It is disappointing that it took Gage until 2006 to see what happened. Architects and Structural Engineers worth their salt should have recognized it immediately because it violated fundamental principles. That said, it is good that he did awaken, and even better that he dedicated himself to digging for and exposing a part of the truth.
As explorations into this topic have developed in the 20+ yrs since the incident, there have been many worthwhile explorations into the ‘how’ question and the ‘why’ question. It’s good to pursue these avenues of thinking, no doubt. However, there is a point where one reaches the end of analyzing the evidence available, and we delve into hypotheses and suppositions. And this can naturally evolve into questions about motivations and ‘who is more right’, etc. Comparing hypotheses is fine and useful, but I would offer that when thinking moves into Camps, subscribing to one hypothesis over another, then we my lose sight of the fundamental observation.
In the case of the WTC, Judy Wood’s exploration raises extremely important questions and concerns, and as regards her examination of the forensic evidence, she is very thorough--more thorough than Richard Gage et. al. There is a point, however, where she moves explicitly into the realm of proposing a hypothesis, some of which fits the observable evidence, and some of which is just a searching for a plausible explanation. That isn’t to say her hypothesis is untenable, but it is also unprovable and untestable (unless someone invents a time machine).
The fundamental observation is that the official narrative is an elaborate lie. The government lied to everyone. They lied and used this lie to justify dismantling the Constitution and attacked our rights to privacy and liberty. The media joined in this lie, amplifying its reach. Scientists supported the lie and produced bogus science and papers to support it. The military acted on this lie, draining the coffers and filling coffins. The weapons contractors profited tremendously, raining cruise missiles on a nation already severely decimated by economic sanctions that had killed millions of children. The judiciary pretended that the right to trial didn’t matter, turned a blind eye to torture and extrajudicial execution. Nearly every pillar of society was affected, damaged severely.
All predicated on an elaborate lie.
The ‘how’ and ‘why’ the towers fell may never be fully unveiled. But the outcomes are known. The tragedy that has unfolded is known.
There is a point where asking ‘how’ and ‘why’ is academic. That is the exploration of theory. I would offer that focus is better spent on the reality of what that event means for us now. What matters is that people understand how deep the deception runs; people that may not have understood the reality of that fateful day, and how far the ripples of that great lie have reached, and how those seemingly unrelated ripples are cast out across the very same pond, Now.
In truth, the great lie of Covid is the descendent of the great lie of 9/11.
Wikileaks dropped the Canadian 5th gen warfare manual, namely psychological operations.
Talks a lot about dealing with stopping insurgences by treating it like stopping a contagion, then goes on to basically explain everything that’s been done to us over the pandemic.
I did realize that was a fake terrorist attack as soon as the tower collapsed. I'm a filmmaker and going through the frames I saw what the video you posted above shows: a controlled demolition without any doubt. And when building 7 collapsed in the afternoon it was the cherry on the cake as we say here in old europe! Then I did download everything was online right after including the radio communication of the famous fake 4th plane that crashed somewhere in a bush without leaving any rest as the one at Pentagon! 😅
Only the fake landing on the Moon in 1969 might seem more real than 9/11 fake terrorist attack!😂
9/11 was the most crystal clear set up by Cia, Mossad at al, and when I saw New York citizens in the streets with the sign "Not in my name" I said "Great so at least New Yorkers are aware that it's an internal job... instead few days after even them with that stupid US flag outside everywhere...
So I agree, since at least 1969 US has been THE CORPORATION of FAKE NEWS, the propaganda machine that never stops, the PSYOP cultural and strategic center.
Covid-19 was the general rehearsal of something even worst than Moon or 9/11, the total world people control. And it worked, most got vaccinated, most blamed against non vaccinated
Again, problem is they know that they have complete control on the majority of idiots brains, that are not ignorant, they prefer not to know.... that it's a big difference and makes them as guilty as the directors of this crimes!
That's why USA is and it has been a real threat to all the rest of the world, sorry to say that, but it's the real sad truth.
Bottom line, math don't lie, is that we are missing literally an order of magnitude in the energy required to pulverize to dust some 200,000 plus tons of glass, steel, and concrete.
The energy available vs the energy required is not even remotely close!
One central issue with 9-11 was the emotional impact. This kept all sorts of people away from any rational questions for a long time. Doubting the narrative made a person feel as if he were supporting the enemy.
