"The KM has also now condemned itself to war crimes tribunals and massive civil lawsuits due to its COVID fraud. Two of the top five medical journals in the world Lancet and the New England Journal of Medicine have retracted COVID-related articles."
"Now Hindawi, one of the world’s largest open-access journal publishers is retracting 511 papers that appeared in 16 different journals based on the discovery of “unethical actions”. The papers have all been published since August 2020."
“What this means is that they are admitting to all the fraud and lies by the medical profession. There will be numerous lawsuits against universities, colleges and medical centers as a result of this. Think about all the tenure given, and grants, that were awarded based on published papers that were bogus, wrong, and in place due to corruption and bribes, all for money.” benjamin fulford.net
Underground Court Lady said a while ago that the LNPs are attracted to fat and in a lean male the heart is the only place with much adipose. The LNPs land in the heart and make spike there. Both spike and the LNP coating is dangerous to cells
I am admittedly only 35 minutes in but I don't think he's saying the lipids in the nanoparticles are doing the damage - it's when the lipid protective coating wears off that the contents inside the lipids (in this case mRNA) are doing the damage.
Yes, it's the fact of bringing the non-self, or the antigen , material inside a cell, that makes the LNP cytotoxic. It is cytotoxic only if transfection occurs, simply because the immune system will do its work and destroy that compromised cell.
Interesting but I see multiple problems with his “one size fits all” & “the spike is NOT the toxin” approach. One preliminary question: how does his hypothesis deal with the “bad batch” issue that seems to be real? Bottles labeled DON’T ASPIRATE? The fragility of the mRNA product & poor manufacturing and/or distribution processes make a strong case if they didn’t actually produce variable dosage batches.
More generally, not being a physician he does not seem to appreciate the systems-nature of pathology. Individuals have broadly variable immune competence, with varying strengths & weaknesses, based on inherited and acquired factors. His broad-brush “the immune system can handle it” clearly misses the mark.
I have no problem believing that intravascular injection can be an aggravating factor, it can happen. However when he talks about vascularity in muscle, the large (macroscopically visible) vessels lie superficial to the muscle. An IM injection may indeed put some material into a tiny intramuscular vein, but the idea of a bolus injection does not remotely seem feasible. Now I confess I am not aware of any studies attempting to quantify actual quantities & rates, but a high concentration, first pass blast to the heart seems questionable.
Endothelial damage is clearly part of the pathology. BBB problems potentially impact the brain, but we already know that this material can pass readily without the need to invoke “bolus” veinous injections.
I applaud out-of-the-box thinking, but I am not convinced. Thank you for the suggestion that he learn how to teach/speak/present. He also undermines his credibility with blatantly denying models postulated by many others, people far more qualified to present as SMEs (subject matter experts). I noted irony in your mention of the narcissistic style of communication too frequently seen, while having a guest repeatedly “toot his own horn.” Mentioning some obscure website giving him an award? Anyway ....
Matthew, keep at it! And come back & visit Birmingham, assuming UAB hasn’t succeeded in convincing EVERYBODY to get multiple jabs ;)
And no response to the other significant points I raised? Specifically the ‘bolus’ concept sounds nice on paper, but as I noted there are serious constraints at a practical level. Guys juicing are generally injecting in glutes rather than deltoids, and there are more layers & sizable veins. OTOH, when you get into the middle deltoid, you aren’t going to see macroscopic veins.
Age group by batch??? Not in America, not as the larger rollout occurred. When I get a chance I’ll read your previous piece on this, I must have missed it. We really have very little QA data on these injections, none here in the US that I am aware of.
I am truly puzzled at how you can state that the spike is NOT the major toxin. The LNPs are the delivery system for the incredibly dangerous & MASSIVELY long lived mRNA, and a possible/likely contributor to some cellular/tissue response
The Bolus concept is not nice on paper. It is the way drugs are delivered in a concentrated fashion by doctors every day throughout the world. Bolus is a reality.
The risk of sending a Bolus of Cytotoxic material into the bloodstream is a well-known phenomenon in other fields, like dentistry, plastic surgery, anaesthesiology. And they have mitigation strategies. This isn't conceptual. It's real.
Have a read of this - will take you an hour at least! - and see if you think if it is a good unifying theory which could underlie a lot of problems , with the specific biology of the spike being an additional problem for these vaccines.
In many science fiction novels I have read, books are not allowed, and in the past 2½ year, we have read about persons sending out in internet critical books about vaccines, as printerns not were allowed to print the books. And thinking about banknotes and coins soon no longer existing, actually I am afraid, that it will be the same concerning books.
Thanks Mathew. I personally have no more time for Marc's theory because it doesn't make any pharmacological sense and doesn't explain at all the longer term effects I am (and the world is) seeing. However it's important to let each person have their say especially if they bring evidence to the table. And Marc seems like a nice guy. So I have reposted this article. Keep up the good work.
Perhaps I will invite Marc on again with multiple people with different views and allow them to talk it out. I will ask him if he is up for it and select people who would have a great conversation without being irritated at hearing/thinking about each other's models and hypotheses.
I think perhaps because he gets very prissy when people disagree with him. It's not conducive to debate. Mathew and I fundamentally disagreed on something two years ago yet here we are. Still friends. It's called scientific rigour.
As noted he is a bit spiky (if you’ll pardon the bad pun) but has a lot of interesting perspectives and knowledge. I know for sure he thinks Walter is a grifter!
I am surprised at your very agressive message. We have never interacted, and I doubt you've even read any of my articles (you are certainly not one my subscribers). I have worked 7,000 hours on all SC2 and the vaccines, and nothing of what I present is assumptive. All is proven. Happy to debate you publicly if you care.
BTW, I have multiple very seasoned scientists backing up my analysis:
- a Nobel prize, Pr Michael Levitt said publicly "This is good science."
- multiple PhDs such as Dr Martin Zizi and Dr Byram Bridle also support the science: Byram publicly on my Substack said " Excellent article. I like your proposed mechanisms of harm. They certainly make scientific sense. Your rationale is very solid. "
- multiple doctors such as Dr Hodkinson and Dr. Harvey Risch also validate the risk of intravascular injection. Here's what Dr Hodkinson wrote to me " The obviousness of it should need no elaboration. Post-capillary venules are ubiquitous, even in ‘safe’ areas such as overlying the deltoid, and are a clear potential access point for sufficient unintended volume to gain direct access to the systemic circulation".
I cannot let you state that my work "doesn't make any pharmacological sense" without asking you to be more specific.
I have been working with Jessica Rose, Matthew Crawfor, Steve Kirsch and John Beaudoin for over a year and half now. We've been investigating all the AEs, and I am sorry to tell you, the Bolus Theory can explain all of the AEs we have seen to date.
