71 Comments
Comment deleted
Aug 29, 2023
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

Who is Dr. Lorrin Pang?

Have you ever seen anything like this?

https://www.youtube.com/live/PLteSp7pYCQ?si=agVA2NfubiRW4lH6

Dr. Pang had a history of speaking out ...and becamec an international scholar on "informed consent" after led a campaign here against Monsanto which got him into the issue.

He was also trained at Walter Reed and has led experimental vax campaigns globally.

https://youtu.be/HV2xConXkys?si=apA4ICT0_zzE8BXO

He is also about to retire. He led the vax campaign here ...but was alarmed when they said ...and now safe/effective for pregnant women, too!

He is a math geek. Someone like Matt and Jessica talk his language ...and might get him to go public.

Malone (Robert & Jill) & Kirsch spent hours with him (and his wife) here. I also hosted a dinner for him with Malones, Kirsch, Cole & Urso ...and Li Wenliang.

He knows. He will talk.

Malone prevented that when he was brought here toxl make it happen. Now is the time. I think Matt is the guy. Back then I was hoping it would be Malone. ;)

Expand full comment

Thank you for this great bit of information on Malone and what took place in Hawaii! But I didn’t see anything in the references about any attacks by Malone on Pang. Can you expound, including on his betrayal of you and the coalition? Also, the Dowd article on ZeroHedge is archived and paywalled. Do you have a copy you can share. I spend a lot of time on Maui and was present at the Mykovitz/Dowd presentations at the Iao theater last year. Disappointing,but oh well. Thanks for coming forth!

Expand full comment

No attacks by Malone on Pang. But we had a powerful plan /program to support Pang and Malone thwarted it. Maybe someone can post ZeroHedge. I cant access. I wont be adding more here. Like i said, seeking serious investigators /writers to share my archives with ....this is consequential and needs to be handled deliberately. Blessings!

Expand full comment

Definitely Matthew is the man to approach with thiis. Perhaps he will set up a group via campfirewiki to go through your archives. Matthew has a large following of serious readers and investigators, as I understand it. Another person to approach would be SageHana on Substack, if you haven't already. If Matthew is reading this I can't call myself an investigator or professional writer but I do have an MD background and would be very willing to help on this project.

Expand full comment

I am hoping Matthew takes this up.

SageHana is witty but swings wildly about Maui. The info i have is consequential and actionable and requires serious work to create serious impact ... many eyes on Maui and Josh Green. This is the time.

What threat did Pang pose?

Did u ever see anything like this against a public health officer?

https://youtu.be/rBP3XXaDzdo?si=QuEGLBjrcOcTIkQX

Remember, Pang is (still) the senior epidemiologist in all of Hawaii (and a numbers guy like Matt) who led the vqccination campaing here. The governor is an ER doctor.

I just posted my contact info so anyone can reach out. Contact me there Tom.

Expand full comment

My contact info:

TheMauiCenter@gmail.com

808-633-1178

Expand full comment

Keep up the great work Mat. You’re a hero, but reading your substack scares the hell out of me. Seems like what we are up against is much more complicated and insidious than i could ever imagine.

Expand full comment

they had a lot of years and expert inputs, and dress rehearsals, to flesh out the plans to make the program all encompassing. Unavoidable chaos.

Expand full comment

Biowarfare by its very nature is complicated and insidious!

Expand full comment

“At first, JJ had a hard time putting the concept into words. It's not his field of concentration. I think that a few of us helped him explain it better and better through conversation and linguistic improvements. He now explains it more clearly as you might see in one of his recent videos. Still, I do wish that he would write it up, even if the hypothesis branches into multiple scenarios.”

This seems to be the crux of the matter. JJ needs to write up his ideas in a paper and invite comments on it.

Expand full comment

I've told him to start a substack

Expand full comment

Agree 100%

Expand full comment

Starting from the day Trump announced our state of emergency on Fri 13, March 2020 the entire pandemic event displayed so many incongruities that anyone possessed of the strength to rise above the panic porn could see it and wonder what the heck is going on?

Everything from the media fear mongering to, health agencies stumbling all over themselves to, lockdown leaders not following their own dictates to, the banning of safe, long prescribed drugs, the punishment of local physicians and research scientists who step out of the narrative box, PCR testing and the strange death of its inventor who criticized its use as a diagnostic tool. The constant bombardment of case counts.

