60 Comments
May 20, 2022Liked by Mathew Crawford

There will never be a way to know the real numbers with all of the intentional fraud for $$$. My 85 yr old dad had a lab diagnosed UTI that was not responding quickly enough to Bactrim at home. He needed IV antibiotics so fearfully I took him to the hospital. They refused to even evaluate him to start, even though his Primary Dr. suggested IV’s, without the $COVID$ PCR test. What a shock his $PCR$ test was +. I signed all admittance forms manually writing NO REMDESIVIR, NO VENT on every page. After a twit of an NP tried to scare me my dad might die from $Covid$ but not to fear he had an antiviral $REMDESIVIR$ that could save him. I emphatically refused telling him we were not there for $Covid$ *ONLY* his UTI. Within 24 hrs they dropped the quarantine BS realizing they were not getting the 20% $Remdesivir$ bonus. His UTI cleared and was to be released on the day he died suddenly. I paid for an independent autopsy that showed unequivocally he bled to death, but had no $Covid$ whatsoever or any for of pneumonia only a stomach, duodenum, & intestines full of blood. Most likely (my belief) the result of the CMS protocol of Lovenox to prevent clots. However, his Death Certificate reads: #1. Pulmonary Embolism (mind you they held him in the ER for an extra 7 hrs to do a CT with & without imaging to make sure he had no $Covid$ clots before admitting him) #2. had recent $Covid$. Hopefully, the IN Attorney Generals office that has an investigation open now since I have the autopsy proof will prove FRAUD, charge and prosecute. My dad’s case may be one less $Covid$ death on the Midwest Stats, but unfortunately most families are not getting the autopsies done to hold these lying, greedy monsters accountable to give true meaning to the data. The biggest Ponzi money laundering scheme ever thought up and this far executed flawlessly.

Expand full comment

BTW, he was unvaccinated so the PE fear was never real either since the vaccinated are the one’s with the clots if the data were to be ever truly presented accurately.

Expand full comment

So they claimed he had recently had Covid when he had not?

Expand full comment

Worthless PCR positive and he never had symptoms. However, every single patient is forced to be tested at this hospital or they refused to treat. They knew it was a false positive since they dropped all quarantine and PPE requirements by the next morning. If they believed his PCR test was accurate they would have kept the quarantine and only one guest per day with PPE requirement. The autopsy later proved the false positive.

Expand full comment

Glad you are pursuing this. Sorry for your loss and for your Dad. (God bless)

Expand full comment

Thank you very much. It is my way of honoring my dad by seeking truth and justice to help those to come.

Expand full comment

Bless you for doing this. May your Dad be at peace, and perhaps enjoy being part of the huge team of ancestors on the side of truth and justice and accountability.

Expand full comment

I certainly hope he is at peace and somehow knows I am working in his absence and memory for justice. Thank you for the kind thoughts.

Expand full comment
May 20, 2022Liked by Mathew Crawford

Could the noise also be explained by the "deaths with/from COVID" debacle where COVID played a mostly immaterial role in a large number of deaths (possibly enough to drown out any beneficial effect of the vaccine in noise)

Expand full comment
author
May 20, 2022·edited May 20, 2022Author

That's a reasonable question that authorities will never want to answer. If clearing that up revealed reasonable levels of vaccine efficacy, it would also reveal reduced risk-benefit per efficacy. It's a wash, and also carries less fear factor.

Edit: It would also further crush the already thin justification for vaccinating anyone young at all.

Good question rewarded with 30 day subscription.

Expand full comment
May 20, 2022Liked by Mathew Crawford

I wish I had something intelligent to say here. I got the gist of your findings, loved the music and your wonderful sense of humour. Thank you.

Expand full comment
author

I love Rodrigo y Gabriella. Have seen them twice live---a rarity for me. I'm glad sharing their craft pleases some ears.

Expand full comment

So Phizer sold 50billion worth of spike proteins that most succedded in damaging people, while a legion of bureaucrats did ten trillion+ damage to the country, for the love of money and the urge to power?

Expand full comment

& the ones who made it this far will be big pharma customers for life with injuries.

Expand full comment

Pretty much sums it up. All about money, control, power. No health or safety was ever considered, just fear mongering to push toxic vaccines on everyone. When they went for the children, it became demonic.

Expand full comment

Nobody could have known...

Expand full comment
May 20, 2022Liked by Mathew Crawford

Your quote from the Screwtape Letters caught my eye. Am in middle of reading That Hideous Strength (actually re-reading - I read it first as a teenager, when many of the implications of the tale went right over my head). C.S. Lewis, along with Orwell and others, was so remarkably prescient...

Expand full comment

N.I.C.E, the National Institute of Co-ordinated Experiments, is "the first-fruits of that constructive fusion between the state and the laboratory on which so many thoughtful people base their hopes of a better world. It was to be free from almost all the tiresome restraints--'red tape' was the word its supporters used--which have hitherto hampered research in this country."

