"the fact remains that they aren’t yet on the whole doing so"
All we need is for a few leaders and lawyers to do so. We're not talking about reversing all of mass psychosis here.
"that it isn’t the slam dunk they thought it was, even if you are instead presenting us with a drawn foul and two made free throws."
1. It's an identifiable database.
2. It's used by the CDC.
3. It's a matter of national security.
4. The changes are irrefutable.
5. This could open the door to finding out if unlawful orders were issued to the military. If that is the case, those orders need not be followed, and this could lead to the removal of a top level general or even the sitting president.
This is a dunk over Michael Jordan. What is your goal, here?
Jarrod’s explanation makes sense to me. We’re in a world where massive data manipulation is the norm. Funny numbers and bullshit is the norm. Not caring that your argument is built on funny numbers and bullshit is the norm. We have a bigger problem than one fake data set.
"the fact remains that they aren’t yet on the whole doing so"
All we need is for a few leaders and lawyers to do so. We're not talking about reversing all of mass psychosis here.
"that it isn’t the slam dunk they thought it was, even if you are instead presenting us with a drawn foul and two made free throws."
1. It's an identifiable database.
2. It's used by the CDC.
3. It's a matter of national security.
4. The changes are irrefutable.
5. This could open the door to finding out if unlawful orders were issued to the military. If that is the case, those orders need not be followed, and this could lead to the removal of a top level general or even the sitting president.
This is a dunk over Michael Jordan. What is your goal, here?
Jarrod’s explanation makes sense to me. We’re in a world where massive data manipulation is the norm. Funny numbers and bullshit is the norm. Not caring that your argument is built on funny numbers and bullshit is the norm. We have a bigger problem than one fake data set.