You mentioned you were one of the first to blow the whistle on the covid farce. I would appreciate you pointing me to your first post in this regard. Thank you,
I love that "hind sight is 2022". Health and Happiness to all on this substack.
I'm on my phone now, but my Substack goes back to Feb 2021, but was started with chapters from a book I was writing on 2020 called the Chloroquine Wars. Much of what I'd written on social media was scrubbed, which is why I moved to Substack.
This is a great story; kudos to you and to Asli. Unfortunately I doubt any single lawsuit is going steer the giant ship of Covid fraud in a more righteous direction.
People with open minds who can see the other side are so rare that this story literally blows my mind.
Mat there has to be someone in the movement that is willing to expose whats going on with the DMED. Del Bigtree? Bret Weinstein? Aaron Siri? I know these guys are busy nowadays but going after Unissant could be the biggest move yet imo.
I dont get it. Some of them have to want to get to the actual truth. They cant ALL be controlled opposition. At least i dont think they can. I bring up your name and work on the DMED stuff in the comment sections of some substacks, especially Steve Kirsch’s. I wish there was something else i could do to help.
They want you focused on Fauci , Democrats and China. They wont touch the Military or certain Republicans role in the crime, so in that sense they are controlled or just unwittingly serve to divert you from the truth that this is a much broader conspiracy than Left vs Right or China -WEF vs US
I think this is at least part of the story. There are specific election plans and schemes that I know about personally, and I believe that integrity has been compromised to achieve political goals.
We don't need a revolution between parties. We need a revolution of thinking about drawing new lines of governance. We don't need a new FDA head. We need less FDA. Peter Thiel likes to talk about "0 to 1". I think it's time to talk about when "1 to 0" is the technological leap.
"Peter Thiel likes to talk about "0 to 1". I think it's time to talk about when "1 to 0" is the technological leap."
This might be the most important change in thought process you've written, and you've written thousands upon thousands of words. Adding complexity adds edge cases, loopholes, dead ends, and all sorts of ways to manipulate things. Simplifying and cleaning house boils things to the important parts.
This is way beyond election plans or party conflict.
As for FDA its not more or less, its about integrity.
Political Parties and FDA are supposed to represent the people and act in their interests. They dont.
They are all corrupted and serve their corporate masters while lying to you about why they cant do what they promised or telling you why poison is good for you
The lobbying and campaign contributions..especially the ones we can't see (donations to politicians non profits on which their children and wives are officers) need to be totally eliminated.
I think the entire structure of the federal government needs ripping out root and branch..and not replaced.... except in a distributed, public and transparent way with people like yourself out there using their talents and interacting with the public in those areas which might be needed...but not confined. I am not expressing myself well, but 1 to 0 as the technologic leap ...local & distributed processing.
I think they get tunnel vision because of how ubiquitous the distinct issues involved are. I would reach out to Del if you think you can explain your position to him and if it's at all related to what his show about.
Mathew. This gave me goosebumps. A kindred spirit. You know, almost all of the very best people in my life started out absolutely hating me. So, I LOVE seeing this transition. I have experienced it many times and the path is hard but when you get to the end, man oh man: solid foundations.
A very interesting read Mathew, thanks. For Asli to have started out with such a bilious diatribe based on lack of knowledge and assumptions and end in this way is probably a good thing but is very disconcerting to me. Tread carefully, I know you will.
I'm extremely even-keeled personality wise. My closest friends have even referred to me as robotic at times.
And I can fly off the handle on some of this stuff when certain trigger words come at me. My wife can tell you how I just start ranting when people suggest masks work for example.
We've been living with the data and recognizing the lies for the better part of 3 full years now, and patience is mighty thin for trolls or those who jump in with poor facts. Mathew's comment does read a bit like that if you don't have or know the background, and it's easy to lash out. I'm heartened that she stopped, breathed, and recognized this as a contribution not an attack.
Happy New Year, Mathew, and here's to more honesty and sanity in 2023. And this is such a great story. I have a lot of respect for when people change their mind based on new information.
