A Biological Warfare Threat: Please Do Not Feed the Animals
The Wars of the DoD
Other Wars of the DoD articles can be found here.
The Medical Freedom Movement Recruited for Propaganda Messaging
Understand that I'm not blaming anyone here. But I want to issue a warning, or three.
Over the past few days there is a substack rush in which approximately 73% of the substacks in the orbit of the Medical Freedom Movement are talking about the same shock GoF research.
The "instant classic" in question (Chen et al, 2022) contains the following jarring sentences right up front in the abstract where it's going to slap you in the face like a full-blast firehose juiced with ice water and skunk piss. Emphasis mine:
We generated chimeric recombinant SARS-CoV-2 encoding the S gene of Omicron in the backbone of an ancestral SARS-CoV-2 isolate and compared this virus with the naturally circulating Omicron variant. The Omicron S-bearing virus robustly escapes vaccine-induced humoral immunity, mainly due to mutations in the receptor-binding motif (RBM), yet unlike naturally occurring Omicron, efficiently replicates in cell lines and primary-like distal lung cells. In K18-hACE2 mice, while Omicron causes mild, non-fatal infection, the Omicron S-carrying virus inflicts severe disease with a mortality rate of 80%. This indicates that while the vaccine escape of Omicron is defined by mutations in S, major determinants of viral pathogenicity reside outside of S.
Before we get to the 80% mortality rate (bestill your beating heart), note the declaration that Omicron is a "vaccine escape" variant. This is an opinion that has been thrust into the Medical Freedom Movement due to consistency with evidence of prior variants popping up after vaccine trials. However, the people who know best—the several geneticists and biowarfare experts I talk with—sharply disagree (on the whole, but none at all come down conclusively on the "escape variant" side). So, why don't most people in the Medical Freedom Movement know that? Is it that there are a dozen primary influencers, none of them know much of anything about genetics, and they're mostly concerned with "rallying the troops" while the wrong people are whispering in their ears about such topics? Are they compromising understanding momentarily, unaware that they're letting the science virus into their own pool?
Have they let highly agreeable spies into their circles?
Do they have their own post-war agendas?
Omicron is so far away from SARS-CoV-2 on any coherent phylogenetic tree (which is really hard to construct at this point) that if some amazing and unprecedented "tunneling event" occurred that produced all those tactically precise mutations, we would see evidence of "in-betweener" cousins in the quasi-species viral cloud of coronavirus passed among humans. Does anyone at all really believe that exactly all of those mutations are stable, but none of them would be individually or in clusters?!
There is also evidence of serial passage through mice, but somehow the image of an HIV patient in South Africa breathing into a rat hole, then later sucking rat air back out, captured more imaginations than clearly-unnatural-looking synonymous codon biases.
But there it is in print, stated without warrant and as if there is consensus, attached to a paper that will surely be read and shared by everybody who is anybody in the Medical Freedom Movement: Omicron is an escape variant.
Huh.
Is it out of respect for Geert Vanden Bossche, who was correct in his original warning about non-sterilizing vaccines for respiratory viruses, but bafflingly ignores all other details about Omicron while grouping it into the same pool of vaccine escape variants, that the Medical Freedom Movement gravitates toward such a conclusion that essentially nobody else who actually works in genetics seems keen to agree with? That level of deference is unnecessary, but it reveals the point that Mattias Desmet made in his book, and that needs to be made now: the resistance can get caught up in mass formations, too.
Also, if you express that level of deference and proxy trust for anyone, you're inviting the gaming of your drinking well. It will be poisoned sooner or later. It has happened already, and on many levels.
And don't think the people you're resisting don't know it. It would be existentially foolish to think they're not plotting a course and planning their moves.
Can we talk about the 80% mortality rate now, because GAH!
Okay, sure.
That's pfucked up. But you know that, already.
It may also be science fabrication—that subgenre of science fiction that gets published in peer-reviewed journals. Why am I the first person to suggest that the humanity-obliterator virus that leapt past the merely humanity-crippling progression of bioweapon engineering might not be real?
Jonathan Couey has reached a point of unraveling so much nonsense science that he thinks GoF is almost entirely fabricated science. I'm not there, but he raises so many good points that I've moved further toward that direction—a lot of it is probably bullpfizer. But I do think plenty of genetic engineering tests go on in laboratories around the world—particularly at Fort Detrick and on Hunter Biden's underwear. Most of the results we should be worried about are likely short-term pathogens that revert closer to normality once released into nature. Viruses that obliterate all their hosts find themselves without hosts to carry on reproduction. They need a continuum of healthy-to-unhealthy people to thrive optimally.
In other words, this new paper should be viewed through a highly skeptical lens.
What's the point, then?
It makes the most sense if you accept that we're well into World War E. I suspect that this "research paper" is a threat to those who oppose the dollar regime. BRICS and OPEC+ nations are making moves that threaten U.S. economic hegemony. Biden is busy begging Saudi Arabia not to cut oil production until after midterm elections. The Dollar Dominion needs a card to play back, and after nearly three years of pandemic scariness, suggesting that we can kill everyone with a virus could function as the right threat—or the right bluff.
And who better to project that message with than the truthers of the Medical Freedom Movement?
Right.
Bullpfizer. This is World War E, you're scientists in [yet again] Boston, and you're competing with all other interests.
The NIH as an Arm of the DoD
Recently I watched this discussion at Housatonic.
