He expects a sharp increase in virulence that will affect the vaccinated due to their immune status being very different to the unvaccinated (and vaccinated after infected). And upcoming pressure on the virus to induce glycosilation changes that will allow the virus to overcome fragile vaccinated protection against severe disease.
I don't have time to read all this. I know what his general theory is, but can you tell me which of these is specific to Omicron?
Lately, Covid symptoms have been more similar to those of the original Wuhan strain than the first Omicron strain. That should be in defiance of his theory.
There's evidence and bio-logic to show his hypothesis is already upon those being shot in the friendly-fire of counter measures. Hence, he seems to have conscientiously appeared to say he doesn't intend to keep promoting his ideas publicly. His interview way back with Bret Weinstein was friendly yet telling in what was to be ignored. Similarly, groups like the CHD posted articles not to trust Geert because he used to be contracted by Gates Foundation. Oh well, its institutional narcissistic behavior... to blame, shame and doubt those who care beyond the over-controllers for whom they were once employed. I may be wrong, but sense Geert knows that he doesn't need to keep raising a warning flag that he knows is both meaningful and truly seen by others.
Any opinion on whether Geert's coming "pandemic of the vaccinated" is a good hypothesis?
Can you link to his commentary?
Hi Mathew
He expects a sharp increase in virulence that will affect the vaccinated due to their immune status being very different to the unvaccinated (and vaccinated after infected). And upcoming pressure on the virus to induce glycosilation changes that will allow the virus to overcome fragile vaccinated protection against severe disease.
The hypothesis is laid out in his book The Inescapable Immune Escape Pandemic https://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/the-inescapable-immune-escape-pandemic-geert-vanden-bossche-dvm-phd/1143309868
One of the better video summaries is here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z8ZGS8rvxuY
The logic of how this works (which I am not educated enough to validate) is here:
https://www.voiceforscienceandsolidarity.org/scientific-blog/the-ecology-of-the-human-immune-ecosystem
https://www.voiceforscienceandsolidarity.org/scientific-blog/why-have-dr-vanden-bossches-concerns-about-the-covid-19-mass-vaccination-campaign-received-little-attention
Thank you for reading
I don't have time to read all this. I know what his general theory is, but can you tell me which of these is specific to Omicron?
Lately, Covid symptoms have been more similar to those of the original Wuhan strain than the first Omicron strain. That should be in defiance of his theory.
There's evidence and bio-logic to show his hypothesis is already upon those being shot in the friendly-fire of counter measures. Hence, he seems to have conscientiously appeared to say he doesn't intend to keep promoting his ideas publicly. His interview way back with Bret Weinstein was friendly yet telling in what was to be ignored. Similarly, groups like the CHD posted articles not to trust Geert because he used to be contracted by Gates Foundation. Oh well, its institutional narcissistic behavior... to blame, shame and doubt those who care beyond the over-controllers for whom they were once employed. I may be wrong, but sense Geert knows that he doesn't need to keep raising a warning flag that he knows is both meaningful and truly seen by others.