In retrospect, I think the window of time is key. While my wife never showed severe symptoms, her recovery to ship-shape was 3x longer than mine. My own investigations of other accounts seemed to yield similar results. The sooner the protocol is started, the faster the recovery time (which stands to reason from a virologic standpoint, actually).
In retrospect, I think the window of time is key. While my wife never showed severe symptoms, her recovery to ship-shape was 3x longer than mine. My own investigations of other accounts seemed to yield similar results. The sooner the protocol is started, the faster the recovery time (which stands to reason from a virologic standpoint, actually).
IVM together with zinc prevents viral replication. That is why early treatment is essential and Pierre Kory has pointed out studies indicating the first 72 hours are the window of opportunity with that treatment. Delay increases the risk of longCovid of one form or another. I only had one patient, treated early, develop long Covid and she unfortunately received the 3 day treatment at .4 mg/kg only. Subsequently the FLCCC increased to 0.6mg/kg for 5 days. I did that as well but actually recommended that people continue using a lower dose of IVM/zinc for two weeks. Nobody developed long Covid with that treatment. Of course, Vit C, D, and aspirin (i recommend adult strngth for 1 month) were part of the treatment as well.
obviously, you headed off viral replication long before she did.
on another disgusting note, it's factually true that some hospitals successfully argued in court against being forced to treat patients with ivermectin due to its inhibiting of viral replication, because by the time where they were in court adjudicating it, the argument was made that there was no chance for ivermectin to head off the replication and the despicable judges agreed.
In retrospect, I think the window of time is key. While my wife never showed severe symptoms, her recovery to ship-shape was 3x longer than mine. My own investigations of other accounts seemed to yield similar results. The sooner the protocol is started, the faster the recovery time (which stands to reason from a virologic standpoint, actually).
IVM together with zinc prevents viral replication. That is why early treatment is essential and Pierre Kory has pointed out studies indicating the first 72 hours are the window of opportunity with that treatment. Delay increases the risk of longCovid of one form or another. I only had one patient, treated early, develop long Covid and she unfortunately received the 3 day treatment at .4 mg/kg only. Subsequently the FLCCC increased to 0.6mg/kg for 5 days. I did that as well but actually recommended that people continue using a lower dose of IVM/zinc for two weeks. Nobody developed long Covid with that treatment. Of course, Vit C, D, and aspirin (i recommend adult strngth for 1 month) were part of the treatment as well.
This also makes sense, as I continued the dosage for a full week, even after symptoms disappeared.
Smart move. Long Covid is something to be avoided if at all possible.
obviously, you headed off viral replication long before she did.
on another disgusting note, it's factually true that some hospitals successfully argued in court against being forced to treat patients with ivermectin due to its inhibiting of viral replication, because by the time where they were in court adjudicating it, the argument was made that there was no chance for ivermectin to head off the replication and the despicable judges agreed.