So the 3 possibilities are (1) that this was just purely accidental, (2) that there was some malevolent intent but it got messed up, or (3) this is fully intentional.
If fully intentional, what would be the point? (That is a genuine question, not a rhetorical one.)
If you were a mad genocidist, why would you want to preferentially sicken…
So the 3 possibilities are (1) that this was just purely accidental, (2) that there was some malevolent intent but it got messed up, or (3) this is fully intentional.
If fully intentional, what would be the point? (That is a genuine question, not a rhetorical one.)
If you were a mad genocidist, why would you want to preferentially sicken or kill off ALL the jabbed - and leave the unjabbed unscathed?
Myself, I do think that there is some convoluted and sinister plan here, but I think it more likely to be related to 5G activation of some sort, getting us all connected to the grid with an electronic ID so we can be surveilled and controlled (and killed if we cross too many lines). But that is just an opinion, from looking at the big picture.
They do seem to be wanting us all to get jabbed - and so they need to suppress any obvious evidence of harm before people start to wake up too much.
I can't think of any reason that makes sense, to be targeting the jabbed - in an indiscriminate way like this - right now.
I don’t think omicron, if it is targeted to the jabbed, would be done so to be more lethal to them. I think it might be to a) cause such mass infection (because most are jabbed) that massive supply chain and economic havoc is caused, and b) to justify boosters (to remove the negative efficacy of a faded two jabs)
But I'd agree that the primary thing is the vax passports & digital ID.
And economic disruption, so as to bring in the new global financial system.
So experimenting with different doses/ingredients in different batches also seems very likely.
If they are injecting some sort of graphene oxide/hydrogel/self-assembling nano-chips with the jabs, that would explain the need to get as much of this stuff into people's bodies as they can. Presumably the CIA/DARPA already know more about this technology than they have disclosed (as always) - but they won't know about the larger & wider scale effects. Technically, we are still in the stage 3 trials.
Omicron seems to also be justification for a whole new regime of new jabs (being tested right now by Pfizer, in their usual efficient fashion).
It is also giving them an excuse for the failing efficacy of the initial 2-shot package, and increasing case numbers.
With a bit of help from their friends, they will be able to continue the Ponzi scheme for several more years...
Yes, I most agree. I’ve seen convincing evidence of the graphene oxide now (spectrometry), but yet to really explore in detail the whole nano-chip/5G thing because it sounds absurd and I assumed it was most likely disinformation. Have you seen convincing evidence of that sort of thing, then? Any notable sources you could direct me to?
It does sound sort of absurd and farfetched - but I have a horrible feeling that the technology to make this possible is already much further advanced than most of us realise.
Before CV hit, I was already following the 5G awareness movement, and as with CV, there is a lot of uninformed alarmism. Along with a lot of informed alarmism. When the 5G theory about CV was making the rounds, I looked at what people were saying and dismissed it (and still do, short of further evidence). Yet the fact is that Wuhan did roll out 5G just about that time... and there is evidence that emf radiation can exacerbate viral spread & virulence.
I think the jabs are largely about vaccine passports (and money), not killing people necessarily. I was thinking the adverse events were just an unfortunate bug in the technology, not on purpose. However, having seen more and more evidence that only certain batches cause the adverse events, they could also be active experiments that we are unaware of. Or maybe it’s just contamination in those batches, I don’t know. But I don’t think the AIM is to kill the vaccinated with the vaccines.
So the 3 possibilities are (1) that this was just purely accidental, (2) that there was some malevolent intent but it got messed up, or (3) this is fully intentional.
If fully intentional, what would be the point? (That is a genuine question, not a rhetorical one.)
If you were a mad genocidist, why would you want to preferentially sicken or kill off ALL the jabbed - and leave the unjabbed unscathed?
Myself, I do think that there is some convoluted and sinister plan here, but I think it more likely to be related to 5G activation of some sort, getting us all connected to the grid with an electronic ID so we can be surveilled and controlled (and killed if we cross too many lines). But that is just an opinion, from looking at the big picture.
They do seem to be wanting us all to get jabbed - and so they need to suppress any obvious evidence of harm before people start to wake up too much.
I can't think of any reason that makes sense, to be targeting the jabbed - in an indiscriminate way like this - right now.
I don’t think omicron, if it is targeted to the jabbed, would be done so to be more lethal to them. I think it might be to a) cause such mass infection (because most are jabbed) that massive supply chain and economic havoc is caused, and b) to justify boosters (to remove the negative efficacy of a faded two jabs)
Agree. After all, we are just speculating here!
But I'd agree that the primary thing is the vax passports & digital ID.
And economic disruption, so as to bring in the new global financial system.
So experimenting with different doses/ingredients in different batches also seems very likely.
If they are injecting some sort of graphene oxide/hydrogel/self-assembling nano-chips with the jabs, that would explain the need to get as much of this stuff into people's bodies as they can. Presumably the CIA/DARPA already know more about this technology than they have disclosed (as always) - but they won't know about the larger & wider scale effects. Technically, we are still in the stage 3 trials.
Omicron seems to also be justification for a whole new regime of new jabs (being tested right now by Pfizer, in their usual efficient fashion).
It is also giving them an excuse for the failing efficacy of the initial 2-shot package, and increasing case numbers.
With a bit of help from their friends, they will be able to continue the Ponzi scheme for several more years...
Yes, I most agree. I’ve seen convincing evidence of the graphene oxide now (spectrometry), but yet to really explore in detail the whole nano-chip/5G thing because it sounds absurd and I assumed it was most likely disinformation. Have you seen convincing evidence of that sort of thing, then? Any notable sources you could direct me to?
It does sound sort of absurd and farfetched - but I have a horrible feeling that the technology to make this possible is already much further advanced than most of us realise.
For example: https://www.scmp.com/tech/science-research/article/3036602/nanorobots-track-revolutionise-disease-treatment-making-1960s
And this one, which struck me as being a credible source:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9V1U_hnxEjo
Before CV hit, I was already following the 5G awareness movement, and as with CV, there is a lot of uninformed alarmism. Along with a lot of informed alarmism. When the 5G theory about CV was making the rounds, I looked at what people were saying and dismissed it (and still do, short of further evidence). Yet the fact is that Wuhan did roll out 5G just about that time... and there is evidence that emf radiation can exacerbate viral spread & virulence.
https://www.electricsense.com/5g-coronavirus/
None of this really counts as "convincing evidence" - but it all starts to paint a very suggestive picture that I think we would be foolish to ignore!
I think the jabs are largely about vaccine passports (and money), not killing people necessarily. I was thinking the adverse events were just an unfortunate bug in the technology, not on purpose. However, having seen more and more evidence that only certain batches cause the adverse events, they could also be active experiments that we are unaware of. Or maybe it’s just contamination in those batches, I don’t know. But I don’t think the AIM is to kill the vaccinated with the vaccines.