Cults? The Catholic Church has had a long and sordid history, long before any so-called infiltration.... all the way back to Emperor Constantine in the 300s, who only embraced Christianity because unlike the local pagans, the Chirstians pffered forgiveness for his brutally killing his wife and family. Disgusting morals at the highest levels continued until the Reformation forced the popes to start acting a bit more human.
Aside from this bit of digression, David Martin and Mikki Willis are both extremely new agey in a squishy way, and connected through some new age network. Willis's 9/11 story is questionable. Martin is just odd. I looked into him a while ago and on his college graduation page he stated that he lost his legs in an accident. He wrote a book, Lizards Eat Butterflies. He has a new age goddess type second wife, and they do cringeworthy social media video posts. A speech he gave a couple years ago sounded like a religious sermon, but at one point he stopped short of saying God, instead asking the question "who?" to the audience, and then thanking them for the "God" reply. His business seems to be based in patent research, but spins off into whatever expertise seems called for in any given moment. Strange.
Oh and don't get me started on Russell Brand - there is a video somewhere on rumble I think, something like "Who is Russell Brand" and covers a lot of his Pied Piper sketchiness. His "OBEY" moment with then-wife and fellow weirdo Katy Perry is telling, and is evidence for the idea he was her handler.
Speaking of mind control, Sirhan Sirhan is in the news again, after the rabbi RFK met with and kowtowed to tweeted praises to both RFK and his dad, supposedly such a great friend of Israel that a Palestinian assassinated him. Problem is Sirhan never got close enough or behind RFK to fire the fatal shots. Srihan was as obvious a mind controlled patsy as there ever was. That whole thing stinks and it stinks for some schmuck rabbi to throw that lone gunman BS in RFK's face, when he knows better.
I could go on - it is a juicy topic and appreciated. I look forward to reading your work.
"David Martin and Mikki Willis are both extremely new agey in a squishy way, and connected through some new age network."
While I haven't been able to confirm, I believe that David Martin and I grew up in the same New Age quasi-cult called the Association for Research and Englightenment. It had government connections to Remote Viewing. That's part of what got me digging down this hole. I rejected the A.R.E. in childhood, and suffered for it until I left home at 17. I knew that the program was something very bad, but couldn't get anyone to listen to me. I believe that part of what the DoD was doing was learning how to use people's values against them in order to push them into some sort of perspective that would make them controllable. I will present evidence as such.
Note: part of what I will be presenting is evidence that Remote Viewing was a Scientology operation from the start. People need to understand this.
So interesting. Yeah, lots to unpack.. I gather Mr. Martin grew up in a conservative Christian framework with a very static definition of Truth, and so journeyed far from it. I can't read where it has taken him - maybe his current lawsuit is the real deal - I am just wary of the "self-actualized." I can relate to the journey though - as the above rant indicated. I think those of us who grew up in abusive or cultish settings often become seekers, in search of integrity, rebelling against false authority. Sometimes this leads us into other strange places to work out our stuff. (Your DoD comment seems right on the mark with a lot of the current madness.) I ended up in and around various quasi-cults over many years in Santa Fe, so my BS detector remains big. It's also why I am a farmhand now - I can trust plants and animals! I am profoundly grateful when I find other humans like yourself compelled to understand and improve things.
Or, you protect it. Like the self-proclaimed inventor of the mRNA monster. What god can bring himself to destroy the entirety of his creation despite the destruction it has wrought? Criticize it? Sure. But certainly it can be tamed and bring good upon the world. Any. Day. Now.
The Academy of Divine Knowledge linked a large number of folks in the "Medical Freedom Movement" including
- many (all?) of "America's Frontline Doctors"
- Clay Clark (Reawaken America Tour) and most of the speakers
- Del Bigtree, David Icke (whose beliefs seem identical to those of Theosophy) and RFK JR. !!!
This group also has ties to Mike Flynn, who made his affiliation obvious with a public recitation of a Theosophy / New Age "prayer". Mike Flynn appears to be running a propaganda group which includes a number of these people as well as some others.
Blz no psyop has done considerable investigation into Flynn's group and its roots. I'm not sure I would have organized the information exactly has she has done, and I'm not at all sure she herself can be entirely trusted, but
(2) There are several other videos here https://rumble.com/user/BlzNoPsyop which contain interesting information about Flynn and his group, and Blznopsyop has a telegram channel too with much more information available.
While Blz no psyop is probably too quick to add people to her list of suspects, and appears to have her own pro-Trump agenda, I think she presents enough evidence in these videos to add a number of people to your list of right wing chaos agents.
This guy has two vaccine damaged children and has been an anti-vaccine activist for a long time. He has a whole web-site with *a lot* of info. It's not very well organized unfortunately and he's not great at presenting it - but he has thousands of hours of research into controlled opposition within the anti-vaccine movement.
In particular he has direct experience of working with Del Bigtree and RFK Jr and links them with scientology. This link leads to one page of his 100+entires dealing with Del Bigtree: https://gregwyatt.net/category/del-bigtree/page/2/
PS I have only just started to read this stuff so he may well have much more useful and interesting information.
Have you read "Secret societies and subversive movements" by Nesta Webster? I've recommended it on a couple of comments - but not sure if you've noticed them.
I don't find her logic watertight, nor therefore her conclusions beyond questioning - but you get a really good understanding of how secret societies work and the scope of what has previously been achieved.
Mikki Willis seems new-agey from a progressive liberal growing up in California way. He seems like he's doing his best to figure things out and expose what he learns along the way. I can relate to being sure that the progressive left has the moral high ground, and then see piece after piece of reality that shows the hypocrisy and emptiness (and power, which from this new perspective, is horrifying), of the movements we thought were righteous.
In this Highwire talk, Mikki talks about his story, and this is where I first heard the other side of the Kyle Rittenhouse story, and the kids with red MAGA hats who were framed by the media to have done things they obviously didn't do. https://thehighwire.com/videos/mikki-willis-exposes-media-madness/
His coherence in exposing media bias, and every sense I get from him, I can't imagine him not being in this for the right reasons.
David Martin .. interesting ... Of course I could be wrong, but I feel much more clear about Mikki Willis.
It's worth bearing the following in mind when it comes to Mikki Willis, or anyone else involved in any kind of "New Age" movement.
1. Theosophy was a freemasonic creation, and organized as a subversive secret society.
2. New Age Spiritualism was created out of Theosophy. New Age groups are typically (always?) organized as a subversive secret society.
