You gotta do what is yours to do. We’re lucky to have someone with courage and integrity to stand against the dragon and that alone can inspire the rest of us to do what is ours to do. I really think people aren’t quite understanding the gravity of it. When I tell people, they shrug it off as just another data crime. It’s a story you need to hear a few times before it sinks in properly.
I love Dune. I love Ender’s Game. An omitted aspect in the film are Peter and Valentine’s stories. As Ender’s siblings, they provided the extremes of humanity- psychopathy to unwavering empathy, and their back and forth philosophical op eds in the book are still so relevant.
"An omitted aspect in the film are Peter and Valentine’s stories. As Ender’s siblings, they provided the extremes of humanity- psychopathy to unwavering empathy, and their back and forth philosophical op eds in the book are still so relevant."
1. All good stories should not be made into 90-ish minute films. Miniseries or nothing at all. GoT or GTFO.
2. You gotta do what is yours to do.
"When I tell people, they shrug it off as just another data crime. It’s a story you need to hear a few times before it sinks in properly."
I know. Even worse, the story behind what the military industrial complex is involves pushing back an even larger amount of propaganda than this current mass formation exercise. I look forward to talking with Desmet about that.
Another long-form junkie here. IMHO, any decent lecture takes an hour to properly INTRODUCE, and many good stories take 6-8 hours (or more) to tell.
It sounds as though you’re being “called”. Heed the calling, even though every fiber of my (admittedly cynical) being tells me it’s too late. I’m old--and humble--enough to tell you that I’m often wrong. Either way, I’m also Christian enough to believe just as strongly that this WILL eventually end well. It just might get REALLY ugly until then.
Do your thing. I’m buckling up, holding on, and praying like a m-ing f-ing monk! 💚
Hi Mathew, I got notification earlier today that I was selected to speak at the June 28 "Future Framework" VRBPAC meeting. I remember vividly that last time you had an issue getting your slides accepted. I'm using a Mac, so I guess I'd be using Keynote to generate slides, if that's kosher with them, but as someone who's yet to present, I wanted to know what you've discerned about the whole slideshow aspect in case it could help me.
My problem with the slides was a matter of poorly articulated deadlines. The instructions talk about "materials" and "slides" in different places, never defining the slides as "the materials" or making it clear in any way that this is what the deadlines regarding "materials" are about (I thought the materials were evidence sent to the committee).
I am also dyslexic and often working to a point of essential blindness, day after day. Then again, I got a walkthrough of the process by David Wiseman, but nothing said made me note "materials = slides" in my notes about how the meeting is conducted.
Fortunately, I had time to rewrite a good three minute slam.
I don't know your current timeline, but I would email slides to the provided email address ASAP to be sure you get them in on time.
There is no rule of law anymore, and with the approval of the shots for babies it’s apparent fraud doesn’t matter either. The baby trial was clearly fraudulent with its immuno- bridging and no explanation of where 3/4 of the trial participants disappeared to. And the EUA for this poison was unanimously approved for an emergency that doesn’t exist. I admire your persistence and courage, but it doesn’t seem to matter what is uncovered. They believe they can’t be stopped (see sentence one.)
"This is not because I think that a fraud conviction will stop what is taking place, but because it will awaken more humans. More humans who can concoct and spring their own trap."
But I don't think a fraud "conviction" is possible. I do think more and more people are waking up to the fact that they have been lied to (at least in my small circle that is true.) I believe there will be much more resistance to any future attempts at lockdowns or coercive medical interventions. They blew the vaccine passport route to control by producing completely ineffective and dangerous vaccines. Food is where they are headed next. Our grandparents were issued ration coupons during WWII. We'll be required to download a "ration app" to control how much food we can get as shortages become more acute. It will accomplish the same control goal, or so they believe. Are people prepared for food self-sufficiency? Are they prepared to go hungry to thwart control?
"But I don't think a fraud "conviction" is possible."
I don't, either. But I think that pointing out that this would be the route toward that goal forces people like you to say that out loud---to face it, and then to discern the meaning of it (as you are doing). That's exactly what I hoped to accomplish---to sift for humans.
I am halfway through the interview with Masterjohn. Who has legal access or security clearance to look at the data, and whether Mathew is looking at publicly available data? or looking at data that whistle blowers have pulled out from under the secret access? I don't care about details, but I like a sense of whether I am looking at data on Mathew's slides that are secrets? or public?
