Oh dear. Oh my.
The Grand Pandemaniacal Circus took another crazy turn. The script writers clearly don't care all that much about remaining in the realm—or even the near vicinity—of basic reality. The raccoon dog origins story of SARS-CoV-2 does not come particularly close to the categorization of "reality adjacent" as it were.
A Brief History of Raccoon Dogs
Raccoon dogs are in fact dogs. Their raccoon-like appearance matches the similar needs of raccoons. The two species of raccoon dogs are native to East Asia, with one being confined to Japan, resulting in the same sorts of phenotypic drift that we often observe in island-confined species. The Japanese adore their raccoon pups, giving them exalted status in both ancient and pop culture. Legends and video games sometimes imbue raccoons with magical powers, like the ability to shapeshift, or just wear adorable clothing.
Due to their luxurious furs, raccoon dogs were imported to Europe. Some inevitably escaped confinement from fur farms, and quickly became an invasive species. This pushed at least some of Europe back to importing raccoon dog fur from China. Some of it gets dishonestly branded as synthetic, though it's not clear to me if this really fools anyone, or if it's just another way for certain personality types to find a narcissistic mask—moral offloading of the issues of consumption onto others.
Get Along Little Dogey
Sorry, I'm getting there. I just need to feed the pets real quick.
Up until recently—meaning for three years and change—we've been fed quite a load of bullpfizer about the certainty (or even shred of evidence) with respect to the Zoonosis Hypothesis (ZH) of SARS-CoV-2 origins. The story told is so laughably bad that you can't blame anyone for wondering if there is a script that gives up on the Level 1 psyop in hopes that the Level 2 psyop folks simply celebrate the W, then call it a day. In fact, this article from Boston Magazine about Alina Chan's breakdown of the ZH from all the way back in September 2020 appears to be just that:
If Chan had spent a lifetime learning how to pursue scientific questions, she spent most of the shutdown learning what happens when the answers you come up with are politically radioactive. After the Newsweek story ran, conservative-leaning publications seized on her paper as conclusive evidence that the virus had come from a lab. “Everyone focused on the one line,” Chan laments. “The tabloids just zoomed in on it.” Meanwhile, conspiracists took it as hard evidence of their wild theories that there had been an intentional leak.
There you are, folks—go anywhere beyond Level 2, and you're actually a conspiracy theorist. But Level 2 is just fine. You're good there. The absurdity theorists are there to tell you which story concocted by organized groups of people officially qualify as conspiracies. And they're the experts.
But almost nobody really believes in the ZH who does any more work than watching a narrow media they fear veering far from. After all, the ZH seems on face to be the pet project of a seemingly dishonest group of insiders. I'll call them the ZooNazis, which is not original to me, but I honestly don't know who to credit for it. The ZooNazis are a demanding bunch, as per their, "We are the experts, so bend the knee" piece from July 5, 2021 in The Lancet:
On Feb 19, 2020, we, a group of physicians, veterinarians, epidemiologists, virologists, biologists, ecologists, and public health experts from around the world, joined together to express solidarity with our professional colleagues in China.1 Unsubstantiated allegations were being raised about the source of the COVID-19 outbreak and the integrity of our peers who were diligently working to learn more about the newly recognised virus, SARS-CoV-2, while struggling to care for the many patients admitted to hospital with severe illness in Wuhan and elsewhere in China.
Solidarity. Unity. These are not words of science, unless it's political science. Though the ZooNazis pushed hard, there were too many people pushing back against their arrogantly corrupt, clearly arranged, and baseless story.
And yet, they weren't yet done. Why?
The China War Hawks
Back in 2020 and 2021, I was trying my best to help friends understand that a case was being built for war with China (and Russia) based on illusions that had been generated for years, and ramped up since the 2008 mortgage bond market crash. It is an uphill climb to explain the China facade, and I haven't had the time to put into it. Perhaps the recognition that China can't even do better than 14 nm chips without U.S. or Taiwanese tech experts will open some eyes. I do think that more people are instinctually starting to understand it just now. After CCP-tied HSBC UK caught on fire (ahem) after buying up Silicon Valley Bank's UK business, more people have to notice the battle going on over capital ties by between Big Tech and China.
Enter the deciders of cocktail party geopolitical truth, The Atlantic, here to
tell sell us that SARS-CoV-2 appears to have come from raccoon dogs all along.
From the article,
Now, an international team of virologists, genomicists, and evolutionary biologists may have finally found crucial data to help fill that knowledge gap. A new analysis of genetic sequences collected from the market shows that raccoon dogs being illegally sold at the venue could have been carrying and possibly shedding the virus at the end of 2019. It’s some of the strongest support yet, experts told me, that the pandemic began when SARS-CoV-2 hopped from animals into humans, rather than in an accident among scientists experimenting with viruses.
The team is…international. So you know it's gotta be top notch, right? It included…genomicists. And people with bachelor degrees from Ivy Leagues mostly still don't know what genomicists even do. So, it's gotta be the work of unquestionable experts.
Go back and read that paragraph again.
