I am hearing from some people that my [obviously fabricated] story about aliens was a bit confusing. That was a challenging article, and I wanted to deliver it with good humor, and that may have made it a bit tougher. Note that the story is not about whether or not aliens exist. The story cannot prove that they do or don't exist or visit Earth. The best way to proceed is to
Carefully identify the moment you knew it wasn't real,
Go back and look for clues you might have missed due to giving me credit for honesty, or wanting to believe this would be a story that vindicates your priors,
Think about the trajectory of your mental state, and whether or not that could be manipulated by…master manipulators,
Apply all this to the second story for partial understanding of what Wokeness is about.
This is not an easy lesson at all, but it's best that people experience it first without a complete walkthrough.
Is the DoD at the Center of the Plandemonium?
This has always been my primary hypothesis stretching back before my interview with Ari Whitten where I said this is all about the dollar. The military is the currency, and extraordinary events we are living through are most likely part of a larger financial war that revolves around the failing of the dollar. That's a tough concept for a lot of people, so I'll be writing more about it soon.
VRBPAC Replay
A few RTE readers asked for an isolated recording of my VRBPAC talk. I need to go ahead and learn the easiest way to make short clips of longer videos, which may depend on what software I use for podcasting. However, I spoke at 5:57:15 for those who are interested in watching/listening.
Watching Biologist Jay Couey's reaction in real time is a lot of fun (56:05). On another note: his show is excellent and highly unique. Being on Twitch rather than Substack or YouTube means he is probably missing some audience, but I bet that audience is growing because he invites on some uniquely undercovered guests, including Charles Rixey who has adeptly dissected a lot of shenanigans surrounding the SARS-CoV-2 zoonosis origins theory.
One of the Greatest Projects of the Pandemic Era
Speaking of shenanigans, if there are just a half a dozen projects during the pandemic revealing indisputable proof of shenanigans at the data level, this is one of them:
This project is what provided the source of the data used by the great Metatron in his analysis on Massachusetts data here.
I cannot understate the importance of this project, which is now being replicated for another state. If you are motivated to follow the process or help with the work (yes, you can), subscribe to those substacks.
Mask Efficacy
There have been numerous disturbingly poor studies on mask efficacy during the plandemonium. While it was not my top priority, I dissected one of those studies previously.
The Bangladesh study looked bad from the start, as pointed out months ago by a really bad naughty kitten. Bad kitten.
But criticisms grew among humans, too. At some point, Steve Kirsch organized a discussion-oriented debate by Dr. Jason Abaluck who led the study and Dr. James Lyons-Weiler. You can find the discussion here:
Stunning was the admission that the p-value for the study was computed from around 10,000 people, but scaled to 300,000 (if I understand correctly). This appears to be an egregious form of p-hacking that shatters the study on face. It's the kind of story that might be a toy example in a conversation on ethics in a university classroom (if that sort of thing still happens in universities). In an email exchange I was on, but did not participate in after the debate, Dr. Abaluck threw out a few insults and then left the discussion. Thoughts from Steve Kirsch:
The TOGETHER Trial
I'm starting to think that trials named with all capital letters are the places to look for result engineering. The minds behind IVMmeta.com delivered a blistering critique of that study. Alex Marinos then went deep to examine claims, counterclaims, and relate them to the data.
It is extremely hard to believe this Gates-funded study was not designed to fail for the case of ivermectin in particular.
Further thoughts via Dr. Tess Lawrie:
And on another note, Lawrie continues the call that many are raising to speak up about the WHO's attempt at a mass power grab.
When the Fringe are Healthy and Successful
I had a lovely chat with He Who Goes by Metatron after discovering his mission and mine are highly similar and complementary. Aside from an affinity for decentralized technology (which I would love to apply to my educational mission), we discussed hyperlocalization, which I had previously called "relocalization" for the past few years when describing the same idea in discussions with friends. Here is an interesting interview on the topic with a woman who might have been previously called "fringe", but who now looks more and more prescient. I don't agree with every part of her description of the world's problems, but with the important framing and general spirit.
When it all breaks down, communities will rebuild it. Those stuck in dependence will fail, but there is always time for a gut check. It's time to find and develop your community. Good luck and best wishes!
Good morning Matthew - on the Masking front, one of the completely unmentioned (other than my blog https://controlgroup.science/2021/08/27/mask-mandate-science/ ) negatives of masking is the inhalation of microplastic particles, which can probably never be removed from lung tissue. For just the science go here - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7773316/
Healthy intellects almost by definition must contain the scars of years of examining where they were wrong. It's when people are not allowed to be wrong, or always given extra chances to be right, that they end up in frames of mind where they will simply believe what it is they're being told.
I had the (fortunate?) experience of growing up in a christian cult that dissolved itself as I became an adult and learning the value of spotting the signs that what you're being told is bullshit, even when the person telling you doesn't want you to see that.
The post on aliens vs wokeness is a good technique for getting people to examine their thinking, if only they'll admit to themselves they were fooled. That's the first step for everyone, admitting to yourself that you can be fooled, that you have been fooled, and that you may be fooled again.