The Vaccine Wars Part XXXVIII
Thank you so much for doing this, your work is invaluable. I'm not knees deep in the data and can't keep up with all of the statistics / maths / bio stuff involved so have just a peripheral understanding of what's happening here - but when I read your posts I come away feeling more educated.
I am also alarmed by certain vaccine skeptics being sloppy with their criticisms - It can end up giving ammo to those who want to write off skepticism of the Covid vaccines as "misinformation, dangerous, etc". It wouldn't surprise me if some fake memes / info are dropped into the ecosystem like with the Pfizer drops to cloud the reality of what's happening.
What you have discovered is massively important, but I think the reason it has failed to make waves is because it’s a more nuanced point that undermines the initial Renz disclosure. The Renz disclosure captured the imagination of those fighting for Covid truth because it was more in line with the cover-up tactics we’ve come to expect from the Covid perpetrators. As in “there were massive increases in the DMED data sets after the Covid vaccine, and when this was publicly disclosed, they attempted to hide it by retroactively manipulating the data pre-vaccine to make the rise in injury disappear.” This is a simple, easy to comprehend story and captured the imagination of the community. Once something sticks, it’s hard to course correct to a more accurate account of events. It’s unfortunate, but it plays a lot better than “no, you don’t understand, the DMED database itself is so hopelessly manipulated that it’s all fake. It’s fakeness is evidence in itself that something is vastly wrong and a huge deal as it renders our ability to accurately ascertain safety signals impossible, but we really can’t reach any definitive conclusions about the initial disclosure that captured all your imaginations until we get the real data.”
Thank you for illuminating the "National Security" aspect of this.
It seems we have little to no "National Security" in many ways beyond this issue and this is entirely by design.
Let us remind everyone that "National Security" is job #1 of the government, and without "National Security" we don't have ANYTHING!
That is right, no LGBT, CRT, Bill of Rights, Social Security, White Supremacy, Black Lives Matter, Indy 500, Super Bowl, Rule of Law (not meant to be funny), Donald J Trump, Joseph "Xi" Biden, Republicans (we don't have them anyway), Super Lotto, Tampons in the Mens Room, and this list is for starters.
So, this and any and all "National Security" issues should be of premier importance to any and all groups in America, no matter your race, gender, skin color, political persuasion, economic class, mental class, age, sex, religion, background, and so forth.
If there is ONE issue we should be able to come together as a nation this is it.
This is not "Rocket Science," people!
You can’t re-index your way into something that is essentially orderly. You can kill your database that way, but that is why you backup before you re-index. So this is a clear indication of fraud, because there is no other way to make this happen. Working with fraudulent data is a waste of time and money. Pointing out that it is fraudulent is priceless.
The answer is simple: They committed an act of fraud to hide the fact that their mandate was killing people. This would be murder, which is a capital offense in this country, except that it is actually an act of war. The enemy is the government, and they are at war with the people who have been attempting to stop their criminal acts through the election process. There is criminal intent to injure or kill. The sooner we face this, the sooner it ends.
But the problem is that we're all overwhelmed already, and the authorities aren't listening; in fact for the most part they're ignoring those of us who understand that there's deception everywhere. So we all converse with each other and their strategy is to ignore us, and to put us into categories so we can be managed.
Because, you see, we're all just "conspiracy theorists." So everyone has a handle on that logical category: conspiracy theorist. If you hear something that isn't on the news, then just take it and put it in that ready-made category: conspiracy theory. There. You're done. No thinking necessary!
Or, one could simply put it into the category of "baseless." That was easy.
All of this is probably (I'm 99% sure) deliberate: these categories of understanding (Kant, anyone?) are created for us so that we understand nothing.
The solution is basic but powerful logic. Yes, that sounds simple but my thesis that we can see but don't understand we can see: we've been deliberately conditioned not to see. But seeing with the eyes of logic opens new worlds for us. And it really is simple.
I'll have much more to say on this and will break it all down.
"I assumed that the information would propagate through our network and would be cause (for those of us who want to see the experimental mass injection campaign stopped) to make a ton of noise. But when I came up for air, I found that wasn't happening, and I'm truly baffled."
It's a head scratcher and a heartbreak to drop life altering truth bombs and feel as if the greatest impact has been exhausting your energy and resources. I never make guesses about why folks do anything but focus on what happens instead. This situation reflects a pattern that repeats in every activist space that has deep pocket, global PR and far flung resistance.