It can be hard to spot the fakes and frauds on our own side sometimes - especially when they are saying what we most want to hear. Good on you for persisting with calling out Renz. He does our cause no good at all. We should all disengage from him.
I know little about the issue, but it seems clear from what I have read that Renz's motives are less than honorable. This won't do. This won't do at all. We must hold those accountable who have destroyed so many lives, who have maimed and killed so many, and we cannot do this without unimpeachable evidence from unimpeachable sources, such as what Mathew and many others have given us. What I think happened, from all the information I have read, is that this clown show was a Pentagon operation gone awry. Why nearly every government in the world followed the CCP playbook is another story, and a frightening one, indeed. Covid&Coffee had a post about this today. One silver lining here is that the percentage of anti-vaxxers among our population has grown by at least an order of magnitude. We deeply appreciate all the hard work you have done, Mathew. It will make a difference in bringing truth to light. Happy new year to one and all. '23 couldn't possibly be worse than '20, '21, or '22. I think it will be harder but better. No longer will the gubment find the public so gullible. Trust gone is very difficult to regain. My favorite current meme is an early '24 campaign poster: "2024 Biden-Fetterman It's a no-brainer."
I love Coffee and Covid too! Mark Wauck (ex-FBI agent) is another great substacker with a perspective on current issues. I can totally see how this might be a Pentagon operation gone awry. I think the world’s response to it has been driven by multiple different agendas - with the CCP’s real motives behind their various actions being the hardest to discern. I note that China has stayed well away from mRNA vaccines though.
I am so tired of the infighting truth be told. Just cause Renz is bad at maths and presented incorrect information (ditto Stu Peters) in this war, everyone has a part to play....everyone has different talents and people are people. Can we just realize we are all players, and the players come and go as needed on the stage, as Shakespear says? And I find most people hate to admit they made an error, it takes them time to recover and realize ...and the vituperation doesn't help.
People who can connect to people on an emotional level but maybe not math brains are as needed as people with cool brains and high intelligence. Remember intelligence is average which means xx% people are smarter than you and xx% are not. As Matthew said elsewhere never atrribute to malice that which can be explained by stupidity. We need everyone. This is a war for the future of the human race. Give people a break. We are all flawed human beings.
The point is not that Renz is bad at math. It's that when presented with information proving he was wrong, he chose to portray publicly the incorrect data story while gas lighting me into thinking he would file FOIAs and pursue the actual truth of the situation as per my corrected data. And it is clear to me that a lot of people actively and passively played along to build a theatrical charade. Those are all the things that we are fighting to end in principle.
I may not be a math genius, but I do know that bad data cannot be added to good data. It only subtracts. This mushy “all in it together” idea that we can each and every one of us throw our personal dollop of ---- against the wall and only add to the collective mass of the sum is misguided. Discernment > volume. Signal > noise.
"there's no way on earth Mr Renz would be wrong." Amazing. Catholics don't even believe this about the Pope (when we had one).
Renz is not a scientist.
Btw, I didn't take vax because I trusted anti vaxxers. I saw scientific method, search for truth being pissed on. I am not able to go much farther than surface... I'm not a scientist
Gaining trust absolutely critical. MC is right on this.
I'm in a separate fight. Our "!leaders" are schokars, meticulous. They HAVE to be.
Btw, I smile sadly when people say, trust the science. Sounds like a phrase from Globalists. I've never heard it before. Science is essentially NOT trusting.
I think these foolish bastards will realize they never saw anything from FDA . it was all garbage
"Trust, follow and believe the science" always makes me laugh. Where in the scientific method are those words? The words in it are "falsifiability & repeatability".
Thank you Ḥasan Ibn al-Haytham & Sir Francis Bacon.
trust faith and belief belong to religion, science requires testing proofs and consensus, based on methodology and repeatable results. The normies can't see it because they are not critical thinkers and/or their feelings have been manipulated by weapons-grade propaganda. Sadly, I think they are in the majority.