"finally found crucial data"
"A new analysis"
"could have been carrying and possibly shedding the virus"
"some of the strongest support yet, experts told me"
"Accident among scientists"
This opening paragraph is almost entirely vacuous except for the emotional manipulation. New. Crucial. Experts. Strong. Maybe. The alternative could only be a lab accident (Level 2 psyop) because anything else is unthinkable.
Understand that the story is not that SARS-CoV-2 has been found in raccoon dogs. In fact, after twenty years, SARS-CoV-1 hasn't been found in raccoon dogs despite there being a whole friggin' raccoon dog institute in Wuhan (if that’s even real?)…sort of suspiciously close to the Wuhan Institute of Virology, don't ya think? The only new evidence is that some swab that was SARS-CoV-2 positive also contained some raccoon dog genetic material.
That's it, and that's all. If they tested the raccoon dogs after this "breakthrough discovery", they haven't recorded a positive test or they would have told us. They would have leapt through your computer screen and screamed it into your eyeballs.
The strongest evidence yet?! I thought that the debate was over, and the ZooNazis already figured it all out because bats, pangolins, and stuff. The problem is that none of the animals in Wuhan tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. And that's telling considering that former Tanzanian president John Magufuli got back positive tests for fruit.
I asked a raccoon dog for his opinion about all of this.
I feel ya.
What do raccoon dogs have to do with a potential East-West military conflict?
Okay, so is there a Wuhan Institute of Raccoon Dogs? I don’t find any record of it, so I think that’s a joke. But…
Puppy Abuse Sparks Outrage – And WAR?
Because of course it sparks outrage. But war?
Warning: Graphic images and details of abuse lie ahead. I have a bolded "Start here" point a few paragraphs down where you can jump to at any time to avoid the gorey details or images of animal abuse.
I'm still old enough to remember when Dr. Anthony Fauci caught deserved fire over some particularly torturous experimentation on Beagles.
I made use of the scandal to call attention to a number of people involved in some way with the Plandemonium.
As one might expect, the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) condemned Fauci in mid-2022, citing the primates used in failed AIDS experiments. Still, most people remember the Beagles. This is America, and puppy dogs fit in somewhere between flags, moms, apple pie, and baseball. In fact, it's puppy dogs that hold together the last remaining threads between the ideological right and left wings. Disparage dogs, and you might just deserve your stay in Gitmo. Am I clear?
Now, let's take a step a bit further back in time to early 2010—close to the time of the mortgage bond collapse when everyone began to worry a bit more about the fabric of the global economy (cough). PETA begins a campaign to "expose" the abuse of raccoon dogs in service of the fur trade.
The description of the torture of these animals is extreme—to the point of making a rational mind ask, "But why?!" Feel free to skip the graphic details.
The article ends with a picture that looks like something out of a gorey horror flick.
This is typical of PETA, which has a long history of shock value campaigns that they say are designed to nudge behavior (here, here, here, and everywhere if you search for it). A rational mind might even wonder if PETA has been a testing ground for the nudge units of Western intelligence agencies.
Next, I'm going to share the video of raccoon dogs being beaten and skinned alive. I'm warning you because I feel like I have a pretty tough constitution, but I stopped watching. I'm an animal lover, and a dog lover in particular. This really makes me sick.
Start here if you skipped past all the above horror.
You know what most people probably never asked about all of this dog torture?
Is it real?
Remember that rational voice that asked, "But why?"
As I searched the internet for a basic explanation as to why dogs or other animals might be skinned alive, every turn I took had the same message: no reason at all (here, here, and here). From Answers.com,
Strictly speaking animals never need to be skinned; In the developed world a variety of alternative to animal furs exist (though this answer does not answer the question)
Individuals with strong stomachs can search for "Chinese fur trade video" in any search engine and find a video of a Chinese fur farm skinning live animals, purportedly the reason is that it is faster and or easier to skin them alive, it is unclear that this is true.
Disturbingly, investigators who looked into the story about the skinning of raccoon dogs found that the video was staged, meaning that somebody—perhaps animal rights activist organizations themselves—or people posing as animal rights activists—incited the cruel and grotesque torture of animals on film. To raise money? To test their ability to manipulate the public?
The story gets worse. In recent weeks, some of the websites that have explained the truth of the matter have gone offline. But they can still be found using the Wayback Machine. From furcommission.com:
This page was available up until just this past December. Here is how the section on the skinning of live raccoon dogs reads:
Hindsight is 2020 (see what I did there?). Looking back, I now wonder the degree to which the beagles were trotted out as emotional bait. The American Mandarin Overlords seemed to have correctly assessed their ability to sacrifice a bishop and maintain momentum with their game plan.
Fast forward to mid-2022, the American media begins to set us up for the raccoon dog story.
You sort of have to prime people for this story, right? You need for people to accept it quickly before they think through the basic facts required for raccoon dogs to be ground zero for a pandemic.