The parallels have been apparent to me for many months, perhaps because this time I didn’t want to be fooled again. And by the time of 9-11 I had already discovered the corruption of Pharma & had ceased speaking for any company. In the early 2000s I was also seeing far more aggressive behavior from drug reps. Someone decided they might have better results by pushy if not intimidating attitudes & behaviors.
Some believe there is 'more' to Mr Gage and his organization than meets the eye.
Andrew Johnson, who has done a remarkable amount of work on the 911 versions, is one. You can download his free ebook '911 Finding the Truth' from this page where he also discusses Mr. Gage.
And investigative journalist Rosemary Frei, who was initially advised to ignore Dr. Wood's theories, dug deeper in 2021 and did a number of articles and interviews that are a great place to start.
There are similar parallels to “plane hits big old steel building, building collapses, sounds about right” in other ops, but such a conclusion is ridiculous, even if your expertise is in low-rise structures or concrete structures. This isn’t about high-rises or steel. There were violations of basic physics and structural principles. Even a well-founded structural intuition would tell you that what happened is not what should be observed.
This shouldn’t take curiosity. It was blatant and outrageous. Just like the proposition that an experimental jab can and should be made mandatory.
The honest truth is that a huge number of architects have terrible structural intuition. They often lack basic expertise, which they really shouldn’t. Just as many doctors have a very dim understanding of many aspects of human physiology (esp nutrition, exercise physiology, immunology, and biological processes). They’re supposed to be “experts”, but they too often are nothing of the kind.
But this isn’t about just incompetence or ignorance.
This is in many ways about people who should know better, accepting the work of others with ‘perceived authority’ at face value, even when that ‘work’ flies in the face of basic rational thought. Some of that is the influence of propaganda, but some of it is a kind of laziness. Some of it is ‘going along to get along’ or keeping your head down.
What is the price of this laziness and obeisance to ‘authority’?
The fallout from 9/11 and Covid speaks for itself.
As others have said, Dr. Judy Wood's analysis is brilliant. She simply presents the evidence of what happened on 9/11, and her conclusion is radically different than the official narrative. Her book is "Where Did The Towers Go?" and unfortunately, most people have never heard of it.
Thank you for this, Matthew! Looking forward to watching your conversation!
When you cite "Loose Change" first, I fear you have not been exposed to Laurent Guyénot's case that Loose Change, and the "(American) Inside Job" hypothesis looks to have been part of the operation, planned in advance as by the perpetrators to distract skeptics from looking at the most likely suspects. The video: https://odysee.com/@ERTV-International-English:f/9-11-and-Israel-s-great-game-Laurent-Guyenot:5
We had a similar event in Spain 03.11.2004. Official version = Total Bullshit. Muslim terrorist were also blamed. Similar to the passport story in NYC, some clues were found in weird locations.
Thinking about it I have developed 4 different possibilities for events like these:
1. The people that are supposed to investigate the events (Governments) are behind the events. I would say this is the case in JFK assassination.
2. Government finds the responsible but it is very inconvenient for its interests. Could be other countries Secret Service, why not the UN, even terrorists... They blame others to avoid "issues".
3. Government is not behind the event but they blame whoever works better for their plans. Perhaps they don't even investigate. Or the investigation is kept secret. Could have been terrorists or not. 2 and 3 are similar and, to me, and before watching the videos, 9/11 sounds something like this.
4. Government must find a culprit because otherwise they look stupid so they "find" one. The one that sounds more likely or whatever. This has happened in "minor" events, for example Maddeleine McCann or Amanda Knox. If they have to pick a responsible, they will choose the one that is better for their interests.
It is disappointing that it took Gage until 2006 to see what happened. Architects and Structural Engineers worth their salt should have recognized it immediately because it violated fundamental principles. That said, it is good that he did awaken, and even better that he dedicated himself to digging for and exposing a part of the truth.
As explorations into this topic have developed in the 20+ yrs since the incident, there have been many worthwhile explorations into the ‘how’ question and the ‘why’ question. It’s good to pursue these avenues of thinking, no doubt. However, there is a point where one reaches the end of analyzing the evidence available, and we delve into hypotheses and suppositions. And this can naturally evolve into questions about motivations and ‘who is more right’, etc. Comparing hypotheses is fine and useful, but I would offer that when thinking moves into Camps, subscribing to one hypothesis over another, then we my lose sight of the fundamental observation.
