Thanks, Mathew. I've come to the conclusion, with near-certainty, that the plandemonium was engineered by the U.S. bioweapons program (which Faucilni headed). Blaming the WIV I think was a geopolitical move, as there are thousands of these labs all over the world. Rather a failure as a bioweapon, as the IFR seems about 0.15%, but a rousing success as a tool of control. Astonishingly successful on that score. But, it also has resulted in a lot more skepticism among the formerly trusting. The herd is a bit smaller now. Your writing is just so damn good. It reveals a keen., penetrating mind able to evaluate evidence without any evident bias. Faucilni, by the way, was Time's man of the year as many times as Stalin, but twice as many times as Hitler.
I'll believe he's the fall guy when he's arrested. There are copies of all those DOD contracts around. Nobody has compiled a list of who signed them, and what their official duties are?
How do we hold an institution responsible or accountable? Trickle down budgets?
I hope you are not forgetting the timeline and repeated hands-on practice of Fauci across manipulations (pharma and research 'market management') of weaponized pharma from one supposed epidemic to the next. No doubt he is just one guy. But he was paid top dollar to coordinate funding of science. And in effect he used American government money to kettle thought leaders, selectively blinding scientists to the purpose of their work.
I sat in an honorary lecture at a northern university hearing one of his direct-reports outline in 1998 exactly what was going to unfold with terribly frightening Asian-sourced flus in the early 2000’s. Fauci’s deputy waived big money to lure basic scientists into vaccine research with mammalian animal models. It was no surprise what unfolded including Fauci’s role in adding the HIV clinical concepts to the AIDs condition (conflating causal concepts), through to his leading the strategic global act to 'neglect" and then "forget" treatable infections so that the most prevalent microbial infectant became a stealth "platform" for communication of disease on the planet. And it fuels chronic age-related illness but was lost in medical education by 2000. Internists and health-related researchers aren't that aware of the underlying condition IF they fall within the reach of USD$.
What Fauci and gang submerged explains the mechanisms of Baric’s weaponized biology and supposed need for more "medical" research. You know... unsettled science. Yet, Fauci and colleagues patented aspects of this along the way for personal benefit shows the level of sway he had in all areas. People didn’t take action against criminal behavior. Some say - with evidence - that everyone who learned of the despicable actions by this American crew of science-leaders, preCOVID, either got on board for personal gain as if in the name of discovery and healthcare, or lost their life in a fluke accident or uncharacteristic suicide.
Some young scientists who became whistleblowers were duped into ‘criminal’ research under his watch, and imprisoned under false pretenses. But it turned out nobody signed the legal documents to keep them in prison. Fauci and his colleagues certainly had sway over the legal framework and system, making it a racket.
I can therefore understand institutional researchers suggesting as you sometimes seem to do in/directly in your writing, that there are many different players. It's as if voices of authority can’t hold any of them individually responsible.
For whose protection? Then again, I don't expect answers. I just don’t know much other than recognizing I don’t have access to info and worldly leaders like well esteemed scholars such as yourself. So I read with interest and defer to you.
Why would any of us care about getting to the bottom of a criminal and deadly consortium let alone hold self-proclaimed and financial authorities responsible? Military scholars observe that this American-led operation causes people to cling to partisan views and attack one another the worse the situation gets. Oh well.
I miss my loved ones who were patriots, working for capitalistic and democratic freedoms. I cringe with the Faucian deal as self-proclaimed Mr Science relies on his success in shaping the Neo-feudal world behest to American imperialism.
Stay well I say as I head back to my mud hut, groveling for fake food and nutrient-depleted crops out of American labs. My dear father and grandparents, and ancestors who fought in WWI and II, would roll in their graves.
What you see on the outside is not the power. You do not see the power of the people who select Fauci (the Rockefellers) or the people who run the mind control programs.
Patents are an evil system. They're also an illusion. It's just rules to fool good people I to arresting people. That system was engineered for men like Fauci before he was born. And he is not smart enough to invent anything on those patents. He is a public spokesman. An ad man. A propagandist more than anything. He is the illusion, not the power.
Yet, institutions are diffusers for responsibility. While I am not a believer in American style capital punishment, I believe justice needs to prevail at a human level of the decision makers.