So please, let's be honest, thorough and scientific. Tell me what AEs you are talking about, else it becomes personal not scientific. Why it's impossible from a pharmacological standpoint?
- The risk of IV is a reality
- The physics of Bolus is a scientific Law, known and validated in the field of pharmacology, and by induction so is the concentrated transfection
- The transfection is the MoA of the vaccines
- The immune attack also, and is proven. That's also a Law of Immunology.
- The disaster of stripping a whole part of the endothelial is homeostasic evidence...like a large burnt area of skin.
I would really like to get a scientifically substantiated answer from you.
Marc, we have interacted. You just don't realise. The pharmacology doesn't make sense because im injections distribute in total similarly to IV injections... Just at a different rate. Your obsession with the IV hypothesis is draining and I don't have time for it. If you wish to provide firm evidence that most or all AEs from covid vaccination are driven by IV injection and that the solution is practical then please do. This might not be the best forum but t.me/micevmutton is open for debate
I have demonstrated it. Simply you haven't read my articles.
I am sorry to disagree IM and IV don't distribute at all in the same way, in the first few minutes.
The difference in transfectability potential can be 1000x higher when accidentally injected in IV. With IM, you get a maximum transfectability of 4% of an endothelial surface (based on Pfizer data), whereas with an IM injection during the first few moments you very easily can get a 200% risk of transfectability . In one case, there no risk of disrupting the homeostasis. In another, the homeostasis is in utter ruin.
IM is the bullet proof vest concept the shock is spread across the entire endothelium. IV is more like a bullet penetrating through the bullet proof vest, causing serious damage, and spreading part of the shock to the endothelium also.
The same phenomenon is proven with Tren Cough. It was proven 80 years ago with accidental IV injection of Pollen. It's also the big difference between a bee sting in the tissue or in a vein. A concentrated dose of melittin that gets to your lungs can be lethal...a diluted dose isn't.
Accidental IV injection marker is often a taste in the mouth (known since at least 1936).
Dr John Campbell also mentioned it a few times. With COVID vaccine, the taste is metallic.
With Trenbolone it's spicy...
The difference in rate is fundamental. It is the core explanation between delivering nutrients everywhere into the body with saline bags, or delivering drugs specifically to an organ via an IV and a bolus.
There is not a difference in magnitudes of adverse events between the sites of administration. What you're talking about is theoretical. If you have even injected skin with a tracer and literally watched it hit lymph nodes in real time within 5 minutes you would understand.
There is nothing theoretical about what I am talking about. It's real. Studies on bolus injection have extracted deug concentration levels in the lungs or in the heart for example.
Bolus is not a theory, it's a principle. It's demonstrable repeatedly, and mathematically very easy to explain. C(t) is concentration at t in units per cub.mm.
Of course, that's simplistic, as the bolus gets diluted, T(t) is reduced, and gets to a point where the cytotoxic effect of the vaccine is negligible bc dying cells can be replaced.
That is true with melittin, or toxins like chlorine we drink in tap water. Wouldn't try to inject the concentrated dose of chlorine we drink daily intravenously...
OK no problem can you just direct me to the clinical or animal study that shows a significant difference in grade 3-4 adverse events from mRNA-LNP injection please
You still don't understand it happens in the first 30-45 seconds.
Of course, everything goes to the Lymph pretty rapidly(very visible in the Acuitis data) but at concentrations that are 100 to 1000 times lower. So the surface transfer tability potential is reduced greatly.
If I blow up a dam, water will do damage.
If they open the valve, the same water will flow over time and do no damage. It's similar
Hope this goes up on the podcast. Would also like to see something on why vaccine cardiac issues should be confined to the young (if they indeed are). Maybe they are just more noticeable among the young where ordinarily they aren't found. But is there any reason why they would be confined to that group?
A thought - what happens when you factor in the metals found in these vaccines with the damage done to the endothelium in various tissues as you’ve described?
The lipidnanoparticles with their overall positive charge were purposely designed, as I understand it, to assault the endothelium and break through to deliver their contents/payload into the interior of the cells. What happens if the highly toxic metals leak in simultaneously???
There is credible work being done on the presence of these metals in the Covid injections. La Columna Quinta and maybe 30 or more labs are working on this, examining vials of Covid injections where chain of custody from the manufacturers has been assured. It would be hard to deny at this stage the reality of the nightmare of metal particles - graphene oxide and heavy metals - in the payload of these injections.
Also, just FYI, The Epoch Times recently published an astounding article with electron microscopic slide shots showing what is strongly believe to be graphene oxide. Other heavy metals were also discovered.
So I would think that after the cationic lipidnanoparticles have breeched the endothelium and done their destructive deed, the metals can also travel in and get to places unimaginable. Dr. Richard Urso, colleague of Dr. Ryan Cole, has been speaking up for some time about lipidnanoparticles and recently in Vienna as well. Dr. Urso spells out that these lipidnanoparticles go absolutely everywhere. Dr. Urso: “If you do a lipidnanoparticle platform, you’re ASKING for trouble.” So the metals can tag along too???
Here is a video of Dr. Richard Urso for your interest:
May be metal play a similar role is they accumulate enough. But the doses are very small, and dilution is done within 2 minutes likely. So I have doubts on that hypothesis.
In a 3D environment, the majority of the components are not touching the endothelial walls, you need very high concentrations for tese metals to be toxic I believe. But I could be wrong.
The video shows the work of La Columna Quinta - microscopic analysis of the contents of a vial of Pfizer vaccine. There is a full display of things that look like they should never be injected into the human body: nanotubes, graphene oxide sheets, all in a hydrogel of some kind with some kind of aggregation occurring. I leave the video link here for your interest.
One more nanotechnology video that I find too disturbing to continue watching this evening. I’m too exhausted from work to mentally process this. Many of us labor by day then spend our off time studying the up to the minute breakthroughs in hopes of helping our loved ones who are affected. Many people were forced to be vaxxed or else they would completely lose all income, have life long careers obliterated and literally be unemployable in another position because of mandates. So anything I see, like the first 5 minutes of this video just ... well, I can hardly watch it. Yet somehow this has to be studied by qualified people to see what these scientists are up to so we can get a handle on what to do.
I find it hard to believe that anyone would get up in the morning and do what is being explained in this webinar - how to plot to insert nanotechnology into the human bloodstream to be able to, or so they say, monitor biomarkers for cancer patients. Would that inevitably be the only purpose? Is using a humanitarian cause going to make people more willing to submit to potentially devastating wiring that could eventually be used for who knows what? Can anybody seriously think you can introduce foreign objects like this on a nano level and not wreak havoc with God given homeostasis? I think your work is starting to prove just how dangerous this line of experimentation is.