The raccoon dogs are a reservoir for the deadliest coronavirus to ever hit humanity, but it never crossed species (not in China, Japan, Europe, or anywhere) until 2019,
And then it did so in the close vicinity of mainland China's only BSL4 lab, built and funded by the same Western powers that have been playing with bioweapons for decades to an extent they probably don't want you digging too deeply into,
The leap coincided almost perfectly with the collapse of the U.S. bond repo market.
The spike protein in the doggie CoV just happened to contain patented inserts,
The spike also has statistical signs of uniform sequence engineering,
And it took the world's great biologists more than three &@# damn years to figure this all out.
Good story, bro.
From my vantagepoint, this all seems so grossly obtuse—not to mention macabre. But most of the American populace hasn't had the three-plus years I have to document and track down so much propaganda. So, we can assume that the ZooNazis will be effective at steering the minds of some subset of the population. And that portion of the population—probably largely liberal-leaning given the subject matter—will then be more likely to support war with China. And if you can get the American left on side for a hotter World War E, just a spoonful of jingoism likely pulls in enough others to create at least the appearance of a mandate for conflict.
Buckle up, kids. The dog days of war seem to be approaching. I can't read the stars, but I recognize the Deep State's need for military-banking war profits and a new era of digital dollar supremacy.
Rounding the Earth is a reader-supported mission. Your subscriptions and your shares are greatly appreciated, and help motivate the work that we do.
All uncited images created with artificial intelligence software.
I couldn’t do all the details. I’m past thinking I must expose myself to this in order to understand it. I’m a dog lover too. Had dogs all my childhood (German Shepards and Red Setters), but not as an adult, because I’m well aware of the responsibilities, which I couldn’t meet without compromises I wasn’t willing to make.
The modern narrative is so bad that it doesn’t bear formal analysis. I don’t know why they don’t just fake the desired resists and have done with it! No one would ever know 🤔
I don’t believe in an accidental leak. Providence doesn’t fit neat timelines.
I don’t like the forcing of the narrative to the forefront of mass media over & again. I believe the perpetrators have extremely good control of main media plus tech. I’ve personally been subject to censorship that, had it just happened today, would probably have terrified me. Now I’m just used to assuming I’m watched 24/7 & probably listened to as well (hi folks at GCHQ! Do your families know what you do for money? If they really understood it, they’d probably reject you, and deservedly so. I live in hope).
Given the extent of conttol, I think it’s reasonable to argue that, if a story is on multiple TV networks and news feeds on the net, the perpetrators put it there & are in any case not opposed to it.
They don’t need to do this. Fauci comes across as corrupt as hell and potentially played a key role in bringing into being a GOF pathogen which has killed millions (I don’t believe any of that). Why would the administration deliberately embarrass itself?
I believe one answer is to force those not paying much attention to choose between two alternatives:
1. the virus arose naturally and jumped into humans. Proximity to the Wuhan Institute a pure coincidence, which happens all the time. Recall the nerve agents released in Salisbury, England? Obviously it was the Russians and proximity to the top secret research facility at Porton Down was pure coincidence.
2. The virus was created in a lab and then leaked out (intentionally or accidentally). People much prefer cockup to conspiracy, so let’s say it was an accident.
Notice the complete & unspoken assumption that there really is a pandemic virus running amok, causing massive scale illnesses and deaths. We know there’s a novel virus because people who would never lie to the public told us there was. And others have confirmed it, because they’re had innumerable positive results in PCR (& other) testing. We know these tests are so specific that there’s no chance a positive result is even plausibly due to anything but SARS-CoV-2. And they’ve found it in waste water, so that proves it was in people.
Back to my question: why are they shoving this absurd story into people’s faces? I think an alternative answer is to minimise the probability that many people will even ask a more fundamental question: what’s the evidence that there was a novel respiratory virus stalking the planet, causing massive scale illnesses and deaths? Because they can’t risk that. A person might conclude, on the balance of probabilities, that the evidence is weak. The most serious objection to there having been a new virus as the dominant cause of widespread respiratory illness & elevated death rate is in the epidemiological evidence. Denis Rancourt’s team & others have found no evidence for there having been a virus pandemic. The wrong age at death profile across the population is inconsistent with a novel respiratory virus, assuming as has been observed for each winters uplift in all causes mortality, it’s the oldest and most frail (already chronically unwell) in whom the biggest % increases in deaths. That’s not what’s seen (at least in USA).
That evidence forced my to look anew at the evidence & I conclude that there’s never been a new pathogen induced cause of massive scale illnesses and deaths.
The media circus we’re currently living then has the objective to make it all but unthinkable that there never was a novel virus. And it’s worked, I believe.
Now we’re in deep trouble if we’re the perpetrators.
We have no idea what animal tested positive or negative in China because those results are reported by China.
As for the Chinese sequences at the market, they show raccoon dog DNA and Sars-Cov-2 sequences with little human DNA. The biological terrorists covering up their crime tell us this is proof of natural origin. They assume people wont know that aerosols (<5 microns) from infected humans don't carry cellular DNA and cant infect animals or humans w/o transporting their DNA
The authors of that ridiculous paper know GITMO is in their future. This was their Hail Mary Pass. Incomplete. Game Over. Bring out the water boards