2) was what I reflexively thought was being implied by the presentation in the first place. I spent some time staring at a magnification of the drawing so I could puzzle out his handwriting. Do the seemingly random fragments of quotes check out?
2) was what I reflexively thought was being implied by the presentation in the first place. I spent some time staring at a magnification of the drawing so I could puzzle out his handwriting. Do the seemingly random fragments of quotes check out?
2) was what I reflexively thought was being implied by the presentation in the first place. I spent some time staring at a magnification of the drawing so I could puzzle out his handwriting. Do the seemingly random fragments of quotes check out?
There is a rule of thumb that I use: "if there are more than 2 coincidences, they are not coincidences." Some of the implications of which are:
- Don't pay much attention to one coincidence, no matter how outlandish
- If there are 2 coincidences look for the third one
[Of course often it depends on what you call a coincidence]
So far I see only one coincidence (I did not look into it, though, I even did not click through the links.)
To be very clear, I merely find this an interesting thing I've been presented- I see no meaning in it.