I found this link in the comment section below the La Columna Quinta video:
Risk is probably exacerbated by near universal refusal to aspirate the injection syringe (pull out a little on the plunger to make sure there is no blood before completing the injection) to make sure that what is supposed to be intramuscular is not inadvertently intravascular. Non-aspiration evidently is based on 2006 WHO statement intended to encourage vaccination of infants. By not aspirating, it was thought the injection would be less painful and frightening. No doubt the reason that hasn't been dropped for the Covid vaccines given to adults is that any such order might raise questions about vaccine safety which they don't want. I understand that Denmark at the behest of one of its immunologists requires aspiration.
I read somewhere that they may have been afraid of wasting product because if there was blood they would have to throw it out and start a new dose. I have no idea if this is true.
Yes, I have heard that, and don't know if it is right. If the needle was withdrawn and the tiny amount of blood expelled before reinjection, that shouldn't make much difference. Nor would it be harmful even if the bloody portion were reinjected intra-muscularly. I suspect that is just an excuse for continuing to suppress aspiration. Per Marc Girardot, it is now required not only in Denmark, but HK and Germany. Given the incidence of myo- and pericarditis, and how serious they are, non-aspiration seems criminal. Another big question: how much subclinical carditis is there? I have heard that a hospital that routinely does troponin tests on all vaccine recipients is finding elevated levels widespread. (troponin indicates damage to heart muscle cells).
Many young people were forced to be vaccinated in order to attend school. The “vaccine schedule” is heavy for children.
I’ve had the suspicion, and Dr. Judy Mikovits has discussed this, that the young people’s immunity is compromised due to these mandatory school “vaccine schedules”. Most older people never had to encounter a needle in order to learn to read and write. I would imagine Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.’s organization will be investigating the relationship of prior vaccine history to Covid vaccine adverse effect.
I found it interesting in one of Steve Kirsch’s recent Substack articles that he reported the results of one of his famous quizzes where he was able to determine that people who routinely took flu shots were the ones who came down with Covid. This reiterates what Dr. Judy says about vaccines.
I think his bolus theory is probably correct but he may be too focused on it to the exclusion of other factors. It's still possible that the mRNA might be more inclined to get out of control in a younger person, and of course, immune responses in younger people are more robust.
Possible, but in 2020, hardly any young people were affected by COVID. Those who were generally had other illnesses and it's not at all clear to me that CoV-with-spike was ever part of illness for that demographic.
The more evidence I've seen, the less I think SARS-CoV-2 was itself particularly pathogenic. I think neglect was the larger part of the pandemic during year 1, which lowers my estimation of the harms attributable to the spike protein.
Most if not all of those who were "affected by Covid" (in 2020 and down the line) were not in fact "affected by Covid" in any meaningful way.
People in nursing homes and hospitals were being killed directly through policies and medical protocols.
I attend weekly meetings which are 3-4 hours in length which go into excruciating detail on the hospital protocols. There are usually around 70-90 attendees. The majority of those in the meetings have had a loved one killed inside the hospital directly due to Covid protocols.
There are many thousand of these stories that are being collected. All of these stories have the same basic template.
They describe what happened inside those hospitals in the most comprehensive way imaginable. Many of these people are in the process of litigation or moving in that direction. It is impossible to convey the brutality of what was happening in these hospitals. You have to hear the stories to understand and believe it.
Similar or worse was happening in nursing homes.
I believe it is a very difficult task to prove that there is even a single Covid death for any individual regardless of age or level of health.
I concur with what you were saying. They panicked everybody. And deprived sick patient of treatments which would have helped the vast majority of the people as Peter claims. WHO, FDA and CDC leadership must be held accountable. All those measures made no sense scientifically and were all intended to push the Bill Gates protocol leading to world vaccination. They put a blind eye on AEs, which should/could have been stopped and corrected as early as mid-January 2021.
The US protocols with systematic intubation and Remsidivir will be remembered as one of the most dreadful, corrupt and lethal public health policies in history. People need to stand up and unite against bureaucratic and political corruption that has led to this nightmare.
I have also come to the conclusion that a large portion of the 2020 deaths were what I call iatrogenocide, aimed at bringing us into the vaccination era. Can you contact me about what information you have collected by replying to one of my newsletter emails?
I think you underestimate the significant difference in spike quantities from an injection vs that induced by synthetic mRNA. This stuff doesn’t stick around for some number of minutes (as in an infection) but some number of WEEKS. The rapid uptake & initiation of protein synthesis by these shots far outstrips anything the virus can do natively. There is so much evidence of the toxic properties of the spike, I simply don’t understand how you can so blithely dismiss what happens with an artificially induced protein synthesis.
Respectfully, that is a fallacy. All the studies show a steep fall from day 5 post injection to day 9-10. 100-1000x decrease.
Scientist have been scaremongering on the spike. And completely ignoring Laws of Immunology. If Spike stays and all these high titers of Antibodies remain in the body. Why aren't they neutralising? it's a fallacy. Spike is being neutralised by Abs and mopped up by macrophages just like any other unwanted protein in the body.
Thanks for taking the time to explain. I'm still wondering if there is an element of the mRNA that makes it uniquely dangerous in that there was that in vitro study showing reverse transcription into DNA. Also, some Substackers have speculated that some people are getting "spike protein tolerance" - their immune systems may be learning to ignore the spike protein because it's attached to the body's own cells.
I did a video a while back on the mRNA to DNA issue - I'm admittedly not a microbiologist...
Since I did that video I learned there is a new type of mRNA vaccine they are working on that would be "self-amplifying" - meaning the mRNA would be programmed to make more copies of itself. These current vaccines aren't supposed to be self-amplifying, so I might have overblown my concerns in the above video, but I still think the mRNA is problematic on its own potentially, not just the immune response to it.
Not a big fan of in-vitro because it escapes the immune system dynamics.
I frankly don't see how a cell could build tolerance to such a long and immunogenic chain. I must say also that often the concentrations of spike used in-vitro are obscene and unreal...making them irrelevant to me.
But even if the nucleus were penetrated and DNA changed. All the cells penetrated that expresse Spike or a piece of will be eventually destroyed destroyed. Not concerned by that. It's one of those Boogey-man stories...Wouldn't worry too much about that. Much more to worry on sterility and LT neurodegenerative disease.
Unfortunately, as I stated it is quite obvious that the aspiration isn't enough. It probably avoids injecting in larger vessels, but quite possibly the smallest vessels collapse upon aspiration....
This is why I propose to inject very slowly ideally over 2 minutes.
Yes, D-dimers, tinnitis, shortness of breath are all common problems. All your problems and timing confirm likely a small disseminated dose hit the endothelium in a variety of places causing some degree of permeability and inflammation. And the thousand cuts in your endothelium started coagulation factors, hence the D-dimers.