I observe we get nowhere towards a just society when the person who takes the money and hands it out to hire or act as a criminal (mass murderer) is not held to account.
Personal choice? What if the guards, doctors and frightened dupes running the deadly showers at Auschwitz just walked away, or said no, not today?
Could Oswald or Ruby walk away from their presumed role?
Or does the explicit 🇺🇸 mind control tech prevent conscientious choice?
Where there is money to be made, there is an incentive to suborn a system to profit from it. "Patents are an evil system" is certainly true now. The concept of intellectual property is not _necessarily_ evil, but it has been turned into a turnkey system in the service of Big Money. The patent office protects the Big Guys. I can't find the original patent that was denied, but I remember reading that the WeedWhacker guy applied for a patent when he invented it, but it was denied by the Patent Office as "not novel", which allowed Black & Decker to flood the market with their version, get a patent on an "improvement" and that was that. Certainly agency capture, as epitomized by "The FDA, Brought to you by Pfizer!", is the rule. But I guess the question is what is the incentive to spend the years inventing when your invention can be stolen by someone with factory capacity and reverse engineering at scale easier than paying you for the license? I know, that's the BigPharm justification for their monopoly, but that includes government-created moats beyond just patent protection. The FDA will knock out your competitors as a "courtesy". How do we solve that problem of protection of the process of invention?
Thank you all round. IMHO There is potential value considering:
(1) your evidence in terms of specific scientific expertise and scale of methodical focus before cross correlating it
(2) degrees between whether or not questions. I.e. Why not open questions to associate ideas before differentiation so you know common or close denominators before division? Maybe it’s just semantics, but I find dichotomous wording oddly located, unless you have already gone through a kind of Fuzzy Logic or perhaps Grounded Theory study in each point of either-or question.
(3) geographic enviro/resource common factors and differences including local history of military/pharma/biochem business and trade . Take a few case examples starting with Puerto Rico. It is known in different sciences for what 🇺🇸 military researchers have done there with bio chemicals including massive test of anti-Zika spraying of pesticides. That was potentially harmful to pop. health, and other events up including sanitation problems up until the big hurricane. On the one hand, The CIA world Facebook is also somewhat telling, especially when we see its elimination of territorial descriptive categories during COVID. On the other hand, you need side notes to tally (intentionally) Forgotten Tropical Diseases as bio regulatory confounders.
When observing behaviours and narrative assumptions, inner logic and context, characters with agency might need to be assessed in terms of their sequence of inclusion and/or exclusion techniques/methods/biases/methodical constraints.
Now I say that because you seem to do that in your assessment process (as you seem to describe in your Bret W behaviour analysis in ways that ring true in other regards to them ). Yet, you mix decisive and divisive lingo into what could be more basic questions. So you raise questions for me as your reader.
But maybe I am just caught on semantics as I read this without reading a full background in your writing.... as I use Substack as a display of signals and noise from a self-selecting sample, of writers of mostly loosely referenced expressions, analytical descriptions and ideas.
So this reminds me:
(4) who turns Phatic expressions into Emphatic, where and when can reveal their expertise or controlling actions as intel or counter intel operatives.
But what do I know? It is just a thought in case it’s useful in your exploration or reflections.
Either way, I like to read about how you think as you describe what you observe.
When you feel more interested in a topic, go to the links at the top of the article. More is often explained. It's hard to reproduce all i.portant info in each article. That's easier to do in a video, but takes much longer to consume.
Aug 20, 2023·edited Aug 20, 2023Liked by Mathew Crawford
Omicron was a baseless deliberate shift in the narrative just like so many others. It’s obvious we are being led. As long as they can sell “variants” there will be on-ramps and off-ramps. Masks-no masks. Distancing-no distancing. Lockdowns-no lockdowns. Shots-no shots. Unsolicited mail-in ballots… No doubt the followers of (pick your favorite kindly Phd) who have been beating the “pressured into a killer swarm” theory to death will get suckered into believing the next variant is the one that’ll kill us all. Thus they will be led by the nose too. Poor saps. They learned much peddling the climate change sky is falling lie and extrapolated it to the viral sky is falling lie. The difference is they can play with germs more effectively than weather. So this Halloween I fully expect the sequel to, “The Monster from the Petri Dish!” There’s an election on the horizon dontcha know?
