Discover more from Rounding the Earth Newsletter
The Fauci Emails: Truth Finally Uncovered, or a Bishop Sacrifice?
The Chloroquine Wars Part XXIX
"Kill your darlings, kill your darlings, even when it breaks your egocentric little scribbler's heart, kill your darlings." -Stephen King
In game one of the 1972 world championship chess match in which the American challenger Bobby Fischer took the crown from Russian Boris Spassky, Fischer played one of the most intriguing moves in the history of chess. But it would be a mistake to examine that move, black's 29th of the game, without absorbing the context.
The game evolved from a Nimzo-Indian opening to a point after 28 moves (apiece) that top grandmasters generally agree was a drawn position. Given that Fischer eviscerated the field of top contenders with 17 wins and just 1 loss over 21 games leading up to the epic championship, it would be perfectly reasonable to suggest that Spassky was only waiting a little longer in hopes that Fischer would himself extend the hand to offer the draw. Such an offer would have been the greatest victory Spassky could have expected from the position.
Prior to the first game of the match, Fischer stared into the TV camera, as if to telegraph what was to come. The story goes that Fischer complained about the camera and demanded it be dismantled while wasting a full 35 minutes of clock time prior to making his first move. Though nobody ever says it, I think Fischer played a defense with the black pieces that he knew perfectly well he could reliably steer into a drawn position against his inferior opponent. I suspect that the rest of his shenanigans were merely distracting psychological theater.
After Spassky pushed a pawn to b5 on his 29th move, Fischer surprised him with a gift so bold it will likely never see its rival in the world of chess. Fischer sacrificed his last remaining minor piece, a bishop, by taking a pawn on h2, knowing he could get no better than two pawns in the process, and no material left to work on a positional advantage. Spassky went on to "win" the game after Fischer's resignation on the 56th move. Fischer never showed up for game two, giving Spassky a two game lead in the match and a lot of time to dwell on his good "fortune". Fischer promptly took the lead in the match by winning three of the next four games. If Spassky never let on, he must have felt crushed by that point. Fischer won 7 games to Spassky's 1 overall in games 3 through 21 where the match completed in the crowning of a new champion.
Source: thechesswebsite via YouTube
Is the truth finally being uncovered in the Fauci email dump, or is Fauci the bishop being sacrificed?
The short answer is "yes" [at least one of these things]. The long answer is, "We still have more questions than answers, and we should still be wondering where we might be in the timeline of a propaganda campaign that seems designed to be too vast (because 'flood the zone') in scale for any one human to keep up with."
Fallout we are already witnessing:
Possibly in an effort to front-run the fallout, Fauci suddenly mentioned that he is "not convinced" of the natural origins hypothesis...at a fact checkers conference.
Top media propagandists suddenly warn of 'expert' consensus while headlining "lab leak" as if "intentional bioweapon release" isn't also a subset of the "engineered virus" theory space.
After it was revealed that he emailed Fauci specifically with suspicions that the virus looked engineered, Kristian Anderson, the eventual lead author of the Proximal Origins paper published in Nature has deleted thousands of tweets (oops, archived) and his co-author has backed out of a public debate with evolutionary biologist Bret Weinstein over the SARS-CoV-2 origins story. Anderson seems to have become the recipient of a large pile of NIH cash following his "cooperation".
Suddenly now (?) Scott Gottlieb says he was informed that Fauci briefed European health leaders of the potential for the lab leak origin hypothesis.
Fauci's book (an obviously responsible thing to squeeze in between 300 on camera interviews during a pandemic that has taken millions of lives) got canceled by Amazon. Of course, after Andrew Cuomo's book sold something like 22 or 23 copies (call it a genetics joke if you're under the impression that Cuomo qualifies as human), this might simply be political theater that helps Amazon sell more books (if you think that's cynical, maybe you're still not paying good enough attention and I don't know how to help you).
It seems hard to believe that the many proposed origins stories of SARS-CoV-2 could have stood the test of time, publicly. Attacking detractors of weak theories as "conspiracy theorists" blunts the tip of that spear. The "fish sticks hypothesis" just made the CCP look more [confidently?] narcissistic, and researcher Alina Chan adeptly poked holes both in the zoonotic "natural origins" theory as well as in the facades of a great many public authorities.
Remember what we learned from "A Clockwork Orange Man": an actor can embody an issue for the sake of controlling that issue. Is it possible that the corporatist kunlangeta are able to strap any and all of their crimes during the pandemic onto one man and his satellites, then blast those controversies out of the solar system?
Only so long as they can confuse and demoralize enough people with their bishop sacrifice and other contrived theatrics.
Remember that Fauci is a "young" 137 years old, so he is very likely within 20 or so months of a natural death, and Nuremberg-esque trials are designed as lengthy sacrifices that distract attention from the queening of all the pawns. Be careful what spectacle you wish for.
Okay, so in the spirit of terrorism "alerts" used to distract the populace, we might also step back and examine what the world is not focusing on. I have no idea if any list I make will be of high or complete quality, but it's worth the exercise.
Things keep heating up between the U.S. and China, at least on the surface. The lab leak hypothesis puts the focus on Planet Fauci, its orbits, and Chinese research exclusively. Meanwhile, there is a very real bioweapons hypothesis to be examined---particularly in light of whatever it is that has gone on at Fort Detrick and evidence suggesting that the CCP saw a Third World War taking place through bioweapons since years ago. Perhaps among the CCP's many lies, their claim of an intentional release by the U.S. military deserves examination. After all, the game of lies works best when you tell the truth half of the time.
Inflation is rearing its ugly head. Even worse, we should worry that the money printers are getting away with an induced Cantillon effect from so much new money. It's not as if we've never seen this before. No wonder Russians want nothing more to do with dollar investments [for a while]. Is the dollar dying something like a slo-motion death while the elites position themselves as princelings of the aftermath?
Vaccine efficacy and cost-benefit are under fire in reasonable ways that are largely without rebuttal. The vaccine manufacturers still refuse to release the raw data on which their claims of 95% efficacy are based.
The Hegelian dialectic on vaccine passports is working its dark magic while vaccines are inexplicably pushed on children and the already infected despite substantial risks, lack of cost-benefit analysis, and evidence of low/lacking risk. Vaccine passports cannot come to fruition without the myth of a universal "need".
Fauci could be burned on a stake during a Super Bowl halftime show, likely to wild cheering and a few boos, and the perverse incentives of intellectual property held without government institutions could still go unnoticed by the public if people in the know don't do a better job of demanding leadership and making their voices heard. This kind of educational process requires a lot of new leaders.
Health care data giants could become the next FAANGs (as a Rounding the Earth subscriber pointed out to me).
Understand that I am not saying that I understand the games being played. I talk to a lot of people, including caring and understanding academics, doctors, scientists and researchers close to various stories of the pandemic. Understand that even most intelligent people have only enough time to understand only the topics in their general wheelhouse. Nobody understands everything. But if you want to understand anything important, understand the importance of the games being played.