35 Comments
author

For those who came to argue that paranormal phenomena and psychics are real...

If it's not something tangible that can be observed by others, trying to convince people that it's real is indistinguishable from trying to convince people that a total fantasy is real from the perspective of the person you're trying to convince. Think about the psychology of that from the perspective of the person you're trying to convince. If you can succeed in convincing them without scientific validation, then they can be convinced of total nonsense as well! That's a recipe for eventually drinking somebody's kool-aid. That's no bueno.

Expand full comment

Mathew, you start with the fibrous clots prediction teaser, but never circle back to it. Can you please spell it out? I see at least 3 possibilities:

1) Riordan faked it (timestamps-shmisetams)

2) You suspect Riordan was fed the info by those who knew what was coming

3) None of the above. You are just using it as a curious entry point into what you really want to say later

Expand full comment
Dec 20, 2022Liked by Mathew Crawford

I find it a wonderful coincidence that this article dropped just as I was finishing the last pages of "Raven," which I had bought at your endorsement several months ago but only just started this weekend.

Expand full comment

oh dear. i guess i get to wear my red dress today.

Haha so yes i can be a remote viewer and I know others...however all of my work is done in other dimensions and is part of my healing work. the dimensions are specific, it is the lower and upper worlds.

The work is not tangible and is not linear. it dovetails nicely in with the work that i do with plant medicine, a big part of which is communicating with the plants to understand their medicine, this communication is not linear either (and i write about it on my substack :) So i get to practice a lot.

So yes, as far as proof goes, there is none. its not a tangible place or does it produce tangible results. basically if its meaningful to you then its meaningful. personally I have travelled to other realms for people around health issues in body mind and spirit and they have had the desired result. they have felt better, things have improved. We believe that it was because of what we did. but there is no proof. and as soon as there is, you're not doing that work. (like so quantum mannnn) so for sure, it absolutely could all be made up. again if it's not meaningful its not.

(you can see how it's going to be hard to profit from any of this unless you're an absolute showman and a lier. I do personally know one medicine man who got told by a plant who was going to win the super bowl that year and one who got told that trump would be president and I suppose they could of bet on it...and I think the super bowl guy was part of a pool so yeah but really. this stuff is not reliable)

and for sure you could spend a lot of words showing how this is all subconscious pattern blah blah, absolutely. However for those of us who work in this line of work our framework and our lineage is that it's part of our healing work.

Now of course, a practice that can't be proved is ripe for gaming. kind of like self declarative gender. like call in the crows its feeding time! so yeah. so many arseholes and charlatans preying on peoples fear. very much like big pharma and bad supplements. the last big wave of for profit arseholes we had was the ayahuasca crew and its not good coz that stuff can fuck people up....

i mean its healing work, that culturally was left in the hands of the healers and so when it gets gamed it is harmful. I'm sure the DoD were also pretty fucked up and one of the first red flags for me is someone needing a lot of money to demonstrate or heal with their "powers". Or to be respected as having healing powers.

Healing work isn't a for profit thing. it is the art of bringing back into balance. not endless energy or health or growth...it doesn't fit into the capitalist framework and really doesn't dovetail into a big power play. And it's not a super power. it's a calling. i mean anyone can build a house, just some people are more gifted. Honestly the best response to magic is so what? we walk with magic everyday. just by remaining stuck to the ground.

Also there needs to be a cultural agreement around folks who work in these realms. you cant really just say this is what I'm good at and expect to be trusted. it needs to be also recognized by your community. (and no i don't mean followers - another red flag), but your community. just like a man cant just say i'm a women and expect to be welcomed in the little girls toilets. the community has to agree that this is okay within the communal context. (and thankfully, no its not okay. and no I don't know any gender fluid person who wants to do that unless they have some really fucked up and dubious issues and shouldn't be trusted) So yes. there are failures. as in people be people. which is why we have community. And if they have a youtube channel, they are probably gaming the system. they might have the skills but to what end are they using them?

So i know some good healers, and remote travelers who are recognized within there communities and make a decent living off their skills and talents. but no one gets rich. This shit isn't tangible or logical. its only felt and anecdotal. and again its only meaningful if its meaningful. And none of them ever want to work for the DoD and most of them are very much on the down low. Have some of them been played? (maybe) but again. you cant prove whats not there lol.

And i'm sorry that you were part of the industrial war complex. A bigger bunch of nice guys being absolutely evil I cant imagine.

Expand full comment

Why is it that one of the tests for success in being a prophet, a viewer, a psychic, a whatnot is whether or not they made a lot of money? When you look around the world as it is now, does it appear that having or securing a lot of money is consistent with holiness, consideration, thoughtfulness, higher morality, truthfulness? Or does it appear differently?

If we learn that there is a significant "spiritual" component to one's ability to move beyond the body or disengage consciousness from a confined locality, and we also learn that money or desiring money is harmful to one's spiritual growth and consistency and flourishing, would we still make that test a standard?

I get the skepticism towards outlandish or slapdash claims. It is also accurate historically to notice there are various systems of remote viewing, which is a different activity from "out of body" experiences or practices. Uri Gellar, for example, emphasized coordinate remote viewing —the practice that became a part of GRILL FLAME, under an operating theory regarding the role consciousness plays in undermining what the supraconscious mind accesses when viewing. Other people practice different techniques; for example, Ed Dames, if I'm recalling correctly here, uses a more intuitive/interpretive model, with different outcomes.

