180 Comments
author
Feb 27, 2023·edited Feb 27, 2023Pinned

My suggestion to people wanting to offer their takes (without waiting) is to explain them as well as possible to see if there is bias that could be toyed with. Make it a habit to hold back---particularly in parasocial circumstances.

Edit: I added the Woody Harrelson appearance with Bill Maher from five months ago in which he went fairly deep (not entirely correct, but with a lot of good or reasonable points and intuition) on pandemic medical scams. That YouTube video was viewed 775,000 times, so there were likely at least a million views. So, yes, it was well understood what Woody Harrelson thought ahead of his SNL appearance.

Expand full comment

Also of relevance is the uniformity and seeming prepared response of the media e.g. https://twitter.com/KanekoaTheGreat/status/1629746822192463873

Expand full comment
Feb 27, 2023·edited Mar 5, 2023

Woody is a liberal who identifies as an anarchist, like many other liberals who've lost the faith. Apostacy, like humor, makes people uneasy.

Jon Stewart's lab-created apostacy made Steve Colbert visibly uneasy in June 2021:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sSfejgwbDQ8

With Ed Dowd's recent revelation on Tucker Carlson (that the Vax is killing people) the tide may be turning. Dowd points to a "conspiracy of interests" and mentions possible violence when the Vaxxed realize their lives have been shortened:

https://rumble.com/embed/v27x60y/

Instead of getting quarterly mandated boosters, people are ignoring pharma. The covid narrative is losing steam and may be tipping over. But there are other false narratives the People still believe and new ones to come. Not finding WMDs did nothing to slow the forever wars. Most people have no interest in waking up.

By the way, just because the vax did not kill you does not mean it's not taken years off your life. It may also degrade the quality of your life in the meantime.

Expand full comment

If you listen to the whole piece, his second punchline, about his drug use, could have been enough allow the cognitively dissonant to ignore the full frontal punchline (which in itself was obviously ironic, as he plays a major role in A Scanner Darkly, which is about EXACTLY THAT!)

Expand full comment

Or perhaps he did what Chappelle did. Went off script.

Expand full comment

As foretold in plans written years ago: it is part of an accelerationist policy meant to destroy nation-States (hence DOD involvement as per CLADE X), by undermining our trust in institutions. Confronted with economic depression and faced with such a level of incompetence and corruption, the people will blame their leaders, Woody (an intelligence asset just like is father) is pushing the ongoing manufactured crisis, which is principally meant to subvert, foment distrust, and cause revolt; have the people destroy their own institutions, so the parasitic barbarians can swoop in and impose new ones.

Expand full comment
Feb 27, 2023Liked by Mathew Crawford

Looks like Woody was reading from a script himself as he did the monologue, so I'm not sure this isn't a planned disclosure. And I noticed not much reaction to the metaphor of the cartel's drugs and making it sound like big pharma. So I don't think the audience members got it. Or they were too shocked by him actually saying it.

I used to be in the "off-script" camp, but no more.

Expand full comment

My intuition says the same.

I argued that actors/comedians and whatever else always have worked in some capacity for the spies. For centuries.

I remember Woody from "Wag the dog." I often say that movie features 99% of what anyone needs to know about politics.

My ol' Shoe. That's the entry-level psyop.

Expand full comment
Feb 27, 2023·edited Feb 27, 2023

How timely for a major celeb 'influencer' to deliver his "the drugs cartel dunnit" message - just

as some of us were starting to believe evidence from Sasha Latypova, Katherine Watt, Karen Kingston and Robert F. Kennedy Jr, etc that the real villains were the Pentagon.

Thank you, Woody, for saving us from more crazy conspiracy theorists. Job done. Now crawl back into the woodwork where you belong.

Expand full comment
Feb 27, 2023Liked by Mathew Crawford

The cabal running this show is free and has shown for 3 years that if they lie - oops I mean when they lie - their largess allows them to move down the road with the story line and few even notice.

If the resistance repeats bad info - they get a permanent black mark. I think this is the tactic being employed now. I looked up the Woody clip yesterday to make sure it was not out of context. What I found out in the search results was screams about conspiracy theories. To wit / from Vanity Fair ‘taking the stage to float conspiracy theories disguised as provocative humor is both intellectually dishonest and tedious.’

Check your outrage addiction at the door y’all. Before forwarding the next ‘epic truth’ to family and friends - Due Diligence! This is exhausting. Just the way they want it.

Great analysis Mathew.

Expand full comment

I think a patte rn is emerging that Pfizer/Moderna are being thrown to the wolves by the Deep State.

The level of death and injury that is emerging out of the rubble is beginning to see blowback and I think maybe the PTB are willing to throw Pharma under the bus, either because they're immune from any prosecution, anyway, and because the FDA/NIH/CDC rubber-stamped it & would otherwise go down with BigPharm..

Maybe not. Maybe they think they can just keep censoring and finessing their lies, but I think this may be a way to pull their asses out of the fire and look like the good guys (or so they think)...

It's really hard to say what's going on, if this is really just organic waking up and smelling the coffee, or if it's a sacrifice bunt. But it does seem like they are trying to steer the rage away from the gov't and that may mean putting the target on Pfizer/Moderna's back.

Expand full comment

This is the controlled opposition.

He did throw a hard red pill at this libtard audience, but this was by design.

Big Pharma knows the blow back is coming hard and fast. They want to get in front of it and control the narrative and limit their losses.

Expand full comment

I am not sure he was "allowed" to say it. It was at the very end of his monolog, and I think he just snuck it in, too late to censor.

The complete monolog was misdirection. There was NO indication this was coming.

Expand full comment
Feb 28, 2023Liked by Mathew Crawford

One more theory:

The whole thing is about DIVIDE AND CONQUER.

in order to do that we need fodder for both camps to keep building hatred.

Expand full comment

So the monologue is still completely available off the NBC site. Now two days later. There are no “live” surprises here, plenty of time to remove anything not allowed to be seen. Also still fully available on youtube.

There are several full minutes of normalizing “the herb” and drug use prior to this clip. He then says the things here, but then wipes it all away by excusing the shots as essentially just another recreational drug that everybody just does anyway. Its all cool, just a drug like “the herb”.

I didn’t really watch him so much, but watched the musicians to see if there were any surprised reactions. I suspect though they’re well trained to not really react, just smile whatever happens. Probably already saw it a few times in rehearsal. So again, fully above board sanctioned content.

Because after all he does tons of drugs all day voluntarily. Why are these any different? Those amateur cartel people have nothing on us real cool druggies.

Expand full comment

If we're going to presume the world is arranged, why should I even believe the media description of Woody's childhood? My problem with presuming there was design in "allowing" (whatever level that permission was given at) Woody to say these things is that it is entirely unclear what means anyone should be using to divine the truth from the lies in media.

I know I'm seeing something that is lies mixed with truth, we've established that is what media is. I know that the CIA and other intelligence agencies (from around the world) have significantly compromised much of what is put out by media (probably greater than 70% at times), we've established that. The problem then is knowing how to separate truth from lies. How can I presume to know what any particular celebrity is if I'm using that background to judge a message we think he was "allowed" to say?

This is the problem between presuming "Design" over "incompetence". I know humans are rampantly incompetent, I see it daily. It is not clear to me that design can exist in a population with so much incompetence.

Expand full comment