There is another very significant data fraud that can now be proven to an extent in the vicinity of "beyond reasonable doubt", at least here in Australia. It's similar to the disingenuous categories of "vaccinated" and "unknown" that Dr Kory mentions in his post, but more overt. It both reveals intent and also strongly evidences injuries occurring soon after each jab.
In Australia (specifically, the state of New South Wales), tipped off by shifty/suspicious language that appeared in some of the NSW Health covid reports, discerned that stats breaking down covid cases, hospitalisations and deaths by "vaccination status" was deviously lumping those who had never been jabbed with those who'd been recently jabbed (either within 14 or 21 days) into the "unvaccinated" category (which they sometimes named "no effective dose" rather than "unvaccinated"). Similarly, they have been lumping those who are >X days post-first-dose with those who are <X days post-second dose as "1 effective dose". They categorise this way up the "dosage chain".
As your mind will no doubt immediately recognise (if it hasn't already), the post-first-jab immune-suppression-driven covid outbreak gets categorised as "unvaccinated" persons. Ditto for each successive jab.
Our team has known about this devious deception for some time. What is new is that one of our experts has just worked out that this fraud can be exposed very powerfully by analysing these stats as they change over time. What it shows is that the "impossible" is happening - steady rates of cases, hospitalisations, and deaths undergo massive point-in-time impossible/inexplicable changes at precisely the periods when big subsets of each vaccination cohort have recently received their next jab. To be more specific, when a certain significant proportion of the population get jabbed at roughly the same time, the cases, hospitalisations and deaths for the vax category BELOW them spikes.
Happy to explain further if you would like. I'm really keen to get this particular fraud wider attention (in the most effective way possible) because there is no way to explain these changes over time in the data series. It both "proves" the categorisation fraud and also very strongly argues for adverse outcomes temporally linked to the jabs.
Mathew, thank you (and thank you to Dr. Kory) for this work. Unfortunately, no matter how much data and evidence we will have, I fear future history books will still tell:
"The covid vaccines were EXTREMELY (yes, absolutely extremely) effective but there were some evil anti vaxxers and due to them the vaccines did not work. These anti vaxxers (who are even more evil than the anti christ himself) infected the vaccinated people and this is the only reason why many vaccinated people died!
Only due to the anti vaxxers the all cause mortality rates in almost all countries increased dramatically after the vaccines were rolled out!
Holy Big Pharma developed these EXTREMELY EFFECTIVE vaccines in extremely short time but unfortunately the covid mortality rates increased after the vaccine rollout (2021 more covid deaths than 2020) because of these anti vaxxers who became extremely infective and created new variants that reduced the efficacy of these vaccines!!!
For that reason booster vaccines had to be administered. They were also EXTREMELY effective but due to the anti vaxxers they were not effective at all and for that reason the all cause mortality rates increased drastically again after these livesaving booster vaccines were rolled out.
Pathologists described that the cancer rates increased drastically after the vaccine campaigns were started. Many vaccinated people developed (turbo-)cancer and many of them died. These new cancers grew much faster than before the vaccines were started. This cancer problem of the vaccinated people also occured ONLY because of the evil unvaccinated people! They infected the vaccinated with cancer cells and so they died.
If everyone would have been vaccinated against covid, zero new cancer cases would have occured worldwide. Cancer would have disappeared completely. However, since there were these evil anti vaxxers, the cancer rate among vaccinated people increased. May the anti-vaxxers burn in hell."
Please see the research cited in my two articles https://nutritionmatters.substack.com/p/influenza-vaccines-do-not-reduce and https://nutritionmatters.substack.com/p/influenza-vaccines-do-not-reduce-1da - which show that influenza vaccination does not reduce hospitalisation or death for influenza or diseases with similar symptoms, at least for people around the age of 65. This is at odds with what is widely believed. So many people want to believe in vaccines, as if they are a magic protection from the gods, administered by priestly or angelic figures. They are also attractive as a cleansing ritual.
There is a great deal of interest in the problems caused by the COVID-19 quasi-vaccines and their limited or at times negative benefits regarding serious illness and death. This is as it should be. Likewise the corruption of the medical system, censorship, the general corruption of government etc. I wish a substantial fraction of the mental and emotional energy which is devoted to these controversies was devoted instead to the most important practical step we can take to improve health - proper vitamin D3 supplementation to attain the 50 ng/mL 125 nmol/L 25-hydroxyvitamin D the immune system needs to function properly.