"...Chris went on to promote the notion that Omicron might be a white hat release to end the pandemic, with no evidence at all...."
Very soon after Omicron was announced to the public was the infamous Gates statement "...*unfortunately*, Omicron appears to be a natural vaccine..." I heard the white hat supposition very soon after that, so I doubt it originated with Chris.
I am interested if anyone has dated the mutations present in the C-19 that showed up months earlier in the sewage with such geographic disparity. I read long time ago, that there were simultaneous appearances of C-19 infections, widely dispersed, that had the exact same genetics. Does not seem that this could be a natural spread, if this was verified.
I hope this issue is not used as an out for the bioweapons programs generally, as some 'proof' of natural origin.
I’m interested in how your group chat with so many smart people didn’t seem to work out, to put it mildly. Everyone there had some sort of expertise/skill. Possibly there were accompanying and sadly strong neuroses there too?
My view: It was a panopticon designed to get some of us to display our understanding of the situation while there was pressure designed to steer the conversation. I don't think this was an ego/expert situation (except perhaps for Alexandros Marinos, whom I believe is auditioning for a role).
I like that. Is this a paradox—is it somewhat liberating to recognize that many events and things we see and experience are engineered to get a certain result?
He expects a sharp increase in virulence that will affect the vaccinated due to their immune status being very different to the unvaccinated (and vaccinated after infected). And upcoming pressure on the virus to induce glycosilation changes that will allow the virus to overcome fragile vaccinated protection against severe disease.
I don't have time to read all this. I know what his general theory is, but can you tell me which of these is specific to Omicron?
Lately, Covid symptoms have been more similar to those of the original Wuhan strain than the first Omicron strain. That should be in defiance of his theory.
There's evidence and bio-logic to show his hypothesis is already upon those being shot in the friendly-fire of counter measures. Hence, he seems to have conscientiously appeared to say he doesn't intend to keep promoting his ideas publicly. His interview way back with Bret Weinstein was friendly yet telling in what was to be ignored. Similarly, groups like the CHD posted articles not to trust Geert because he used to be contracted by Gates Foundation. Oh well, its institutional narcissistic behavior... to blame, shame and doubt those who care beyond the over-controllers for whom they were once employed. I may be wrong, but sense Geert knows that he doesn't need to keep raising a warning flag that he knows is both meaningful and truly seen by others.
Omicron appears distinct from earlier versions, enough so to suspect that it was a brand new version, probably constructed on the same backbone. As I understand it, Omicron emerged in Durbin, in rather close proximity to yet another of Fauci/Gates GOF labs.
Do you have more information on the Puerto Rico sequence?
I mentioned to you that after questioning everything I thought I knew about virology, I ended up chalking all these early Delta/Alpha/Omicron sightings up to typos.
The cover-up I discovered was a cover-up of the institutions sloppiness, not of early VOC sightings.
So I am quite interested to hear about this Puerto Rico bit. GISAID has no record of an Omicron sequence (B.1.1.529) that was uploaded in 2020.
We cannot trust GISAID. For one thing, there was a July 2021 Omicron strain deleted from the records. For another, the researcher pushing to open source the database died suddenly at the age of 30.
You are right, we surely can't. It's a criminal enterprise.
In fact, keeping the typos in their database might very well be another level of cover-up to hide any actual early occurrences of VOC's that might have happened.
Is the sequence on ncbi though? Do you have any further infiormation?
Thanks, Mathew. I've come to the conclusion, with near-certainty, that the plandemonium was engineered by the U.S. bioweapons program (which Faucilni headed). Blaming the WIV I think was a geopolitical move, as there are thousands of these labs all over the world. Rather a failure as a bioweapon, as the IFR seems about 0.15%, but a rousing success as a tool of control. Astonishingly successful on that score. But, it also has resulted in a lot more skepticism among the formerly trusting. The herd is a bit smaller now. Your writing is just so damn good. It reveals a keen., penetrating mind able to evaluate evidence without any evident bias. Faucilni, by the way, was Time's man of the year as many times as Stalin, but twice as many times as Hitler.