I'm sure that only a small minority are able to understand and adopt the scientific method because it is inherently uncomfortable. Inherently.
If you are a scientist (whatever your employment contract says), you get uncomfortable when everyone in the room is nodding their head in the same direction too much of the time.
Possibly why change has only ever come from a small minority.
I think I saw the early part of this exchange over at the other substack before the ad hominems we’re edited out. Reading this post and seeing how things unfolded gives me hope, even though I’m not inclined to assume that everyone will engage in good faith after being given the opportunity to do so, or take the time to sift the details, as Asli did.
Happy new year Mathew, thanks for persevering in pursuit of truth and for the sprinkles of humor embedded in even the more depressing posts.
And if Asli is here, happy new year to you as well, and thanks for the reminder of why we should all do our own research and be open and humble enough to change our mind in light of new information.
I’m a huge Daniel Horowitz fan. He had Jessica Rose on recently and I asked him to follow-up with her off-line to get her take on your take on Andrew Huff. He’s just one of those people whom my ears completely disbelieve and whose stories make my eyes go squinty In skepticism. So your little commentary on him perked my interest - confirmation bias accepted!
The one thing that struck me about the DMED data is that it originally seemed to me to be akin to doctor visit numbers, not cases or individuals. So even if the numbers weren’t wrong, how they were presented was misleading. I am no math wiz, but I was good at math thru high school and did well in logic. But my 4th grader’s Singapore Math makes me feel stupid. That said, I still feel like any DMED data is going to appear exponentially greater than VAERS as each case would be represented in DMED as several appointments. My mom as example: she went deaf in an ear from Moderna 2nd shot. She had at least 4 appointments with the ENT/audiologist. She had a neurology referral. Her MRI on her ears was normal, but there was a small calcification in her brain. That generated a CT scan and more neurology referrals, a 6-month follow-up, and yearly scans etc. The ENT also found a thyroid nodule so that meant FNA (biopsies) and endocrinologist appointments. ENT was not happy with the Endo and has my mom follow-up with her. So in VAERS (which the ENT did not enter) my mom would be 1 case. In DMED she’d be at least 12 appointments for everything. So how can you compare? Each AE generates different numbers of appointments. Right?
My mom turned out fine with everything. She saw the ENT within 24 hours of hearing loss and got steroids right away, she had a near complete hearing recovery and both audiologist and ENT were pleasantly surprised she recovered her hearing at all. They don’t think she would have if she delayed treatment or went to a PCP first. So make note, take immediate action if you ever get sudden hearing loss. Calcification is likely from the time she linked her head on a fallen tree across a trail, and her thyroid nodule is non-cancerous. 🎉 She’s not feeling the cost benefit of the shots. At least that did more than my pleadings to stop the rest of my family from getting any boosters!
You're right about each illness generating numerous all occurrence reports.
I think your intuition is telling you something astute with respect to Huff. I don't have time now, but after working and chatting online with him for several months the red flags piled high. I believe he is a sculpted construct, assigned to play a theatrical role. Amd I have a small mountain of chat logs that support that judgment.
Pretty great to see candor win the day. You can expect any lawsuits related to this to be dismissed for "lack of standing" unless Barnes and CHD prevail in their case against the FDA regarding bait and switch as well as Brook Jackson's case. The bar they are trying to hurdle is a hell of a lot lower than going after DoD or Unissant directly. It will ultimately require new leadership at DoJ, which could happen in 2024 if we all play our cards right.
Didn't realize the DoD insinuated itself into those suits, thought they were just related to FDA and Pfizer. In any case, lower court dismissals of those cases need to get reversed on appeal for a new suit targeting Unissant to have any reasonable chance of success.
