206 Comments
author
Mar 27·edited Mar 27Pinned

It's fascinating how quickly the attacks came. Some act friendly, but want to throw little smoke bombs out there, or otherwise stoke conflict.

Am I the only person who sees the stark difference between the responses to this and other articles?

Note how the attackers have no interest in crowdsourcing information, which would be useful in building a profile, for better or for worse.

Expand full comment
Mar 27Liked by Mathew Crawford

I think, as you point out in your label of "chaos agent," that many of us are suffering from information overload and confusion. I can only imagine how frustrating this is from your perspective, when you know too much.

This has been the longest and worst four years of my life. I am at the point where I know there is evil infiltrated throughout governments and institutions, and that there are multiple layers of deception and "double" agents such that it is impossible to know any longer what is the objective "truth" or reality.

We are trying to put a Plan B in place that is expensive. I know longer pay for any SubStacks as I don't have time to read most of what comes into my inbox any longer and it feels futile to keep adding to my own despair and confusion. I just cancelled my last one last week (Denis Rancourt, as he was trying to expose some of what went on with the number-gaming in Canada).

I am sorry I had to stop paying. I am very worried for the future of my daughter and focusing on what we can do to better set her up, outside of Canada hopefully...it is a scary place to live these days.

I appreciate all I learned from your Substacks, including your deep dive into the stats, and clear explanations, especially in the early days of the mRNA shot roll-out and mandates.

Expand full comment

"Do you think Malone's behavior is incidental to that, or that he is an operator?"

No. He did something. It's obvious. And it's also obvious he has done a few other "somethings" to other researchers or dissidents or whatever. I think he may have even antagonized other operators, because it seems this operation is kind of his magnum opus and he won't let the arrivistes take control of it.

About integrity. I think about the essence of his work in the 80s. Malone himself explained this a couple of times, and it's is a well known observation made by many: pharmacology and genetic "therapies" always crash against the wall of the immune system. The body does not want to take poison or horseshit. So this profession amounts to destroying the integrity of the immune system to deliver the payload, if you will.

In my opinion, that profession of "poison maker" is not compatible with being a man of integrity. I trust the Madoffs of the world better than the people who play around with genes to "cure" diseases.

Expand full comment
Mar 27Liked by Mathew Crawford

Well if there is one good thing to come out of all of this, it is that I am rediscovering mathematics at age 55. Our biggest problem now is adapting to a low trust environment. Eventually life will swing the opposite way, but things are going to be spicy and dicey for a spell. Thanks for all you do.

Expand full comment

Bro...his current supporters are not cognizant enough to question him. Same for Kirsch.

Expand full comment
Mar 27·edited Mar 27Liked by Mathew Crawford

Matthew, it seems as though since COVID, nonmedical, nonscience people have come out of the woodwork as what I call "armchair" doctors and scientists! Back in 2020 and up to December 2020, when COVID-19 was announced, I knew that the whole thing was a hoax. I was "chomping at the bit" to want to launch a podcast to get the truth out there but waited until January of 2023, knowing that more and more of the truth was going to be revealed in the way of the fake science and the frauds that are in this for the money to capitalize. I always say, follow the money with these people, and you will know who is who. Do you notice some of the credible early adopters, such as Dr. Sherry Tenpenny, Dr. Carrie Madej, and Dr. Judy Mikovitz, are no longer around discussing much? In that case, there is a reason for that! This is all about censorship, welcome to the New Normal! I have been censored a couple of times on Youtube for posting interviews I had with guest about non medical topics. Also, do you notice certain people who do NOT get censored on the major platforms?

Expand full comment
Mar 27Liked by Mathew Crawford

If anything, I’ve learned to read, observe, and filter more over the last few years on SubStack. I originally started using it when Mercola moved his database. Now I read a lot less of his stuff and lots of others. A few such as Tess Laurie’s, are totally trusted.

I can’t be bothered reading anything of Malone’s. I found it surprising to see Catherine Austin Fits included in your chaos.

It seems that you have a more pragmatic, honest, delineation of the facts/research you come up with.

I am sorry that you too have experienced mind control abuse. And one recent post with UK association completely disappeared???

