The Chloroquine Wars Part XLIV
Not to mention that early at-home treatment reduces mortality by 85+%.
Mathew, your blog posts are a joy to read. I have really few sources I trust regarding covid, but here is definitely one. Keep up the good work!
There are thousands of post vaxx c19 positive patients in VAERS. Maybe as many as ~30K reports, many deaths also show post vaxx c19 +. I would not doubt these get counted as c19 virus deaths rather than vaxx death only because it's not classified as a breakthrough yet! It's a total shimmey sham! I think it's protocol to give a patient with an AE a PCR test. The vaxx is probably feeding the virus stats. It's all spelled out here: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/HEpBeuAz9n9P/
The deaths are an easily proven hoax, the CDC and WHO decided in April last year to put covid as primary death after a positive PCR test as long as they die within 60 days. The average now is 95% of ''deaths'' have an average of 4 pre existing conditions and the mean age is 82.
The CDC released this new "report" last Friday (Sept. 10)...
They state that during the period from June 20 to July 17, 2021, vaccinated persons accounted for 18% of reported COVID-19 cases, 14% of hospitalizations, and 16% of deaths. Vaccination coverage during this period was reportedly 53%.
So they are acknowledging that the earlier reports that "99.2% of recent US deaths were among unvaccinated individuals" were untenable. Furthermore, they note that vaccine effectiveness is dropping over time: estimated at 90% from April 4 thru June 20, dropping to 80% from June 20 to July 17.
But they also admit that they are conflating "partially vaccinated" with unvaccinated individuals, leaving the door wide open for laundering vaccine-caused deaths as unvaxxed COVID-19 deaths.
They don't mention whether unvaxxed and vaccinated populations were tested for SARS-Cov2 infection at the same rates, nor whether the PCR test was set at different thresholds for the two populations. But presumably, the applicable CDC policies (only test for vaccinated breakthrough cases after hospitalization, and even then at much lower CT) were in place to bias the data collection process.
Thanks, Mathew, for providing the insights that make it possible to see through this CDC propaganda disguised as a research report.
The one potential explanation, not that I believe it, that could be used and would require further look into is the extensive use of the AZ vaccine which is the chimpanzee adenoviral vector rather than the favored mRNA vaccines used Stateside. That would be inconsistent with the original efficacy data posted by all parties involved, though.
In their vaccine efficacy study, the CDC categorized people with a positive test within 14 days of their first dose as unvaccinated, along with people who never received a dose.
The high risk group got vaccinated early and vaccination rate is more like 85%. So the 25% number does not apply evenly to all groups. The high risk group's vaccinated exposure number might be like 50-70%? That would bring the implied covid deaths between 200k and 300k, I guesstimate.