DMED Timeout: Reportable Events Shenanigans

Chaos Agents, Part 6

Click here to see other articles on Chaos Agents. 

Due to a migraine that siphoned excess time for writing away almost completely, I still haven't finished the critique of Died Suddenly. However, something happened in the meantime that requires immediate attention, and it's not entirely unrelated.

---

Yet Another Missed Opportunity

Senator Johnson held another hearing last Wednesday. A lot of officials with red totalitarian jelly on their hands were invited to speak, but probably ignored it. I was not there to speak.

I was told secondhand that I was invited to the hearing, and that Dr. Pierre Kory recommended that I speak. I was told that I would fly in and stay in D.C. on my own dime, and I said that was fine. Then I was told that I wasn't selected to speak.

Why did I find out about all of this secondhand through an intermediary and not Johnson's office or proxy organizer?

This would have been an excellent opportunity to lay out the corrected story regarding the DMED evidence, and explain to a large audience (1) the need for FOIAs, and (2) that Unissant would be a great target for investigation.

But I'm told the speaker list was kept short and that I wasn't on it. When I spoke to Sen Johnson's staffers about my findings eight or so months ago, they reflected back at me a complete dismissal of my findings. This has further put the breaks on the investigation into UNISSANT that should be taking place.

Briefly during the hearing, which was rhetorically quite powerful, more DMED data was presented. Dr. Theresa Long presented this time without attorneys Thomas Renz and Leigh Dundas acting as intermediaries before going on tour whipping up crowds with invalid data they either did not understand or did not care to present honestly.

What did Dr. Long have to say, this time?

28:52 - Dr. Long: "...These concerns were brushed aside as data glitches…"

Since there clearly was a database error (whether or not "glitch" is the appropriate term requires an investigation that did not take place), nobody bothered to handle that fact with interaction, I'd say that's our side's fault as much as theirs. But moving forward…

29:07 - Dr. Long: "Per your request, and as an update, last night I ran a query in the Defense Medical Epidemiology Database looking at all illnesses and injuries across the DoD. As you can see, the total number of Reportable Events…"

This look really, really bad. What's going on?

29:38 - "A Reportable Event is defined as an inherent significant threat to public health and military operations. A Reportable Event represents severe life threatening manifestations that disrupt military deployment…"

Let's stop here for a moment. Judging by this graph, these Reportable Events first surged in 2020, prior to vaccine rollout. In fact, 2021 saw more cases of COVID-19 than 2020 did, so looking at this data, one might begin to make the argument (whether or not we buy it) that this stunning increase in Reportable Events is due to COVID-19 itself, and not the vaccines. Of course, this comes with the admission that the vaccines didn't really stop infection or disease.

Obligatory Reminder: COVID-19 cases grew worse with vaccine uptake in the military.

Now, let's take a look at the history of the Reportable Events data because the problem with the first DMED data presentation was that nobody handling the data through presentation was sophisticated enough with data forensics to check the past history of the data. That's usually the first way to spot a problem. Do we spot a problem?

Yes, we do.

Here are queries from late January (after the so-called glitch was fixed) and from mid-October. The Reportable Events data through 2020 should be more or less identical aside from itty bitty updates to some past medical reports that are consistently under 1% until we get to the 2020 data.

Whoa! The data has changed AGAIN!

Note: While nobody else was paying attention to Reportable Events (it was the Ambulatory Reports being quoted the first time around), I studied them throughout the year for a variety of reasons. In particular, I noted the decidedly downward trend in Reportable Events through 2021 aside from a bump in 2019 that seemed weirdly more specific to the Navy than the rest of the Armed Forces. Of course, the navy is the branch associated with prior bioweapons research aimed at American citizens.

Here is the Reportable Events graph that's been in my slideshow for eight or nine months now:

Obviously, we did not have 2022 data yet, but the 2020 and 2021 data look ENTIRELY DIFFERENT from what the recent queries are showing!

To be clear: This seems to have nothing at all to do with the presumed glitch. Here are queries run 12 days apart, before and after the health databases were taken offline and the glitch was fixed. The Reportable Events data remained invariant down to the last report.

And, to be clear, the 2021 Reportable Events total was around 28,000 when queried early this year (both pre-glitch and just post-glitch). This is a far cry from the 152,000 number Dr. Long presented in Senate testimony.

So, not only has the DMED investigation been bafflingly and irresponsibly steered around anything like an investigation into Unissant, we have fresh new evidence of potential data tampering! Even weirder, this new round of data tampering propels the side of those who want to stop the experimental vaccination campaign, which includes me (well, after 90-something percent of the military was already jabbed, right?).

Do you even wonder how much of the MSM and MFM media is competing Hegelian narratives, and all this is just scripted theatrics from start to finish on both sides?

Well, are you amused, yet?

Is this why nearly all the MFM media refused to mention my findings, or buried them beneath more substantial coverage of the theatrics, despite the many analyses and stories I've helped uncovered? Is this why nearly everyone with any influence ignored RTE specifically from March of this year until very recently? (My link-ins went down 95% or so very suddenly compared to late-2021 and early-2022.)

Hmmmmm.

Brook Jackson 💜 @IamBrookJackson

A picture is worth a thousand words. I heard it over & over again yesterday in preparation for Sen. Johnson’s meeting today. Took the 1st flight out of DC today. I shouldn’t have gone back. Two round tables separated by 400 days & what’s different? More injuries & dead people

I'm with Brook. In fact, I pushed Brook's story and began setting up an interview platform partially with her in mind when I could tell she was being pointedly ignored several months ago. (I spoke harshly at a portion of the MFM for not interviewing and projecting her story and work, and I think I shamed some people into getting that ball rolling.)

If you want a fairly thorough discussion of the problems with the DMED analysis, and what actually happened, there are multiple interviews to watch, including this long one with Chris Masterjohn. Many of my friends said that this presentation I put together in October was the best explanation I've given.

Do you see it? Do you see at least some evidence that the narrative is controlled on both ends? It's certainly not conclusive, and the evidence may never reach that point, even if it's true. But there should at least be a discussion about all this.