Malone's Accusations and Victim Cries

Chaos Agents, Part 20

Click here to see other articles on Chaos Agents. Some more active conversation about topics such as this can be found at the RTE Locals channel.

Over the weekend, Robert Malone continued his parade of victim cries in an article that included me with a completely false statement attached.

Hate Ecosystem and Fifth Gen Warfare (Part IV)

I have mostly ignored the Malone Victim Ecosystem because there is not much reason to give it attention, but in this case I want to set the record straight because the article recklessly groups people like me who have criticisms of Malone or have researched his background, then seems to smear us together without any regard for accuracy or connection.

The only thing Malone says about me in the article (in which he at first misspelled my name, and now shortens it to a diminutive that I never use) is that I "aggressively" edit his Wikispooks page. This is false. I have never made a profile at, or edited Wikispooks. The editor in question, Liam Sturgess, did work for me for a few months on a contract basis. I gave him wide latitude and freedom to work on what he liked because I observed him doing large amounts of sifting through my notes, and then participating in honest documentation himself at the Campfire.wiki. I was not aware that he was editing Wikispooks (a resource that I usually forget about until it pops up in an internet search once in a while), nor did I direct him to do so. I also did not direct him to begin putting together a profile of Karen Kingston that places her at Pfizer, Harvard, and other interesting localities.

On the other hand, Malone brags in his article about doing his diligence. While I haven't communicated with Malone since he called me in January screaming into the phone demanding to know who was passing me information about connections between individuals in the Medical Freedom Movement, I texted him to question my inclusion in the article.

He has not responded, nor corrected his article despite Liam making it clear in his Wikispooks profile that he is the editor, not me (not something Liam wasn’t hiding since the name he chose partially includes his name).

Most of Malone's (or Malones') article focuses on Karen Kingston's story, which I don't want to touch both because I don't know her and don't have the time to absorb the facts around. Otherwise, I will comment here a bit on the absurdity.

• I do not know Catherine Austin-Fitts. I hoped to talk with her at CHD in October, but when I approached her, we exchanged a few quick words and I let her off the hook because she looked slightly stressed over getting in all the conversations she was having with people she clearly knew well. I have read some of her work, and have lamented not having the time to absorb it fully because I do think that there has been a large scale theft of U.S. dollars through a shadow banking system that seeks domination level powers. The Panama Papers may or may not involve some level of psyop, but I worked in finance enough to get a sense that the large scale laundering and embezzlement of global funds is real. I do not know her level of critique on Malone.

• I have never met the Breggins, and talked with Ginger a little (90 minutes total?) earlier this year. I suspect that the Malone lawsuit against the Breggins will fail, and doesn't look well-formed to my untrained legal eye, but you can take that opinion lightly. Some people believe the lawsuit was intended to send a chill through the community to keep anyone from investigating and sharing details about Robert Malone's background. That's not an unreasonable hypothesis to keep in mind. I have also heard the hypothesis that it's all just part of a grand attention-seeking morality play. I don't know, but I have often thought everything we have seen is part of one giant game of Hegelian pinball meant to keep us confused, divided, and off-balance.

• I personally critiqued Stew Peters many times myself, and generally distrust the talk radio-esque podcasting circles (and talk radio) of his ilk. I have never had contact with him. 

• Essentially the same goes for Jane Ruby.

• I have had the most mild contact with Dr. Ben Marble and made him a very small part of my critique regarding Peters. I was glad to hear about his drive to make early treatment meds available (not that I know anything much about the operation), but was shocked to hear a soldier say that Ben was encouraging something like military insurrection directly to troops.

• I have critiqued Carolina Bonita (whose real name appears to be Patricia Rodriguez, not "Carolina Galvan" as Malone lists it…please correct me if I'm wrong) heavily at Locals, and in part in my Chaos Agents articles. I'm honestly not certain that she isn't intended to play a dramatic acting role in all of this, boosting the Malone vs. McCullough leadership rivalry. Yawn.

• I have spoken with George Webb four times, I think, including twice on my podcast. I still don't have a fully formed opinion of him, but we (and Mark Koulacz and JJ Couey) all believe the remdesivir story (and hospital protocols) is an under-covered aspect of the plandemonium. This is an important point on which Malone needs to not just sweep under the rug in one big pot stir—particularly given what appears to be important involvement in the DOMANE program (which I personally believe is a fake program with nonexistent code) that came up with remdesivir as one of the two solutions to SARS-CoV-2. Why is that code never applied to all the other viruses in existence in order to better update treatments? Never mind…

• I've never met or spoken with Paul Alexander, though we have exchanged a small number of emails. I had heard that there was an organized peacemaking meeting between Alexander and Malone brokered through McCullough or Wellness Company founder Foster Coulson (I'm fuzzy on the details), so it surprised me to see Malone adding both Alexander and Coulson to the stirred pot. I have spoken with McCullough only the briefest of words in a couple of group chats, and the closest thing to communication I've had with Coulson is being on an email response that was a response to a cc'd group to which I was a recipient.