1. The larger story was found in the publicly available data. I think that the DoD never expected anyone to look at it, and felt that they could fight on a timeline and propaganda level if they did.
2. The bits of DMED data shown were unclassified by the the whistleblowers. This isn't "deep state secrets" level of intelligence or "top secret" information.
Thanks. I was having a hard time reconciling the statements that the DMED database is vital to national security with the fact a random like me gets to look at slides made from it.
The Medical Surveillance Monthly Reports (MSMR) are made public (if I understand what Meryl Nass explained to me) due to Congressional requirements dating back to the 90s after Gulf War Syndrome controversy. These database snapshots reveal so little that might be considered "national security" on an ordinary basis. It is a decidedly unusual situation that we would even want to look at them. I wanted to look at them because I wanted to do an even-handed job in evaluating which claims made the most sense with respect to historical data. This was particularly tricky with the fertility data.
Information is classified in accordance with the damage that would be caused to national security should it be disclosed. The information in DMED, and in fact all data within military electronic health records is not classified. I'm sure its all "for official use only" (FOUO), needs to comply with HIPAA etc. but it isn't classified. Just because the information is vital for national security doesn't mean that disclosing it poses a serious risk of harm to national security.
It is a confounding issue. Clearly the west is ruled by a cabal of ruthless psychopaths possessing overwhelming financial resources.
When met with opposition their first response is to censor and ridicule. If that is not effective, their fallback is to buy the opposition off (as you are discovering) or blackmail (à la Epstein). If that does not work, then professional ruin. Finally, assassination.
The CIA has followed this playbook for a long time and it is effective. I tend to agree with you that it is going to require a wholesale upheaval of society to change this dynamic.
I went to bed very late last night watching your interview with Masterjohn., I think I've watched all your interviews on this topic, and I learn something new each time. I agree that this was the best one. I was very hopeful that when this information came out in January of this year it would cause a storm to stir thing up and stop the poisonings and the deceit, the abuse of power. Alas, no. This is such a big story, crime, that I too don't understand why others aren't covering it (fear is my guess). I agree that this is the way to wake people up as it is an enclosed population r, symbolic of the rest of the country (or even the world) and certainly a national security issue. I am glad you took it on as you are most capable, intrepid, and stubborn; thank you. We have been living in a sham democracy for over two years and I agree with you here also that it's time to stop the pretense and this issue could shine a light on the true state of things. DoD is at the center of the plandemic and so I am not very optimistic either, in the short term. But truth always finds a way.
I'll need to watch the video, but I'm skeptical that fraud on the DoD's part can be proven beyond a reasonable doubt. Brook Jackson has definitely proven Pfizer engaged in fraud, if only through Ventavia as a proxy, but you would need a DoD insider to attest to the fact that the DMED was deliberately altered with an intent other than to make it more accurate. The data is definitely inaccurate, but the DHA denying that could be attributed to them just following the straightforward incentive to not report that they're all jacked up. Sprinkle a little motivated reasoning on top and you might have a bunch of senior folks just adamantly saying the data is solid, because they asked their people who's rating depends on it being solid, and they said it was solid. Who the hell is going to prove them wrong? Just like the intel that Saddam had WMD was solid. Was that deliberate, or was believing that just wishful thinking on the part of a ruling class that wanted a justification to neutralize a regime that expressed some interest in challenging the petrodollar?
You don't think we can look at the database records and see that some were created out of thin air in 2021? Because I'm pretty sure I can do that, and that a lot of people with even rudimentary database skills can do that.
After that, the *reason* for the data fabrication would have to be revealed. I strongly suspect that unredacted information would demonstrate that. After all, why would somebody even risk the data fabrication?
Think through this: I've been getting strong pushback within "our side" over even explaining what happened to people, and my gut instinct is that the DoD has people embedded in both medias to a high degree of control. I'll be talking about that more in future articles.