Have you had your lungs and heart checked? The fact you haven't suffered clots accidents indicates its mild and diffuse.
The fact you have viruses could mean your immune system capacity was lower (possibly a leak in the blood-bone marrow barrier? often transient) , or more virus around you from the vaccine campaign.
The vaccine has likely poked small holes in your endothelium.
You haven't mentioned any hormonal issues which is reassuring, it could be indicative the BBB wasn't hit, which is good news.
Jesse, when you say you tested positive for 5 viruses, did you test high in antibodies (specifically IgM) or PCR test? I have high EBV antibodies (except for IgM from initial infection) but the two PCR tests (blood and CSF) I've had for it were negative.
Yes, though I think a lot of people confuse "damage by the immune system in response to the foreign spike protein" with "the spike protein itself is toxic."
Well (1) AEs are done by the immune that has been proven over and over. Actually spike are only found in traces each time. (2) check the concentration in the in-vitro studies that prove toxicity, they always used obscene concentrations. After Once the immune has been primed, the production of spike is cut short bc the T cell intervention is so quick, and the enormous amount of Abs present to collect them. We are talking 2,401,250 pg/mL of Abs for 63 pg/mL of spike at peak (Day 5). Even if Ogata is off, by 1000x, the spike would be outnumbered 2000 times.
What would account for negative efficacy against Covid after about five months? If the LNPs were empty, would that still be happening?
The severe heart problems may be limited in numbers, but if a huge percentage of the vaccinated are now more likely to get Covid, doesn't that indicate damage to large number of people, not just the ones injected improperly or who received a contaminated batch?
Surely a significant risk factor when injecting such powerful agents directly into human flesh is the level of expertise required to ensure delivery is to the correct part of the anatomy in order to avoid or at least reduce the risks outlined in this article. It is patently obvious that given the recruitment of so many minimally experienced personnel to perform these injections that these risks are massively increased for the covid jabs.
All normal CMC requirements went out of the window, when these shots received authorisation.
So we simply have no guarantee that each recipient received a consistent, homogenous product.
The opposite, in fact, applies; nobody got a consistent, homogenous or identical product in their shot.
And how close is the administered product compared to that received by the trial participants?
We know that mRNA integrity went down from the trial reference in the commercial batches (but they just carried on), we know that they changed the frozen storage requirements without apparent rationale (but they just carried on).
We don't even know if the first shot from each vial is the same as the last shot from each vial!
Moderna prescribing and dispensing document includes the following:-
"Swirl vial gently after thawing and between each withdrawal. Do not shake."
What happens if the swirl is a bit too vigorous, and more like a shake??
What if you get twice as much LNP's in your shot, compared to the person who came after?
What difference is there if the vial has been in a thawed state for just an hour, compared to a vial that has been sitting in a warm room for 10 hours?
And then we have the visual appearance of the contents.
Moderna say:-
"Parenteral drug products should be inspected visually for particulate matter and
discoloration prior to administration, whenever solution and container permit.
• SPIKEVAX is a white to off-white suspension. It may contain white or translucent
product-related particulates. Do not administer if vaccine is discolored or contains other
That takes the biscuit! How do you know if the particulates that you notice in the vial, are product-related or not product related?? When does 'off-white' become discoloured? What if there is a big label on the vial that prevents proper visual inspection?
It absolutely beggars belief that all of this passed muster to the apparent satisfaction of regulators around the world.
Naomi Wolfe has picked up on this also. It's interesting but I must say I'm not yet convinced but try tokeep an open mind. But to anyone with a background in biochemistry, microbiology and immunology, the effects of the spikes just makes so much sense.. In simple terms, spikes don't belong in the human body and will cause blockages directly in small capillaries. They will also be attacked by the immune system, resulting in clotting and inflammation. All of this seems cconsistent with the clinical evidence and autopsy findings. Prion disease is also consistent with the cleavage of the S2 protein which can cross the blood/brain barrier.
I think all of this also explains why all involved were so desperate to hids the FACT that the LNPs (carrting the mRNA) are NOT immediately consumed at the injection site.
I don't know how people can't intuit this through a priori reasoning. A virus is also a nanoparticle that delivers RNA to cells. The main difference is that the virus has surface proteins which help the immune system to kill it before it can do this and also it generally isn't injected into your body.
Imagine if they actually do make replicating vaccines. If it replicates, it can mutate. Also if it replicates its lipid nanoparticle/exosomal form then it will be a virus that you can never become immune to because the body doesn't attack liposomes but rather lets them deliver stuff to cells so it will never be able to kill it before it gets inside cells, and if it replicates the pseudourylation it won't get recognized even when it's inside cells. Come to think of it it's a wonder that viruses haven't already figured out how to do that?
"The KM has also now condemned itself to war crimes tribunals and massive civil lawsuits due to its COVID fraud. Two of the top five medical journals in the world Lancet and the New England Journal of Medicine have retracted COVID-related articles."
"Now Hindawi, one of the world’s largest open-access journal publishers is retracting 511 papers that appeared in 16 different journals based on the discovery of “unethical actions”. The papers have all been published since August 2020."
https://principia-scientific.com/major-scientific-publisher-retracts-more-than-500-papers/
A CIA affiliated Medical doctors comments:
“What this means is that they are admitting to all the fraud and lies by the medical profession. There will be numerous lawsuits against universities, colleges and medical centers as a result of this. Think about all the tenure given, and grants, that were awarded based on published papers that were bogus, wrong, and in place due to corruption and bribes, all for money.” benjamin fulford.net
Underground Court Lady said a while ago that the LNPs are attracted to fat and in a lean male the heart is the only place with much adipose. The LNPs land in the heart and make spike there. Both spike and the LNP coating is dangerous to cells
I am admittedly only 35 minutes in but I don't think he's saying the lipids in the nanoparticles are doing the damage - it's when the lipid protective coating wears off that the contents inside the lipids (in this case mRNA) are doing the damage.
Yes, it's the fact of bringing the non-self, or the antigen , material inside a cell, that makes the LNP cytotoxic. It is cytotoxic only if transfection occurs, simply because the immune system will do its work and destroy that compromised cell.
Interesting but I see multiple problems with his “one size fits all” & “the spike is NOT the toxin” approach. One preliminary question: how does his hypothesis deal with the “bad batch” issue that seems to be real? Bottles labeled DON’T ASPIRATE? The fragility of the mRNA product & poor manufacturing and/or distribution processes make a strong case if they didn’t actually produce variable dosage batches.
More generally, not being a physician he does not seem to appreciate the systems-nature of pathology. Individuals have broadly variable immune competence, with varying strengths & weaknesses, based on inherited and acquired factors. His broad-brush “the immune system can handle it” clearly misses the mark.
