There's evidence and bio-logic to show his hypothesis is already upon those being shot in the friendly-fire of counter measures. Hence, he seems to have conscientiously appeared to say he doesn't intend to keep promoting his ideas publicly. His interview way back with Bret Weinstein was friendly yet telling in what was to be ignored. Sim…
There's evidence and bio-logic to show his hypothesis is already upon those being shot in the friendly-fire of counter measures. Hence, he seems to have conscientiously appeared to say he doesn't intend to keep promoting his ideas publicly. His interview way back with Bret Weinstein was friendly yet telling in what was to be ignored. Similarly, groups like the CHD posted articles not to trust Geert because he used to be contracted by Gates Foundation. Oh well, its institutional narcissistic behavior... to blame, shame and doubt those who care beyond the over-controllers for whom they were once employed. I may be wrong, but sense Geert knows that he doesn't need to keep raising a warning flag that he knows is both meaningful and truly seen by others.
There's evidence and bio-logic to show his hypothesis is already upon those being shot in the friendly-fire of counter measures. Hence, he seems to have conscientiously appeared to say he doesn't intend to keep promoting his ideas publicly. His interview way back with Bret Weinstein was friendly yet telling in what was to be ignored. Similarly, groups like the CHD posted articles not to trust Geert because he used to be contracted by Gates Foundation. Oh well, its institutional narcissistic behavior... to blame, shame and doubt those who care beyond the over-controllers for whom they were once employed. I may be wrong, but sense Geert knows that he doesn't need to keep raising a warning flag that he knows is both meaningful and truly seen by others.