3. Subversive secret societies are organized in a series of two or (usually) more concentric circles. Members are recruited to each circle under false pretenses, and are then subject to a weeding out/brainwashing process before being elevated to the next circle. At each elevation some secret is revealed which is in opposition to what is understood by members in the lower circle(s) who are therefore deceived.
This mechanism allows
(a) the society's true goals to remain hidden not only from the outside world, *but also from the majority of its members* who are actively working on those goals while believing they are working towards some other (noble) goal in which they sincerely believe.
(b) members are typically unaware of the true number of circles in the organization (in some cases that there are any circles at all), the organizations purpose, and (again in some cases) who the real leaders are.
(c) the organization, working towards secret goals which are not known even to those doing all the work, escapes any organized opposition from society and is able to achieve through stealth what could not possibly be achieved openly.
Thus it is perfectly possible for Mikki Willis to be sincere in an attempt to be doing good, while in fact working towards and end directly opposed to his own beliefs.
Nesta Webster's "Secret societies and subversive movements" is an excellent read. You may not agree with all her conclusions, but she pulls together a lot of very interesting reasearch about the operation of such societies and what they were able to achieve in historical times. The example of Abdullah ibn Maymun and the Kharmathites is eye opening in terms of its operation, similarities to what is known about more modern secret societies, and what he was able to achieve in terms of power through his organization.
I believe such organizations always feature pagan mysticism / Lucifer worship at their core, and this can be explained as either
- the true purpose of the organization with political power merely an incidental tool
- the best method for selecting usefully immoral/amoral operatives willing to stop at nothing to achieve the politcial goals which are the ultimate aim of a primarily political organization.
PS One could look at the "New World Order" (expression seemingly invented by Alice Bailey - theosophist) is simply the achievement of the goal of turning the entire population into an all-encompassing subversive secret society where ["We will know we have succeeded when] everything the [American] public believes is a lie" (William Casey Director CIA), and we are all motivated to work towards some goal which we believe in (e.g. stopping Covid, saving the world from climate change, preventing financial collapse, etc.), while our efforts are in fact serving to create global totalitarianism.
David Martin and Mikki Willis both have some suspicious elements to them. This document https://www.martinvrijland.nl/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/WHO-IS-DAVID-E.-MARTIN-.pdf has links to several videos of Willis including the 9/11 one, and another in which he claims to have been in the background of Rodney King's famous 'why can't we all get along?' video. Very strange stuff.
Mathew, I would love to see you host a panel discussion on these suspicious people. J.J. Couey would probably be up for it, and perhaps Whitney Webb, or James Corbett, or Derrick Broze - people who've been digging under various rocks for years - might have some interesting perspectives.
Assuming that Mikki Willis and David Martin are 5th gen warfare players, I'm struggling to understand what the benefit to they/them/those who won't leave us alone (to use Ernie Hancock's immortal phrase) is, of having Mikki Willis make a documentary series that makes they/them/those look bad, and calls on humanity to unite against them. Is it misdirection - pointing people toward the WEF rather than the tier above them? Is it divide and conquer - set the people who think Mikki Willis is a prophet, against those who think he's a shill? Is it laying the groundwork for a cult to induct the resistors into?
Same goes for Malone, Dundas, and all the other people who've had suspicions raised about them. How does their very vocal dissidence benefit they/them/those? If Del Bigtree is secretly a pharma shill, how would all the lawsuits that ICAN has won against government agencies, be to the benefit of they/them/those? But if he isn't a shill, why is he supporting Mikki Willis? And why did Alex Jones show up at the premiere of Plandemic 3? Is the guy who's been screaming about the New World Order for decades actually a double agent?
I have many, many questions about this whole shebang!
One quick point re Del Bigtree - he is associated with the Academy of Divine Knowledge (now UnifyD) which is a Luciferian new age cult descended from Theosophy.
For me - that's all I need to know. He's either knowingly guilty, or he's unknowingly doing the bidding of someone who is knowingly guilty. Either way he cannot be trusted.
This 'Academy of Divine Knowledge': https://www.instagram.com/p/COi05uWpYOo/?img_index=1? It looks like a dating site. How is Bigtree 'associated' with it? Also how is his conduct up to this point consistent with him acting for the opposition? He has brought more people over to our side of the argument than all the people who criticise him, put together. I judge people by their actions and I haven't seen him engage in any actions that indicate that he is malign. I'm open to evidence to the contrary, but accusations without evidence are not persuasive.
"Is it misdirection - pointing people toward the WEF rather than the tier above them? Is it divide and conquer - set the people who think Mikki Willis is a prophet, against those who think he's a shill? Is it laying the groundwork for a cult to induct the resistors into? "
All of those (you can generalize the misdirection / limited hangout aspect to encompass other data beyond WEF vs tier above e.g. the existence of viruses at all, which is at least questionable) + misdirection of resources and energy of any grass roots opposition which attempts to form by starting arguments, assuming leadership roles and then leading ineffectively.
Wow, this is an amazing document. Thank you for posting it. 💕 I'm becoming more familiar with the 2-3 layers of deception and misdirection -protecting the center core of the emerging technocracy and some kind of bio-nano-technological control grid.
Not very familiar with Willis (beyond knowing he is a person), but there is definitely something off about Martin. Have never been able to pin point it, but from the first time he came on scene, something didn't sit right with me. As for Brand, he comes off as a 'freedom loving court jester' type of character. Sort of a counter balance to the Kimmel/Colbert character types. Gotta keep the fake awake entertained, ya know
I have heard inside stories about Martin's circle getting "on message" from the outset. Being so organized, so early about the Big Picture either means you were hunting the right stories for years ahead of time, or were within it for years ahead of time, IMHO. Which is it?
That actually was one of the major red flags for me. I've probably scoured every rabbit hole over the past 20 yrs and never once heard of the guy before. Feel the same way about Stew Peters too. Like if I made a movie with a 'conspiracy theorist' news guy, Stew Peters is the perfect template. And also too well produced from the get go at the perfect time
It seems like the new age woo woo is one patheay into disembodiment and disengagement. The trans extreme movement is another pathway to disembodiment (I was horrified to read about "gender nullifying surgery" that erases one's genitals and gives a smooth area like a Barbie doll).
A disembodied person is more easily drawn into the fake digital twin world. And a person who leans too heavily into "vast consciousness" or "galactic entities" to solve our problems may not stand strong in the here and now.
I speak their language from my spiritual path that is very much about embodiment, and also about trranscendence. I find that being grounded in the direct non-conceptual experience of presence, energy, aliveness, consciousness is going to be needed more and more as people are more challenged with what is really true. I didn't grow up in a cult or a religion, so I didn't come to it as an escape from something.