I have no problem believing that intravascular injection can be an aggravating factor, it can happen. However when he talks about vascularity in muscle, the large (macroscopically visible) vessels lie superficial to the muscle. An IM injection may indeed put some material into a tiny intramuscular vein, but the idea of a bolus injection does not remotely seem feasible. Now I confess I am not aware of any studies attempting to quantify actual quantities & rates, but a high concentration, first pass blast to the heart seems questionable.
Endothelial damage is clearly part of the pathology. BBB problems potentially impact the brain, but we already know that this material can pass readily without the need to invoke “bolus” veinous injections.
I applaud out-of-the-box thinking, but I am not convinced. Thank you for the suggestion that he learn how to teach/speak/present. He also undermines his credibility with blatantly denying models postulated by many others, people far more qualified to present as SMEs (subject matter experts). I noted irony in your mention of the narcissistic style of communication too frequently seen, while having a guest repeatedly “toot his own horn.” Mentioning some obscure website giving him an award? Anyway ....
Matthew, keep at it! And come back & visit Birmingham, assuming UAB hasn’t succeeded in convincing EVERYBODY to get multiple jabs ;)
Bad batch issue is to me a fake.
Studies from. European QA agency showed discrepancies, but +-20%
I believe simply lots were aloccated by age groups, elderly first, elderly resiliency to the shock is much lower than a young r population.
I agree with Marc, but as with everything else, I remain open-minded to the possibility. I wrote an article on this a few months back:
https://roundingtheearth.substack.com/p/understanding-batch-lot-toxicity
And no response to the other significant points I raised? Specifically the ‘bolus’ concept sounds nice on paper, but as I noted there are serious constraints at a practical level. Guys juicing are generally injecting in glutes rather than deltoids, and there are more layers & sizable veins. OTOH, when you get into the middle deltoid, you aren’t going to see macroscopic veins.
Age group by batch??? Not in America, not as the larger rollout occurred. When I get a chance I’ll read your previous piece on this, I must have missed it. We really have very little QA data on these injections, none here in the US that I am aware of.
I am truly puzzled at how you can state that the spike is NOT the major toxin. The LNPs are the delivery system for the incredibly dangerous & MASSIVELY long lived mRNA, and a possible/likely contributor to some cellular/tissue response
The Bolus concept is not nice on paper. It is the way drugs are delivered in a concentrated fashion by doctors every day throughout the world. Bolus is a reality.
The risk of sending a Bolus of Cytotoxic material into the bloodstream is a well-known phenomenon in other fields, like dentistry, plastic surgery, anaesthesiology. And they have mitigation strategies. This isn't conceptual. It's real.
Awesome... as usual.
https://amidwesterndoctor.substack.com/p/why-does-every-vaccine-often-cause?utm_medium=reader2
Have a read of this - will take you an hour at least! - and see if you think if it is a good unifying theory which could underlie a lot of problems , with the specific biology of the spike being an additional problem for these vaccines.
Very interesting. But I would like it as a book. Since teenager back i 1960s, I have been critical to vaccinating.
Would love to. I have all the material.
anybody know a quality Publisher?
In many science fiction novels I have read, books are not allowed, and in the past 2½ year, we have read about persons sending out in internet critical books about vaccines, as printerns not were allowed to print the books. And thinking about banknotes and coins soon no longer existing, actually I am afraid, that it will be the same concerning books.
Thanks Mathew. I personally have no more time for Marc's theory because it doesn't make any pharmacological sense and doesn't explain at all the longer term effects I am (and the world is) seeing. However it's important to let each person have their say especially if they bring evidence to the table. And Marc seems like a nice guy. So I have reposted this article. Keep up the good work.
Perhaps I will invite Marc on again with multiple people with different views and allow them to talk it out. I will ask him if he is up for it and select people who would have a great conversation without being irritated at hearing/thinking about each other's models and hypotheses.
So Walter. And nobody seems to talk to John Paul of Things Hidden in Complexity Substack…
I think perhaps because he gets very prissy when people disagree with him. It's not conducive to debate. Mathew and I fundamentally disagreed on something two years ago yet here we are. Still friends. It's called scientific rigour.
Yeah I hear you. It’s a shame as he has a lot to contribute.
I read Walter and have just barely talked to him. Can you link to John?
Sure he’s at :-
https://hiddencomplexity.substack.com/
As noted he is a bit spiky (if you’ll pardon the bad pun) but has a lot of interesting perspectives and knowledge. I know for sure he thinks Walter is a grifter!
Respectfully, Dr Khan.
I am surprised at your very agressive message. We have never interacted, and I doubt you've even read any of my articles (you are certainly not one my subscribers). I have worked 7,000 hours on all SC2 and the vaccines, and nothing of what I present is assumptive. All is proven. Happy to debate you publicly if you care.
BTW, I have multiple very seasoned scientists backing up my analysis:
- a Nobel prize, Pr Michael Levitt said publicly "This is good science."
- multiple PhDs such as Dr Martin Zizi and Dr Byram Bridle also support the science: Byram publicly on my Substack said " Excellent article. I like your proposed mechanisms of harm. They certainly make scientific sense. Your rationale is very solid. "
- multiple doctors such as Dr Hodkinson and Dr. Harvey Risch also validate the risk of intravascular injection. Here's what Dr Hodkinson wrote to me " The obviousness of it should need no elaboration. Post-capillary venules are ubiquitous, even in ‘safe’ areas such as overlying the deltoid, and are a clear potential access point for sufficient unintended volume to gain direct access to the systemic circulation".
I cannot let you state that my work "doesn't make any pharmacological sense" without asking you to be more specific.
I have been working with Jessica Rose, Matthew Crawfor, Steve Kirsch and John Beaudoin for over a year and half now. We've been investigating all the AEs, and I am sorry to tell you, the Bolus Theory can explain all of the AEs we have seen to date.
So please, let's be honest, thorough and scientific. Tell me what AEs you are talking about, else it becomes personal not scientific. Why it's impossible from a pharmacological standpoint?
- The risk of IV is a reality
- The physics of Bolus is a scientific Law, known and validated in the field of pharmacology, and by induction so is the concentrated transfection
- The transfection is the MoA of the vaccines
- The immune attack also, and is proven. That's also a Law of Immunology.
- The disaster of stripping a whole part of the endothelial is homeostasic evidence...like a large burnt area of skin.
I would really like to get a scientifically substantiated answer from you.
I am sorry to have wasted your time.