In the case of the WTC, Judy Wood’s exploration raises extremely important questions and concerns, and as regards her examination of the forensic evidence, she is very thorough--more thorough than Richard Gage et. al. There is a point, however, where she moves explicitly into the realm of proposing a hypothesis, some of which fits the observable evidence, and some of which is just a searching for a plausible explanation. That isn’t to say her hypothesis is untenable, but it is also unprovable and untestable (unless someone invents a time machine).
The fundamental observation is that the official narrative is an elaborate lie. The government lied to everyone. They lied and used this lie to justify dismantling the Constitution and attacked our rights to privacy and liberty. The media joined in this lie, amplifying its reach. Scientists supported the lie and produced bogus science and papers to support it. The military acted on this lie, draining the coffers and filling coffins. The weapons contractors profited tremendously, raining cruise missiles on a nation already severely decimated by economic sanctions that had killed millions of children. The judiciary pretended that the right to trial didn’t matter, turned a blind eye to torture and extrajudicial execution. Nearly every pillar of society was affected, damaged severely.
All predicated on an elaborate lie.
The ‘how’ and ‘why’ the towers fell may never be fully unveiled. But the outcomes are known. The tragedy that has unfolded is known.
There is a point where asking ‘how’ and ‘why’ is academic. That is the exploration of theory. I would offer that focus is better spent on the reality of what that event means for us now. What matters is that people understand how deep the deception runs; people that may not have understood the reality of that fateful day, and how far the ripples of that great lie have reached, and how those seemingly unrelated ripples are cast out across the very same pond, Now.
In truth, the great lie of Covid is the descendent of the great lie of 9/11.
Wikileaks dropped the Canadian 5th gen warfare manual, namely psychological operations.
Talks a lot about dealing with stopping insurgences by treating it like stopping a contagion, then goes on to basically explain everything that’s been done to us over the pandemic.
Thanks for another amazing guest. You seem to be able to find the most amazing people to have a conversation with.
Unfortunately, 90% of the people believe the official narrtative about 9/11. The same will happen with the shots...
Nice, interesting!
I did realize that was a fake terrorist attack as soon as the tower collapsed. I'm a filmmaker and going through the frames I saw what the video you posted above shows: a controlled demolition without any doubt. And when building 7 collapsed in the afternoon it was the cherry on the cake as we say here in old europe! Then I did download everything was online right after including the radio communication of the famous fake 4th plane that crashed somewhere in a bush without leaving any rest as the one at Pentagon! 😅
Only the fake landing on the Moon in 1969 might seem more real than 9/11 fake terrorist attack!😂
9/11 was the most crystal clear set up by Cia, Mossad at al, and when I saw New York citizens in the streets with the sign "Not in my name" I said "Great so at least New Yorkers are aware that it's an internal job... instead few days after even them with that stupid US flag outside everywhere...
So I agree, since at least 1969 US has been THE CORPORATION of FAKE NEWS, the propaganda machine that never stops, the PSYOP cultural and strategic center.
Covid-19 was the general rehearsal of something even worst than Moon or 9/11, the total world people control. And it worked, most got vaccinated, most blamed against non vaccinated
Again, problem is they know that they have complete control on the majority of idiots brains, that are not ignorant, they prefer not to know.... that it's a big difference and makes them as guilty as the directors of this crimes!
That's why USA is and it has been a real threat to all the rest of the world, sorry to say that, but it's the real sad truth.
Bottom line, math don't lie, is that we are missing literally an order of magnitude in the energy required to pulverize to dust some 200,000 plus tons of glass, steel, and concrete.
The energy available vs the energy required is not even remotely close!
Unresolved issues with this man- namely his ignoring of evidence. I’d rather hear Judy Woods explanation of events
One central issue with 9-11 was the emotional impact. This kept all sorts of people away from any rational questions for a long time. Doubting the narrative made a person feel as if he were supporting the enemy.
The parallels have been apparent to me for many months, perhaps because this time I didn’t want to be fooled again. And by the time of 9-11 I had already discovered the corruption of Pharma & had ceased speaking for any company. In the early 2000s I was also seeing far more aggressive behavior from drug reps. Someone decided they might have better results by pushy if not intimidating attitudes & behaviors.