Your efforts in picking up and peering under this rock are much appreciated.
Something very, very weird is going on, that's for sure. The glorious Notre Dame Cathedral took 200 years to complete; I can't help but think that we are witnessing the culmination of an Evil hundreds of years in the making. Also kinda eerie to contemplate that the fire during Holy Week of 2019 seemed to portend the horror that's been unleashed on the world later that year, no?
As for Dundas and Ray Epps, it's interesting to note that Dante places betrayers in the deepest, coldest part of Hell. Next to Ol' Scratch himself. Traitors destroy trust. Societies collapse when trust is gone. We are living in very dramatic times.
At certain points in time, God lets the devil winds of chaos blow, and opens up the threshing floors to sort out the wheat and the chaff. Not saying it’s THE END of everything. But I firmly believe we are all caught up in just such a time right now, and we will all discover who we are, what we believe and align ourselves too, and which side of the great divide we are on. In times past it was contained to certain parts of the world. But thanks to the globalist takeover schemes, the playing field has gotten much bigger and we are all in it together, one way or another.
I asked my friend the other day what he thought of my story idea: that the deformed, spinelessly sadistic, dark triad, hideous people are the ones who survive this in their bunkers replicate, and breach the quantum, the nonlocal nontemporal, and go back in time before all blood was contaminated by mrna, and that becomes the vampire of history. I'm only half making up fictional plots and only half kidding.
Mark Vernon, in his book on Dante, finds it significant that in order for Dante and Virgil to leave the Ninth Circle, they have to crawl over the frozen body of Lucifer, with his three chewing mouths. If Dante was prescient, what might that symbol of malevolence be chewing on? Dominionists? The secret unbroken line of Nazi ideology seeking to catalyst the Thousand Year Reich? Wokeism (technofeudal climate collectivist cult with depravity including the rape and transhumanizing of children)?? Those three things? And how do we crawl over this f**&ker?
Enough about the Nazis and the idea that they were the pinacle of human evil. This is repeated ad nauseum mainly because jews were their victims and Americans fought the Nazis but mostly because the Western left repeats this like a mantra 4 times in every sentence they utter. Evil greater than the Nazis are in play here.
As evidenced by its rabid defenders (members) who willingly ignore its blatant criminality in support of 'their' guy who is, importantly, not the other (awful people's) guy. Very cultish.
Members just play roles. Their guy, our guy, it’s all the same guy. Circle within circle of knowledge and power and if you don’t participate by the rules of the inner circle, you don’t get invited by the inner circle. Kinda like the Masons. Another cult. Cults all the way down.
I often ask myself did the Trump presidency hurt or help the cult behavior that’s prevalent today?
It’s a chicken-egg dilemma. Was Trump a victim of unfair persecution, was he his own worst enemy? Or, worse, was everything a show?
From the beginning he came out swinging at “the swamp.” A swamp that he actually surrounded himself with and never drained near as I can tell.
It all feels like it’s contrived. Like a WWE wrestling match. The fake good guys vs the fake bad guys mixing it up so we dig deep and buy a ticket to the show.
Pre-covid Trump was a shoe-in for reelection. But had he been re-elected his detractors made it clear they’d never take the “Trump vaccine.” So was his crashing and burning by design to achieve almost total “vaccine” compliance?
Is everything theatre?
Trump declared the pandemic a National emergency on the auspicious date of Fri the 13th of March 2020. He pushed through DARPAs Operation Warp Speed “vaccinations” and is still bragging about it.
Is his current victimization a theatrical production to garner sympathy because he’s being groomed by the so-called swamp for a return?
It is important to understand Trump Derangement Syndrome works both ways and can be used to manipulate both sides to achieve a predetermined agenda. Trump’s enemies ultimately lined up to get transfected. Everyone could be getting roped-in to an unpleasant script without realizing it.
If we’re not careful and so quick to embrace what appears to be obvious we can all be sucked into cults.
And now you toss RFK in the mix. Since they are playing games with us, they may as well give us a good showdown and have RFK talking all sorts of shit about vaccines, Trump trying to defend warp speed, and Joe just being like Hunter is the smartest guy i've ever met.
I'm neither as intelligent, nor as thorough, nor anywhere near as organized as you - but I've been dabbling in this for quite some time now, and much of this seems to have proximal roots in theosophy, freemasonry and illuminism, and before that Sabbataean-Frankism. Illuminism and communism were/are essentially the same idea, and theosophy appears to have played a significant role in the fascist movement too in both Germany (deep occult roots inside the nazi party) and Italy (e.g. Julius Evola). EDIT - I forgot to add that Rasputin is also linked to theosophy through his key lieutenant, son-in-law and successor (from memory name was maybe Boris Soloviev) who was a Blavatsky acolyte.
Theosophy appears to be the direct precursor of the New Age movement and both were/are heavily involved in the United Nations (e.g. Alice Bailey, Robert Muller, David Spangler. Also Lucis trust previously known as the Lucifer publishing company). There appear to be strong links to the Kabbalah and Gnosticism in all of this too.
Further to that, something called the Academy of Divine Knowledge (now UNIFYD) seemed to link together a lot of prominent early anti-vaxxers inside a new age cult, which is itself tied to the United Nations through an individual named Sacha Stone. Members/teachers included David Icke (who appears to be a freemason as well), Del Bigtree, RFK Jr, Robert David Steele, Carrie Madej and dozens of others. Clay Clarke's reawaken america tour seemed to be linked to this group as far as I remember too. The web-site has changed, and much is now hidden - but you can see what it used to look like from this video https://www.bitchute.com/video/qETEsG2QU7xY/. Amusingly membership used to cost $33 per period (I can't remember the length of the period - but it isn't important - the key is the 33, as numerology appears to be a recurring theme of these cults probably derived from the Kabbalah).
Other ancient cult/sects which appear to be related - Knights Templar/Rosicrucians, Assassins, Ismaili sect esp Abdullah ibn Maymun (eventually resulting in the Kharmathites. The current leader of the Ismaili sect is the Aga Khan whose followers refer to him as the "bringer of light").
More recently Nxium is, I think, part of this, and Richard Branson appears to have been involved with that group hosting their meetings on his private island (Necker island) curiously located in the Bristish Virgin Islands about 25 miles from Epstein's Little St. James.