Sincerely Marc Girardot
Marc, we have interacted. You just don't realise. The pharmacology doesn't make sense because im injections distribute in total similarly to IV injections... Just at a different rate. Your obsession with the IV hypothesis is draining and I don't have time for it. If you wish to provide firm evidence that most or all AEs from covid vaccination are driven by IV injection and that the solution is practical then please do. This might not be the best forum but t.me/micevmutton is open for debate
I have demonstrated it. Simply you haven't read my articles.
I am sorry to disagree IM and IV don't distribute at all in the same way, in the first few minutes.
The difference in transfectability potential can be 1000x higher when accidentally injected in IV. With IM, you get a maximum transfectability of 4% of an endothelial surface (based on Pfizer data), whereas with an IM injection during the first few moments you very easily can get a 200% risk of transfectability . In one case, there no risk of disrupting the homeostasis. In another, the homeostasis is in utter ruin.
IM is the bullet proof vest concept the shock is spread across the entire endothelium. IV is more like a bullet penetrating through the bullet proof vest, causing serious damage, and spreading part of the shock to the endothelium also.
The same phenomenon is proven with Tren Cough. It was proven 80 years ago with accidental IV injection of Pollen. It's also the big difference between a bee sting in the tissue or in a vein. A concentrated dose of melittin that gets to your lungs can be lethal...a diluted dose isn't.
Accidental IV injection marker is often a taste in the mouth (known since at least 1936).
See NBC News ackowledged its existence. https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/mouthful-nickels-some-say-they-taste-metal-after-covid-19-n1261944
Dr John Campbell also mentioned it a few times. With COVID vaccine, the taste is metallic.
With Trenbolone it's spicy...
The difference in rate is fundamental. It is the core explanation between delivering nutrients everywhere into the body with saline bags, or delivering drugs specifically to an organ via an IV and a bolus.
There is not a difference in magnitudes of adverse events between the sites of administration. What you're talking about is theoretical. If you have even injected skin with a tracer and literally watched it hit lymph nodes in real time within 5 minutes you would understand.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8353930/
There is nothing theoretical about what I am talking about. It's real. Studies on bolus injection have extracted deug concentration levels in the lungs or in the heart for example.
Bolus is not a theory, it's a principle. It's demonstrable repeatedly, and mathematically very easy to explain. C(t) is concentration at t in units per cub.mm.
T(t) is number of transfectable cell per sq.mm.
T(t)=C(t)^(2/3)
Of course, that's simplistic, as the bolus gets diluted, T(t) is reduced, and gets to a point where the cytotoxic effect of the vaccine is negligible bc dying cells can be replaced.
That is true with melittin, or toxins like chlorine we drink in tap water. Wouldn't try to inject the concentrated dose of chlorine we drink daily intravenously...
OK no problem can you just direct me to the clinical or animal study that shows a significant difference in grade 3-4 adverse events from mRNA-LNP injection please
You still don't understand it happens in the first 30-45 seconds.
Of course, everything goes to the Lymph pretty rapidly(very visible in the Acuitis data) but at concentrations that are 100 to 1000 times lower. So the surface transfer tability potential is reduced greatly.
If I blow up a dam, water will do damage.
If they open the valve, the same water will flow over time and do no damage. It's similar
Hope this goes up on the podcast. Would also like to see something on why vaccine cardiac issues should be confined to the young (if they indeed are). Maybe they are just more noticeable among the young where ordinarily they aren't found. But is there any reason why they would be confined to that group?
I have 2 hypothesis:
1)physiological, young men are more muscular and might have larger vein accessible, so higher probability of IV
2) higher resilience versus weaker elder who would simply not withstand the cardiac shock.
A thought - what happens when you factor in the metals found in these vaccines with the damage done to the endothelium in various tissues as you’ve described?
The lipidnanoparticles with their overall positive charge were purposely designed, as I understand it, to assault the endothelium and break through to deliver their contents/payload into the interior of the cells. What happens if the highly toxic metals leak in simultaneously???
There is credible work being done on the presence of these metals in the Covid injections. La Columna Quinta and maybe 30 or more labs are working on this, examining vials of Covid injections where chain of custody from the manufacturers has been assured. It would be hard to deny at this stage the reality of the nightmare of metal particles - graphene oxide and heavy metals - in the payload of these injections.
Also, just FYI, The Epoch Times recently published an astounding article with electron microscopic slide shots showing what is strongly believe to be graphene oxide. Other heavy metals were also discovered.
So I would think that after the cationic lipidnanoparticles have breeched the endothelium and done their destructive deed, the metals can also travel in and get to places unimaginable. Dr. Richard Urso, colleague of Dr. Ryan Cole, has been speaking up for some time about lipidnanoparticles and recently in Vienna as well. Dr. Urso spells out that these lipidnanoparticles go absolutely everywhere. Dr. Urso: “If you do a lipidnanoparticle platform, you’re ASKING for trouble.” So the metals can tag along too???
Here is a video of Dr. Richard Urso for your interest:
“We Know Why There’s an Explosion of Disease”
https://shtf.tv/dr-richard-urso-we-know-why-theres-an-explosion-of-disease/
May be metal play a similar role is they accumulate enough. But the doses are very small, and dilution is done within 2 minutes likely. So I have doubts on that hypothesis.
In a 3D environment, the majority of the components are not touching the endothelial walls, you need very high concentrations for tese metals to be toxic I believe. But I could be wrong.
I sense you may find this interesting: https://rumble.com/v1m9diq-analysis-of-a-pfizer-vaccine-graphene-and-carbon-nanotubes.-it-is-not-a-vac.html
The video shows the work of La Columna Quinta - microscopic analysis of the contents of a vial of Pfizer vaccine. There is a full display of things that look like they should never be injected into the human body: nanotubes, graphene oxide sheets, all in a hydrogel of some kind with some kind of aggregation occurring. I leave the video link here for your interest.
One more nanotechnology video that I find too disturbing to continue watching this evening. I’m too exhausted from work to mentally process this. Many of us labor by day then spend our off time studying the up to the minute breakthroughs in hopes of helping our loved ones who are affected. Many people were forced to be vaxxed or else they would completely lose all income, have life long careers obliterated and literally be unemployable in another position because of mandates. So anything I see, like the first 5 minutes of this video just ... well, I can hardly watch it. Yet somehow this has to be studied by qualified people to see what these scientists are up to so we can get a handle on what to do.
I find it hard to believe that anyone would get up in the morning and do what is being explained in this webinar - how to plot to insert nanotechnology into the human bloodstream to be able to, or so they say, monitor biomarkers for cancer patients. Would that inevitably be the only purpose? Is using a humanitarian cause going to make people more willing to submit to potentially devastating wiring that could eventually be used for who knows what? Can anybody seriously think you can introduce foreign objects like this on a nano level and not wreak havoc with God given homeostasis? I think your work is starting to prove just how dangerous this line of experimentation is.