I think Fauci is the elderly fall guy. He doesn't have the kind of power held by the DOD.
I'll believe he's the fall guy when he's arrested. There are copies of all those DOD contracts around. Nobody has compiled a list of who signed them, and what their official duties are?
The bits and pieces of what I've seen point to the Rockefeller circle that was often heavily involved in the DoD.
How do we hold an institution responsible or accountable? Trickle down budgets?
I hope you are not forgetting the timeline and repeated hands-on practice of Fauci across manipulations (pharma and research 'market management') of weaponized pharma from one supposed epidemic to the next. No doubt he is just one guy. But he was paid top dollar to coordinate funding of science. And in effect he used American government money to kettle thought leaders, selectively blinding scientists to the purpose of their work.
I sat in an honorary lecture at a northern university hearing one of his direct-reports outline in 1998 exactly what was going to unfold with terribly frightening Asian-sourced flus in the early 2000’s. Fauci’s deputy waived big money to lure basic scientists into vaccine research with mammalian animal models. It was no surprise what unfolded including Fauci’s role in adding the HIV clinical concepts to the AIDs condition (conflating causal concepts), through to his leading the strategic global act to 'neglect" and then "forget" treatable infections so that the most prevalent microbial infectant became a stealth "platform" for communication of disease on the planet. And it fuels chronic age-related illness but was lost in medical education by 2000. Internists and health-related researchers aren't that aware of the underlying condition IF they fall within the reach of USD$.
What Fauci and gang submerged explains the mechanisms of Baric’s weaponized biology and supposed need for more "medical" research. You know... unsettled science. Yet, Fauci and colleagues patented aspects of this along the way for personal benefit shows the level of sway he had in all areas. People didn’t take action against criminal behavior. Some say - with evidence - that everyone who learned of the despicable actions by this American crew of science-leaders, preCOVID, either got on board for personal gain as if in the name of discovery and healthcare, or lost their life in a fluke accident or uncharacteristic suicide.
Some young scientists who became whistleblowers were duped into ‘criminal’ research under his watch, and imprisoned under false pretenses. But it turned out nobody signed the legal documents to keep them in prison. Fauci and his colleagues certainly had sway over the legal framework and system, making it a racket.
I can therefore understand institutional researchers suggesting as you sometimes seem to do in/directly in your writing, that there are many different players. It's as if voices of authority can’t hold any of them individually responsible.
For whose protection? Then again, I don't expect answers. I just don’t know much other than recognizing I don’t have access to info and worldly leaders like well esteemed scholars such as yourself. So I read with interest and defer to you.
Why would any of us care about getting to the bottom of a criminal and deadly consortium let alone hold self-proclaimed and financial authorities responsible? Military scholars observe that this American-led operation causes people to cling to partisan views and attack one another the worse the situation gets. Oh well.
I miss my loved ones who were patriots, working for capitalistic and democratic freedoms. I cringe with the Faucian deal as self-proclaimed Mr Science relies on his success in shaping the Neo-feudal world behest to American imperialism.
Stay well I say as I head back to my mud hut, groveling for fake food and nutrient-depleted crops out of American labs. My dear father and grandparents, and ancestors who fought in WWI and II, would roll in their graves.
I'm not forgetting anything.
What you see on the outside is not the power. You do not see the power of the people who select Fauci (the Rockefellers) or the people who run the mind control programs.
Patents are an evil system. They're also an illusion. It's just rules to fool good people I to arresting people. That system was engineered for men like Fauci before he was born. And he is not smart enough to invent anything on those patents. He is a public spokesman. An ad man. A propagandist more than anything. He is the illusion, not the power.
I like how you think and tend to agree.
Yet, institutions are diffusers for responsibility. While I am not a believer in American style capital punishment, I believe justice needs to prevail at a human level of the decision makers.
I observe we get nowhere towards a just society when the person who takes the money and hands it out to hire or act as a criminal (mass murderer) is not held to account.
Personal choice? What if the guards, doctors and frightened dupes running the deadly showers at Auschwitz just walked away, or said no, not today?
Could Oswald or Ruby walk away from their presumed role?
Or does the explicit 🇺🇸 mind control tech prevent conscientious choice?