Also there's a fair bit of info out there regarding the infiltration of the catholic church which seems to have occurred relatively recently. The permanent instruction of the alta vendita (Italian freemasonry's plan to infiltrate the church) is a matter of record as is the pope's response at the time. Subsequently Vatican 2, various papal banking scandals, Malachi Martin's account (subsequently corroborated by the confession of a participant) of the enthronement of Lucifer in the vatican, the curious death of John Paul 1, the (forced?) partial abdication of Benedict, the idol worship of Francis (pacha mama) etc.
PS Random observation: Dr. David Martin has an eye of horus tattoo, as well as a very curious globalist background and a web-site littered with masonic symbology.
PPS Trump sports a fair bit of masonic symbology too.
Here's William Cooper on Icke from way back in the 1990s. Cooper was known for predicting a rash of school shootings in 1991 and tied them to prescription meds and MK Ultra-type programs. He thought the purpose of them was to take down 2A. He also predicted a terrorist event that would be blamed on Bin Laden in the summer of 2001. A couple of months after 9/11, he died in a mysterious and still-disputed shootout with local law enforcement...something else he said was likely to happen.
Apologies for responding here, but you seem to have closed your comments to non-paying subscribers, and - having quit my job as part of my general refusal to comply with "the system" - I am not really in a position to subscribe :-(.
I have read subsequent articles in this series with interest - you are doing an excellent job.
May I suggest you read Nesta Webster's "Secret Societies and Subversive Movements"? She is a controversial author, and some of her claims are disputed, but she does, I think, provide a good understanding of how secret societies function, and points to historical examples of what has been achieved and how.
In particular
(a) she describes the mechanism of circles of deception where
(i) recruiters are instructed to initially pretend to be whatever the potential recruit is likely to accept (be a jew to a jew, a christian to a christian, and a muhammedan to a muhammedan)
(ii) each level of a secret society believes they have been told the truth and are part of a group of elect working secretly towards a noble aim (or at least one to which they are sympathetic). And as a member is selected for promotion to the next level, a "new truth" is revealed to them.
(iii) Thus a large organization can be maintained which works towards a goal where hardly any of the members understand the true goal because they have all been deceived. The example of Abdullah ibn Maymun is very powerful - recruits were invited to join an organization whose goal, they were told, was the glory of Allah. they were gradually introduced to "new truths" until promotion to the final, ninth (I think) circle where it was revealed that there was no God, and that these ninth level initiates were enitiled to act as Gods themsleves and need be restrained by no morality except their own will.
It's also worth noting that a similar mechanism is now commonly used in military/intelligence "need to know" and has been used to maintain secrecy for vast projects - e.g. the Manhattan project where only a handful of people knew what the project's goal actually was. And the fact that this method for maintaining secrecy has been proven to work over millenia (webster provides examples going back to the first millenium) draws the teeth of one of the most common objections to conspiracies "they'd never be able to keep it secret - too many people would have to know and someone would spill the beans".
(b) she documents the Rothschild involvement with Adam Weishaupt who seems to have
(i) assumed control of pretty much all of freemasonry in the late eighteenth century through infiltration (the structure of secret societies makes them very vulnerable to infiltration).
(ii) codified communism decades before Marx under the title "Illuminism" - Marx seems to have used many of these ideas in his own work and there are direct links between Rothschild and Weishaupt, Rothschild and Marx, and indirectly between Marx and Weishaupt through Moses Hess. * It is possible that this point (b) actually came from a different author and I have misremembered it as Webster, in which case - sorry.
There are other points worth addressing:
1. It is not clear to me whether the primary goal of these societies is political or spiritual.
If you assume the primary goal is political, and reject the spiritual as mumbo-jumbo, you must answer the question as to why these societies always seem to feature evil magic/religion. I think the answer is that the process of slow introduction to such ideas allows both the corruption of and individual's morals and/or the selection of those whose morals are already corrupted to advance through the levels - because it is necessary to identify or create people willing to act in a way which the vast majority of people would reject and expose. And the use of multiple levels allows a gradual process which avoids too much damage should anyone rebel once initiated to a new level as only a very few truly understand all the secrets.
All that said, I rather suspect that at the very heart of these societies is truly Satan himself, and the fundamental purpose of the society's existence is the creation of hell on earth with political power merely a byproduct.
Both explanations work.
2. I think that these societies have been so successful that they have essentially co-opted the whole of society and we are all living in a lie (well possibly except a few of us who have begun to see through some of the lies - but even then one can never be sure that one has penetrated every veil and discerned what is truly truthful). They metastasized from freemasonry to government intelligence agencies and government bureaucracies (whose function is not what the majority of people within them believe, and never was - even though it may have appeared so initially). And the whole population at almost every level is controlled by "narratives" (lies) like climate change, peak resources/overpopulation, financial collapse etc. which again serve to co-opt society to work towards a goal which they believe is good, but which actually serves to enrich and empower a small group of insiders and encourages the "moral majority" to impose tyranny (spiritual harm) on dissenters.
3. I did find a link between Blavatsky and Rasputin. Boris Soloviev was a Blavatsky disciple who became a close adviser to rasputin, succeeded him as adviser to the Tsar after Rasputin's muder and posthumously married Rasputin's daughter. Make of that what you will.
4. Hitler appears to have been an illegitimate grandson of a Rothschild. See Koehler, "Inside the Gestapo".
5. General Flynn appears to be a Theosophist. A citizen journalist who goes by the moniker Blz No Psyop has posted some thought provoking stuff (this one shows Flynn reciting a Luciferian prayer and juxtaposes it with the theosophist Clare Elizabeth Prophet reciting a very similar prayer): https://rumble.com/v30gj9c-the-organized-disinformation-flynn-network.html (prayer starts at 2:59). Many other members of the medical freedom movement were associated with Flynn and/or Clay Clark and the Theosophist/New Age Academy of Divine Knowledge (see video at this link): https://truthinplainsight.com/some-prominent-anti-vaxers-may-have-masonic-ties/.
6. Finally there are reasons to at least suspect that Nesta Webster and Blz No Psyop were/are both "limited hangouts" themselves. Nevertheless the information they provide is interesting and useful, but - as with everyone - caution is advised and not all conclusions should be accepted.
I looked into Jack Parson a few years ago, after Fox did a TV show about him. Some very weird and evil stuff about him..a satanist at the very least. Makes one wonder what NASA is really all about.
It's the latter: ["world's largest ever theatrical production aimed at convincing the world to accept a lesser level of rights and freedom (along with a series of market manipulations and grifts that result in little real organized opposition with the resources to push back)." ]
or maybe an unplanned and fractioned parallel timeline of the two possibilities.