China and their shenanigans has its own chapter incl wet markets, bat ladies, pangolins, foggers in hazmat suits, lab leak, on and on. In hindsight it strongly suggests a tie-in with DARPA, not the enemy that is responsible for mass death and ten-trillion dollars in damage to the world.

This event gave birth to a new spate of heroes that skeptics relied on to cut through the bullshit and save the world from having boots on its face to save us from the spiky orb. Weirdly many of them previously insisted we take the shots. It’s been long enough what have they done?

Pandemic 2.0 is on-deck for October. Helloooo? Freedom fighter “experts” where are you? I harbor a conspiracy theory that everything happening to Trump right now is theater to galvanize not only his re-election but total subservience to him.

I think Trump’s role will be to sell the elimination of cash for CBDCs. After everything people *think* he’s been through who will argue? Just a theory. Trump famously ain’t a Bitcoin guy. We’ll see.

Expand full comment

I think you hit the nail on the head. They are going long and wide to give this guy hero status-so obvious he was in on it from the beginning.

Expand full comment

The vast majority of Americans live cashless now. Virtually nobody pays their mortgage in cash, utility bills, insurances, groceries…do we bring a stack of $100 bills to pay our medical expenses?

Amazon is the biggest retailer of goods. Restaurants rarely see cash anymore. Almost everything is paid through electronic transactions from credit cards debited from accounts that most likely were electronically deposited.

So what’s cash for? Well, apart from a few tidbits here and there, Craigslist purchases, yard sales, tip jars, flea markets, it seems to me cash is mainly the parallel system used for covert operations.

As I recall, it was pallets of cash Obama-Biden sent to Iran via C130. Cash funds trafficking, rebels, coups and insurgencies.

So cash sticks around despite most Americans hardly using it anymore. But we shouldn’t kid ourselves, as soon as something digital can run alongside CBDCs to fill cash’s shoes same as cash currently runs alongside credit cards, cash will go out with nary a whimper.

Was Bitcoin invented to do exactly that? Have the last dozen or so years been a test of its viability? Why was it allowed to proliferate?

I see Trump as being the best salesman for the aforementioned shift because if he says it’s in everybody’s best interests almost nobody will argue.

It was necessary he leave so that those insisting they’d never take the Trump vaccine would roll up their sleeves.

Now, it is imperative he return victorious to the cheering hordes so he can initiate the biggest economic shift in history with minimal resistance.

Not saying I’m right. Just willing to chew on the bitter thoughts most people avoid.

Expand full comment

I ask every service person or business if they give cash discounts. Pretty much all do, and usually 10%. Everybody should get in the habit of doing so. Keeps cash active and probably means less $ for the State. What’s not to like?

Expand full comment

Tom: I do almost all my transactions with cash. Three or four bills a month by check. I use my debit card only at the ATM at the credit union which issued it. I only rarely use my Visa, and pay it in full. It's hard enough to survive Bidenomics on a pension, so I can't afford to pay interest, meanwhile the hordes crashing our southern border get a paycheck equal to mine.

Expand full comment

Part of the perps' plan appears to be to crash the economy. Inflation is one of the keys to that. As always, fixed income people who can't compensate at all on the top line will suffer the most. I think part of the upcoming battle will involve learning to live with less, probably much less.

Expand full comment

We who’ve remained unvaccinated and use cash more than credit cards like our parents did must understand we are not representative of the country at large. Kudos to us. But our numbers are, I fear, not significant enough to stop the inevitable. Slow it down maybe. But we’ll age out and they will never give up. And if a highly influential person like say, Trump, says CBDCs are the only way out of paying a million dollars for a home in the ghetto and $25 for a gallon of milk who will argue?

Expand full comment

I like the way you think.

Expand full comment

That has been my gut from the day he "lost." He lost and yet not a day has gone by that he hasn't been front and center in the media every single day--and we know how that works. If they wanted him to be invisible, they'd easily make him so. But they want to keep him fresh and rife with drama to create outrage. This last stunt brought even more people to his side. And of course, we know he loves the vaccine. There is NO WAY he does not know what is going on with those injections.

They flip flop all these candidates to get laws passed and populous approval for whatever is next. And you're right--its the digital system they need the right on board with.

Expand full comment

Completely agree on Trump.

Expand full comment

"Ultimately, JJ caught onto the possibility of the use of infectious clones in warfare from an interview he watched Malone give at some point. "

Memory isn't my longest suit but pretty sure the seminal comment by Malone that landed as the aha moment for Jay was that "most viral particles are replication incompetent" which was said during a very early interview with a foreign woman who went to the Malone farm for the interview.

