You gotta do what is yours to do. We’re lucky to have someone with courage and integrity to stand against the dragon and that alone can inspire the rest of us to do what is ours to do. I really think people aren’t quite understanding the gravity of it. When I tell people, they shrug it off as just another data crime. It’s a story you need to hear a few times before it sinks in properly.
I love Dune. I love Ender’s Game. An omitted aspect in the film are Peter and Valentine’s stories. As Ender’s siblings, they provided the extremes of humanity- psychopathy to unwavering empathy, and their back and forth philosophical op eds in the book are still so relevant.
Hi Mathew, I got notification earlier today that I was selected to speak at the June 28 "Future Framework" VRBPAC meeting. I remember vividly that last time you had an issue getting your slides accepted. I'm using a Mac, so I guess I'd be using Keynote to generate slides, if that's kosher with them, but as someone who's yet to present, I wanted to know what you've discerned about the whole slideshow aspect in case it could help me.
There is no rule of law anymore, and with the approval of the shots for babies it’s apparent fraud doesn’t matter either. The baby trial was clearly fraudulent with its immuno- bridging and no explanation of where 3/4 of the trial participants disappeared to. And the EUA for this poison was unanimously approved for an emergency that doesn’t exist. I admire your persistence and courage, but it doesn’t seem to matter what is uncovered. They believe they can’t be stopped (see sentence one.)
I am halfway through the interview with Masterjohn. Who has legal access or security clearance to look at the data, and whether Mathew is looking at publicly available data? or looking at data that whistle blowers have pulled out from under the secret access? I don't care about details, but I like a sense of whether I am looking at data on Mathew's slides that are secrets? or public?
It is a confounding issue. Clearly the west is ruled by a cabal of ruthless psychopaths possessing overwhelming financial resources.
When met with opposition their first response is to censor and ridicule. If that is not effective, their fallback is to buy the opposition off (as you are discovering) or blackmail (à la Epstein). If that does not work, then professional ruin. Finally, assassination.
The CIA has followed this playbook for a long time and it is effective. I tend to agree with you that it is going to require a wholesale upheaval of society to change this dynamic.
I went to bed very late last night watching your interview with Masterjohn., I think I've watched all your interviews on this topic, and I learn something new each time. I agree that this was the best one. I was very hopeful that when this information came out in January of this year it would cause a storm to stir thing up and stop the poisonings and the deceit, the abuse of power. Alas, no. This is such a big story, crime, that I too don't understand why others aren't covering it (fear is my guess). I agree that this is the way to wake people up as it is an enclosed population r, symbolic of the rest of the country (or even the world) and certainly a national security issue. I am glad you took it on as you are most capable, intrepid, and stubborn; thank you. We have been living in a sham democracy for over two years and I agree with you here also that it's time to stop the pretense and this issue could shine a light on the true state of things. DoD is at the center of the plandemic and so I am not very optimistic either, in the short term. But truth always finds a way.
I'll need to watch the video, but I'm skeptical that fraud on the DoD's part can be proven beyond a reasonable doubt. Brook Jackson has definitely proven Pfizer engaged in fraud, if only through Ventavia as a proxy, but you would need a DoD insider to attest to the fact that the DMED was deliberately altered with an intent other than to make it more accurate. The data is definitely inaccurate, but the DHA denying that could be attributed to them just following the straightforward incentive to not report that they're all jacked up. Sprinkle a little motivated reasoning on top and you might have a bunch of senior folks just adamantly saying the data is solid, because they asked their people who's rating depends on it being solid, and they said it was solid. Who the hell is going to prove them wrong? Just like the intel that Saddam had WMD was solid. Was that deliberate, or was believing that just wishful thinking on the part of a ruling class that wanted a justification to neutralize a regime that expressed some interest in challenging the petrodollar?
There's that line attributed to Groucho Marxx about not joining any club that would have him as a member. Could it apply to Mathew and the "weird" job offers?
🙏 Thank you Matthew for your courage. This country needs more courage and less conformity. 🛡
You gotta do what is yours to do. We’re lucky to have someone with courage and integrity to stand against the dragon and that alone can inspire the rest of us to do what is ours to do. I really think people aren’t quite understanding the gravity of it. When I tell people, they shrug it off as just another data crime. It’s a story you need to hear a few times before it sinks in properly.
