It may be larger and deeper, but when you deep dive I think you will find Fauci’s fingerprints all over it, either as a master pusher or a greedy psycho willing to do whatever he’s told. He has a history of manipulating for his gain and his power. He’s truly evil.
Fauci is not likely the head of the snake. Gilead's history includes Chairman Donald Rumsfeld who took a far greater seat of power. But the head of the snake would surely be further up than either of those men.
This is the problem. Fauci is the public face of an endeavor that has deep roots back into, back into what? Probably the military. I'm a gardener by trade and I can tell you, deep roots snap before you can get the whole thing out, unless you do it just right.
I applaud you efforts. You are getting to the core.
Yeah there is more people than the corrupt Fauci for sure. I think also that HIV was their test run. They got away with killing a lot of people with their toxic AZT and it didn't matter to the majority of the world. It wasn't us that they were killing. Now they came after us and our children.
I'm not going to exclude documentation because a reader asks me to skip past some facts, and it would be absurd of anyone to put pressure on somebody to do so.
Actually I don't want to hear what you have to say, because Malone is doing such great work that saying anything bad about him, even if true - and we all have human failings - is to just give fuel to the idiots and/or deep state operatives who are constantly attacking him. Any dirt on him, to be worth reporting, would have to be much worse than I think is possible, especially with him being strongly supported by Drs. Cole, Kory, Marik, McCullough, Nass and Kheriaty, plus Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., Del Bigtree and many other great and prominent people. I'd think it over, dude.
Some points I side with Dr Malone (he worked for a different company than Webb says that had the same name). Other questions make me think. I like that.
We all have to tolerate criticism, so why shouldn't Dr Malone? Or Steve Kirsch? Or Mathew Crawford for that matter? Expect it and deal with it.
I think this is much larger/deeper than Fauci.
It may be larger and deeper, but when you deep dive I think you will find Fauci’s fingerprints all over it, either as a master pusher or a greedy psycho willing to do whatever he’s told. He has a history of manipulating for his gain and his power. He’s truly evil.
Fauci is not likely the head of the snake. Gilead's history includes Chairman Donald Rumsfeld who took a far greater seat of power. But the head of the snake would surely be further up than either of those men.
Rumsfeld had his murderous fingers in pushing the toxic anthrax vaccine on the military.
As well as paved the way for an excito-toxic artificial sweetener yo be passed by the FFA
Rumsfeld's former boss has him to thank for greasing the wheels for aspartame's approval.
This is the problem. Fauci is the public face of an endeavor that has deep roots back into, back into what? Probably the military. I'm a gardener by trade and I can tell you, deep roots snap before you can get the whole thing out, unless you do it just right.
I applaud you efforts. You are getting to the core.
It’s going to be interesting to see the corrupt head(s) of the snake. Looking forward to see what/who is exposed.
Do not expect heads of snakes to be named. This isn't that sort of deep dive and would require inside knowledge or amazing modeling.
Well darn….
Yeah there is more people than the corrupt Fauci for sure. I think also that HIV was their test run. They got away with killing a lot of people with their toxic AZT and it didn't matter to the majority of the world. It wasn't us that they were killing. Now they came after us and our children.
Criticize Malone and you’ll lose me. I don’t agree with everything he says but I think he’s doing more for the world than just about anyone.
I'm not going to exclude documentation because a reader asks me to skip past some facts, and it would be absurd of anyone to put pressure on somebody to do so.
Ditto Matt. ✔
"Go where the evidence leads".
Sounds like an excuse for predatory journalism to me, but I’ll wait to hear what you have to say.
Good soldier.
Actually I don't want to hear what you have to say, because Malone is doing such great work that saying anything bad about him, even if true - and we all have human failings - is to just give fuel to the idiots and/or deep state operatives who are constantly attacking him. Any dirt on him, to be worth reporting, would have to be much worse than I think is possible, especially with him being strongly supported by Drs. Cole, Kory, Marik, McCullough, Nass and Kheriaty, plus Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., Del Bigtree and many other great and prominent people. I'd think it over, dude.
How about we hear the Truth, The Whole Truth?
Alright, have you ever broken any laws, Marla? Have you ever lied to anyone? And what did you say your last name is?
How do you like The Whole Truth now?
"predatory journalism" - Done properly journalism IS a hunt. A hunt for facts, truth, whatever you want to call it. Getting it is a hunt.
It's rarely an either/or is it? And that is how psyops often work - with limited hangouts.
https://rumble.com/v2nsq36-the-root-of-degroot.html?mref=1b8qxb&mrefc=2&utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email
(Strange I went to edit a word and the entire comment disappeared.)
I've seen that.
Refresh page.
It's there, and edited. (Glitch in the Substack matrix.)
Some points I side with Dr Malone (he worked for a different company than Webb says that had the same name). Other questions make me think. I like that.
We all have to tolerate criticism, so why shouldn't Dr Malone? Or Steve Kirsch? Or Mathew Crawford for that matter? Expect it and deal with it.