Where there is money to be made, there is an incentive to suborn a system to profit from it. "Patents are an evil system" is certainly true now. The concept of intellectual property is not _necessarily_ evil, but it has been turned into a turnkey system in the service of Big Money. The patent office protects the Big Guys. I can't find the original patent that was denied, but I remember reading that the WeedWhacker guy applied for a patent when he invented it, but it was denied by the Patent Office as "not novel", which allowed Black & Decker to flood the market with their version, get a patent on an "improvement" and that was that. Certainly agency capture, as epitomized by "The FDA, Brought to you by Pfizer!", is the rule. But I guess the question is what is the incentive to spend the years inventing when your invention can be stolen by someone with factory capacity and reverse engineering at scale easier than paying you for the license? I know, that's the BigPharm justification for their monopoly, but that includes government-created moats beyond just patent protection. The FDA will knock out your competitors as a "courtesy". How do we solve that problem of protection of the process of invention?
Thank you all round. IMHO There is potential value considering:
(1) your evidence in terms of specific scientific expertise and scale of methodical focus before cross correlating it
(2) degrees between whether or not questions. I.e. Why not open questions to associate ideas before differentiation so you know common or close denominators before division? Maybe it’s just semantics, but I find dichotomous wording oddly located, unless you have already gone through a kind of Fuzzy Logic or perhaps Grounded Theory study in each point of either-or question.
(3) geographic enviro/resource common factors and differences including local history of military/pharma/biochem business and trade . Take a few case examples starting with Puerto Rico. It is known in different sciences for what 🇺🇸 military researchers have done there with bio chemicals including massive test of anti-Zika spraying of pesticides. That was potentially harmful to pop. health, and other events up including sanitation problems up until the big hurricane. On the one hand, The CIA world Facebook is also somewhat telling, especially when we see its elimination of territorial descriptive categories during COVID. On the other hand, you need side notes to tally (intentionally) Forgotten Tropical Diseases as bio regulatory confounders.
When observing behaviours and narrative assumptions, inner logic and context, characters with agency might need to be assessed in terms of their sequence of inclusion and/or exclusion techniques/methods/biases/methodical constraints.
Now I say that because you seem to do that in your assessment process (as you seem to describe in your Bret W behaviour analysis in ways that ring true in other regards to them ). Yet, you mix decisive and divisive lingo into what could be more basic questions. So you raise questions for me as your reader.
But maybe I am just caught on semantics as I read this without reading a full background in your writing.... as I use Substack as a display of signals and noise from a self-selecting sample, of writers of mostly loosely referenced expressions, analytical descriptions and ideas.
So this reminds me:
(4) who turns Phatic expressions into Emphatic, where and when can reveal their expertise or controlling actions as intel or counter intel operatives.
But what do I know? It is just a thought in case it’s useful in your exploration or reflections.
Either way, I like to read about how you think as you describe what you observe.
Ever grateful for you and your writing.
When you feel more interested in a topic, go to the links at the top of the article. More is often explained. It's hard to reproduce all i.portant info in each article. That's easier to do in a video, but takes much longer to consume.
Omicron was a baseless deliberate shift in the narrative just like so many others. It’s obvious we are being led. As long as they can sell “variants” there will be on-ramps and off-ramps. Masks-no masks. Distancing-no distancing. Lockdowns-no lockdowns. Shots-no shots. Unsolicited mail-in ballots… No doubt the followers of (pick your favorite kindly Phd) who have been beating the “pressured into a killer swarm” theory to death will get suckered into believing the next variant is the one that’ll kill us all. Thus they will be led by the nose too. Poor saps. They learned much peddling the climate change sky is falling lie and extrapolated it to the viral sky is falling lie. The difference is they can play with germs more effectively than weather. So this Halloween I fully expect the sequel to, “The Monster from the Petri Dish!” There’s an election on the horizon dontcha know?
"...Chris went on to promote the notion that Omicron might be a white hat release to end the pandemic, with no evidence at all...."
Very soon after Omicron was announced to the public was the infamous Gates statement "...*unfortunately*, Omicron appears to be a natural vaccine..." I heard the white hat supposition very soon after that, so I doubt it originated with Chris.