• I talked to Sage Hana once, and think he does some good research at times, has some good takes and meandering thoughts that range in quality (IMHO), but I was astonished at his obtuse refusal to do diligence beyond "this gets attention" with the obnoxious Died Suddenly "documentary".

Malone follows the mentions of each of us with the following,

And a wide range of third and fourth tier mimics, trolls, and others who routinely mirror and amplify the lies and hate promoted by the above. Quite literally, a hate cult.

Do you see a pattern of organization among the people above? Because I do not. I'm not saying that some of the people above have not worked together to critique Malone, though many worked quite independently, and for different reasons. Clearly, this is not a "cult".

Do you see hate as a motivating factor? Or do you think we have all payed some attention to Malone's background because any new candidate for leadership should be well-vetted? And because we had troubling experiences or found troubling information we felt worth sharing?

Let's be clear: Malone paints a picture in this article of him being the center of organized efforts to discredit him.

As some of you may know, I write about fifth generation warfare from the point of view of someone who has been constantly subjected to it for about three years. Day in and day out. Five, ten times a day. Coordinated waves of attacks, some clearly coming from corporate media cooperating with the US Government and Pharma, others from the fevered imaginations of a wide variety of individual actors with a wide variety of motivations, and some coming from coordinated cyberstalker teams of bots and trolls - which the Epoch Times has documented are at least partially paid for and facilitated by the Foundation for the Center for Disease Control and Prevention.

It's pretty irresponsible to throw a bunch of names like mine into an article talking about "coordinated action" by government actors. I've never worked for the government or through the CDC (unless you want to count a few people who worked for the government enrolling in a class I taught). In fact, I'm somebody who eventually dropped out of college after quickly rejecting the corrupt culture that tried to pull me in at the age of 18 (after a successful summer internship solving one hard stats problem for the Human Genome Project, I was offered easy money to fake research papers, but chose to seek out much lesser-paying work as an actuarial analyst while taking classes). Anyone who knows me or has tracked down my online trail knows that I've spent my entire adult life dropping critiques of corrupt government-funded science around the internet long before I started a Substack.

The best Malone could do is a poorly-researched false claim that I documented his past.

(big yawn)

What I haven't done is fallen into lockstep with Malone. After he asked me onto the DMED project, which I performed independently and without bias, rejecting the conclusions of both sides, I suffered a flattening of Substack income that was mitigating my leaving of multiple better-paying and lower-risk careers.

I could have "played the game" as I believe I was expected (and pressured) to do, but honesty has a way of revealing more important truths in time.

Did you notice Malone's interest in writing about the DMED issues went from highly interested to total silence in early 2022?

Huh.

Did you see him echo my warnings about the contractor Unissant, which handles the DMED data, the Medicare data, and the border data (some of those contracts started at the outset of the plandemonium)? Is Unissant the exhaust port for the Death Star, but Malone and many of the heavy hitters presumably at the top of the Medical Freedom Movement such as Malone don't want to talk about it?

Hmmmm.

Instead of spending his time pushing his knowledge of the inner workings of government contracting to urge a strong look into Unissant, Malone chooses instead to find the loosest of reasons to go after me.

Instead of spending his time pushing for an investigation into remdesivir (and protocols in which it played a part), Malone chooses instead to associate me with Karen Kingston's story.

Instead of ever promoting any of the good research I did along the way over the past three years (and I'm not the only person whose research he seemed to selectively ignore), Malone chooses instead to group me with the Mainstream Media with an article about how a hate cult is out to get him.

But "Unity" means you can't have a mind of your own and look into his background and behavior.

As my friend Gabe called it, "Unity for me, but not for thee."

Or is this somebody else's Unity?

I'm going to leave you with this interesting interview between Scientology and QAnoner John Mappin, whose family has been jewelers to the Crown for nearly 250 years (most of the span of Prussian-Saxe-Coburg-Gotha reign), in which Malone credits WEF-aligned Elon Musk with saving Western civilization. Happy viewing.