Yes. For a LOT of detail see this post (skim and skip to the end) about how laws have been passed so that under EUA the normal vaccine rules/laws don't apply. So, depressingly, it appears to me that Jackson/Barne's lawsuit might be dismissed at some point. :
And, here's some links to the Wash Post and Malone talking about how DARPA
"seeded the ground for a rapid coronavirus cure ... to find a way to produce antibodies for any virus in the world within 60 days of collecting a blood sample from a survivor";
the mRNAs are being pushed specifically to shave off the time needed to properly study a new vax or drug; time being money. I think there was an FDA consensus that allowed them to go ahead and approve the mouse-tested bivalent, and they intend this platform for the entire vax schedule. No more maintaining a warm production line. No more years long trials. I expect to never see an official study of the full years long outcomes of the current live experiment. The CDC aren't even studying the data collected up to this point.
If they can get away with it, Unissant will be able to do the same thing. Pretty sure the lack of standing thing applied to the Brook Jackson case because of DoD and the CHD case on bait and switch because of FDA. The courts are trying to use a catch-22 to play Pontius Pilate.
Yes, there is little doubt that a lawsuit wouldn't succeed, but that's essentially true for all the fundamentally important lawsuits that could unwind the whole vaccination program. What would be important would be the information discovered, the responses, and the optics.
Happy New Year, fella. You are the biz. Peace out.
Happy New Year!
Hindsight is 2022.
You got Steve to agree to discuss the DMED data?! Wow...
Hindsight is 20/20
Foresight is 20/22
I can't wait for February 2, 2222!
Missed this while traveling all day yesterday.
You mentioned you were one of the first to blow the whistle on the covid farce. I would appreciate you pointing me to your first post in this regard. Thank you,
I love that "hind sight is 2022". Health and Happiness to all on this substack.
I'm on my phone now, but my Substack goes back to Feb 2021, but was started with chapters from a book I was writing on 2020 called the Chloroquine Wars. Much of what I'd written on social media was scrubbed, which is why I moved to Substack.
This is a great story; kudos to you and to Asli. Unfortunately I doubt any single lawsuit is going steer the giant ship of Covid fraud in a more righteous direction.
People with open minds who can see the other side are so rare that this story literally blows my mind.
Mat there has to be someone in the movement that is willing to expose whats going on with the DMED. Del Bigtree? Bret Weinstein? Aaron Siri? I know these guys are busy nowadays but going after Unissant could be the biggest move yet imo.
God bless-im a huge fan keep up the great work.
You'd think they'd have been interested.
I dont get it. Some of them have to want to get to the actual truth. They cant ALL be controlled opposition. At least i dont think they can. I bring up your name and work on the DMED stuff in the comment sections of some substacks, especially Steve Kirsch’s. I wish there was something else i could do to help.
"Some of them have to want to get to the actual truth."
Unless their interests are not what you think they are.
There is so much more to come...
They want you focused on Fauci , Democrats and China. They wont touch the Military or certain Republicans role in the crime, so in that sense they are controlled or just unwittingly serve to divert you from the truth that this is a much broader conspiracy than Left vs Right or China -WEF vs US
I think this is at least part of the story. There are specific election plans and schemes that I know about personally, and I believe that integrity has been compromised to achieve political goals.
We don't need a revolution between parties. We need a revolution of thinking about drawing new lines of governance. We don't need a new FDA head. We need less FDA. Peter Thiel likes to talk about "0 to 1". I think it's time to talk about when "1 to 0" is the technological leap.
"Peter Thiel likes to talk about "0 to 1". I think it's time to talk about when "1 to 0" is the technological leap."
This might be the most important change in thought process you've written, and you've written thousands upon thousands of words. Adding complexity adds edge cases, loopholes, dead ends, and all sorts of ways to manipulate things. Simplifying and cleaning house boils things to the important parts.
This is way beyond election plans or party conflict.
As for FDA its not more or less, its about integrity.
Political Parties and FDA are supposed to represent the people and act in their interests. They dont.
They are all corrupted and serve their corporate masters while lying to you about why they cant do what they promised or telling you why poison is good for you
The lobbying and campaign contributions..especially the ones we can't see (donations to politicians non profits on which their children and wives are officers) need to be totally eliminated.
