1 Comment
⭠ Return to thread

"Unfortunately he seems to have become a bit too enamored for his own theories and does not understand some essential points."

Can you explain what he doesn't understand?

"In this present article Mat again uses “pneumonia” as though it is a univocal word. With COVID (and this directly contradicts JJ’s erroneous statement) the pneumonia seen was NOT one of bacterial pneumonia, but was inflammatory in nature."

I've made no statements at all distinguishing between the forms of pneumonia simply because it has not related to any points I was making. Nor do I understand why the nature of it changed, so I shouldn't say too much.

"When the early pathology images came out of Italy, it was clearly NOT due to a secondary bacterial infection, it was an inflammatory process."

I'm not sure how you determine that the inflammatory process does not involve bacteria. It might be a new bacteria-virus interaction at play. If you have specific information beyond that, please share it.

Expand full comment