It won't make you feel any better about the results but you're in good company if you consider Edward Snowden leaked evidence of NSA's global spying and he's still living in exile as lying Clapper moves to a cushy media career and Julian Assange still in London's GITMO facing extradition for exposing war crimes despite the fundamental threat to free press and evidence of CIA plot to assassinate him verified in a Spanish Court. You're on your own to decide what lessons to draw from those cases but it's clear incontrovertible evidence isn't gam eover.
"I posit that (1) people who look at the numbers side-by-side pretty much always get it, and (2) people who do not look at the numbers side-by-side sometimes still get it and sometimes don't."
Probably safe to say my mathematically challenged brain is closer to average folks than yours. What most of us see turns blurry the instant we are faced with a spreadsheet. Ratios that leap out intuitively for you are factors of intimidation for us if they aren't instantly clear.
It's why Naomi's 1000% sticks like glue once it lands; the number and concept are easy to remember and visualize. Better still they reinforce core belief established by enough other facts it feels right. We saw this in early gmo reporting that highlighted terminator seeds which were mostly distraction and caught fire like the 1000% while the lie of FDA approval is still unassailed.
"An ounce of facade is worth a pound of substance" applies to most information for most people. Look at how many doctors believe they are well informed about COVID jabs because they can cite abstract summaries and read New York Times, Guardian, Bloomberg, WaPo etc.
To a practical suggestion from the numeric phobic peanut gallery. The chart needs to be way bigger it's impossible to see the numbers in the video even at full screen so when the potentially aha moment is lost for folks who might see.
The whole story is the two blow up boxes and they need to be the focus. Folks good with memes & tag lines asking how you identify Enron accounting and folks cooking the books, like where's Waldo find the fraud but it needs a viral hook. Answers are over my pay grade, at best all you get are questions, observations & hugs. <3
Mathew, thank you for explaining this so clearly. I will send to my reps in Congress, however, living in California, I don't see that being of much help. I have written to all of them before. Both Senators Feinstein and Padilla will respond by thanking me for supporting the very thing about which I wrote asking them to vote Nay. Linda Sanchez does not even acknowledge that she has received anything. However, I have to try. As your opening quote intimates, silence is not an option, and gives a wink to those who are complicit in the deception.
Did you contact and share with Naomi Wolf and Steve Bannon?
Thank you, Mathew for your thorough review of what there is.
I generally don’t feature numbers of casualties from “vaccination” because as you’ll know, I major on the total deceit of it all.
The question that needs to be asked (by someone good like Sen. Ron Johnson or an attorney for the Navy Seals) is this: “If the commander-in-chief issued an order to falsify the DMED database, would that be a *lawful* order?”
It would be a trap question for the administration, and here’s why: They *could* contend that the Commander-in-Chief DOES have the right to conceal a potential weakness of the US military from an adversary. In a time of potential conflict, they could argue that it would be irresponsible to publish a broad-based weakness (vaccine injury) affecting (perhaps) thousands of US military personnel.
On the other hand, the administration might contend that falsifying the DMED data would be an *unlawful* order. If they do, it could lead to whistleblowers coming forward to admit they were ordered to falsify the data. In other words, such an order could have been issued by someone below the C-i-C. (Your work certainly suggests that it was.) Then, it might be possible to work up the chain of command to the true source (which might be *very* high up indeed).
I think the key is simply to *ask the question*. Either answer (yes or no) would open MANY doors.
I will add that if the administration makes an argument that the DMED *IS* legally subject to falsification by the C-i-C due to “national security interests,” it would open the door to other very pointed questions. For example, would it be legal for the C-i-C order that “vaccine injury deaths be classified as deaths by suicide*? 🤔
So to summarize: the data is faked, but we don't know how, which leaves a vacuum for people to make up ideas about how it was faked, and to be manipulated to make those who question the false vaccines look like they don't know what they are talking about?
" Something went wrong" when I tried to like. Will share this on my Gettr and try to share to Dr Wolf and Bannon.
If false / bad data is being released, and promoted, it could very well be a tactic to make "noisy" the claims and act as a red herring any future claims. The public and politicians will then just think it is misinformation, even though the truth is among the noise.
Glad Naomi called you! God bless and stay strong.
My only thought is to reach out to Pam Popper who works closely with Tom Renz and is the head of MAFA. My experience with her is that she is always open to new data, and I would be surprised (and very disappointed!) if she ignored your interpretation. She wants to get it right, and has repeatedly stated that she wants everything vetted to avoid the dissemination into and adoption of bad information in our camp. firstname.lastname@example.org, or call Wellness Forum Health at 614-841-7700.
Mathew – Perhaps this has already been answered, but have you taken steps to archive the critical trade industry data snapshots in some neutral, verified manner so that they cannot simply be memory-holed by powerful interests? Or do they perhaps already exist in a form that could not be disappeared?