clipped when talking about race and gender. What, Bash asked, do Harris’s race and gender mean to her? Harris’ answer: “I am running because I believe that I am the best person to do this job at this moment for all Americans, regardless of race and gender.” But, she added, she did see the viral photograph of her grandniece gazing up at her in awe, “and I was deeply touched by it. And, you’re right, she’s—it’s the back of her head, and her two little braids, and—and then I’m in the front of the photograph, obviously speaking. It’s very humbling. It’s very humbling in many ways.”
It was not the most illuminating answer in the world—it doesn’t really say all that much about what her race and gender mean to her. But it does explain her understanding of how meaningful her campaign is to so many people. And it still manages to emphasize the universality of her message and her leadership—something that too hefty a focus on identity can inhibit.
Support for transgenderism has since become a defining feature of Kamala's family, including among those who call her 'momala'.
Ella Emhoff helps raise money to give over to black trans people.
Unlike her father, Ella does not identify as Jewish. A spokesperson said so, and then it was printed in an online magazine, which qualifies under the rule by which it can then appear on her Wikipedia page. What do you suppose the return on that investment was?
The real question is how many young voters (the only ones who really know who Ella is) have grown wise to virtue signaling celebrities, and how many think this is the LARP of a sociopathic rich girl using a progressive cause for self-promotion while gaming the system to maximize the return on hiring a spokesperson.
Ella has the sort of waif frame that designers who produce expensive clothing like to hang their wares over. And you can put such clothes on a young woman to make her look joyful, sexy, pouty, robotic, and a lot of other things—including like a weirdly non-trans trans person, apparently. Is this mental illness chic?
Look closely. This may be the best example in modern politics of the actual right-wing (in the sense of controlling the tech for which the "king" negotiates) Mandarin blob leading young people (who haven't found good mental health) joyfully by the hair, through their mockery.
"We love you, obedient slave.
That's why we aspire to look like you.
Really, we do.
Follow me on Instagram."
Because this is definitely not about anyone and everyone in a demographic getting their narcissistic fix through a political machine designed by British intelligentsia to transition much of its military outpost into eunuch (slave) form, possibly spurring a profitable [multi-]color revolution along the way.
I can't help but to wonder what this rapidly growing surgical transition industry spends on public relations, and which celebrities it pays.
If you can get into the heads of children, you can encourage them to nag their parents (who might pass the buck to the government, then to the taxpayer) to pay for damn near anything, including the time of highly skilled surgeons who worked their asses off to achieve a narrowly valuable education towing a heap of student loan debt. Artificial penises and vaginas included.
Consumerism.
"I thought the Democratic Party pushed back against…"
The customer is always right. Ahem.
This can go three ways: We can accelerate an era in which kids are sucked into radicalized communities on their smartphones, learning to turn their problems into politics rather than personal growth and development, we can pursue health as a community while coming together, or…
This is a script that the British Empire understands better than most people understand that it understands. This is Hegelian theatrics, as defined. This direction will lead toward the genetic offspring of fascism and communism, with a eusocial world that reduces the mental experience of the world for 99.9999% of the population.
Let's switch gears to talk about how a 29-year-old Kamala once dated 60-year-old married-but-amicably-split Willie Brown. The dull Team Red take we are fed is that Kamala slept her way to the top. The dull Team Blue take that we are fed is that, "Trump is a philanderer; no false equivalencies; tha's racist."
I'm not saying that the dull takes have no truth to them. But I'd like to elevate the discussion. The dull takes combine to distract attention away from more important meanings behind relationships between much older, more powerful leaders and whoever they choose to be with behind closed doors.
I'm neither talking about the former GOP House Gym Whisperer, the current Sniffer-in-Chief, or whoever Queen Victoria's heirs might have on the blackmail leash. This is not unimportant, of course, but I would like to keep our focus on the bigger picture: information that helps us distinguish between the presented models of reality.
Model 1: There is the "incumbent" model of history that we are led to believe through a combination of textbooks, mostly written by organizations within the British Empire, reinforced by Hollywood and the social pressure of crowd adherence.
Model 2: The British Empire never died. It went invisible, by design, and is still run out of the City of London and various outposts around the world, with local headquarters often tucked away on difficult-to-invade islands with names like Singapore, Taiwan, the Bahamas, etc. This is the Military Occult Banking Syndicate (MOBS).
