I meant more that he is moving more towards spectacle and emotion than data because there's already piles of data being ignored.
Your argument, after you boiled it down, is a single slide and very compelling. I think he has just left principle behind in favor of spectacle. Maybe something to do with the tap on the shoulder?
I meant more that he is moving more towards spectacle and emotion than data because there's already piles of data being ignored.
Your argument, after you boiled it down, is a single slide and very compelling. I think he has just left principle behind in favor of spectacle. Maybe something to do with the tap on the shoulder?
I meant more that he is moving more towards spectacle and emotion than data because there's already piles of data being ignored.
Your argument, after you boiled it down, is a single slide and very compelling. I think he has just left principle behind in favor of spectacle. Maybe something to do with the tap on the shoulder?