Expand full comment

May be.

Expand full comment

Thanks for the info on clones. I hadn't heard it before. Another part of the missing puzzle solved!

Expand full comment

Wow. You should right now wonder why you hadn't heard about the ICH. Had it not been muted in our community, the world would have been discussing it for a year now.

Expand full comment

So many things get muted it’s disheartening. Way before the plandemic hit my daughter was starting Kindergarten at exactly the same time Common Core was implemented.

The more I learned the more furious I got. So before she was enrolled in school I had a 45 minute phone chat with our superintendent. At his behest I called our Governor’s office and state BOE to complain.

The infuriating thing which absolutely parallels our current state of plandemonium is, absolutely nobody in my circle of friends which include an MD, COO, and Director of Hospital Operations knew anything of what I was talking about. Not a clue. Nor did any of the parents I’d gotten to know at my daughter’s day-care.

I laugh when people speak of our Information Age. The educated specialists I know live in a box. Most people today are domesticated lap dogs rolling over for an easy biscuit from their masters. Roman Empire 2.0.

Expand full comment

More and more information on Malone....have you come up with any info on our upcoming candidates? It seems politics isn't displayed much here (no criticism)...but curious how our leaders are involved. Like when I read about the Bush connections to pharma. I then wonder say with Vivek Ramaswamy, what his deal is considering he is making traction.

Expand full comment

There will be some talk of politics moving forward. I'm most of the way through an article on Roger Stone, in fact.

Expand full comment

Stone on Style (https://stoneonstyle.com/) has got to be the best fashion blog ever created.

Very much looking forward to that article. :D

Expand full comment

WTF. Ha

Expand full comment

You didn't know that about Roger??

Expand full comment

Roger is a fascinating character in the context of the swamp with a lot of relationships that are complicated to understand and easy to distort. Not the least of the confusion is longtime partnership with Paul Manafort tossed into the Russiagate hoax targeting of Julian Assange & WikiLeaks so this will be an interesting profile challenge, good luck!

Expand full comment

It sounds like Vivek, like every bright young thing in the last twenty years, wanted to make big money on pharma too; Jordan Schachtel has a substack post on it. I have not done my own research.

Expand full comment

Well we all have to make money. I am not ready to demonize every person in pharma. We need pharma on some level. I guess I am more concerned with the possible connection to the WEF.

Expand full comment

OH! I finally get the infectious clone idea. I'd been wondering if the no-virus theory meant that these were chemical attacks or bacterial or fungal (making Jessica Rose's question oh-so-relevant). But this makes total sense of things like the NYC first wave that receded rather than surging. So much that Malone couldn't find enough hospitalized patients to use his $2+M grant to test famotidine.

Also, I don't know if you've seen the article Kathleen wrote from your Scientology piece: https://devanneykathleen.substack.com/p/weaving. I did explain how to edit the spelling of your name, to which she replied, "Oh damn!! I hate that. (That's what I get for sending stuff out before being awake long enough.)" But like all of her writing, it's a beautiful philosophical piece that provides a rich context for your article and a hopeful direction, I think.

Expand full comment

I look so forward to these--dipping toes into alternative theories for what has happened. So far, there has been no real (certainly no official) explanation for why there were clusters out outbreaks in certain groups of people, or why for instance, NY was dying and Los Angeles had almost no infections. That's not how viruses work. I remember the wedding in Maine--where all of them got sick and I believe some died but the people around them never got that ill. Or churches or cruise ships--what better way to infect an isolated group and make it look "normal." Perhaps targeted to makes examples of.

I loved your cadmium piece too. For me, the theories need not be conclusive but they shatter the nonsense ideas that have been pushed on all of us and fill in the gaps where nothing the mainstream has said makes sense.

Expand full comment

Is all the friendly fire really productive? Maybe more productive to set aside personal beefs to focus more on the enemies of medical freedom?

Expand full comment

Why aren't you asking somebody making false statements about me about the friendly fire?

Expand full comment

If I come across Malone or anyone else making unproductive criticisms of you or other folks in the Medical Freedom Movement, I will ask the same question, should we quibble amongst ourselves or focus on the demons that wish to enslave and inject us?

Expand full comment

I agree. Using controlled opposition to enslave and inject you is better because at least they're on our side.

Expand full comment

Hit the nail on the head.

Expand full comment

I'm not assuming it's friendly fire.