The transition from AHLTA to MHS GENESIS does have the potential to explain records being added out of thin air. The database that DMED pulls from got very high fidelity input from AHLTA. There have been ongoing problems with information input into MHS GENESIS making it into this database. I'm pretty sure this database I'm talking about is the MHS Data Repository (MDR) which is accessed with M2. I could be wrong about all of this, independent research being what it is. This page has some information, but it is pretty difficult to discern without a background in military health informatics: https://health.mil/Military-Health-Topics/Technology/Support-Areas/MDR-M2-ICD-Functional-References-and-Specification-Documents. None of this is to say I don't share your concerns, I'm just red teaming because if there are plausible explanations for all of this from the perspective of people with knowledge about how these systems work then those will need to be addressed. I don't like that you're getting push back, and I've been continually annoyed that people aren't paying attention to Brook Jackson, the problems with the Pfizer trial design e.g. lopsided exclusions, basically everything that you've been trying to emphasize. I want answers, and I'm not particularly afraid to ask them of people that work in DHA because they already know my vax status anyway, but I only like to engage in such discussion if I can't explain the issue away. I know if I can explain it away, someone with motivated reasoning will be able to no problem, and then they'll never consider anything I bring to them again.
There's that line attributed to Groucho Marxx about not joining any club that would have him as a member. Could it apply to Mathew and the "weird" job offers?
I think this misses the point. Brook has not been invited to interview much with "our side" (the Rebel Alliance?). Her story has not been pushed much by "our side" relative to what would seem intuitively normal given the magnitude of the revelations (lackadaisical trials at best, total frauds at worst, but probably some of both).
I've talked with 25ish potential interviewers, recorded far fewer interviews, those started months late, and most of them are **still** being held back from the public weeks and weeks after they took place.
Over the past few months I've come to think that the Rebel Alliance(TM) includes a portion of captured individuals, and a portion of people following complicated interests who do not deserve full faith and credit. Everyone needs to act with discernment.
Our side are a bunch of substack writers and their commenters. No actual media outlets left or right seek any truth in regards to the vaccines. Who would you expect to interview her? The Epoch Times maybe? Everyone else is bought n paid for by big pharma.
I thought you were talking about news and media. Yeah im not a big listener of podcasts but i definitely havent heard of Brook being on any that i know about.
"Our side are a bunch of substack writers and their commenters"
Your view is from Substack and limited by big tech censorship. Many Not Substack sources reported Brooke Jackson case. Many lesser known names do followup with fab journalism and brave truth tellers. They swim upstream against a sea of propaganda too.. swim through the swill and find them...
British Medical Journal ~ Covid-19: Researcher blows the whistle on data integrity issues in Pfizer’s vaccine trial - Cite this as: BMJ 2021;375:n2635 https://www.bmj.com/content/375/bmj.n2635
MedPage Today ~ A report from a purported "whistleblower" alleging that Pfizer falsified data and failed to promptly pursue reports of adverse events in its COVID-19 vaccine trial raised some eyebrows among vaccine experts.
An article published Wednesday in The BMJ claimed that Texas contractor Ventavia Research Group unblinded patients in the phase III vaccine trial that led to the vaccine's approval and employed inadequately trained vaccinators. The employee, Brook Jackson, who worked as a regional director for Ventavia, is said to have reported her concerns to the FDA. https://www.medpagetoday.com/special-reports/exclusives/95484
🙏 Thank you Matthew for your courage. This country needs more courage and less conformity. 🛡
You gotta do what is yours to do. We’re lucky to have someone with courage and integrity to stand against the dragon and that alone can inspire the rest of us to do what is ours to do. I really think people aren’t quite understanding the gravity of it. When I tell people, they shrug it off as just another data crime. It’s a story you need to hear a few times before it sinks in properly.
I love Dune. I love Ender’s Game. An omitted aspect in the film are Peter and Valentine’s stories. As Ender’s siblings, they provided the extremes of humanity- psychopathy to unwavering empathy, and their back and forth philosophical op eds in the book are still so relevant.
"You gotta do what is yours to do."
I love this.
"An omitted aspect in the film are Peter and Valentine’s stories. As Ender’s siblings, they provided the extremes of humanity- psychopathy to unwavering empathy, and their back and forth philosophical op eds in the book are still so relevant."
1. All good stories should not be made into 90-ish minute films. Miniseries or nothing at all. GoT or GTFO.
2. You gotta do what is yours to do.
"When I tell people, they shrug it off as just another data crime. It’s a story you need to hear a few times before it sinks in properly."
I know. Even worse, the story behind what the military industrial complex is involves pushing back an even larger amount of propaganda than this current mass formation exercise. I look forward to talking with Desmet about that.
Another long-form junkie here. IMHO, any decent lecture takes an hour to properly INTRODUCE, and many good stories take 6-8 hours (or more) to tell.