I think the entire structure of the federal government needs ripping out root and branch..and not replaced.... except in a distributed, public and transparent way with people like yourself out there using their talents and interacting with the public in those areas which might be needed...but not confined. I am not expressing myself well, but 1 to 0 as the technologic leap ...local & distributed processing.
Actually, they all could be- or at least all of the prominent ones.
I think they get tunnel vision because of how ubiquitous the distinct issues involved are. I would reach out to Del if you think you can explain your position to him and if it's at all related to what his show about.
I was told by friends that they reached out to him on my behalf many months ago at this point.
It's very hard for me to be optimistic.
Mathew. This gave me goosebumps. A kindred spirit. You know, almost all of the very best people in my life started out absolutely hating me. So, I LOVE seeing this transition. I have experienced it many times and the path is hard but when you get to the end, man oh man: solid foundations.
I'm uncertain what this transition is. I feel that I'm on the same course that I have been for nearly three years, just calling it as I see it.
A very interesting read Mathew, thanks. For Asli to have started out with such a bilious diatribe based on lack of knowledge and assumptions and end in this way is probably a good thing but is very disconcerting to me. Tread carefully, I know you will.
I'm extremely even-keeled personality wise. My closest friends have even referred to me as robotic at times.
And I can fly off the handle on some of this stuff when certain trigger words come at me. My wife can tell you how I just start ranting when people suggest masks work for example.
We've been living with the data and recognizing the lies for the better part of 3 full years now, and patience is mighty thin for trolls or those who jump in with poor facts. Mathew's comment does read a bit like that if you don't have or know the background, and it's easy to lash out. I'm heartened that she stopped, breathed, and recognized this as a contribution not an attack.
A well earned and much deserved little win 🤝🏼
It is a little win that might be leveraged for a bigger win.
I've heard it said that major change happens little by little, and then it happens all at once.
Happy New Year, Mathew, and here's to more honesty and sanity in 2023. And this is such a great story. I have a lot of respect for when people change their mind based on new information.
Happy New Year, Tessa!
It can be hard to spot the fakes and frauds on our own side sometimes - especially when they are saying what we most want to hear. Good on you for persisting with calling out Renz. He does our cause no good at all. We should all disengage from him.
I know little about the issue, but it seems clear from what I have read that Renz's motives are less than honorable. This won't do. This won't do at all. We must hold those accountable who have destroyed so many lives, who have maimed and killed so many, and we cannot do this without unimpeachable evidence from unimpeachable sources, such as what Mathew and many others have given us. What I think happened, from all the information I have read, is that this clown show was a Pentagon operation gone awry. Why nearly every government in the world followed the CCP playbook is another story, and a frightening one, indeed. Covid&Coffee had a post about this today. One silver lining here is that the percentage of anti-vaxxers among our population has grown by at least an order of magnitude. We deeply appreciate all the hard work you have done, Mathew. It will make a difference in bringing truth to light. Happy new year to one and all. '23 couldn't possibly be worse than '20, '21, or '22. I think it will be harder but better. No longer will the gubment find the public so gullible. Trust gone is very difficult to regain. My favorite current meme is an early '24 campaign poster: "2024 Biden-Fetterman It's a no-brainer."
I love Coffee and Covid too! Mark Wauck (ex-FBI agent) is another great substacker with a perspective on current issues. I can totally see how this might be a Pentagon operation gone awry. I think the world’s response to it has been driven by multiple different agendas - with the CCP’s real motives behind their various actions being the hardest to discern. I note that China has stayed well away from mRNA vaccines though.
I am so tired of the infighting truth be told. Just cause Renz is bad at maths and presented incorrect information (ditto Stu Peters) in this war, everyone has a part to play....everyone has different talents and people are people. Can we just realize we are all players, and the players come and go as needed on the stage, as Shakespear says? And I find most people hate to admit they made an error, it takes them time to recover and realize ...and the vituperation doesn't help.