Yes, I am mad at everyone who is so easily nudged in any direction by ultimately tax payer financed incentives. People need to become so much more aware of these manipulation attempts anf These attempts need to be shunned, morally condemned throughout an aware public, so that this "invisible hand" does not work any more.
Don’t believe there’s any “What If” about this whole rotten s**t show. And it obviously runs even deeper that I had previously thought.
I remember talking with some Twitter folks awhile back about the whole snarled mess (this was during Trumps four years). We agreed that the tangle was deliberate…erected to obfuscate who exactly was connected to whom, and influencing (at the very least, but I think also coordinating) the evil that has suddenly come out front and center, everywhere and all at once.
God bless your labors to pull back the curtain. May God guard and guide you and shine His grace upon on you.
Interesting that Dr. Malone, in his interview with Mappin, recognizes that the expression of normal proteins that should be "self" are treated as "non-self" by the immune systems of patients treated with such gene therapy, yet he has remained silent about the autoimmune origins of many of the "vaccine" adverse events like myocarditis. The video is evidence that he MUST have been aware of autoimmune problems we were warned about by Prof Dr Dolores Cahill in early 2021 and the biodistribution reported by Dr. Byram Bridle by summer 2021 along with the lack of aspiration reported by John Campbell. Yet he did not become an outspoken expert on such dangers, preferring instead to spend his time suing Dr. Breggin while at the same time agreeing with Breggin on demonizing the China for its role in the scam.
In Dr. Malone's defense, he may not have been aware of the use of pseudouridine to increase the durability of the mRNA, and he was in fact vaccinated himself. Still, a bit of a mystery.
Malone claimed even though he knew the risks better than almost anyone he took the vax to travel. Really? Would you take poison to travel? I’m not buying it. He’s a very smooth salesman though.
I do not know Dr. Malone personally, so no he did not tell me that. He has been quoted in multiple sources as saying he took the vax to travel, and at the time it was difficult to travel without. As it was very early, he may not have known about the pseudouridine or the biodistribution. I'm willing to take his word that he was vaccinated, just as Steve Kirsch was. However, the clip with Mappin proves he was aware of the potential for autoimmune problems.. He's a very bright guy, but if he truly was vaxxed as he claims, it shows a large gap in his wiring.
Malone's prior relations with government are also inconsistent with his professed libertarianism. I'll reserve judgement on his overall sincerity, but there's certainly reason to doubt specific policy positions he espouses.
(a) You appeared to be implying that his vaccination status was an additonal datapoint which could be used as evidence in assessing his integrity and sincerity
(b) Since the source of the information regarding his vaccination status is the gentleman himself, there is no useful, additional evidence contained in his assertion.
Another way of expressing this might be: "Well, he would say that, wouldn't he?"
If your knowledge of his vaccination status originated with a trusted third party then that might be different.
Exactly, and this claim to being vaxxed shows up over and over among probable fake leaders in the so-called MFM. Kirsch is another one. The weird thing is that so many otherwise awake, like-minded fall for it. It just goes to show how well-conditioned (i.e., brainwashed, we all are)!
If you want to know about the man, read his Substack.( As is true of many of the people now who are continuously being called out as being untrustworthy and worse ) He got the vaccine and had a serious adverse reaction with the second shot.He has admitted this. At the time he didn't think it would be dangerous. Yes, he needed to travel for work, like so many that got the shot. He wasn't anti vax. He trusted them. He had managed vaccine trials and other aspects of vaccines for years. He didn't invent the vaccine. He discovered the platform that it was eventually created from 30 years ago. He has 9 patents to prove this but has never gotten recognition. He has had to explain and defend this and the many other of the seemingly constant attacks to his credibility and integrity on a regular basis. And he is just one of many who have been working so hard to find and speak the truth who have had to endure this abuse. People have become so quick to judge. It is so counter productive and devisive. I wish people would do some research before making accusations.
(1) I didn't attack him. I merely pointed out what I perceived as a logical flaw in the argument anti-republocrat put forward suggesting that his vaccination status was an additional datapoint that could usefully be used in making a judgment. Purely as a matter of logic, it isn't - and that was all I said here.
(2) I've read his substack, and other substacks. I know plenty about him.
(3) I understand that you deplore the apparent division within "the movement". Most of us deplore it. You would like everyone to get along and work together. So would I. However the problem is that we are fighting a battle that has been going on a very long time. The "enemy" infiltrates and attempts to both divide and control any movement that forms to oppose it. So - whether you and I like it or not, it is absolutely the case that there will be many figures within the movement whose goal is to destroy it. In that context, it is clear that we cannot just all get along, because quite a few of the leading figures have the goal of co-opting, splintering, and/or destroying the movement themselves.
(4) Given (3), it is unfortunately necessary to try and identify which figures are actually working for the enemy. If we do not, we have zero chance of being successful. Following leaders who are trying to lose the battle will not lead to victory.
(5) Whether Malone is one such, you must decide for yourself. But even if he is not, there absolutely will be many who are. And we do need to try and discover who they are and avoid wasting our energy on them.
(6) There are several reasons to be suspicious of Malone.
(a) He is a wealthy deep-state creature with a lot of questionable connections, and both his and his wife's parents were swamp-creature intelligence agents.
(b) His wife (and supposed partner in this battle) continues to list Bill Gates, Melinda Gates and Richard Branson as three of her top six influencers on linkedin. I believe she used to list Justin Trudeau as well the last time I checked which was earlier this year, but it's possible I have remembered that incorrectly.
(c) It appears from a paper he published prior to the vaccine rollout that he must have been aware of how dangerous the vaccines were a long time before he spoke up.
(d) Malone has launched a completely unnecessary lawsuit against Breggins. This is exactly the type of action one would expect from someone who is attempting to infiltrate and destroy a movement.
(e) He has pushed the mass psychosis idea which in my view is another psy-op developed initially by Matthias Desmet who seems to be part of a questionable group of academics operating out of the University of Ghent (conveniently located right next to the heart of the EU power structure) pushing what in my view are dubious theories.
So - now that you have raised the issue - yes I think it is likely that Malone is an infiltrator working for the deep state (or whatever you want to call the enemy). Am I certain - no?
But do I think him saying he took the vaccine himself is an indicator of anything? No I don't. Either he is a good guy, in which case, he did take the vaccine and he is telling the truth. Or he is a bad guy in which case he didn't take the vaccine and he is lying about it. The fact that he says he took the vaccine doesn't alter the probability of either of those possibilities one whit.