It sounds as though you’re being “called”. Heed the calling, even though every fiber of my (admittedly cynical) being tells me it’s too late. I’m old--and humble--enough to tell you that I’m often wrong. Either way, I’m also Christian enough to believe just as strongly that this WILL eventually end well. It just might get REALLY ugly until then.
Do your thing. I’m buckling up, holding on, and praying like a m-ing f-ing monk! 💚
Yes, hopefully talking with Matthias illuminates the strange fractioning within the skeptic movement.
“GoT or GTFO” -- stealing.
Hi Mathew, I got notification earlier today that I was selected to speak at the June 28 "Future Framework" VRBPAC meeting. I remember vividly that last time you had an issue getting your slides accepted. I'm using a Mac, so I guess I'd be using Keynote to generate slides, if that's kosher with them, but as someone who's yet to present, I wanted to know what you've discerned about the whole slideshow aspect in case it could help me.
Thanks and God bless for what you're doing.
My problem with the slides was a matter of poorly articulated deadlines. The instructions talk about "materials" and "slides" in different places, never defining the slides as "the materials" or making it clear in any way that this is what the deadlines regarding "materials" are about (I thought the materials were evidence sent to the committee).
I am also dyslexic and often working to a point of essential blindness, day after day. Then again, I got a walkthrough of the process by David Wiseman, but nothing said made me note "materials = slides" in my notes about how the meeting is conducted.
Fortunately, I had time to rewrite a good three minute slam.
I don't know your current timeline, but I would email slides to the provided email address ASAP to be sure you get them in on time.
There is no rule of law anymore, and with the approval of the shots for babies it’s apparent fraud doesn’t matter either. The baby trial was clearly fraudulent with its immuno- bridging and no explanation of where 3/4 of the trial participants disappeared to. And the EUA for this poison was unanimously approved for an emergency that doesn’t exist. I admire your persistence and courage, but it doesn’t seem to matter what is uncovered. They believe they can’t be stopped (see sentence one.)
Like I said in the article,
"This is not because I think that a fraud conviction will stop what is taking place, but because it will awaken more humans. More humans who can concoct and spring their own trap."
But I don't think a fraud "conviction" is possible. I do think more and more people are waking up to the fact that they have been lied to (at least in my small circle that is true.) I believe there will be much more resistance to any future attempts at lockdowns or coercive medical interventions. They blew the vaccine passport route to control by producing completely ineffective and dangerous vaccines. Food is where they are headed next. Our grandparents were issued ration coupons during WWII. We'll be required to download a "ration app" to control how much food we can get as shortages become more acute. It will accomplish the same control goal, or so they believe. Are people prepared for food self-sufficiency? Are they prepared to go hungry to thwart control?
"But I don't think a fraud "conviction" is possible."
I don't, either. But I think that pointing out that this would be the route toward that goal forces people like you to say that out loud---to face it, and then to discern the meaning of it (as you are doing). That's exactly what I hoped to accomplish---to sift for humans.
Every exposed lie opens some eyes:
Whistleblower Says With 120,000 Troops Still Unvaccinated, Army May Move June 30 Deadline Far Into Future
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/whistleblower-military-covid-19-vaccine-mandate/
I am halfway through the interview with Masterjohn. Who has legal access or security clearance to look at the data, and whether Mathew is looking at publicly available data? or looking at data that whistle blowers have pulled out from under the secret access? I don't care about details, but I like a sense of whether I am looking at data on Mathew's slides that are secrets? or public?
1. The larger story was found in the publicly available data. I think that the DoD never expected anyone to look at it, and felt that they could fight on a timeline and propaganda level if they did.
2. The bits of DMED data shown were unclassified by the the whistleblowers. This isn't "deep state secrets" level of intelligence or "top secret" information.
Thanks. I was having a hard time reconciling the statements that the DMED database is vital to national security with the fact a random like me gets to look at slides made from it.
The Medical Surveillance Monthly Reports (MSMR) are made public (if I understand what Meryl Nass explained to me) due to Congressional requirements dating back to the 90s after Gulf War Syndrome controversy. These database snapshots reveal so little that might be considered "national security" on an ordinary basis. It is a decidedly unusual situation that we would even want to look at them. I wanted to look at them because I wanted to do an even-handed job in evaluating which claims made the most sense with respect to historical data. This was particularly tricky with the fertility data.
