275 Comments

"I have often thought everything we have seen is part of one giant game of Hegelian pinball meant to keep us confused, divided, and off-balance." Exactly!

Expand full comment
Aug 14, 2023·edited Aug 15, 2023Pinned

"after quickly rejecting the corrupt culture that tried to pull me in at the age of 18 (after a successful summer internship solving one hard stats problem for the Human Genome Project, I was offered easy money to fake research papers)" - can you educate the trusting public on this? didn't know this was a thing.

Expand full comment

I’m drawing attention to a few cogent observations made by other commenters here, and will then make my own.

First, an excerpt from GLK, above:

“Malone appears to echo the standard Phd narcissist model that pervades nowadays…”

Second, from The Science Analyst:

“Malone still believes that politics, companies and media can be steered into the good direction. Which is a weakness….”

Yes to both of those comments. A thousand times, yes.

Over time the plandemic was easier for me to see through due to:

1. the unscientific use of masks for an airborne pathogen

2. the suppression of off-label use of approved medications

3. pushing a brand new medical technology as safe within such a short time period

Of course, pHarma has always skewed the regulatory approval process in their favor but the sheer recklessness here shocked even me.

Malone’s inability to see the last bit surprised me, but I think it might boil down to ego and belief in institutions.

Malone seems to require a lot of praise and attention as many PhD narcissist types do, and he’s highly invested in the idea of mRNA, but I could never understand how any biologist who claims to understand evolution could be so stupid as to take a mRNA vaccine.

It occurred to me in 2020 that one should not override the body’s natural defenses against mRNA. This is a HIGHLY conserved defense among almost all organisms, including bacteria. A biologist called Joomi? with a Substack has written some pieces on this. It’s a basic idea from biology textbooks. I remember pointing it out on Facebook in late 2020 but it was generally ignored by conventionally “smart” people, i.e. normies.

I then saw unconventionally smart people who I’d been very close with personally — but who were at the same time, very fearful of covid — dismiss me and publicly mock me.

If a biological defense is that highly conserved, it is very important to survival. To override it is a VERY bad idea. Basic logic of the precautionary principle in combo with risk/cost benefit analysis told me mRNA vaccines were a no-go territory except for a terminal disease. Indeed, that was the conventional wisdom in regulatory approval prior to the covid plandemonium. (Not that I agree with the concept of regulatory approval, but I digress...)

In January 2021 I then read Dr. Vanessa Schmidt-Kruger’s assessment of the vaccines and how they might affect cardiac health. This was presented to Fuellmich crew. Whatever one might think of that crew, I knew at this point the vaccines would be a disaster because there were so many other mechanisms for how they could harm that I’d not considered. (Shortly thereafter I learned of Yeadon’s statements warning about fertility concerns and GVB’s warnings about non-sterilizing vaccines, which also made theoretical sense to me).

One could call into question the motives of all of these people, of course, but for me it boiled down to this:

Can smart people really be this stupid?

I think the answer is "yes." And the reason for that lies in independence, and what one feels the need to defend (materially, intellectually, etc.).

Some people refuse to grow out of their beliefs in institutional solutions. These include a lot of well-meaning people in the MFM who refuse to question the validity of the authority of the state.

Are these people “controlled opposition”?

Are these people “controlled” by anything other than their own beliefs in limiting systems of the last 10.000 years?

Isn’t that control over the mind sufficient to keep them reigned in by the powers that be?

The Malones, Weinsteins, and RFJ Jrs of the world will only push more statism as a ‘solution.’ I prefer to think that they mean well (since they talk about decentralization), but I definitely believe they’re hamstrung by ego and confidence in governments, corporations, and institutions -- generally speaking.

There’s plenty of credulity to go around, apparently. Or it may simply be that such types have a lot to defend (materially, psychologically, intellectually, etc.). Humility isn’t their strong suit.

Expand full comment

I feel like Dr Meryl Nass' thoughts on Malone / Malone - Breggin, should be considered ~ https://merylnass.substack.com/p/breggin-and-malone-analysis-and-suggested

https://merylnass.substack.com/p/the-deep-state-attack-on-robert-malone

Malone's responses in his article make sense. It is low how he calls you "Mat", conflates you with Liam, and groups everyone together. You're not someone who would run with an assassination theory upon reading its headline.

The shots-render-people-technologically-capable-of-receiving-signals theory just got a little harder to believe, after this from Karen Kingston.

Expand full comment
Aug 14, 2023Liked by Mathew Crawford

Stopped following M when he began his wining about the Breggins. Truth will out all lies eventually.