Expand full comment
May 20, 2022Liked by Mathew Crawford

One might have to take a look at all cause mortality in the individual states to determine whether or not the COVID/not COVID data is corrupted. In short, what I am saying is that some states, after the election, might have suddenly started to undercount COVID deaths, especially after the vaccination programs were pushed in early 2021.

Expand full comment
author

ACM tells us different things, and we can add that to the data set.

For the larger purposes, I will have a few articles showing that at this juncture, C19 has essentially nothing to do with vaccination.

Expand full comment

And I don't think we can dismiss the probability that a lot of state government public health officials will be far more reluctant to write "COVID related" on a death certificate of someone who was vaccinated and boosted, and far less reluctant to do so on a unvaccinated person. The data is the data, but the data here is probably very corrupt giving the politics involved.

Expand full comment

Absolutely agree.

Expand full comment

My favorite thing about California has been their hiding of negative efficacy. Happens everywhere else in the world, but not here. My mom thinks I should have died 20 times because I'm not vaxxed.

"From April 18, 2022 to April 24, 2022, unvaccinated people were 4.8 times more likely to get COVID-19 than people who received their booster dose"

https://covid19.ca.gov/state-dashboard/#postvax-status

Fun with numbers!!

Expand full comment
May 20, 2022Liked by Mathew Crawford

At the Santa Fe Institute in New Mexico, they have a Fractal Faculty. I nominate you for department head of the Fractal Faculty of the dissenters. Or maybe the Edelweiss Pirates (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edelweiss_Pirates), since the global resonances with the last days of the Weimar Republic are unmistakable. Thank you for staying with this.

Expand full comment
May 22, 2022Liked by Mathew Crawford

Robert Bird is from West Virginia. We had Strom Thurmond

Expand full comment
author

Arg, thank you. I certainly knew that and this was one of those "oops, getting older means ten billion facts no longer catalog so cleanly in the brainofile" moments.

Expand full comment
May 20, 2022Liked by Mathew Crawford

Very interesting Mathew. Thank you for doing this work. It looks like a few states like OK and FL had waning vaccine rates (less to plot as time went on). There does seem to be a usual lack of negative correlation that would show the "vaccines" are effective. I recommend adding the word "COVID" or "Covid" in front of deaths on the chart titles to be clear it is Covid deaths and not all cause deaths being plotted.

Expand full comment
author

I will alter future chart titles.

I would fix these except arranging them took hours.

Expand full comment
May 20, 2022Liked by Mathew Crawford

Speaking of fractals and self-similarity, in May of 2021 the map of the shoreline of lies looked a hundred miles long. And in May of 2022 it is looking as long as people like Mathew can keep looking for lying.

Expand full comment
author
May 20, 2022·edited May 20, 2022Author

It's Nordic

Expand full comment

Data from an Ontario study showed the vaxxed and unvaxxed had the same Covid hospitalization and death rates from December 14, 2020 to August 7, 2021.

https://twitter.com/rubiconcapital_/status/1428106825799540742

And when I was following all-cause mortality data from the CDC month by month from March 2020 through April 2021, there was no rise in all-cause mortality from the previous five-year average.

NOW they claim there was a surge in all-cause mortality from March 2020 through June 2020, but that was never in the monthly or annual data as of April 30, 2021. So I don't believe the claimed surge in spring of 2020 now.

Because of those data points, I assumed Covid-19 was fake (or at worst a bad cold/flu) and I assumed the shots were placebos. To support that view, there were periodic stories in the media of people who had gotten saline instead of real shots at various Walgreens outlets and clinics.

Then we started getting all-cause mortality data for 2021 and I stopped assuming the shots were placebos. This data came from the insurance industry (the Society of Actuaries just put out a 56-page report). There was death certificate data from Massachusetts with a clear rise in all-cause mortality, with the cause of excess deaths being mostly clots and cardiovascular issues. We got detailed data from a county in Indiana. And we got data from Big Funeral -- large funeral home/casket/cremation chains whose stocks trade on the NYSE. The excess mortality was always in people under age 65.

We also started seeing case studies showing ADE in the vaxxed. Molecular biologist Dolores Cahill was saying before the shots were ever released that people who got them would virtually all die of ADE and the authorities would call it organ failure. She said the ADE could be triggered by exposure not just to SARS-CoV-2 but to any coronavirus (i.e. the common cold).

And that's what we're seeing. We're seeing heart failure in 18-year-olds. My wife's mother died suddenly of kidney failure after no history of kidney problems. We're seeing hepatitis in children resulting in liver transplants and death. While the children were unvaxxed, I would bet they were living with vaxxed parents who shed spike protein via exosomes. The parents may even have shed the shot mRNA in its lipid nanoparticles, which are recognized by the body as exosomes.