Instead, I would like to shift your focus toward the psychology of a young woman (Kamala) who chooses to enter the tent of the Baron (Willie) despite clearly having the option to build a balanced life full of organically-grown peer love, along with a matching peer with whom she can create and nurture a family (I mean children) with. What does that tell you about Kamala, the sudden would-be candidate whom we know even less about than we knew about Barack Obama?
Understand that I ask this question as a married man who chose a childless route due to the trauma associated with the unchosen path of a Neo-Theosophy social engineering program. If you do not yet understand, I won't blame you. But in order to reach the requisite point of understanding, I had to start by shattering the illusion mutually-crafted by partisan magicians.
Don't worry, we'll get there. It'll be a transition, pun intended.
That's my lame segue into pointing out that trangender social acceptance (and maintenance) policy is about giving people enough rope to population-control themselves. Meanwhile, the immigration issue is less about race than most people think, and more about the filtration of ideology among the immigrant population. Have you stopped to wonder what it means if just 10% of the Asians brought into the U.S. are trained in institutions built by British Empire assets, a basket in which we should include the Rockefeller, Carnegie, and other seemingly-American Empires? What if, unbeknownst to Americans (or even most of the Asian-Americans who are largely highly moral and hard working people), it is those largely pre-selected Asian immigrants who are set up at the control panels of this here…global policing outpost?
As support for the rapidly evolving transgenderism [creation and] support policies, academia has worked overtime to engineer the appearance of historical normalization. A farcical story about transgenderism acceptance in ancient Egypt has been coupled with the story of the Roman Emperor who was probably too aristocratic for his own health (and was assassinated at the age of 18 over his disrespectful behavior).
In 2020, Donald Harris pushed back at Kamala's use of their Jamaican heritage as a cynical use of identity politics. The mainstream media covered the story lightly, then largely memory-holed it.
There are some partisans who over-extrapolate the contention, suggesting that Donald generally dislikes or opposes Kamala, but that is not quite true, either. After a tense custody dispute over two little girls, Shyamala took the kids, engineering their experiences during their formative years. Donald's shock probably indicates his role as a highly educated, useful idiot Mandarin who genuinely has a good heart, but had no idea where Critical Race Theory and Marxism actually fits in the MOBS grand plans.
Donald dedicated his 1978 text Capital Accumulation and Income Distribution to Kamala and Maya.
"I have. And I did inhale. It was a long time ago…I think it gives a lot of people joy."
The quote comes from this friendly interview:
This turned into a question as to whether Kamala was just making $#!t up.
The quote refers to an interview Harris did in February 2019 with The Breakfast Club, a morning radio show about Black culture, politics and more. Hosts Charlamagne Tha God and DJ Envy asked Harris questions on various topics. The full interview can be seen youtu.be/Kh_wQUjeaTk ; .
In the interview, Charlamagne Tha God asks Harris if she has ever smoked marijuana and Harris responds that she has ( youtu.be/Kh_wQUjeaTk?t=2193 ). Later in the interview, DJ Envy asks Harris what music she listens to. Before she has a chance to answer, Charlamagne Tha God interrupts by asking what music Harris listened to while smoking marijuana in college ( youtu.be/Kh_wQUjeaTk?t=2288 ).
Harris laughs but ignores Charlamagne Tha God’s question and responds to the original query of what music she listens to by saying “Snoop Dogg”, “Tupac” and adds that she loves “Cardi B”.
Without seeing the interview, the audio can lead a listener to believe Harris was responding to the marijuana question. In the video, she is looking at DJ Envy and responding to his original question about music.
Honestly, I do lean toward Kamala making $#!t up in the flow of bull$#!tting, but is, after all, what politicians doo-doo. But I don't lean that way very strongly. What I find far more interesting is Kamala's promotion of Cardi B. The rapper Cardi B strikes me as one of the more disturbingly engineered role models the entertainment occult complex has ever thrown at young people. That's saying a lot.