For me, I'm more familiar with the Gateway techniques and practices advanced by the Monroe Institute, which don't focus so much on remote viewing as developing one's consciousness to be less inhibited, less constrained, and so more free to go beyond the physical body. Do you recall the story told about Jesus where the disciples around him were concerned about paying taxes? The story goes that Jesus instructs them to go fishing, and soon enough catch a fish with the exact amount needed to pay the tax. When you combine this with the "Render unto . . ." story, I take it the point is that focusing on material wealth and gain confines you to material concerns. When you give yourself over to a "higher power" that's orchestrating "higher events" out from the seemingly random and seemingly conspiratorial and seemingly mundane occurrences happening all around you, you find you are given a life that balances out. The more I have learned about the spiritual world, the less I have wanted a life of material wealth. Of course, I'm a poor and broke person, so maybe this is just delusion to assuage a regretful ego, when if I had applied myself and gotten my papers in order, I'd be making nice cheddar stacks and live as a village godfather like my grandfather had. Or, on the other hand, I'm working through the karma such a family history built up and I'm learning to treasure more wisely.

Either way, I agree there are many forms of psychological warfare occurring, and in this age of Endless Total War, what better weapon is there than to inculcate self-doubt in people in order to deny them the most effective and powerful force-multiplier they have: their spiritual self? You cannot use the car parked in your driveway if you don't even believe in cars; you cannot leave an unlocked room if you are thoroughly convinced to never even try the knob —why look silly? Won't you be embarrassed when it doesn't work? Only fools and clowns believe in The Outside World! You don't want to be a clown, do you? You don't want to get scammed, right?

I'm not saying any of this to say that Riordan is right-on or legitimate.

Expand full comment

What does Mathew believe at this point? Is everything fake? Just a normal coronavirus and an inert vaccine that’s only dangerous when injected into a blood vessel?

Expand full comment

I'm writing a book on history of Tarot cards which by chance takes in a lot of information about divination and the occult. It's amazing that there have been divinatory meanings attached to the cards since the late 18th century and yet no respectable scholar has waded into the occult swampy waters to the source. So, I have thought about such things as psychic powers. I think these powers exist but they cannot be reliably measured. Ironically, the Tarot cards came out of the Renaissance along with the project to measure every inch of the world, and yet the humanists of the 15th century knew that some things cannot be measured. Why is that? Is it because they don't exist--that if something can't be measured it doesn't exist? Or maybe measuring these intangibles requires a level of squishy pythagorean mathematics that is non-linear and unacceptable to the academy. Most definitely, though, there is a lot of trickery there but also genuine mystery.

Expand full comment

Hi Matthew, had to pause all payments. Money just doesn't interest me, so I don't have much. I bought a book on crypto currency and I can't understand it, feels like reading blurry words that make me sleepy. I have dissociative disorder or ADHD.

I really would like to talk about remote viewing more and hear what you learned as a child, your abilities and so forth. In a past life I was a nazi, worked as a remote viewer then used as a breeder in experiments. They killed or experimented on the ones who didn't show potential to be chosen ones. There are beserkers, they're basically channels, and they know the mutation for it. Hitler wanted blonde blue eyed mutations because he thought good aliens or angels manifested as blue eyed and blond. It was because of his stepmom/aunt that he believed this. He was half Jewish btw. Thought he could save the world through eugenics. I remember things about him and nazi occultism through dreams mostly.

Anyways, I escaped with my son during childbirth. He had black hair. I was helping to free some of the children like a double spy. The psychic spies could communicate through twin telepathy, but not through technology. You have to be really close to a person to have twin telepathy. This was back in the 1940s so I'm sure they've come far through technological enhancements of telepathy. I've met some psychics who could imagine things then make them happen. Definitely a spiritual component to it. Not everyone has these capabilities. The ones who do have potential often don't develop it.

As for the flamboyent fashion of psychics, I think that we feel like mascots in a way. We don't fit in but merge consciousness with others, so we are like antennas but trying hard to maintain a unique identity. The ego also gets in the way of processing truth, so by separating ourselves from an ego that reacts, it's better to just be treated like a mascot than be taken seriously. Detachment = sanity. As soon as you start caring what they think or what could happen you lose all sense of going with the flow and fall into dangerous territories of self annihilation or worse, they become afraid of you. Like killing the messenger, people hate seers who see things they want to hide.

Expand full comment

sidis method > transhumanism

Expand full comment

Did you watch the James Randi biopic in which he admitted his life was a fraud; that he was secretly gay for decades, but let his lover die alone in order to maintain his secrecy?

Not a big fan of remote viewing, but having taken part in Dean Radin's Double Slit research at the Institute of Noetic Sciences, and surprised him by both blocking photons and making them conform into a tighter pattern, using different techniques, all within a Faraday Cage etc etc.

https://noetic.org/research/double-slit-experiment/

Be sure if you see the article in Frontiers claiming the data is misinterpreted, that you dig for Radin's response that his critic is not competent in statistical analysis, a problem, dear Mathew, you know ALL TOO WELL! :-)

Expand full comment
deletedDec 20, 2022Liked by Mathew Crawford
Comment deleted
Expand full comment