54 Comments
Oct 4, 2022Liked by Mathew Crawford

Mathew, I deeply appreciate your time, money, effort, sacrifice here and ongoing for humanity. That's probably no consolation to what you have sacrificed. As much as trusting the science, RCTs etc, that one would have believed in 1 year ago, it's nice to have someone like you who hasn't been corrupted (or so it seems😉). I recognize there are multiple explanations for what the data flushes out and our leaders wouldn't want to think that hard. It might collapse the house of cards. Have you been following Coque de.Chien and his case in Massachusetts for falsifying death certificates. I feel like there needs to be a war room where a group of you locks yourselves in the room and hash out theories and possibilities. If you do that, I would love to see that live from a zoom link. It would be fascinating to listen to a group of thinkers! I may not understand it all, but I am sure the energy in the room would be something to witness. Again, thanks for carrying on!!!

Expand full comment
Oct 4, 2022Liked by Mathew Crawford

This is why I will continue to pay for this 'stack in perpetuity.

Expand full comment

I live in WV & I personally know many more healthy people who died from the jab versus Covid.

Not ONE autopsy was done on anyone I know or the MANY people I’ve talked to who died after getting the jab!

Hitlers doctors got the death penalty for exterminating Jews with bad medicine/vaccines & that’s why our CDC & FDA put into place the major testing before any vaccine/medication can be used.

Now if someone is dying from a disease & would like to try a new medication that hasn’t been released I think that ok.

But this whole Covid Plandemic was created in a lab in China that Fauci & USA was funding, they released it on people & then used the state owned media to scare so many into compliance.

Now that the truth is coming out more people are waking up.

We need to unite to beat the Evil Elites!

Expand full comment

These clear rates of CFR cry out for an explanation. Something I would want to check is whether they correlate temporally with the "bad batches" of vaccine as indicated by VAERS data.

Expand full comment
Oct 4, 2022Liked by Mathew Crawford

Yes I believe that most peoples' perception of the excess deaths due to these vaxxines is obscured by their naturally low level of experience with regular causes of death. For people that only encounter death among friends and family relatively rarely (the norm) it isn't apparent when an increase occurs even when this may be statistically significant.

There is an undeniable increase in excess mortality which can't be hidden but will be explained away by other causes. One device is to count deaths within 21 days post jab as unvaccinated deaths often from covid-19. Nice trick if you can get away with it, and they did.

Yet the scale of non-fatal adverse health effects from these vaxxines is far greater but much easier to disguise as being due too other factors. Lockdowns are now the scapegoat for sudden adult death syndrome.

Expand full comment
Oct 4, 2022·edited Oct 4, 2022Liked by Mathew Crawford

The problem with both "Covid cases" and "Covid deaths"is that the data in most countries (given that Covid resp[onse and "management" was obviously globally coordinated) has been highly manipulated for political reasons. Many statisticians such as Prof. Norman Fenton believe that it is only meaningful to analyze ACM and Excess deaths to address indirectly the issue of "vaccine" mortality..

CFR may still produce indicative data (as here) and I raise this more as a question than a statement.

Expand full comment
Oct 4, 2022Liked by Mathew Crawford

I too deeply appreciate your hard work! It helps keep me sane in a very insane world!!!

Expand full comment
Oct 5, 2022Liked by Mathew Crawford

I have enjoyed some of your interviews now on YouTube on your new channel there.

Expand full comment
Oct 4, 2022Liked by Mathew Crawford

Brilliant analysis. Thank You

Expand full comment
Oct 4, 2022Liked by Mathew Crawford

"We have a serious lack of stats minds caring to work on these problems. This is concerning. We will not achieve a world of great freedom and prosperity without people taking responsibility for sorting out challenging problems during challenging times."

I have a stats mind, and have been following analysts from the start like Ethical Skeptic and Eugippus. I mainly do GIS/Geospatial analysis in my employment. I don't have all the datasets at hand and don't know what analysis would be useful or is outstanding at this point in time. Maybe I'll email you some day.

Expand full comment

When you cover up the immediate mortality, you sell people on safety and efficacy. By the time the numbers catch up to reality, most people have picked their side.

Expand full comment

Matthew, thanks for the 'bottom line up front'. That helps.

Expand full comment

I refer to my laptop as Brain 2, and my phone has Brain 3, but you, Mathew, as Brain 4, have more computational power and value then all my three brains together. Thanks!

Expand full comment

So much of this issue is reliant on perceptions that are apparently easily manipulated given the MSM messaging reinforced by Bigtech. There's no doubt that lockdowns were negative and negative actions have negative impacts. Exploiting a negative to mask other causes is deceitful with the only positive being that it makes future lockdown attempts less likely.

Expand full comment

Lets go TGoF--show your face. Put your money where ya mouth is!

Expand full comment

The major problem with finding the correct number of vaccine deaths is that most were not reported & the doctors/hospitals marked most deaths as heart attacks & strokes or blood clots but because they were paid by the government to keep their mouths shut they didn’t bother to do any autopsies on the unknown 100,000 to 1,000,000 of healthy people who have died after the depopulation vaccine???

Expand full comment