People who can connect to people on an emotional level but maybe not math brains are as needed as people with cool brains and high intelligence. Remember intelligence is average which means xx% people are smarter than you and xx% are not. As Matthew said elsewhere never atrribute to malice that which can be explained by stupidity. We need everyone. This is a war for the future of the human race. Give people a break. We are all flawed human beings.
The point is not that Renz is bad at math. It's that when presented with information proving he was wrong, he chose to portray publicly the incorrect data story while gas lighting me into thinking he would file FOIAs and pursue the actual truth of the situation as per my corrected data. And it is clear to me that a lot of people actively and passively played along to build a theatrical charade. Those are all the things that we are fighting to end in principle.
I may not be a math genius, but I do know that bad data cannot be added to good data. It only subtracts. This mushy “all in it together” idea that we can each and every one of us throw our personal dollop of ---- against the wall and only add to the collective mass of the sum is misguided. Discernment > volume. Signal > noise.
"there's no way on earth Mr Renz would be wrong." Amazing. Catholics don't even believe this about the Pope (when we had one).
Renz is not a scientist.
Btw, I didn't take vax because I trusted anti vaxxers. I saw scientific method, search for truth being pissed on. I am not able to go much farther than surface... I'm not a scientist
Gaining trust absolutely critical. MC is right on this.
I'm in a separate fight. Our "!leaders" are schokars, meticulous. They HAVE to be.
Btw, I smile sadly when people say, trust the science. Sounds like a phrase from Globalists. I've never heard it before. Science is essentially NOT trusting.
I think these foolish bastards will realize they never saw anything from FDA . it was all garbage
"Trust, follow and believe the science" always makes me laugh. Where in the scientific method are those words? The words in it are "falsifiability & repeatability".
Thank you Ḥasan Ibn al-Haytham & Sir Francis Bacon.
It's the form of dogma under the flag of science. It's a seduction.
trust faith and belief belong to religion, science requires testing proofs and consensus, based on methodology and repeatable results. The normies can't see it because they are not critical thinkers and/or their feelings have been manipulated by weapons-grade propaganda. Sadly, I think they are in the majority.
I'm sure that only a small minority are able to understand and adopt the scientific method because it is inherently uncomfortable. Inherently.
If you are a scientist (whatever your employment contract says), you get uncomfortable when everyone in the room is nodding their head in the same direction too much of the time.
Possibly why change has only ever come from a small minority.
I think I saw the early part of this exchange over at the other substack before the ad hominems we’re edited out. Reading this post and seeing how things unfolded gives me hope, even though I’m not inclined to assume that everyone will engage in good faith after being given the opportunity to do so, or take the time to sift the details, as Asli did.
Happy new year Mathew, thanks for persevering in pursuit of truth and for the sprinkles of humor embedded in even the more depressing posts.
And if Asli is here, happy new year to you as well, and thanks for the reminder of why we should all do our own research and be open and humble enough to change our mind in light of new information.
I’m a huge Daniel Horowitz fan. He had Jessica Rose on recently and I asked him to follow-up with her off-line to get her take on your take on Andrew Huff. He’s just one of those people whom my ears completely disbelieve and whose stories make my eyes go squinty In skepticism. So your little commentary on him perked my interest - confirmation bias accepted!
The one thing that struck me about the DMED data is that it originally seemed to me to be akin to doctor visit numbers, not cases or individuals. So even if the numbers weren’t wrong, how they were presented was misleading. I am no math wiz, but I was good at math thru high school and did well in logic. But my 4th grader’s Singapore Math makes me feel stupid. That said, I still feel like any DMED data is going to appear exponentially greater than VAERS as each case would be represented in DMED as several appointments. My mom as example: she went deaf in an ear from Moderna 2nd shot. She had at least 4 appointments with the ENT/audiologist. She had a neurology referral. Her MRI on her ears was normal, but there was a small calcification in her brain. That generated a CT scan and more neurology referrals, a 6-month follow-up, and yearly scans etc. The ENT also found a thyroid nodule so that meant FNA (biopsies) and endocrinologist appointments. ENT was not happy with the Endo and has my mom follow-up with her. So in VAERS (which the ENT did not enter) my mom would be 1 case. In DMED she’d be at least 12 appointments for everything. So how can you compare? Each AE generates different numbers of appointments. Right?