I ignore the mainstream media and corporate ESG along with all cults. So many people are so lost and thus become a member of this cult or that hoping to find themselves. Cults are nothing more that another name for collectives where you surrender your individual sovereignty in favor of becoming a slave to the cult leaders.
I've been feeling that vaccines themselves have been elevated to a cult status, such that the label "anti-vaxxer" carries the same weight as being labeled a blasphemer or Satan worshipper in 17th century Salem, MA. Or the same as any member of a latter-day cult questioning or challenging the words of the cult leader.
I was at a wedding and spoke to an older Filipino couple who talked about vaccines with a reverence normally reserved for Holy Water. The strange part was they considered their belief system scientifically proven, but when I pointed out a couple of problems in the science, they immediately reverted to "I believe in the FDA" and "Doctors wouldn't hurt us", which gets them really close to the cult definition.
What a perfect example! It's also interesting how they, and others, seem to approach "science" as something to take on faith, like religion. Rather than the dynamic process of challenging orthodoxy and changing in response to new data ~ the very opposite of religion. Thanks for sharing this! (And I'm not putting down religion; just noting how the boundary between faith and science have become so blurred.)
Well yes, operatively speaking probably that. But you know how easy it is to get someone to do something, someone wants something done, for reason A. Therefore he arranges it so that someone else does it for that someone else's reason, reason B. Same recipe with Muslim terror as with school, mall etc shootings. In any case no accident.
"But you know how easy it is to get someone to do something, someone wants something done, for reason A. Therefore he arranges it so that someone else does it for that someone else's reason, reason B"
Very well put. Much larger applications too. I think this is how the whole of society is now run. We're nearly all doing this.
Interesting timing about the mind control part since the Unabomber just died. He took part in MK Ultra-type experiments at Harvard. With your math background, I'd be curious of your thoughts on him. I've read parts of his manifesto, and his description of the left in the 80s and early 90s sounds like the more totalitarian woke of today. I've head his PhD thesis was similar to John Nash's but never looked into it.
Allison McDowell talks about a couple of Scientology connections (Tony Muhammad and Michael Baum) to the California chapter of children's health defense in minutes 23 through 43 or so of this video:
Yes, I've watched some of her discussion on Scientologists and added some of her observations to my own. I still haven't fully researched the Nation of Islam piece, but I have some information and thoughts about it. Many people don't recall that we are not 30 years removed from a foreign leader trying to send the Nation of Islam a billion dollars to use for an armed insurrection against U.S. government.
Cults? The Catholic Church has had a long and sordid history, long before any so-called infiltration.... all the way back to Emperor Constantine in the 300s, who only embraced Christianity because unlike the local pagans, the Chirstians pffered forgiveness for his brutally killing his wife and family. Disgusting morals at the highest levels continued until the Reformation forced the popes to start acting a bit more human.
Aside from this bit of digression, David Martin and Mikki Willis are both extremely new agey in a squishy way, and connected through some new age network. Willis's 9/11 story is questionable. Martin is just odd. I looked into him a while ago and on his college graduation page he stated that he lost his legs in an accident. He wrote a book, Lizards Eat Butterflies. He has a new age goddess type second wife, and they do cringeworthy social media video posts. A speech he gave a couple years ago sounded like a religious sermon, but at one point he stopped short of saying God, instead asking the question "who?" to the audience, and then thanking them for the "God" reply. His business seems to be based in patent research, but spins off into whatever expertise seems called for in any given moment. Strange.
Oh and don't get me started on Russell Brand - there is a video somewhere on rumble I think, something like "Who is Russell Brand" and covers a lot of his Pied Piper sketchiness. His "OBEY" moment with then-wife and fellow weirdo Katy Perry is telling, and is evidence for the idea he was her handler.
Speaking of mind control, Sirhan Sirhan is in the news again, after the rabbi RFK met with and kowtowed to tweeted praises to both RFK and his dad, supposedly such a great friend of Israel that a Palestinian assassinated him. Problem is Sirhan never got close enough or behind RFK to fire the fatal shots. Srihan was as obvious a mind controlled patsy as there ever was. That whole thing stinks and it stinks for some schmuck rabbi to throw that lone gunman BS in RFK's face, when he knows better.
I could go on - it is a juicy topic and appreciated. I look forward to reading your work.
"David Martin and Mikki Willis are both extremely new agey in a squishy way, and connected through some new age network."
While I haven't been able to confirm, I believe that David Martin and I grew up in the same New Age quasi-cult called the Association for Research and Englightenment. It had government connections to Remote Viewing. That's part of what got me digging down this hole. I rejected the A.R.E. in childhood, and suffered for it until I left home at 17. I knew that the program was something very bad, but couldn't get anyone to listen to me. I believe that part of what the DoD was doing was learning how to use people's values against them in order to push them into some sort of perspective that would make them controllable. I will present evidence as such.
Note: part of what I will be presenting is evidence that Remote Viewing was a Scientology operation from the start. People need to understand this.
So interesting. Yeah, lots to unpack.. I gather Mr. Martin grew up in a conservative Christian framework with a very static definition of Truth, and so journeyed far from it. I can't read where it has taken him - maybe his current lawsuit is the real deal - I am just wary of the "self-actualized." I can relate to the journey though - as the above rant indicated. I think those of us who grew up in abusive or cultish settings often become seekers, in search of integrity, rebelling against false authority. Sometimes this leads us into other strange places to work out our stuff. (Your DoD comment seems right on the mark with a lot of the current madness.) I ended up in and around various quasi-cults over many years in Santa Fe, so my BS detector remains big. It's also why I am a farmhand now - I can trust plants and animals! I am profoundly grateful when I find other humans like yourself compelled to understand and improve things.
"I think those of us who grew up in abusive or cultish settings often become seekers"
My observation: You either hunt the monster, run away, or become it.
Or, you protect it. Like the self-proclaimed inventor of the mRNA monster. What god can bring himself to destroy the entirety of his creation despite the destruction it has wrought? Criticize it? Sure. But certainly it can be tamed and bring good upon the world. Any. Day. Now.
David Martin seems to be connected with more than one New Age organization. AFAIR he had links to the Academy of Divine Knowledge ((see video here: https://truthinplainsight.com/some-prominent-anti-vaxers-may-have-masonic-ties/) , although the web-site has now vanished due to it causing questions), and appears on this web-site too https://arlingtoninstitute.org/david-martin-big-financial-disruption/. Clicking around the web-site reveals all the usual new age / Theosophy BS as well as at least one event speaker (Freddy Silva) who explicitly references his association with the A.R.E.