They also started removing fibrin clots from people the size of carrots, typically with multiple branches and sub-branches, like trees. Here's a thread on those babies, with photos:

https://twitter.com/janiesaysyay/status/1486115772640362496

So I don't trust CDC data at all. There's no way that spring 2020 excess all-cause mortality could have remained hidden for over a year.

I think the all-cause excess mortality since the start of vax mandates, which is showing up from such a variety of sources, is good evidence that the shots kill and will continue killing. But the deaths will not be counted as Covid deaths. They'll be counted as strokes and heart attacks and organ failure. They'll only be counted as Covid deaths if the person is unvaccinated. They're already obviously trying to cloak the deadliness of the shots with false claims about Covid.

I expect Dolores Cahill is right that the excess mortality rate will surge two years after the start of vaxxing (this coming winter) and then stay high. She didn't expect a lot of excess mortality yet at this point-- only a couple of percent due to allergic reactions and then inflammation and clotting. Dolores Cahill thought the vaxxed would all be dead within 10 years of their shots. But she didn't know about the cobra & viper venom inserts that cause the fibrin clots (same type of clots as in envenomed prey). And she didn't foresee the HIV inserts, which are actually causing immunodeficiency. And she didn't know about the prion inserts, which are already causing CJD, Alzheimer's, etc. Other scientists who know the full picture are now predicting a lifespan of 2-5 years from the first shot.

And I think Geert Vanden Bosch may be right that we can expect a pandemic among the vaxxed but not the unvaxxed, not so much because Covid is so dangerous but because the shots make the vaxxed so much sicker because of ADE and autoimmunity, even upon exposure to the common cold.

And I expect the authorities will lie to everyone all the way through. Fortunately for them, people will be distracted by the coming market crash and economic crisis.

Expand full comment

Thanks for that brilliant 65+ graphic. Truly, a picture worth (some large number) words.

Expand full comment

Is there any way you can provide a graph of what we might expect very efficacious and slowly waning procedures to have looked like ? I know several of my mathematically/statistically illiterate friends will have no clue how to interpret these otherwise.

Expand full comment
author

If I get the chance I may do that next week. I have another DMED article to write for now.

Expand full comment

Correlation does not equal causation. But, under any metric involving public health, the public health authorities have completely failed at their job. If there was justice, they would all be fired for having forced a course of action that had no positive impact on the course of the pandemic. Then, we could bring in new management to show us the real data. Or we could just disband the entire government run public health bureaucracy.

Even if we take the the PHA’s at their word on the data, the data still shows that they failed. Arguing about how wrong the data might be doesn’t excuse the amount of failure they have already admitted to.

Expand full comment
author

Correlation need not imply causation, but causation leads to correlation unless substantially interfered with by other variables that I will explore in subsequent articles.

And really, we should see more similarity among the fractals than we do if the vaccines were highly effective.

Expand full comment

My complaint is simpler than that. The PHA’s will try to explain away any correlation showing that vaccines, masks, NPI’s didn’t make a difference or made things worse. They will just say correlation doesn’t mean causation and it could have been worse.

It isn’t a legitimate excuse anymore. Everything that they have suggested or mandated has failed to improve conditions. Public health has failed. Arguing about the specifics and the made up data is a distraction. The PHA’s faking the data to show that the unvaccinated have worse outcomes than the vaccinated doesn’t matter. The actual vaccine campaign itself has failed based on any population wide metric. They should all be fired based on that fact alone.

Expand full comment
author

Let them make their arguments. Statistics are always in the eye of the beholder. The people who simply say, "Jump through hoops" without connecting to any logic reveal themselves as empty methodologists.

This is the first of numerous articles with this data set.

Expand full comment

I feel the need to express my argument in a different way. According to the technocratic ideals driving the public health authorities, the PHA’s have failed at their job. They promised that if we followed their dictates, they would save us from Covid. They did not save us from Covid. They didn’t even reduce the spread. Here in the north eastern states, we have a higher case rate than we did during the peak of the 2021 winter wave.

Therefore, even the people who believe in the technocratic mission of the CDC and PHA’s should be able to admit that they failed and should be replaced. We don’t need to argue that they are lying about the data. We can use their own data to show that their management of the Covid crisis has failed. As a technocratic institution that follows the Science, this argument should be enough to drive them from power.

To be clear, I am convinced their was never a technocratic solution to Covid, or to most any other crisis. If, however, we are forced to play by the rules of the technocrats, we can still defeat them based on the fact their plans almost always fail. We don’t even have to argue about the specifics of why their plans have failed. As the purported expert class, just the fact that their results were the opposite of what was promised should be enough to prove that they are not actually the experts.

Expand full comment

I agree completely. I just wish there was some way to dismiss their empty rhetoric of “masks work”, and “safe and effective”, and “stay home, save lives” and just force them to confront the basic data and trends, and admit their failure. Reasons for the failure don’t matter. Just the admission of failure is needed to start the process of determining all of the errors and propaganda they forced upon us.

Expand full comment