Without proper supplementation - such as 0.125 mg 5000 IU vitamin D3 a day for 70 kg 154 lb bodyweight - most people have only 1/10 yo 1/2 the 50 ng/mL 25-hydroxyvitamin D they need to be healthy. All sound to simple? Too good to be true? Please read the research articles cited at: https://vitamindstopscovid.info/00-evi/ .
We're often told how conspiracy theories cannot be true, because too many people would be involved. But here it is very clear that many hundreds or thousands of people are directly involved in knowingly and willingly distorting safety data and hiding danger signals.
Which makes them scum.
While also censoring dissenting opinion. To me the whole 'too many people would... argument is completely dead.
Aug 6, 2022·edited Aug 6, 2022Liked by Mathew Crawford
CDC numbers on breakthrough EVERYTHING, not just cases, always represented a massive undercount. There was some pushback against the fact that the CDC publicly stopped counting breakthrough cases altogether, but it unfortunately obscured the fact that its counting of breakthrough hospitalizations and deaths was never coupled with any demand for such information from states.
"This surveillance system is passive and relies on voluntary reporting from state health departments which may not be complete.")
Of course, this implies we had a massively different methodology for putting figures into the numerator and the denominator of our fraction of vaccinated/breakthrough COVID hospitalizations and deaths over the total number of COVID hospitalization and deaths; if I have a passive system for counting breakthrough deaths and hospitalizations, and I’m actively incentivizing case counts, hospitalization counts, and death counts (as has irrefutably been done throughout the pandemic), and I put the former as the numerator over the latter, then of course the vaccines are going to look like they’re working amazingly.
Dr. Pierre Kory, Dr. Paul Marik, Dr. Lee Vliet, and all our honest compasssionate doctors and clinicians have countless saved lives validating their observations, insights, and determination to stand up for their patients against this abusive and corrupt system. My gratitude and respect for them continuing to do the right thing because it’s the right thing to do is well deserved by all, present company included!
Mathew your analysis is correct it was a military psyop operation to counter vaccine hesitancy, a term I detest in all its inferences. In Australia the Stasi Australian Health Practitioners Authority AHPRA de-register doctors who provide informed consent that creates vaccine hesitancy. I just cannot believe that most of my Aussie compatriots cannot see that this is an overreach too far and a tunnelling into our dark history of the early days of 1930s in Nazi Germany. In fact I believe those bast@rd elite eugenicist billionaires would have forced governments to double down on medical tyranny if Delta had remained the prime SARSCov2 variant and Omicron hadn’t come along. As it was by late 2021, Germany,Austria and Italy were mandating the vaccine and going to penalise and fine people on a monthly basis until they got vaccinated. Mark my words, forced quarantine concentration camps were next on the list, all hallmarked by false positive PCR tests set to Ct cycles of 45 just to lockdown people who would resist their tyranny. This was marked medical fascism and tyranny by subterfuge because people who were already happy to be vaccinated couldn’t see the breakdown in democracy and bodily autonomy.
But are they really that smart, that organized, and that adaptive to successfully organize a long-term truth-bending illusion? Hard to believe they have the skill to pull it off. Was everyone fed a psychotic insight? Did they put something in the water supply?
Excellent as usual. There is no question that a hoax, sorry hoaxes, are in play. The question, I presume being answered as Matthew and others work the structure out, is to the question how. Will this get us to the answer for why? Is there an attempt to transfer wealth from people to want to be masters. The carnage on the general population isn't a concern to the want to be masters, they are psychopaths, they have no connection to the shared soul.
Denis Rancourt, a Canadian researcher, just published a paper on the all-cause excess mortality in USA during the covid times. He found among other things that income is strongly correlated with the probability of getting sick and dying. You may want to check out his paper:
A great post (as usual), Matthew.
There is another very significant data fraud that can now be proven to an extent in the vicinity of "beyond reasonable doubt", at least here in Australia. It's similar to the disingenuous categories of "vaccinated" and "unknown" that Dr Kory mentions in his post, but more overt. It both reveals intent and also strongly evidences injuries occurring soon after each jab.
In Australia (specifically, the state of New South Wales), tipped off by shifty/suspicious language that appeared in some of the NSW Health covid reports, discerned that stats breaking down covid cases, hospitalisations and deaths by "vaccination status" was deviously lumping those who had never been jabbed with those who'd been recently jabbed (either within 14 or 21 days) into the "unvaccinated" category (which they sometimes named "no effective dose" rather than "unvaccinated"). Similarly, they have been lumping those who are >X days post-first-dose with those who are <X days post-second dose as "1 effective dose". They categorise this way up the "dosage chain".