The Academy of Divine Knowledge linked a large number of folks in the "Medical Freedom Movement" including
- many (all?) of "America's Frontline Doctors"
- Clay Clark (Reawaken America Tour) and most of the speakers
- Del Bigtree, David Icke (whose beliefs seem identical to those of Theosophy) and RFK JR. !!!
This group also has ties to Mike Flynn, who made his affiliation obvious with a public recitation of a Theosophy / New Age "prayer". Mike Flynn appears to be running a propaganda group which includes a number of these people as well as some others.
Blz no psyop has done considerable investigation into Flynn's group and its roots. I'm not sure I would have organized the information exactly has she has done, and I'm not at all sure she herself can be entirely trusted, but
(1) This video, at the 2.59 mark, juxtaposes Michael Flynn's "prayer" (actually a Theosophist Luciferian incantation) with that of Elizabeth Clare Prophet (a Theosophist and founder of a New Age "church": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elizabeth_Clare_Prophet): https://rumble.com/v30gj9c-the-organized-disinformation-flynn-network.html
(2) There are several other videos here https://rumble.com/user/BlzNoPsyop which contain interesting information about Flynn and his group, and Blznopsyop has a telegram channel too with much more information available.
While Blz no psyop is probably too quick to add people to her list of suspects, and appears to have her own pro-Trump agenda, I think she presents enough evidence in these videos to add a number of people to your list of right wing chaos agents.
My research has gone down this avenue recently, but you make a couple of points that help. Thank you.
This guy has two vaccine damaged children and has been an anti-vaccine activist for a long time. He has a whole web-site with *a lot* of info. It's not very well organized unfortunately and he's not great at presenting it - but he has thousands of hours of research into controlled opposition within the anti-vaccine movement.
In particular he has direct experience of working with Del Bigtree and RFK Jr and links them with scientology. This link leads to one page of his 100+entires dealing with Del Bigtree: https://gregwyatt.net/category/del-bigtree/page/2/
PS I have only just started to read this stuff so he may well have much more useful and interesting information.
Have you read "Secret societies and subversive movements" by Nesta Webster? I've recommended it on a couple of comments - but not sure if you've noticed them.
I don't find her logic watertight, nor therefore her conclusions beyond questioning - but you get a really good understanding of how secret societies work and the scope of what has previously been achieved.
Mikki Willis seems new-agey from a progressive liberal growing up in California way. He seems like he's doing his best to figure things out and expose what he learns along the way. I can relate to being sure that the progressive left has the moral high ground, and then see piece after piece of reality that shows the hypocrisy and emptiness (and power, which from this new perspective, is horrifying), of the movements we thought were righteous.
In this Highwire talk, Mikki talks about his story, and this is where I first heard the other side of the Kyle Rittenhouse story, and the kids with red MAGA hats who were framed by the media to have done things they obviously didn't do. https://thehighwire.com/videos/mikki-willis-exposes-media-madness/
His coherence in exposing media bias, and every sense I get from him, I can't imagine him not being in this for the right reasons.
David Martin .. interesting ... Of course I could be wrong, but I feel much more clear about Mikki Willis.
It's worth bearing the following in mind when it comes to Mikki Willis, or anyone else involved in any kind of "New Age" movement.
1. Theosophy was a freemasonic creation, and organized as a subversive secret society.
2. New Age Spiritualism was created out of Theosophy. New Age groups are typically (always?) organized as a subversive secret society.
3. Subversive secret societies are organized in a series of two or (usually) more concentric circles. Members are recruited to each circle under false pretenses, and are then subject to a weeding out/brainwashing process before being elevated to the next circle. At each elevation some secret is revealed which is in opposition to what is understood by members in the lower circle(s) who are therefore deceived.
This mechanism allows
(a) the society's true goals to remain hidden not only from the outside world, *but also from the majority of its members* who are actively working on those goals while believing they are working towards some other (noble) goal in which they sincerely believe.
(b) members are typically unaware of the true number of circles in the organization (in some cases that there are any circles at all), the organizations purpose, and (again in some cases) who the real leaders are.
(c) the organization, working towards secret goals which are not known even to those doing all the work, escapes any organized opposition from society and is able to achieve through stealth what could not possibly be achieved openly.
Thus it is perfectly possible for Mikki Willis to be sincere in an attempt to be doing good, while in fact working towards and end directly opposed to his own beliefs.
Nesta Webster's "Secret societies and subversive movements" is an excellent read. You may not agree with all her conclusions, but she pulls together a lot of very interesting reasearch about the operation of such societies and what they were able to achieve in historical times. The example of Abdullah ibn Maymun and the Kharmathites is eye opening in terms of its operation, similarities to what is known about more modern secret societies, and what he was able to achieve in terms of power through his organization.
I believe such organizations always feature pagan mysticism / Lucifer worship at their core, and this can be explained as either
- the true purpose of the organization with political power merely an incidental tool
- the best method for selecting usefully immoral/amoral operatives willing to stop at nothing to achieve the politcial goals which are the ultimate aim of a primarily political organization.
PS One could look at the "New World Order" (expression seemingly invented by Alice Bailey - theosophist) is simply the achievement of the goal of turning the entire population into an all-encompassing subversive secret society where ["We will know we have succeeded when] everything the [American] public believes is a lie" (William Casey Director CIA), and we are all motivated to work towards some goal which we believe in (e.g. stopping Covid, saving the world from climate change, preventing financial collapse, etc.), while our efforts are in fact serving to create global totalitarianism.
David Martin and Mikki Willis both have some suspicious elements to them. This document https://www.martinvrijland.nl/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/WHO-IS-DAVID-E.-MARTIN-.pdf has links to several videos of Willis including the 9/11 one, and another in which he claims to have been in the background of Rodney King's famous 'why can't we all get along?' video. Very strange stuff.
Mathew, I would love to see you host a panel discussion on these suspicious people. J.J. Couey would probably be up for it, and perhaps Whitney Webb, or James Corbett, or Derrick Broze - people who've been digging under various rocks for years - might have some interesting perspectives.
Assuming that Mikki Willis and David Martin are 5th gen warfare players, I'm struggling to understand what the benefit to they/them/those who won't leave us alone (to use Ernie Hancock's immortal phrase) is, of having Mikki Willis make a documentary series that makes they/them/those look bad, and calls on humanity to unite against them. Is it misdirection - pointing people toward the WEF rather than the tier above them? Is it divide and conquer - set the people who think Mikki Willis is a prophet, against those who think he's a shill? Is it laying the groundwork for a cult to induct the resistors into?