Information is classified in accordance with the damage that would be caused to national security should it be disclosed. The information in DMED, and in fact all data within military electronic health records is not classified. I'm sure its all "for official use only" (FOUO), needs to comply with HIPAA etc. but it isn't classified. Just because the information is vital for national security doesn't mean that disclosing it poses a serious risk of harm to national security.
One of the whistleblowers marked each query "unclassified", not "declassified" FWIW.
I LOVE YOU, MAN!
Grab your rod and reel. It's time to go fishing.
I take heart in the fact that there are people out there working on this stuff (both Barnes and you). I do care about the fraud.
I also turn to the (paraphrased) quote from Michael Malice: It has never been necessary to have a majority of the population to move society.
I think ultimately it will all turn on the work of a relative handful of people.
It is a confounding issue. Clearly the west is ruled by a cabal of ruthless psychopaths possessing overwhelming financial resources.
When met with opposition their first response is to censor and ridicule. If that is not effective, their fallback is to buy the opposition off (as you are discovering) or blackmail (à la Epstein). If that does not work, then professional ruin. Finally, assassination.
The CIA has followed this playbook for a long time and it is effective. I tend to agree with you that it is going to require a wholesale upheaval of society to change this dynamic.
I went to bed very late last night watching your interview with Masterjohn., I think I've watched all your interviews on this topic, and I learn something new each time. I agree that this was the best one. I was very hopeful that when this information came out in January of this year it would cause a storm to stir thing up and stop the poisonings and the deceit, the abuse of power. Alas, no. This is such a big story, crime, that I too don't understand why others aren't covering it (fear is my guess). I agree that this is the way to wake people up as it is an enclosed population r, symbolic of the rest of the country (or even the world) and certainly a national security issue. I am glad you took it on as you are most capable, intrepid, and stubborn; thank you. We have been living in a sham democracy for over two years and I agree with you here also that it's time to stop the pretense and this issue could shine a light on the true state of things. DoD is at the center of the plandemic and so I am not very optimistic either, in the short term. But truth always finds a way.
I'll need to watch the video, but I'm skeptical that fraud on the DoD's part can be proven beyond a reasonable doubt. Brook Jackson has definitely proven Pfizer engaged in fraud, if only through Ventavia as a proxy, but you would need a DoD insider to attest to the fact that the DMED was deliberately altered with an intent other than to make it more accurate. The data is definitely inaccurate, but the DHA denying that could be attributed to them just following the straightforward incentive to not report that they're all jacked up. Sprinkle a little motivated reasoning on top and you might have a bunch of senior folks just adamantly saying the data is solid, because they asked their people who's rating depends on it being solid, and they said it was solid. Who the hell is going to prove them wrong? Just like the intel that Saddam had WMD was solid. Was that deliberate, or was believing that just wishful thinking on the part of a ruling class that wanted a justification to neutralize a regime that expressed some interest in challenging the petrodollar?
You don't think we can look at the database records and see that some were created out of thin air in 2021? Because I'm pretty sure I can do that, and that a lot of people with even rudimentary database skills can do that.
After that, the *reason* for the data fabrication would have to be revealed. I strongly suspect that unredacted information would demonstrate that. After all, why would somebody even risk the data fabrication?
Think through this: I've been getting strong pushback within "our side" over even explaining what happened to people, and my gut instinct is that the DoD has people embedded in both medias to a high degree of control. I'll be talking about that more in future articles.
The transition from AHLTA to MHS GENESIS does have the potential to explain records being added out of thin air. The database that DMED pulls from got very high fidelity input from AHLTA. There have been ongoing problems with information input into MHS GENESIS making it into this database. I'm pretty sure this database I'm talking about is the MHS Data Repository (MDR) which is accessed with M2. I could be wrong about all of this, independent research being what it is. This page has some information, but it is pretty difficult to discern without a background in military health informatics: https://health.mil/Military-Health-Topics/Technology/Support-Areas/MDR-M2-ICD-Functional-References-and-Specification-Documents. None of this is to say I don't share your concerns, I'm just red teaming because if there are plausible explanations for all of this from the perspective of people with knowledge about how these systems work then those will need to be addressed. I don't like that you're getting push back, and I've been continually annoyed that people aren't paying attention to Brook Jackson, the problems with the Pfizer trial design e.g. lopsided exclusions, basically everything that you've been trying to emphasize. I want answers, and I'm not particularly afraid to ask them of people that work in DHA because they already know my vax status anyway, but I only like to engage in such discussion if I can't explain the issue away. I know if I can explain it away, someone with motivated reasoning will be able to no problem, and then they'll never consider anything I bring to them again.