As your mind will no doubt immediately recognise (if it hasn't already), the post-first-jab immune-suppression-driven covid outbreak gets categorised as "unvaccinated" persons. Ditto for each successive jab.
Our team has known about this devious deception for some time. What is new is that one of our experts has just worked out that this fraud can be exposed very powerfully by analysing these stats as they change over time. What it shows is that the "impossible" is happening - steady rates of cases, hospitalisations, and deaths undergo massive point-in-time impossible/inexplicable changes at precisely the periods when big subsets of each vaccination cohort have recently received their next jab. To be more specific, when a certain significant proportion of the population get jabbed at roughly the same time, the cases, hospitalisations and deaths for the vax category BELOW them spikes.
Happy to explain further if you would like. I'm really keen to get this particular fraud wider attention (in the most effective way possible) because there is no way to explain these changes over time in the data series. It both "proves" the categorisation fraud and also very strongly argues for adverse outcomes temporally linked to the jabs.
Mathew, thank you (and thank you to Dr. Kory) for this work. Unfortunately, no matter how much data and evidence we will have, I fear future history books will still tell:
"The covid vaccines were EXTREMELY (yes, absolutely extremely) effective but there were some evil anti vaxxers and due to them the vaccines did not work. These anti vaxxers (who are even more evil than the anti christ himself) infected the vaccinated people and this is the only reason why many vaccinated people died!
Only due to the anti vaxxers the all cause mortality rates in almost all countries increased dramatically after the vaccines were rolled out!
Holy Big Pharma developed these EXTREMELY EFFECTIVE vaccines in extremely short time but unfortunately the covid mortality rates increased after the vaccine rollout (2021 more covid deaths than 2020) because of these anti vaxxers who became extremely infective and created new variants that reduced the efficacy of these vaccines!!!
For that reason booster vaccines had to be administered. They were also EXTREMELY effective but due to the anti vaxxers they were not effective at all and for that reason the all cause mortality rates increased drastically again after these livesaving booster vaccines were rolled out.
Pathologists described that the cancer rates increased drastically after the vaccine campaigns were started. Many vaccinated people developed (turbo-)cancer and many of them died. These new cancers grew much faster than before the vaccines were started. This cancer problem of the vaccinated people also occured ONLY because of the evil unvaccinated people! They infected the vaccinated with cancer cells and so they died.
If everyone would have been vaccinated against covid, zero new cancer cases would have occured worldwide. Cancer would have disappeared completely. However, since there were these evil anti vaxxers, the cancer rate among vaccinated people increased. May the anti-vaxxers burn in hell."
Please see the research cited in my two articles https://nutritionmatters.substack.com/p/influenza-vaccines-do-not-reduce and https://nutritionmatters.substack.com/p/influenza-vaccines-do-not-reduce-1da - which show that influenza vaccination does not reduce hospitalisation or death for influenza or diseases with similar symptoms, at least for people around the age of 65. This is at odds with what is widely believed. So many people want to believe in vaccines, as if they are a magic protection from the gods, administered by priestly or angelic figures. They are also attractive as a cleansing ritual.
There is a great deal of interest in the problems caused by the COVID-19 quasi-vaccines and their limited or at times negative benefits regarding serious illness and death. This is as it should be. Likewise the corruption of the medical system, censorship, the general corruption of government etc. I wish a substantial fraction of the mental and emotional energy which is devoted to these controversies was devoted instead to the most important practical step we can take to improve health - proper vitamin D3 supplementation to attain the 50 ng/mL 125 nmol/L 25-hydroxyvitamin D the immune system needs to function properly.
Without proper supplementation - such as 0.125 mg 5000 IU vitamin D3 a day for 70 kg 154 lb bodyweight - most people have only 1/10 yo 1/2 the 50 ng/mL 25-hydroxyvitamin D they need to be healthy. All sound to simple? Too good to be true? Please read the research articles cited at: https://vitamindstopscovid.info/00-evi/ .
The FLCCC I-PREVENT, I-RECOVER (Long COVID) and MATH+ protocols now accord with this research. https://covid19criticalcare.com/covid-19-protocols/
We're often told how conspiracy theories cannot be true, because too many people would be involved. But here it is very clear that many hundreds or thousands of people are directly involved in knowingly and willingly distorting safety data and hiding danger signals.
Which makes them scum.
While also censoring dissenting opinion. To me the whole 'too many people would... argument is completely dead.