During her teens, Cardi B was employed at a grocery store in Tribeca.[16] She was fired and became a dancer at a strip club across the street.[17][18] Cardi B has said that becoming a stripper was positive for her life in many ways: "It really saved me from a lot of things. When I started stripping I went back to school."[19][20][21] She stated that she became a stripper to escape poverty and domestic violence, having been in an abusive relationship at the time after being kicked out of her mother's house,[22][23] and that stripping was her only way to earn enough money to escape the situation and get an education.[24] She attended Borough of Manhattan Community College[25] before eventually dropping out.[26] While stripping, Cardi B lied to her mother by telling her she was making money by babysitting.[27]
In 2013, she began to gain publicity due to several of her videos spreading on social media, on Vine and her Instagram page.[28]
Publicity.
Mathew's law strikes again as Wikipedia just sort of glosses the content of the video, which is Cardi B admitting to drugging and robbing men while working as a stripper.
We might debate the sad state of affairs that brings desperate women into work at strip clubs, but Cardi B bragged about dangerous crimes on a whole different level. Is this desperation for bread to feed kids on the street?
Now, let's zoom in on Cardi B's pregnant photo shoot in which the word 'pedophile' is hidden within 'homesick' (look closely). It's just subtle enough for plausible deniability, which at best reveals Cardi B as a product manipulated by…what should we call them…social engineers? What should we expect from a worker in an industry designed by the CIA to keep the prisons filled?
Identity.
Perhaps Kamala is too busy being a leader to bother with such details. That might also explain dating a man thirty years her senior who supported cult leader Jim Jones. After transitioning his flock from Second Great Awakening church (pre-Theosophy) Disciples of Christ, Jones played communist pied piper to nearly a thousand now-dead Americans at Guyana (Jones preyed on black Americans most of all), including a concerned Congressman, just prior to the cult's treasury being looted of an estimated $18 million by a suspected CIA officer. Remember, we're not talking about social engineering geared toward tearing down American society. That's just conspiracy theory.
Fun fact: the aforementioned suspected CIA officer, Mark Lane, was one of the few people to escape Jonestown. While multiple other escapees were working on books, they were murdered under suspicious circumstances, which made Lane's book on the incident less debatable. He also defended one of America's biggest white nationalist organizations. He was arrested as a Freedom Rider, and wrote a 10,000 word brief in defense of Lee Harvey Oswald that served to add fuel to the fires of confusion surrounding the JFK assassination. The Guardian published his obfuscatory obituary.
There is a story about a woman named Wanda Kagan, who says that Kamala's family took her in when she was being sexually abused and battered while Wanda and Kamala were in high school. This story may be true. If so, good on Kamala's family. But after everything I've seen, I do have to wonder. We have so few stories about Kamala between kindergarten and adulthood from anyone who grew up with her outside of her family.
Wanda Kagan's X-Twitter account was created in January 2016, though her first tweet was on March 18, 2020. No other tweets take place until after the 2020 election at which point Wanda begins promoting Kamala and the story of their time together. Oh, and retweeting about sex predator Snoop Dogg, Kamala's other music passion, who has been sued multiple times over claims of sexual assault in addition to a host of other criminal matters.
Kagan describes Kamala as having been very studious, which stands in contrast to pot smoking, Snoop Dogg and Cardi B jamming Kamala. The ability to promote distinct identities to audiences targeted by technology backed with vast quantities of mined data would certainly be an advantage for social engineers marketing a purpose-driven vessel.
After 2021, there are a handful of tweets prior to 2024 when Kagan again starts advertising for Kamala, sometimes repeating their story together, which is only evidenced by a few high school photos. No school or state documentation seems to have been produced to corroborate Kagan's story.
Are you certain that you understand what is going on in all these relationships? Because I'm still noodling over some of it.
Don't worry, it's all for the sake of joy—that brilliant, ecstatic joy that you get from being part of tearing it all down in the name of your chosen guru [who pays homage to the British Empire]?
Joy: Fake it until you break it? Does the psychology transition to policy?
Kamala ally Kelley Robinson explains the radical plan of destroying the Constitution, then seeing how the chaos plays out without a backstop that directs the government to protect the rights of minorities.
Perhaps Robinson is as radical as Angela Davis. Black Americans may want to revisit the advice Davis gave, from a safe distance, to the black Americans at Jonestown.
The Border Wall Flip - A Glitch in the Matrix
You probably know all about the border wall story. Except that if you haven't been following RTE for a good, long while, you probably don't. There is the story we are fed, and then there is the real story.