Some believe there is 'more' to Mr Gage and his organization than meets the eye.
Andrew Johnson, who has done a remarkable amount of work on the 911 versions, is one. You can download his free ebook '911 Finding the Truth' from this page where he also discusses Mr. Gage.
https://www.checktheevidence.com/wordpress/2014/08/03/richard-gage-and-other-liars-for-9-11-truth/
And investigative journalist Rosemary Frei, who was initially advised to ignore Dr. Wood's theories, dug deeper in 2021 and did a number of articles and interviews that are a great place to start.
https://www.rosemaryfrei.ca/revisiting-dr-judy-wood/
Forgot - both Woods & Johnson appear in the video 'Where Did The Towers Go' archived here: https://archive.org/details/where-did-the-towers-go-9-11
There are similar parallels to “plane hits big old steel building, building collapses, sounds about right” in other ops, but such a conclusion is ridiculous, even if your expertise is in low-rise structures or concrete structures. This isn’t about high-rises or steel. There were violations of basic physics and structural principles. Even a well-founded structural intuition would tell you that what happened is not what should be observed.
This shouldn’t take curiosity. It was blatant and outrageous. Just like the proposition that an experimental jab can and should be made mandatory.
The honest truth is that a huge number of architects have terrible structural intuition. They often lack basic expertise, which they really shouldn’t. Just as many doctors have a very dim understanding of many aspects of human physiology (esp nutrition, exercise physiology, immunology, and biological processes). They’re supposed to be “experts”, but they too often are nothing of the kind.
But this isn’t about just incompetence or ignorance.
This is in many ways about people who should know better, accepting the work of others with ‘perceived authority’ at face value, even when that ‘work’ flies in the face of basic rational thought. Some of that is the influence of propaganda, but some of it is a kind of laziness. Some of it is ‘going along to get along’ or keeping your head down.
What is the price of this laziness and obeisance to ‘authority’?
The fallout from 9/11 and Covid speaks for itself.
As others have said, Dr. Judy Wood's analysis is brilliant. She simply presents the evidence of what happened on 9/11, and her conclusion is radically different than the official narrative. Her book is "Where Did The Towers Go?" and unfortunately, most people have never heard of it.
Good stuff. I've followed Gage since 2006 or so. He's a truth warrior. Sharing
911: IN PLANE SIGHT is another crucial video, now deleted from youtube
And the footage of the "plane" hitting the pentagon is worth trusting your eyes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0SL2PzzOiF8
Thank you for this, Matthew! Looking forward to watching your conversation!
When you cite "Loose Change" first, I fear you have not been exposed to Laurent Guyénot's case that Loose Change, and the "(American) Inside Job" hypothesis looks to have been part of the operation, planned in advance as by the perpetrators to distract skeptics from looking at the most likely suspects. The video: https://odysee.com/@ERTV-International-English:f/9-11-and-Israel-s-great-game-Laurent-Guyenot:5
The article: https://www.unz.com/article/the-9-11-double-cross-conspiracy-theory/
Two more videos on multiple subjects including 9/11
Zeitgeist
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1166827/?ref_=nv_sr_srsg_0
and JFK to 9/11 - Everything is a rich man's trick
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt4798606/?ref_=nv_sr_srsg_0
Will watch these videos asap!
We had a similar event in Spain 03.11.2004. Official version = Total Bullshit. Muslim terrorist were also blamed. Similar to the passport story in NYC, some clues were found in weird locations.
Thinking about it I have developed 4 different possibilities for events like these:
1. The people that are supposed to investigate the events (Governments) are behind the events. I would say this is the case in JFK assassination.
2. Government finds the responsible but it is very inconvenient for its interests. Could be other countries Secret Service, why not the UN, even terrorists... They blame others to avoid "issues".
3. Government is not behind the event but they blame whoever works better for their plans. Perhaps they don't even investigate. Or the investigation is kept secret. Could have been terrorists or not. 2 and 3 are similar and, to me, and before watching the videos, 9/11 sounds something like this.
4. Government must find a culprit because otherwise they look stupid so they "find" one. The one that sounds more likely or whatever. This has happened in "minor" events, for example Maddeleine McCann or Amanda Knox. If they have to pick a responsible, they will choose the one that is better for their interests.