I found this link in the comment section below the La Columna Quinta video:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=iTbh5VutXYQ
Good link. Thank you.
Risk is probably exacerbated by near universal refusal to aspirate the injection syringe (pull out a little on the plunger to make sure there is no blood before completing the injection) to make sure that what is supposed to be intramuscular is not inadvertently intravascular. Non-aspiration evidently is based on 2006 WHO statement intended to encourage vaccination of infants. By not aspirating, it was thought the injection would be less painful and frightening. No doubt the reason that hasn't been dropped for the Covid vaccines given to adults is that any such order might raise questions about vaccine safety which they don't want. I understand that Denmark at the behest of one of its immunologists requires aspiration.
Yes Denmark, Hong Kong and Germany!!
I read somewhere that they may have been afraid of wasting product because if there was blood they would have to throw it out and start a new dose. I have no idea if this is true.
Yes, I have heard that, and don't know if it is right. If the needle was withdrawn and the tiny amount of blood expelled before reinjection, that shouldn't make much difference. Nor would it be harmful even if the bloody portion were reinjected intra-muscularly. I suspect that is just an excuse for continuing to suppress aspiration. Per Marc Girardot, it is now required not only in Denmark, but HK and Germany. Given the incidence of myo- and pericarditis, and how serious they are, non-aspiration seems criminal. Another big question: how much subclinical carditis is there? I have heard that a hospital that routinely does troponin tests on all vaccine recipients is finding elevated levels widespread. (troponin indicates damage to heart muscle cells).
Many young people were forced to be vaccinated in order to attend school. The “vaccine schedule” is heavy for children.
I’ve had the suspicion, and Dr. Judy Mikovits has discussed this, that the young people’s immunity is compromised due to these mandatory school “vaccine schedules”. Most older people never had to encounter a needle in order to learn to read and write. I would imagine Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.’s organization will be investigating the relationship of prior vaccine history to Covid vaccine adverse effect.
I found it interesting in one of Steve Kirsch’s recent Substack articles that he reported the results of one of his famous quizzes where he was able to determine that people who routinely took flu shots were the ones who came down with Covid. This reiterates what Dr. Judy says about vaccines.
I think his bolus theory is probably correct but he may be too focused on it to the exclusion of other factors. It's still possible that the mRNA might be more inclined to get out of control in a younger person, and of course, immune responses in younger people are more robust.
Possible, but in 2020, hardly any young people were affected by COVID. Those who were generally had other illnesses and it's not at all clear to me that CoV-with-spike was ever part of illness for that demographic.
The more evidence I've seen, the less I think SARS-CoV-2 was itself particularly pathogenic. I think neglect was the larger part of the pandemic during year 1, which lowers my estimation of the harms attributable to the spike protein.
Most if not all of those who were "affected by Covid" (in 2020 and down the line) were not in fact "affected by Covid" in any meaningful way.
People in nursing homes and hospitals were being killed directly through policies and medical protocols.
I attend weekly meetings which are 3-4 hours in length which go into excruciating detail on the hospital protocols. There are usually around 70-90 attendees. The majority of those in the meetings have had a loved one killed inside the hospital directly due to Covid protocols.
There are many thousand of these stories that are being collected. All of these stories have the same basic template.
They describe what happened inside those hospitals in the most comprehensive way imaginable. Many of these people are in the process of litigation or moving in that direction. It is impossible to convey the brutality of what was happening in these hospitals. You have to hear the stories to understand and believe it.
Similar or worse was happening in nursing homes.
I believe it is a very difficult task to prove that there is even a single Covid death for any individual regardless of age or level of health.
There was no pandemic.
I concur with what you were saying. They panicked everybody. And deprived sick patient of treatments which would have helped the vast majority of the people as Peter claims. WHO, FDA and CDC leadership must be held accountable. All those measures made no sense scientifically and were all intended to push the Bill Gates protocol leading to world vaccination. They put a blind eye on AEs, which should/could have been stopped and corrected as early as mid-January 2021.
The US protocols with systematic intubation and Remsidivir will be remembered as one of the most dreadful, corrupt and lethal public health policies in history. People need to stand up and unite against bureaucratic and political corruption that has led to this nightmare.
Allen,
I have also come to the conclusion that a large portion of the 2020 deaths were what I call iatrogenocide, aimed at bringing us into the vaccination era. Can you contact me about what information you have collected by replying to one of my newsletter emails?
Thanks.
I think you underestimate the significant difference in spike quantities from an injection vs that induced by synthetic mRNA. This stuff doesn’t stick around for some number of minutes (as in an infection) but some number of WEEKS. The rapid uptake & initiation of protein synthesis by these shots far outstrips anything the virus can do natively. There is so much evidence of the toxic properties of the spike, I simply don’t understand how you can so blithely dismiss what happens with an artificially induced protein synthesis.
Respectfully, that is a fallacy. All the studies show a steep fall from day 5 post injection to day 9-10. 100-1000x decrease.
Scientist have been scaremongering on the spike. And completely ignoring Laws of Immunology. If Spike stays and all these high titers of Antibodies remain in the body. Why aren't they neutralising? it's a fallacy. Spike is being neutralised by Abs and mopped up by macrophages just like any other unwanted protein in the body.
Thanks for taking the time to explain. I'm still wondering if there is an element of the mRNA that makes it uniquely dangerous in that there was that in vitro study showing reverse transcription into DNA. Also, some Substackers have speculated that some people are getting "spike protein tolerance" - their immune systems may be learning to ignore the spike protein because it's attached to the body's own cells.
I did a video a while back on the mRNA to DNA issue - I'm admittedly not a microbiologist...
https://wholistic.substack.com/p/if-vaccine-mrna-alters-dna-what-does
Since I did that video I learned there is a new type of mRNA vaccine they are working on that would be "self-amplifying" - meaning the mRNA would be programmed to make more copies of itself. These current vaccines aren't supposed to be self-amplifying, so I might have overblown my concerns in the above video, but I still think the mRNA is problematic on its own potentially, not just the immune response to it.
Hi Stephanie, Apologies I missed this earlier.
Not a big fan of in-vitro because it escapes the immune system dynamics.
I frankly don't see how a cell could build tolerance to such a long and immunogenic chain. I must say also that often the concentrations of spike used in-vitro are obscene and unreal...making them irrelevant to me.
But even if the nucleus were penetrated and DNA changed. All the cells penetrated that expresse Spike or a piece of will be eventually destroyed destroyed. Not concerned by that. It's one of those Boogey-man stories...Wouldn't worry too much about that. Much more to worry on sterility and LT neurodegenerative disease.
Best, Marc
Unfortunately, as I stated it is quite obvious that the aspiration isn't enough. It probably avoids injecting in larger vessels, but quite possibly the smallest vessels collapse upon aspiration....