I love Dune. I love Ender’s Game. An omitted aspect in the film are Peter and Valentine’s stories. As Ender’s siblings, they provided the extremes of humanity- psychopathy to unwavering empathy, and their back and forth philosophical op eds in the book are still so relevant.
Hi Mathew, I got notification earlier today that I was selected to speak at the June 28 "Future Framework" VRBPAC meeting. I remember vividly that last time you had an issue getting your slides accepted. I'm using a Mac, so I guess I'd be using Keynote to generate slides, if that's kosher with them, but as someone who's yet to present, I wanted to know what you've discerned about the whole slideshow aspect in case it could help me.
Thanks and God bless for what you're doing.
There is no rule of law anymore, and with the approval of the shots for babies it’s apparent fraud doesn’t matter either. The baby trial was clearly fraudulent with its immuno- bridging and no explanation of where 3/4 of the trial participants disappeared to. And the EUA for this poison was unanimously approved for an emergency that doesn’t exist. I admire your persistence and courage, but it doesn’t seem to matter what is uncovered. They believe they can’t be stopped (see sentence one.)
I am halfway through the interview with Masterjohn. Who has legal access or security clearance to look at the data, and whether Mathew is looking at publicly available data? or looking at data that whistle blowers have pulled out from under the secret access? I don't care about details, but I like a sense of whether I am looking at data on Mathew's slides that are secrets? or public?
I LOVE YOU, MAN!
Grab your rod and reel. It's time to go fishing.
I take heart in the fact that there are people out there working on this stuff (both Barnes and you). I do care about the fraud.
I also turn to the (paraphrased) quote from Michael Malice: It has never been necessary to have a majority of the population to move society.
I think ultimately it will all turn on the work of a relative handful of people.
It is a confounding issue. Clearly the west is ruled by a cabal of ruthless psychopaths possessing overwhelming financial resources.
When met with opposition their first response is to censor and ridicule. If that is not effective, their fallback is to buy the opposition off (as you are discovering) or blackmail (à la Epstein). If that does not work, then professional ruin. Finally, assassination.
The CIA has followed this playbook for a long time and it is effective. I tend to agree with you that it is going to require a wholesale upheaval of society to change this dynamic.
I went to bed very late last night watching your interview with Masterjohn., I think I've watched all your interviews on this topic, and I learn something new each time. I agree that this was the best one. I was very hopeful that when this information came out in January of this year it would cause a storm to stir thing up and stop the poisonings and the deceit, the abuse of power. Alas, no. This is such a big story, crime, that I too don't understand why others aren't covering it (fear is my guess). I agree that this is the way to wake people up as it is an enclosed population r, symbolic of the rest of the country (or even the world) and certainly a national security issue. I am glad you took it on as you are most capable, intrepid, and stubborn; thank you. We have been living in a sham democracy for over two years and I agree with you here also that it's time to stop the pretense and this issue could shine a light on the true state of things. DoD is at the center of the plandemic and so I am not very optimistic either, in the short term. But truth always finds a way.
I'll need to watch the video, but I'm skeptical that fraud on the DoD's part can be proven beyond a reasonable doubt. Brook Jackson has definitely proven Pfizer engaged in fraud, if only through Ventavia as a proxy, but you would need a DoD insider to attest to the fact that the DMED was deliberately altered with an intent other than to make it more accurate. The data is definitely inaccurate, but the DHA denying that could be attributed to them just following the straightforward incentive to not report that they're all jacked up. Sprinkle a little motivated reasoning on top and you might have a bunch of senior folks just adamantly saying the data is solid, because they asked their people who's rating depends on it being solid, and they said it was solid. Who the hell is going to prove them wrong? Just like the intel that Saddam had WMD was solid. Was that deliberate, or was believing that just wishful thinking on the part of a ruling class that wanted a justification to neutralize a regime that expressed some interest in challenging the petrodollar?
Oh man, you brought me right back to the Kunlangeta and BTC. As if I had almost forgotten...
There's that line attributed to Groucho Marxx about not joining any club that would have him as a member. Could it apply to Mathew and the "weird" job offers?
Can you imagine how many interviews per day Brook Jackson would be doing if our president had an R next to his name?