CDC numbers on breakthrough EVERYTHING, not just cases, always represented a massive undercount. There was some pushback against the fact that the CDC publicly stopped counting breakthrough cases altogether, but it unfortunately obscured the fact that its counting of breakthrough hospitalizations and deaths was never coupled with any demand for such information from states.
(https://www.propublica.org/article/the-cdc-only-tracks-a-fraction-of-breakthrough-covid-19-infections-even-as-cases-surge
“Only half the states provide some data on COVID-19 illnesses in vaccinated people.”
CDC PDF document: https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwiBvbHnnfXyAhUkmGoFHZcqCU0QFnoECAMQAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Fstacks.cdc.gov%2Fview%2Fcdc%2F105217%2Fcdc_105217_DS1.pdf&usg=AOvVaw24t_Y7SWwdibTeL0nvcCQZ
"This surveillance system is passive and relies on voluntary reporting from state health departments which may not be complete.")
Of course, this implies we had a massively different methodology for putting figures into the numerator and the denominator of our fraction of vaccinated/breakthrough COVID hospitalizations and deaths over the total number of COVID hospitalization and deaths; if I have a passive system for counting breakthrough deaths and hospitalizations, and I’m actively incentivizing case counts, hospitalization counts, and death counts (as has irrefutably been done throughout the pandemic), and I put the former as the numerator over the latter, then of course the vaccines are going to look like they’re working amazingly.
I wrote a blog post on this back in September of last year: https://pandemicoftheunvaccinated.blogspot.com/2021/09/pandemic-of-unvaccinated.html
Dr. Pierre Kory, Dr. Paul Marik, Dr. Lee Vliet, and all our honest compasssionate doctors and clinicians have countless saved lives validating their observations, insights, and determination to stand up for their patients against this abusive and corrupt system. My gratitude and respect for them continuing to do the right thing because it’s the right thing to do is well deserved by all, present company included!
In defense of ‘Pierre Kory Theory’ this indeed did happen with Oregon breakthrough data in omicron, and they corrected it: https://drflurmgooglybean.substack.com/p/seeking-kernels-of-truth?r=r6d2x&s=w&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
I think this also explained the much higher efficacy from California breakthrough data, though its been months since I looked too.
Anyway sorry — yes its a component, not a complete explanation — now will finish reading and thinking about this, which is awesome!
Mathew your analysis is correct it was a military psyop operation to counter vaccine hesitancy, a term I detest in all its inferences. In Australia the Stasi Australian Health Practitioners Authority AHPRA de-register doctors who provide informed consent that creates vaccine hesitancy. I just cannot believe that most of my Aussie compatriots cannot see that this is an overreach too far and a tunnelling into our dark history of the early days of 1930s in Nazi Germany. In fact I believe those bast@rd elite eugenicist billionaires would have forced governments to double down on medical tyranny if Delta had remained the prime SARSCov2 variant and Omicron hadn’t come along. As it was by late 2021, Germany,Austria and Italy were mandating the vaccine and going to penalise and fine people on a monthly basis until they got vaccinated. Mark my words, forced quarantine concentration camps were next on the list, all hallmarked by false positive PCR tests set to Ct cycles of 45 just to lockdown people who would resist their tyranny. This was marked medical fascism and tyranny by subterfuge because people who were already happy to be vaccinated couldn’t see the breakdown in democracy and bodily autonomy.
But are they really that smart, that organized, and that adaptive to successfully organize a long-term truth-bending illusion? Hard to believe they have the skill to pull it off. Was everyone fed a psychotic insight? Did they put something in the water supply?
Excellent as usual. There is no question that a hoax, sorry hoaxes, are in play. The question, I presume being answered as Matthew and others work the structure out, is to the question how. Will this get us to the answer for why? Is there an attempt to transfer wealth from people to want to be masters. The carnage on the general population isn't a concern to the want to be masters, they are psychopaths, they have no connection to the shared soul.
Dancing with the stars, Sweeney Todd, Clinton celebrating the death of Muammar Gaddafi.
50/50
Ask a stranger
Call a friend
"(2) counting lack of hospitalization documentation as lack of vaccination."
I think you meant "lack of vaccination documentation..."
Mathew,
Denis Rancourt, a Canadian researcher, just published a paper on the all-cause excess mortality in USA during the covid times. He found among other things that income is strongly correlated with the probability of getting sick and dying. You may want to check out his paper:
https://denisrancourt.ca/uploads_entries/1659483189845_USA%20ACM%20vaccine%20deaths%20-%20article----19m.pdf
Can't argue with their success.
Fantastic! Thank you!