This is why I propose to inject very slowly ideally over 2 minutes.
Yes, D-dimers, tinnitis, shortness of breath are all common problems. All your problems and timing confirm likely a small disseminated dose hit the endothelium in a variety of places causing some degree of permeability and inflammation. And the thousand cuts in your endothelium started coagulation factors, hence the D-dimers.
Have you had your lungs and heart checked? The fact you haven't suffered clots accidents indicates its mild and diffuse.
The fact you have viruses could mean your immune system capacity was lower (possibly a leak in the blood-bone marrow barrier? often transient) , or more virus around you from the vaccine campaign.
The vaccine has likely poked small holes in your endothelium.
You haven't mentioned any hormonal issues which is reassuring, it could be indicative the BBB wasn't hit, which is good news.
Check my article.
https://covidmythbuster.substack.com/p/when-and-how-can-vaccine-particles
Hope it can be helpful to you and your doctor.
Jesse, when you say you tested positive for 5 viruses, did you test high in antibodies (specifically IgM) or PCR test? I have high EBV antibodies (except for IgM from initial infection) but the two PCR tests (blood and CSF) I've had for it were negative.
Yes, though I think a lot of people confuse "damage by the immune system in response to the foreign spike protein" with "the spike protein itself is toxic."
Well (1) AEs are done by the immune that has been proven over and over. Actually spike are only found in traces each time. (2) check the concentration in the in-vitro studies that prove toxicity, they always used obscene concentrations. After Once the immune has been primed, the production of spike is cut short bc the T cell intervention is so quick, and the enormous amount of Abs present to collect them. We are talking 2,401,250 pg/mL of Abs for 63 pg/mL of spike at peak (Day 5). Even if Ogata is off, by 1000x, the spike would be outnumbered 2000 times.
What would account for negative efficacy against Covid after about five months? If the LNPs were empty, would that still be happening?
The severe heart problems may be limited in numbers, but if a huge percentage of the vaccinated are now more likely to get Covid, doesn't that indicate damage to large number of people, not just the ones injected improperly or who received a contaminated batch?
Several possibilities:
1. Survivorship bias
2. Miscategorization of early illnesses (like first 14 days) dramatically skew VE.
3. Healthy User Bias. It may take time for the damage to catch up after the HUB means the vaccinated are an initially healthier cohort.
4. Reporting lag.
I think there is a combination.
This is what I believe is going on:
https://moondiamond.substack.com/p/the-pseudouridine-question
Are you a vaccinazi?
If you threaten a person’s livelihood because of their vaccine views, you are a vaccinazi.
If you censor a person’s speech because of their vaccine views, you are a vaccinazi.
If you coerce a person to get vaccinated, you are a vaccinazi.
If you restrict a person’s activities because of their vaccine status, you are a vaccinazi.
If you impede the open study and free discussion of vaccines, you are a vaccinazi.
Surely a significant risk factor when injecting such powerful agents directly into human flesh is the level of expertise required to ensure delivery is to the correct part of the anatomy in order to avoid or at least reduce the risks outlined in this article. It is patently obvious that given the recruitment of so many minimally experienced personnel to perform these injections that these risks are massively increased for the covid jabs.
All normal CMC requirements went out of the window, when these shots received authorisation.
So we simply have no guarantee that each recipient received a consistent, homogenous product.
The opposite, in fact, applies; nobody got a consistent, homogenous or identical product in their shot.
And how close is the administered product compared to that received by the trial participants?
We know that mRNA integrity went down from the trial reference in the commercial batches (but they just carried on), we know that they changed the frozen storage requirements without apparent rationale (but they just carried on).
We don't even know if the first shot from each vial is the same as the last shot from each vial!
Moderna prescribing and dispensing document includes the following:-
"Swirl vial gently after thawing and between each withdrawal. Do not shake."
What happens if the swirl is a bit too vigorous, and more like a shake??
What if you get twice as much LNP's in your shot, compared to the person who came after?
What difference is there if the vial has been in a thawed state for just an hour, compared to a vial that has been sitting in a warm room for 10 hours?
And then we have the visual appearance of the contents.
Moderna say:-
"Parenteral drug products should be inspected visually for particulate matter and
discoloration prior to administration, whenever solution and container permit.
• SPIKEVAX is a white to off-white suspension. It may contain white or translucent
product-related particulates. Do not administer if vaccine is discolored or contains other
particulate matter."
https://assets.ctfassets.net/qjie68e5s6cv/5z3Eh7GEIURixd7wmKA3RW/3b781794281d5ab4893a20077c47f5bf/Spikevax-PI-Final_1.31.22.pdf
That takes the biscuit! How do you know if the particulates that you notice in the vial, are product-related or not product related?? When does 'off-white' become discoloured? What if there is a big label on the vial that prevents proper visual inspection?
It absolutely beggars belief that all of this passed muster to the apparent satisfaction of regulators around the world.
Fascinating
I don't think spike protein is the issue. I don't think it's related to mRNA. I think it's metal(s).
Naomi Wolfe has picked up on this also. It's interesting but I must say I'm not yet convinced but try tokeep an open mind. But to anyone with a background in biochemistry, microbiology and immunology, the effects of the spikes just makes so much sense.. In simple terms, spikes don't belong in the human body and will cause blockages directly in small capillaries. They will also be attacked by the immune system, resulting in clotting and inflammation. All of this seems cconsistent with the clinical evidence and autopsy findings. Prion disease is also consistent with the cleavage of the S2 protein which can cross the blood/brain barrier.
I think all of this also explains why all involved were so desperate to hids the FACT that the LNPs (carrting the mRNA) are NOT immediately consumed at the injection site.
I’m going to share clips of this on The Jonathan Kogan Show podcast! https://jsk.transistor.fm/subscribe
I don't know how people can't intuit this through a priori reasoning. A virus is also a nanoparticle that delivers RNA to cells. The main difference is that the virus has surface proteins which help the immune system to kill it before it can do this and also it generally isn't injected into your body.
Imagine if they actually do make replicating vaccines. If it replicates, it can mutate. Also if it replicates its lipid nanoparticle/exosomal form then it will be a virus that you can never become immune to because the body doesn't attack liposomes but rather lets them deliver stuff to cells so it will never be able to kill it before it gets inside cells, and if it replicates the pseudourylation it won't get recognized even when it's inside cells. Come to think of it it's a wonder that viruses haven't already figured out how to do that?
So if a loved one does develop the unthinkable -cancer - from the covid vaccinations fenbendazole a safe, inexpensive, OTC, effective treatment is available see this new Substack https://fenbendazole.substack.com/?r=oh1g6&utm_campaign=pub&utm_medium=web