Expand full comment
Mar 27Liked by Mathew Crawford

Mathew, you are now one of two substacks that I support for two reasons. One, you follow the truth no matter where it leads you, and at great cost to yourself. I respect this greatly.

And two, I need to step back and follow only those people I respect. We live in such a crazy world now, I've come to believe the only way out is spiritually. And true spirituality is based in love. Period.

If you come from a place of love, you are open to truth, yet you understand that people will have other views.

Keep in mind, many of these views come from people who are so full of fear, literally, they have no idea what they are doing to others. They don't view themselves as being afraid, unworthy, etc., which is why they blame others, build empires of control, react in anger (to name just a few) as their defense mechanism. This way, they don't have to look at themselves, but rather, they try to manipulate or manage the external world to feel like they are in control and good enough.

I have no idea how we get past this. Somehow, I know we will, thanks to people like you staying the course. I appreciate everything you are doing.

Expand full comment

I don’t care about your ego, or his. The recurring theme of your posts has become how incredibly smart you are, and how evil others are whom you don’t agree with. It gets old. These are useless distractions.

Expand full comment
founding

Matt: please never get discouraged or give up. Your integrity is absolute. Your characterization of all these jackals as Chaos Agents is eloquent and accurate. Malone's "supporters" must be primarily shills. Even Katherine A-F gives me the creeps, and without getting into more detail, I regard this as the most definitive evidence of a false flag. My primary impression of this part of the war is 1) that the psyops have stepped up and 2) that if the globalists had direct methods to control or kill us, they would. Theirs is common criminality. Assertions that they have technology that could trump us are an attempt to conjure atavistic fears of magic.

Expand full comment
Mar 27·edited Mar 27

Malone’s image is polished to a brilliant shine. Knowledgeable, sincere, articulate, caring, soft morning DJ voice, additionally he’s a farmer, loves horses, nature, and we should feel sorry because he alleges he too was shot damaged. Malone is everybody’s white Dr. Heathcliff Huxtable. For the hordes of skilled TV watchers who are too lazy to dig deeper Malone is their perfect representative. Even if things go nowhere under his watchful eye they’ll be sure it’s not for lack of trying on his part. He’s perfectly within his right to defend himself. How dare anyone challenge such a carefully crafted image!

Expand full comment

Malone is CIA/DOD.

NUFF SAID.

Expand full comment
Mar 27Liked by Mathew Crawford

People can’t see through the veil of war to realize that he’s controlled opposition. Suggested reading for everyone. (Matthew Crawford is listed in the writing in a positive light).

https://actionabletruth.substack.com/p/the-truth-about-controlled-opposition

Expand full comment

Why do you assume he has any followers?

Personally, at this stage in the game I assume everyone putting out professional content is being paid by someone (no offense intended - sorry!).

I just learn from the fantastic parts that look real (yours, his) and discard the rest.

Expand full comment

Some people don't seem to understand that there are two sides to every story and that critical thinking doesn't mean that we cheer-lead for one narrative, but that we ourselves have to weigh different views and decide for ourselves what makes the most sense, even if some views contradict the way we thought the world works.

Many people have decided that, since Malone says many things that makes sense in our fight against the globalists, therefore everything he says makes sense. But many of the things he says make no sense at all if weighed against what his opponents say, and some of the things he does-- such as suing the Breggins-- are the bizarre actions of someone who cares about his self-aggrandizing "integrity" more than he cares about civility.

As we move closer to an era of massive and complete censorship-- which will hopefully be turned back before it engulfs us, as people come to their senses-- many are overwhelmed by all the information coming out every day and can't keep up. Malone serves as an experienced "seen it all" supposed one-stop shopping for what's happening but it's my belief that, as with his support of Desmet (whose theory provided cover for the censorship/propaganda machine,) Malone serves to obfuscate while seeming to enlighten. Whether he's deep state or just plain seeking an audience, a kingship, and income, who knows.

Expand full comment

Dude! This article is synchronistic! I just published an article today about gatekeepers and Malone is mentioned as well. I do have an interesting twist though: I think gatekeepers may have some good to share: https://unorthodoxy.substack.com/p/the-complex-roles-and-benefits-of

Expand full comment