The guest is "citizen researcher" Nick who tweets at @pizzapicklespur. I did not realize when the discussion started that Nick was somebody I've been in a conversation with, via a livestream discussion one night at Kevin McCairn's channel. Nick and I weren't directly interfacing, so I did not get to find out how knowledgeable he seems to be until watching this video.
What is interesting about this discussion is that Nick lays out detailed history threads from the world of virology. There are whistleblowers, corruption, political doublespeak, and much more. But ultimately, I think the primary lesson from it all is that whatever terrible happens through the NIH, the DoD is ultimately responsible for it. Thus we have the world's most dangerous and uncontrollable bioweapons research causing more problems throughout the years than people recognize.
But the entire enterprise lacks transparency to a critical degree. And now we see clearly that we're past the point at which that knowledge can be used to extort compliance from the entire world.
Why?
Because the military is the bank is the currency. It's a dollar game. That's why it's World War E.
Viral Bioterrorism Messaging
Yes, it's all insane. No, it's not easy to figure out how much of it is true. Remember that the economically optimal mis-dis-cis-information campaign is to mix truth with lies to the point that it's all too taxing to unwind.
One way or another, being a watchdog has suddenly made it hard not to participate in the process of threat signaling. That's very clever. It also feels like something of an existential threat, and if Western society continues in this direction, we will see Moloch feed off of itself more and more often. And really—that's the way to lose a war, not win one.
Bret Weinstein and I seem to be on a similar page in regards to the effects on the American military. Whether or not there is an actor with intent, those who protect Americans are being hamstrung and handcuffed. The compromising of the U.S. military makes leadership look even crazier—maybe crazy enough to make an insane threat like an 80% virus-bomb seem real?
Bless those whose oaths come from a moral center. They stand—perhaps without knowing it—on the front lines, already.
Strange Tales of Connection Between the DoD and Pharma
Now, return to the story of the Pharmafia funding the fight against U.S. troops in the Middle East. On face, it doesn't make sense—that is, until you realize how profitable war can be and how little regard those who orchestrate it for profit have for anyone—even their own brethren.
Also, in the Brook Jackson suit against Pfizer, the lawyers for Pfizer basically said whatever they did wrong wasn't wrong because it was on behalf of the government.
Are we witnessing World War E in which the corporate-DoD relationship is so polluted that its fight appears to be more on the level of propaganda aimed inward in order to avoid its mounting crimes? Okay, so who is fighting who, then?
The best way to win some games is simply not to play them. When all this is said and done, can we agree not to return to business as usual?
Thanks for pointing this out, Mathew! Anyone calling Omicron a vaccine-escape variant either hasn't done their research or is otherwise ignorant/confused/malicious. Here's a post I made on this topic in December 2021 to Steve Kirsch's substack:
https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/was-omicron-a-natural-evolution-of/comment/4199722
Full text of the above comment:
Great comment! I was going to say something very similar. You already said it. I'll add a few comments:
A) Self spreading vaccines have been discussed quietly for a long time. They were always off-limits to "serious people" because they gratuitously violate the Nuremberg Code. Due to extensive government violations of that same code it's now moot. Note that self-spreading vaccines are ANATHEMA to big pharma, as there's no easy way to monetize them.
B) Omicron perfectly fits the design specifications of a self-spreading vaccine: less dangerous, spreads best in people who have taken the mRNA jab, maximally transmissible.
1. First modify it to only reproduce in throat epithelial cells, making it less dangerous. This could be done by evolutionary selection via serial passage through humanized mice, which have multiple kinds of human epithelial cells..
2. Modify it to exploit mRNA vaccination to spread better. Again, evolutionary selection via serial passage through jabbed humanized mice ought to do it.
3. Modify it to be maximally transmissible. Use every trick known to the state of the art. This may have taken some engineering beyond evolution selection via serial passage. Or not. I don't know.
4. All this will take a while. Like a year or so. Not simple & can't be rushed.
Omicron seems to fit my ideal for a self-spreading vaccine. It altered the narrative in a way that's hostile to the Great Rest crowd. Sure seems likely that it came from some white hat biohacker lab.
While I obviously don't know, my guess is that it's the operation of a small independent team acting on its own without official backing. As in, I guess that INDIVIDUALS from some lab that already does biowarfare technology teamed up in secret and conducted an "independent project" on the sly. We know these labs both operate in secrecy and have poor oversight. Knowing that no good deed goes unpunished, I guess those who created Omicron have already been identified and eliminated as traitors to both pharma companies and the Great Reset crowd. I hope they died well, knowing that did a great service to humanity.
I guess the "four foreign diplomats" thing s a red herring.
That's my two cents.
I don’t think Omicron required whitehatting to begin post dec 2019 and occur under tight deadlines.
Even prior to release of gene drives, the community is building and publishing the countermeasures known as Daisy Chain drives.
https://www.pnas.org/doi/full/10.1073/pnas.1716358116
If SARs-COV-2 is a bioweapon (alone it sucks as one, but combined with propaganda it’s very effective), no one would build it, without concurrently building the antidote. Otherwise it ceases to become a weapon.
One reason, I’m skeptical of the immunocomp patient theory of omicron emergence is that immunocomp patients aren’t isolated like lab rats and it took months for a few variants to emerge so we’d need 18 months for omicron to emerge without intermediate leak. There should be intermediates if this was brewed in people (unless all those intermediates reside in an unsampled tissue like the GI, unlikely).
Labs can contain intermediates from leaking more so than hospitals with patients.
There is clear evidence of selective pressure in spike and it occurred faster than naturally possible. There is an evolutionary thumb on the scale.