I am interested if anyone has dated the mutations present in the C-19 that showed up months earlier in the sewage with such geographic disparity. I read long time ago, that there were simultaneous appearances of C-19 infections, widely dispersed, that had the exact same genetics. Does not seem that this could be a natural spread, if this was verified.
I hope this issue is not used as an out for the bioweapons programs generally, as some 'proof' of natural origin.
I’m interested in how your group chat with so many smart people didn’t seem to work out, to put it mildly. Everyone there had some sort of expertise/skill. Possibly there were accompanying and sadly strong neuroses there too?
My view: It was a panopticon designed to get some of us to display our understanding of the situation while there was pressure designed to steer the conversation. I don't think this was an ego/expert situation (except perhaps for Alexandros Marinos, whom I believe is auditioning for a role).
I like that. Is this a paradox—is it somewhat liberating to recognize that many events and things we see and experience are engineered to get a certain result?
Thanks. Eagerly waiting for the further delving into this hypothesis.
I don't think I ever saw an article with a ratio of likes:comments = 54:1 (Now 36:1)
I turned subscribers only on, and plan to do so more often.
Any opinion on whether Geert's coming "pandemic of the vaccinated" is a good hypothesis?
Can you link to his commentary?
Hi Mathew
He expects a sharp increase in virulence that will affect the vaccinated due to their immune status being very different to the unvaccinated (and vaccinated after infected). And upcoming pressure on the virus to induce glycosilation changes that will allow the virus to overcome fragile vaccinated protection against severe disease.
The hypothesis is laid out in his book The Inescapable Immune Escape Pandemic https://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/the-inescapable-immune-escape-pandemic-geert-vanden-bossche-dvm-phd/1143309868
One of the better video summaries is here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z8ZGS8rvxuY
The logic of how this works (which I am not educated enough to validate) is here:
https://www.voiceforscienceandsolidarity.org/scientific-blog/the-ecology-of-the-human-immune-ecosystem
https://www.voiceforscienceandsolidarity.org/scientific-blog/why-have-dr-vanden-bossches-concerns-about-the-covid-19-mass-vaccination-campaign-received-little-attention
Thank you for reading
I don't have time to read all this. I know what his general theory is, but can you tell me which of these is specific to Omicron?
Lately, Covid symptoms have been more similar to those of the original Wuhan strain than the first Omicron strain. That should be in defiance of his theory.
There's evidence and bio-logic to show his hypothesis is already upon those being shot in the friendly-fire of counter measures. Hence, he seems to have conscientiously appeared to say he doesn't intend to keep promoting his ideas publicly. His interview way back with Bret Weinstein was friendly yet telling in what was to be ignored. Similarly, groups like the CHD posted articles not to trust Geert because he used to be contracted by Gates Foundation. Oh well, its institutional narcissistic behavior... to blame, shame and doubt those who care beyond the over-controllers for whom they were once employed. I may be wrong, but sense Geert knows that he doesn't need to keep raising a warning flag that he knows is both meaningful and truly seen by others.
Omicron appears distinct from earlier versions, enough so to suspect that it was a brand new version, probably constructed on the same backbone. As I understand it, Omicron emerged in Durbin, in rather close proximity to yet another of Fauci/Gates GOF labs.
Do you have more information on the Puerto Rico sequence?
I mentioned to you that after questioning everything I thought I knew about virology, I ended up chalking all these early Delta/Alpha/Omicron sightings up to typos.
The cover-up I discovered was a cover-up of the institutions sloppiness, not of early VOC sightings.
So I am quite interested to hear about this Puerto Rico bit. GISAID has no record of an Omicron sequence (B.1.1.529) that was uploaded in 2020.
We cannot trust GISAID. For one thing, there was a July 2021 Omicron strain deleted from the records. For another, the researcher pushing to open source the database died suddenly at the age of 30.
You are right, we surely can't. It's a criminal enterprise.
In fact, keeping the typos in their database might very well be another level of cover-up to hide any actual early occurrences of VOC's that might have happened.
Is the sequence on ncbi though? Do you have any further infiormation?
I wish I had time to walk down every avenue, but I don't.
Excellent
Mathew: Agreed. He was the titular head.