Expand full comment

I find the discussion to be extremely important in figuring out the bigger picture. I have had this conversation with a few people. It's those that do not have a deep understanding as to how the people behind this pandemic (and other deliberate disasters) work, who find the topic petty. If half the people we revere and ultimately tout to be the good "experts" on the subject are actually chaos agents, then are later celebrated by mainstream media, at long last and when the time is right, then we're right back in the matrix, but even worse, believing again deeply in nothing but contrived theories now baked in as fact across the world. Oh!, the layers.

Who is real and who isn't? Most of my tribe are still gagging for Trump and nothing can convince them that he is part of all of this. They aren't even willing to look at the evidence because the truth will be too devastating for them.

Bring on the ugly truth, whatever it may be.

Expand full comment

I'm going to be exploring Trump some.

Expand full comment

I'm on the fence on Trump. How do you explain all the persecution? Is it all for show?

Expand full comment

You're asking the right question. Do you believe we live in a Matrix? Wouldn't that include players on both sides?

Ever watched professional wrestling?

Expand full comment

Thanks for replying!

I get your sentiment. I've always had a

feeling about controlled opposition because of Chomsky (whom very well could be part of the machine after his latests opinions or just a hypocrite), and

after reading you, it has gotten stronger.

At the same time, not every person in the matrix is part of it.

How do you determine who is part of it and who is against it? For a lay person with limited time and knowledge, it is very difficult. But it could be life or death.

I can only go by signals. Who is being censonred, persecuted, and risking it all?

If they have credentials, this makes their opinion stronger in my view. This little formula, while not full proof, has served me well trying to navigate this crazy world after the blinds came off a few years ago.

To me the way treat Trump and his movement, and this is coming from an ex life-long democrat/communist, makes me think the Matrix is afraid of him. I think the same way about figures such as Assange, Tucker, RFK Jr, Snowden, Michael Hastings, and many people in the MFM (although your definition might be different than mine.)

Expand full comment

Remember this lesson from the Matrix: Anyone not free of the Matrix can become an agent at any time.

Expand full comment

How do you determine who is free and who isn't?

Expand full comment

In a word, yes (it is). It's constant theatre. Prosecutions that go nowhere, home raids, impeachment hearings, mug shots, grand juries, election lawsuits that all just peter out. He's none the worse for wear--comes back stronger every time (can you hear the applause?!?) Dragging you through 4 more years where further damage is done while you hang on tight for your hero to come back. You couldn't write a better Netflix show. This is not real life, but we've been groomed to think that it is.

I believe even the secondary players are staged actors--Vivek, RFK Jr., playing their parts to give the scene texture. Real candidates aren't given any press--who even knows who they are. No one who is not part of the scheme is even allowed on STAGE. Trump has been front and center EVERYWHERE since 2020 even though he's longer president--on Twitter, Tucker and in every leftist rag (NYT, Atlantic, Politico, Guardian etc.) on Earth. No doubt they would "disappear" him in media as if he didn't exist --wouldn't that be the most effective way to get rid of him? But even for Trump haters, they need to keep him alive and keep fueling the rage.

If Trump were real, they would have buried him in the press long ago, or more likely killed him.

Trump had to be replaced in 2020 to get the dems/libs on board with vaccines after getting the old folks injected--- because that wasn't happening--no lib/dem trusted his OWS. Perfectly timed, Winter 2020/2021, when the vaccines were green-lighted, they brought in Team 2 to spin how saving grandma was everyone's responsibility and definitely SAFE and EFFECTIVE.

They have us figured out better than we know ourselves.

Think like a director. Think like the most powerful group in the world. How would you "play" billions of people worldwide to mete out your agenda?

I'm not a predictor, but if I were writing this script, he'll win next year. The biggest "tell" for me was his stance on vaccines. He can say or do the most outrageous things, but his stance on vaccines was non-negotiable. To outrage the useless sheep (who cares, they're already walking off the cliff voluntarily), to dispel questions of election fraud and out that ridiculous notion to rest, and to energize his base and convince them to do anything he says. I wonder what ideas he will have. Digital currency, pharma forever, climate change lockdowns framed in a way that you'll love it!

Mathew was much more concise and to the point. I think the gap for most people (including me at some point) was believing it could be this insidious.

Expand full comment

Believe me, I get you. I don't know, to me it seems like there are people trying to get on the stage who are not allowed. Or people who turn against the director. I would put RFK, JFK, RFK jr, Assange, Hastings, Tucker, and many other people, like Matthew, in those buckets.