Oh man, you brought me right back to the Kunlangeta and BTC. As if I had almost forgotten...
There's that line attributed to Groucho Marxx about not joining any club that would have him as a member. Could it apply to Mathew and the "weird" job offers?
Can you imagine how many interviews per day Brook Jackson would be doing if our president had an R next to his name?
I think this misses the point. Brook has not been invited to interview much with "our side" (the Rebel Alliance?). Her story has not been pushed much by "our side" relative to what would seem intuitively normal given the magnitude of the revelations (lackadaisical trials at best, total frauds at worst, but probably some of both).
I've talked with 25ish potential interviewers, recorded far fewer interviews, those started months late, and most of them are **still** being held back from the public weeks and weeks after they took place.
Over the past few months I've come to think that the Rebel Alliance(TM) includes a portion of captured individuals, and a portion of people following complicated interests who do not deserve full faith and credit. Everyone needs to act with discernment.
Our side are a bunch of substack writers and their commenters. No actual media outlets left or right seek any truth in regards to the vaccines. Who would you expect to interview her? The Epoch Times maybe? Everyone else is bought n paid for by big pharma.
It's more than the Stackers. There are numerous famous Podcasters and commentators. Look around online and think it through.
I think both Daniel Horowitz and Steve Deace from the blaze had her on.
I thought you were talking about news and media. Yeah im not a big listener of podcasts but i definitely havent heard of Brook being on any that i know about.
"Our side are a bunch of substack writers and their commenters"
Your view is from Substack and limited by big tech censorship. Many Not Substack sources reported Brooke Jackson case. Many lesser known names do followup with fab journalism and brave truth tellers. They swim upstream against a sea of propaganda too.. swim through the swill and find them...
British Medical Journal ~ Covid-19: Researcher blows the whistle on data integrity issues in Pfizer’s vaccine trial - Cite this as: BMJ 2021;375:n2635 https://www.bmj.com/content/375/bmj.n2635
UK Daily Mail ~ https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10186363/Researchers-running-arm-Pfizers-Covid-jab-trials-falsified-data-investigation-claims.html
MedPage Today ~ A report from a purported "whistleblower" alleging that Pfizer falsified data and failed to promptly pursue reports of adverse events in its COVID-19 vaccine trial raised some eyebrows among vaccine experts.
An article published Wednesday in The BMJ claimed that Texas contractor Ventavia Research Group unblinded patients in the phase III vaccine trial that led to the vaccine's approval and employed inadequately trained vaccinators. The employee, Brook Jackson, who worked as a regional director for Ventavia, is said to have reported her concerns to the FDA. https://www.medpagetoday.com/special-reports/exclusives/95484
International Business Times ~ https://www.ibtimes.sg/who-brook-jackson-whistleblower-leaves-20-dent-biontech-shares-single-day-61120
RT ~ https://www.rt.com/usa/539247-whistleblower-issues-pfizer-trial/
Rebel News ~ https://www.rebelnews.com/whistleblower_researcher_alleges_data_integrity_issues_in_pfizer_vaccine_trial
Childrens Health Defense ~ https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/pfizer-whistleblower-brook-jackson-covid-vaccine-clinical-trial/
21St Century Wire ~ https://21stcenturywire.com/2021/11/04/whistleblower-pfizer-falsified-data-unblinded-patients-aloof-to-vaccine-adverse-reactions/
Organic Consumers ~ https://www.organicconsumers.org/news/pfizer-admits-fraud-court
The Highwire ~ Best Brooke interview Year of the Whistleblower https://thehighwire.com/videos/the-year-of-the-whistleblower-highwire-episode-149/
Unlimited Hangout Covid -19 Archives https://unlimitedhangout.com/tag/covid-19/
Rumble ~ https://rumble.com/vyia7t-brooke-jackson-pfizer-vaccine-trial-whistleblower-on-fri.-night-livestream.html
Expose ~ https://expose-news.com/2022/06/22/trudeau-panics-9-in-10-covid-deaths-fully-vaccinated/
This is an info war.. successful resistance takes underground communications :~)
I agree with Mathew’s response to you. Both sides are in service to the oligarchy. I don’t think it would matter much.
I recommend the Jimmy Dore and Russell Brand podcasts for an entertaining take on the captured nature of both political parties in this vaudeville.