Expand full comment
Aug 14, 2023Liked by Mathew Crawford

Thank you Matthew....you are the cooler brain that Malone pretends to have.

Expand full comment

Malone is a Chaos Agent. Everything he writes and says stinks of limited hangout disinfo nonsense. Sorry, but I call it like I see it.

Expand full comment
Aug 14, 2023Liked by Mathew Crawford

Anyone who has worked for/still works for a 3-letter agency is suspect at this point.

Expand full comment

Matt - my humblest apologies. I should have done this long ago. I just watched your DMED presentation (simplified version) where you conclusively prove the DMED data was completely manipulated. While the DMED manipulation is real, tragic, and grossly immoral, it pales compared to the Global Warming data lies.

As someone who went through the Climate Gate Wars over a decade ago, let me confidentially say "The entire Global Warming Scam is a data manipulation Scam." The same techniques that were used in the Covid Scam were used in Climate Gate; gross data manipulation and non-disclosure, deference to authority, branding skeptics dangerous "deniers" that want children to die (antivaxxers), the Science is settled, censorship, and career destruction. And of course, totally false data. A favorite trick of the Global Warming liars was to lower past temperatures (particularly the hot 1930's), increase current temperatures, use restricted data sets, hide everything, and shut down debate. While the DMED manipulation is terrible, the impacts of the Global Warming lies will destroy civilization, except for the psychopaths that want us all to die. The data manipulation is so great, without it there would be no warming. The Covid scammers want to kill people, the Global warming scammers want to kill society. Good sources for this are Anthony Watt's Watts Up with That. (WUWT) work. Thanks for all you do but we are fighting entrenched evil that got its playbook a decade ago. All the best.

Expand full comment
Aug 14, 2023Liked by Mathew Crawford

Thanks, Mathew. I am a free subscriber to Dr. Malone’s Substack, so I read that piece. I found it odd. Grownups don’t, or shouldn’t whine, and they owe everyone the minimal respect to spell a their name correctly. It was a bruised ego talking. One of the things the plandemonium has taught me is that credentials don’t necessarily mean anything absent performance.

Expand full comment

Austin-Fitts was, unfortunately, right on with the facts in the spring of 2020. I kind of hope she’s wrong about some of the things she has discussed recently but I very seriously doubt that she is. She saw the future then, clearly, and there is no reason to doubt her.

Expand full comment

I read Malone’s Substack and for the most part find him helpful and entertaining (Friday Funnies). However, his article in response to Karen Kingston clearly showed her as questionable. Malone’s comments attacking others, especially you, were unfounded and not necessary to address Karen’s accusations. I was a bit put off by it and was glad to read your response. Thank you. I appreciate how you don’t attack, only clarify.

Expand full comment

Nice summary and agree often what folks omit from discussion tells as much as what they say.

Expand full comment

I'm done with this fucking in-fighting. Anyone that posts like you just did, no matter who or what. I will refuse to follow or support. Are you clowns too stupid to understand the first rule of battle is to divide? To confuse? Don't start with why Malone is evil or anyone else you have your eyes on to destroy or defame. Do you guys not understand who the fucking real enemy is? Do you not understand the massive powers behind this nonsense? Do you not understand that evil Neocons are dragging us into a war where nukes fly? Do you not understand the rise of a cashless society will lead to extreme tyranny? Do you not know that the climate change hoax will be used for massive lockdowns when we revolt over Imperial Credits forced upon us to track every action we do and confiscate our assets, just as they did with Russia? THE RULE OF LAW HAS CEASED OPERATING! Do you understand what is happening right now and the tremendous loss of freedom? Yet, you fight over stupidity. You act like dolts fresh out of dumb school.

I swear some in this medical freedom movement still have their eyes glued shut and argue over kindergarten issues. It's pathetic!!! Grow up!

STOP this nonsense. I'm done!

Expand full comment

As it relates the Karen issue, I think it seems strange that Karen says that she hired a security firm who told her that her life is in danger, then she makes the leap to say that she "has a feeling" it is Malone who is the one trying to kill her. Simply having a feeling doesn't seem like good enough evidence to start publicly accusing someone of trying to kill you in my opinion. Nevertheless, I agree that Malone should not be suing people or portraying everyone who disagrees with him as working in some sort of coordinated effort to destroy him as he has done. I don't really trust Malone or Karen.

Expand full comment

We love you Mathew. You're truly one of the best brother.

Expand full comment