Since to me these buckets are not empty, I just try to see who I can put in them based on signals the system gives me. Are they censored? Are they smeared? Are they saying uncomfortable things for the current narrative? Are they risking their well-being? Are they credentialed in what they are talking about? Are they being persecuted or killed?

Trumps fits this in my opinion, and like I said to Matthew, I was a life-long democrat/communist until very recently.

At the same time, all you said about his involvement with vaccines is true. I'm also troubled by the people whom he chose to "drain the swamp." But again the reaction to him by the system seems too much. Makes me think they are afraid of him.

Why not kill him? Maybe they fear the reaction of 50-80 (or more) million? Maybe they will. They didn't kill Saddam immediately. Would that change your mind?

Expand full comment

Thank you JL. No, I don’t think it would change my mind, but as I’ve said these are just my gut feelings based on the facts I DO know. When I read what you wrote, my thought was, “Ah, it’s just too intricate to be believed.” It took me years to see the breadth and depth of this and how long it’s been going on.

Remember, the only way this works is if some truth is weaved in, and some innocents are in the play. Then controlling what we see and how we see it. They’re not afraid to make him sound scary- who cares? That only fuels the division even more. Even some censorship is for show- to get people riled. We’ll never know what they’re really hiding from us.

Saddam? The only reason they killed Saddam if they did so at all, was because he refused to get on board with their global plans. That’s when they were setting up all countries with specific leaders in place. They’re never doing anything especially like that, for the reasons they say. They lied about WMD just so they could get Americans to support the invasion.

Expand full comment

It’s not friendly fire and it’s not personal beliefs. You’re either asleep or trolling.

Expand full comment

You assume it's friendly fire. That's how they've got you. How open are you to considering that you've been played by your hero Trump? Are you really sucked in to all of this drama. I get it--it gets you invested. He's not your friend.

Expand full comment

Why on earth would you assume that Trump is my hero? He belongs in prison along with all the rest of the war criminals (Biden, Obama, Bushes, and Clintons included) that have occupied the Oval Office.

Expand full comment

I’ve been following JJ as best I can with the time I can afford to give him. I find this article, Mat, very helpful. It has given greater resolution to a blurry picture, though for me there’s still a great deal of blur. If Malone is attempting to misdirect our attention, his minimization of JJ is a clue that JJ is onto something very important.

Maybe we should call you Mathew Dupin Crawford, to allude to the fictional character created by Edgar Allan Poe: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C._Auguste_Dupin.

Expand full comment

"...Malone talks about the "need" to keep facilities constantly operating for various agendas, calling many of those threats "valid" on what I'd consider debatable evidence. Is Malone using that time to sell the narrative that funds the DoD's biowarfare program?..."

Doesn't Malone get some of his own funding thru the same instrumentalities that fund the biowarfare programs? Or are a layer removed, they fund the funders?

Expand full comment

Really caught me by surprise, but makes total sense, that social clues are indicating some path forward in this densely obfuscated mystery! Keep it up!

Expand full comment

Thank you so much, Mathew, for the link to the J.J. Couey presentation. I've learned so much from him. He has a gift for explaining a complex topic in understandable terms, and he possesses the utmost scientific integrity. One of my favorites. And his most salient point, which he makes repeatedly, about this whole debacle is that the protocols murdered people. All other lines of inquiry about the plandemic are immaterial beside this fact. As for Dr. Malone, I don't think of him as any sort of malicious force, but as a man lacking in the moral courage to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. Sometimes the truth, sometimes attacking those who are obvious allies were he searching for the truth, sometimes ignoring the glaringly obvious, like the ICH. This hypothesis checks al three boxes: motive, means, and method. And it is both biologically plausible and would have been child's play to pull off. Or, it could have been all an illusion, as most science done today (and for decades) is fake.

Expand full comment

I saw the fly twice. What I want to know is why, if Meryl Nass has 27,000 subscribers, only 130 people showed up on the Zoom call with Mike Yeadon and Sasha Latipova? I started watching the Qanon documentary, I think a lot of thought was put into how to get us all going in circles.

Expand full comment

Malone would do great in a Scientology audit. Wouldn't budge the needle an inch while straight up lying through his teeth.

Expand full comment

I don't think that's right. I think je gets nervous being deceitful. Watch the first of his Mappin interviews.. what's that laugh about?

Expand full comment