The other day JJ Couey had McCullough on and moved his needle visibly.
Part of the story is likely that the honest people pushing back in their spaces were so ahead on their topics of expertise that they could be easily steered to talk all the time, not listen. That's part of the control process, and it's hard to get to them amd defuse th…
The other day JJ Couey had McCullough on and moved his needle visibly.
Part of the story is likely that the honest people pushing back in their spaces were so ahead on their topics of expertise that they could be easily steered to talk all the time, not listen. That's part of the control process, and it's hard to get to them amd defuse that cycle.
But now is a moment when perhaps many of them can take a step back amd reevaluate things. It will be interesting to watch.
Mathew, one of the things I appreciate about you is your willingness to interact with your readers in the comments.
Your criticisms of some of the people in the MFM make me uncomfortable but I’m willing to look at any evidence of that. I don’t follow JJ but I’d really like to see the interview with McCullough you mention. I’d also appreciate being directed to where Malone defames you. I watched the interview of you with Sam Sigoloff discussing your findings about DMED, which looked like GREAT work to me. I guess I’m feeling a bit confused. So apparently Malone attacked your work on that?
Malone was highly interested in the DMED, and asked me onto it. My findings conflicted with the narrative pushed loudly, and he never took the single step to use his several platforms to say one time, "Mathew is right, and it makes sense to investigate Unissant." There is more to it, but I might as well just write it sometime when it hits my priority stack top.
I don’t blame you for thinking the way you are. I used to as well..
Until I got a job at a huge and famous Hospital campus with 20,000 employees.
We had every manner of scientific research, engineering, therapies, surgeries and support staff imaginable.
That’s when I realized the cast of characters involved in medicine are not all the image of a geeky, shorn, well dressed “professional.”
The people that deal with the public are that way, sure. The people that work in labs, run the machines, perform experiments. The bio engineers, etc., include a lot of “colorful” people.
They get paid based on what they know. Not how they look. Lots of eccentric people.
And, why not? Their big brains afford them the latitude and luxury of expressing whatever counterculture style they want.
JJ Couey’s look and manner may not be mainstream but it’s tame compared to the guys I saw on a daily basis.
Judge him not by the superficial but by his work because his work has been a step ahead of everyone else’s for a long time.
Hi GLK. I'm not sure exactly what you mean, but it seems you're making some unfounded assumptions about me.
I have worked with a fair diversity of eccentric intellectual people, within and without the walls of academia, with varying degrees of brilliance -- some of whom are fit to interface effectively with business/leadership types or the general public, some not no much. I am not "judging" JJ's content by his style, only remarking on the effectiveness of that style with regard to influencing the public conversation.
I don't doubt that he's a smart cookie. Some of his theories may well be more accurate than more popular competitor theories. But for whatever reason, he's kept his "college lecturer" schtick despite becoming unemployable as such, and doesn't care to write things down, let alone in an organized and accessible way. That's limited my own engagement with his work, simply because I don't have time for two-hour videos.
The other day JJ Couey had McCullough on and moved his needle visibly.
Part of the story is likely that the honest people pushing back in their spaces were so ahead on their topics of expertise that they could be easily steered to talk all the time, not listen. That's part of the control process, and it's hard to get to them amd defuse that cycle.
But now is a moment when perhaps many of them can take a step back amd reevaluate things. It will be interesting to watch.
Mathew, one of the things I appreciate about you is your willingness to interact with your readers in the comments.
Your criticisms of some of the people in the MFM make me uncomfortable but I’m willing to look at any evidence of that. I don’t follow JJ but I’d really like to see the interview with McCullough you mention. I’d also appreciate being directed to where Malone defames you. I watched the interview of you with Sam Sigoloff discussing your findings about DMED, which looked like GREAT work to me. I guess I’m feeling a bit confused. So apparently Malone attacked your work on that?
Malone was highly interested in the DMED, and asked me onto it. My findings conflicted with the narrative pushed loudly, and he never took the single step to use his several platforms to say one time, "Mathew is right, and it makes sense to investigate Unissant." There is more to it, but I might as well just write it sometime when it hits my priority stack top.
Here is my response to Malone defaming me.
https://roundingtheearth.substack.com/p/malones-accusations-and-victim-cries
Note that not one of the doctors upset about me writing about Ryan called this out.
JJ is on Twitch, which many adults aren't aware exists.
https://gigaohmbiological.com
https://twitter.com/jjcouey
I'd say the problem is that he's just not reliably transmitting on serious adult frequencies, and his twitch stream sessions lean long and rambly.
I wish somebody would set up machine transcriptions. With his permission, of course -- maybe that's the issue, he doesn't want his remarks in text?
Anyway, when somebody interviews him, that usually ends up on Rumble, thanks to the other party.
I don’t blame you for thinking the way you are. I used to as well..
Until I got a job at a huge and famous Hospital campus with 20,000 employees.
We had every manner of scientific research, engineering, therapies, surgeries and support staff imaginable.
That’s when I realized the cast of characters involved in medicine are not all the image of a geeky, shorn, well dressed “professional.”
The people that deal with the public are that way, sure. The people that work in labs, run the machines, perform experiments. The bio engineers, etc., include a lot of “colorful” people.
They get paid based on what they know. Not how they look. Lots of eccentric people.
And, why not? Their big brains afford them the latitude and luxury of expressing whatever counterculture style they want.
JJ Couey’s look and manner may not be mainstream but it’s tame compared to the guys I saw on a daily basis.
Judge him not by the superficial but by his work because his work has been a step ahead of everyone else’s for a long time.
Hi GLK. I'm not sure exactly what you mean, but it seems you're making some unfounded assumptions about me.
I have worked with a fair diversity of eccentric intellectual people, within and without the walls of academia, with varying degrees of brilliance -- some of whom are fit to interface effectively with business/leadership types or the general public, some not no much. I am not "judging" JJ's content by his style, only remarking on the effectiveness of that style with regard to influencing the public conversation.
I don't doubt that he's a smart cookie. Some of his theories may well be more accurate than more popular competitor theories. But for whatever reason, he's kept his "college lecturer" schtick despite becoming unemployable as such, and doesn't care to write things down, let alone in an organized and accessible way. That's limited my own engagement with his work, simply because I don't have time for two-hour videos.
To illustrate my point, here's a great recent example of somebody taking the effort to summarize a lengthy and unconstrained verbal exchange with a subject matter expert. It shouldn't take more than five minutes to read: https://wherearethenumbers.substack.com/p/an-explosive-discussion-with-ex-cdc
Maybe you could do that for JJ? The world would thank you!
I did not know that. Thanks Mathew; I will check it out. Peace.
Watched. Very good. Everyone needs to see this. https://covid19alternativeperspectives.wordpress.com/2023/10/10/denis-rancourt-and-peter-mccullough-jonathan-couey-oct-02-2023/