My mom turned out fine with everything. She saw the ENT within 24 hours of hearing loss and got steroids right away, she had a near complete hearing recovery and both audiologist and ENT were pleasantly surprised she recovered her hearing at all. They don’t think she would have if she delayed treatment or went to a PCP first. So make note, take immediate action if you ever get sudden hearing loss. Calcification is likely from the time she linked her head on a fallen tree across a trail, and her thyroid nodule is non-cancerous. 🎉 She’s not feeling the cost benefit of the shots. At least that did more than my pleadings to stop the rest of my family from getting any boosters!
You're right about each illness generating numerous all occurrence reports.
I think your intuition is telling you something astute with respect to Huff. I don't have time now, but after working and chatting online with him for several months the red flags piled high. I believe he is a sculpted construct, assigned to play a theatrical role. Amd I have a small mountain of chat logs that support that judgment.
Pretty great to see candor win the day. You can expect any lawsuits related to this to be dismissed for "lack of standing" unless Barnes and CHD prevail in their case against the FDA regarding bait and switch as well as Brook Jackson's case. The bar they are trying to hurdle is a hell of a lot lower than going after DoD or Unissant directly. It will ultimately require new leadership at DoJ, which could happen in 2024 if we all play our cards right.
Actually, Pfizer is standing behind the DoD in the Brook Jackson lawsuit, so it's essentially the same story and odds.
Didn't realize the DoD insinuated itself into those suits, thought they were just related to FDA and Pfizer. In any case, lower court dismissals of those cases need to get reversed on appeal for a new suit targeting Unissant to have any reasonable chance of success.
Pfizer's claim is that they aren't responsible for anything because they were acting as an arm of the DoD, if I understand correctly.
Yes. For a LOT of detail see this post (skim and skip to the end) about how laws have been passed so that under EUA the normal vaccine rules/laws don't apply. So, depressingly, it appears to me that Jackson/Barne's lawsuit might be dismissed at some point. :
https://bailiwicknews.substack.com/p/american-domestic-bioterrorism-program?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android
And, here's some links to the Wash Post and Malone talking about how DARPA
"seeded the ground for a rapid coronavirus cure ... to find a way to produce antibodies for any virus in the world within 60 days of collecting a blood sample from a survivor";
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/how-a-secretive-pentagon-agency-seeded-the-ground-for-a-rapid-coronavirus-cure/2020/07/30/ad1853c4-c778-11ea-a9d3-74640f25b953_story.html
https://dhvi.duke.edu/news/darpa-names-researchers-working-halt-outbreaks-60-days-or-less and
mRNA Vaccines: The CIA and National Defense -- Why mRNA vaccines? Why is this being pushed?" https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/mrna-vaccines-the-cia-and-national
the mRNAs are being pushed specifically to shave off the time needed to properly study a new vax or drug; time being money. I think there was an FDA consensus that allowed them to go ahead and approve the mouse-tested bivalent, and they intend this platform for the entire vax schedule. No more maintaining a warm production line. No more years long trials. I expect to never see an official study of the full years long outcomes of the current live experiment. The CDC aren't even studying the data collected up to this point.
If they can get away with it, Unissant will be able to do the same thing. Pretty sure the lack of standing thing applied to the Brook Jackson case because of DoD and the CHD case on bait and switch because of FDA. The courts are trying to use a catch-22 to play Pontius Pilate.
Yes, there is little doubt that a lawsuit wouldn't succeed, but that's essentially true for all the fundamentally important lawsuits that could unwind the whole vaccination program. What would be important would be the information discovered, the responses, and the optics.
Progress, one person at a time.
Good for her!!!! It speaks well of her character to be able to pivot.
Much respect for the honesty of this person. Quite refreshing
Well done!