30 Comments
⭠ Return to thread

Thanks, Mathew. I've come to the conclusion, with near-certainty, that the plandemonium was engineered by the U.S. bioweapons program (which Faucilni headed). Blaming the WIV I think was a geopolitical move, as there are thousands of these labs all over the world. Rather a failure as a bioweapon, as the IFR seems about 0.15%, but a rousing success as a tool of control. Astonishingly successful on that score. But, it also has resulted in a lot more skepticism among the formerly trusting. The herd is a bit smaller now. Your writing is just so damn good. It reveals a keen., penetrating mind able to evaluate evidence without any evident bias. Faucilni, by the way, was Time's man of the year as many times as Stalin, but twice as many times as Hitler.

Expand full comment

I think Fauci is the elderly fall guy. He doesn't have the kind of power held by the DOD.

Expand full comment

I'll believe he's the fall guy when he's arrested. There are copies of all those DOD contracts around. Nobody has compiled a list of who signed them, and what their official duties are?

Expand full comment

The bits and pieces of what I've seen point to the Rockefeller circle that was often heavily involved in the DoD.

Expand full comment

How do we hold an institution responsible or accountable? Trickle down budgets?

I hope you are not forgetting the timeline and repeated hands-on practice of Fauci across manipulations (pharma and research 'market management') of weaponized pharma from one supposed epidemic to the next. No doubt he is just one guy. But he was paid top dollar to coordinate funding of science. And in effect he used American government money to kettle thought leaders, selectively blinding scientists to the purpose of their work.

I sat in an honorary lecture at a northern university hearing one of his direct-reports outline in 1998 exactly what was going to unfold with terribly frightening Asian-sourced flus in the early 2000’s. Fauci’s deputy waived big money to lure basic scientists into vaccine research with mammalian animal models. It was no surprise what unfolded including Fauci’s role in adding the HIV clinical concepts to the AIDs condition (conflating causal concepts), through to his leading the strategic global act to 'neglect" and then "forget" treatable infections so that the most prevalent microbial infectant became a stealth "platform" for communication of disease on the planet. And it fuels chronic age-related illness but was lost in medical education by 2000. Internists and health-related researchers aren't that aware of the underlying condition IF they fall within the reach of USD$.

What Fauci and gang submerged explains the mechanisms of Baric’s weaponized biology and supposed need for more "medical" research. You know... unsettled science. Yet, Fauci and colleagues patented aspects of this along the way for personal benefit shows the level of sway he had in all areas. People didn’t take action against criminal behavior. Some say - with evidence - that everyone who learned of the despicable actions by this American crew of science-leaders, preCOVID, either got on board for personal gain as if in the name of discovery and healthcare, or lost their life in a fluke accident or uncharacteristic suicide.

Some young scientists who became whistleblowers were duped into ‘criminal’ research under his watch, and imprisoned under false pretenses. But it turned out nobody signed the legal documents to keep them in prison. Fauci and his colleagues certainly had sway over the legal framework and system, making it a racket.

I can therefore understand institutional researchers suggesting as you sometimes seem to do in/directly in your writing, that there are many different players. It's as if voices of authority can’t hold any of them individually responsible.

For whose protection? Then again, I don't expect answers. I just don’t know much other than recognizing I don’t have access to info and worldly leaders like well esteemed scholars such as yourself. So I read with interest and defer to you.

Why would any of us care about getting to the bottom of a criminal and deadly consortium let alone hold self-proclaimed and financial authorities responsible? Military scholars observe that this American-led operation causes people to cling to partisan views and attack one another the worse the situation gets. Oh well.

I miss my loved ones who were patriots, working for capitalistic and democratic freedoms. I cringe with the Faucian deal as self-proclaimed Mr Science relies on his success in shaping the Neo-feudal world behest to American imperialism.

Stay well I say as I head back to my mud hut, groveling for fake food and nutrient-depleted crops out of American labs. My dear father and grandparents, and ancestors who fought in WWI and II, would roll in their graves.

Expand full comment

I'm not forgetting anything.

What you see on the outside is not the power. You do not see the power of the people who select Fauci (the Rockefellers) or the people who run the mind control programs.

Patents are an evil system. They're also an illusion. It's just rules to fool good people I to arresting people. That system was engineered for men like Fauci before he was born. And he is not smart enough to invent anything on those patents. He is a public spokesman. An ad man. A propagandist more than anything. He is the illusion, not the power.

Expand full comment

I like how you think and tend to agree.

Yet, institutions are diffusers for responsibility. While I am not a believer in American style capital punishment, I believe justice needs to prevail at a human level of the decision makers.

I observe we get nowhere towards a just society when the person who takes the money and hands it out to hire or act as a criminal (mass murderer) is not held to account.

Personal choice? What if the guards, doctors and frightened dupes running the deadly showers at Auschwitz just walked away, or said no, not today?

Could Oswald or Ruby walk away from their presumed role?

Or does the explicit 🇺🇸 mind control tech prevent conscientious choice?

Expand full comment

Where there is money to be made, there is an incentive to suborn a system to profit from it. "Patents are an evil system" is certainly true now. The concept of intellectual property is not _necessarily_ evil, but it has been turned into a turnkey system in the service of Big Money. The patent office protects the Big Guys. I can't find the original patent that was denied, but I remember reading that the WeedWhacker guy applied for a patent when he invented it, but it was denied by the Patent Office as "not novel", which allowed Black & Decker to flood the market with their version, get a patent on an "improvement" and that was that. Certainly agency capture, as epitomized by "The FDA, Brought to you by Pfizer!", is the rule. But I guess the question is what is the incentive to spend the years inventing when your invention can be stolen by someone with factory capacity and reverse engineering at scale easier than paying you for the license? I know, that's the BigPharm justification for their monopoly, but that includes government-created moats beyond just patent protection. The FDA will knock out your competitors as a "courtesy". How do we solve that problem of protection of the process of invention?

Expand full comment