Same goes for Malone, Dundas, and all the other people who've had suspicions raised about them. How does their very vocal dissidence benefit they/them/those? If Del Bigtree is secretly a pharma shill, how would all the lawsuits that ICAN has won against government agencies, be to the benefit of they/them/those? But if he isn't a shill, why is he supporting Mikki Willis? And why did Alex Jones show up at the premiere of Plandemic 3? Is the guy who's been screaming about the New World Order for decades actually a double agent?
I have many, many questions about this whole shebang!
You're asking reasonable questions, but these are cans that I'll have to kick down the road for now.
I understand. My file of article ideas is overflowing too!
One quick point re Del Bigtree - he is associated with the Academy of Divine Knowledge (now UnifyD) which is a Luciferian new age cult descended from Theosophy.
For me - that's all I need to know. He's either knowingly guilty, or he's unknowingly doing the bidding of someone who is knowingly guilty. Either way he cannot be trusted.
This 'Academy of Divine Knowledge': https://www.instagram.com/p/COi05uWpYOo/?img_index=1? It looks like a dating site. How is Bigtree 'associated' with it? Also how is his conduct up to this point consistent with him acting for the opposition? He has brought more people over to our side of the argument than all the people who criticise him, put together. I judge people by their actions and I haven't seen him engage in any actions that indicate that he is malign. I'm open to evidence to the contrary, but accusations without evidence are not persuasive.
"Is it misdirection - pointing people toward the WEF rather than the tier above them? Is it divide and conquer - set the people who think Mikki Willis is a prophet, against those who think he's a shill? Is it laying the groundwork for a cult to induct the resistors into? "
All of those (you can generalize the misdirection / limited hangout aspect to encompass other data beyond WEF vs tier above e.g. the existence of viruses at all, which is at least questionable) + misdirection of resources and energy of any grass roots opposition which attempts to form by starting arguments, assuming leadership roles and then leading ineffectively.
Wow, this is an amazing document. Thank you for posting it. 💕 I'm becoming more familiar with the 2-3 layers of deception and misdirection -protecting the center core of the emerging technocracy and some kind of bio-nano-technological control grid.
Not very familiar with Willis (beyond knowing he is a person), but there is definitely something off about Martin. Have never been able to pin point it, but from the first time he came on scene, something didn't sit right with me. As for Brand, he comes off as a 'freedom loving court jester' type of character. Sort of a counter balance to the Kimmel/Colbert character types. Gotta keep the fake awake entertained, ya know
I have heard inside stories about Martin's circle getting "on message" from the outset. Being so organized, so early about the Big Picture either means you were hunting the right stories for years ahead of time, or were within it for years ahead of time, IMHO. Which is it?
That actually was one of the major red flags for me. I've probably scoured every rabbit hole over the past 20 yrs and never once heard of the guy before. Feel the same way about Stew Peters too. Like if I made a movie with a 'conspiracy theorist' news guy, Stew Peters is the perfect template. And also too well produced from the get go at the perfect time
Stupiders.
Exactly
It seems like the new age woo woo is one patheay into disembodiment and disengagement. The trans extreme movement is another pathway to disembodiment (I was horrified to read about "gender nullifying surgery" that erases one's genitals and gives a smooth area like a Barbie doll).
A disembodied person is more easily drawn into the fake digital twin world. And a person who leans too heavily into "vast consciousness" or "galactic entities" to solve our problems may not stand strong in the here and now.
I speak their language from my spiritual path that is very much about embodiment, and also about trranscendence. I find that being grounded in the direct non-conceptual experience of presence, energy, aliveness, consciousness is going to be needed more and more as people are more challenged with what is really true. I didn't grow up in a cult or a religion, so I didn't come to it as an escape from something.
Your efforts in picking up and peering under this rock are much appreciated.
Something very, very weird is going on, that's for sure. The glorious Notre Dame Cathedral took 200 years to complete; I can't help but think that we are witnessing the culmination of an Evil hundreds of years in the making. Also kinda eerie to contemplate that the fire during Holy Week of 2019 seemed to portend the horror that's been unleashed on the world later that year, no?
As for Dundas and Ray Epps, it's interesting to note that Dante places betrayers in the deepest, coldest part of Hell. Next to Ol' Scratch himself. Traitors destroy trust. Societies collapse when trust is gone. We are living in very dramatic times.
It’s the biggest drama of all!
At certain points in time, God lets the devil winds of chaos blow, and opens up the threshing floors to sort out the wheat and the chaff. Not saying it’s THE END of everything. But I firmly believe we are all caught up in just such a time right now, and we will all discover who we are, what we believe and align ourselves too, and which side of the great divide we are on. In times past it was contained to certain parts of the world. But thanks to the globalist takeover schemes, the playing field has gotten much bigger and we are all in it together, one way or another.
Excellent comment. I am not sure if this is "The Big Show" of the Book of Revelation, but it definitely is evil and needs to be ferociously opposed.
I’ve often said the “vaccines” were the pre-Tribulation practice exam. The grades were disappointing but about what I expected.
I asked my friend the other day what he thought of my story idea: that the deformed, spinelessly sadistic, dark triad, hideous people are the ones who survive this in their bunkers replicate, and breach the quantum, the nonlocal nontemporal, and go back in time before all blood was contaminated by mrna, and that becomes the vampire of history. I'm only half making up fictional plots and only half kidding.
Mark Vernon, in his book on Dante, finds it significant that in order for Dante and Virgil to leave the Ninth Circle, they have to crawl over the frozen body of Lucifer, with his three chewing mouths. If Dante was prescient, what might that symbol of malevolence be chewing on? Dominionists? The secret unbroken line of Nazi ideology seeking to catalyst the Thousand Year Reich? Wokeism (technofeudal climate collectivist cult with depravity including the rape and transhumanizing of children)?? Those three things? And how do we crawl over this f**&ker?
Enough about the Nazis and the idea that they were the pinacle of human evil. This is repeated ad nauseum mainly because jews were their victims and Americans fought the Nazis but mostly because the Western left repeats this like a mantra 4 times in every sentence they utter. Evil greater than the Nazis are in play here.
Interesting observation:-)
Thanks. We live in interesting times.
Looking forward to finding out how Tom Cruise fits in to all of this. Has he aged yet?
Fresh blood transfusions from pure beings?
Well, if we’re gonna go there, the Government is a cult.
As evidenced by its rabid defenders (members) who willingly ignore its blatant criminality in support of 'their' guy who is, importantly, not the other (awful people's) guy. Very cultish.
Maybe its cults all the way down.
Members just play roles. Their guy, our guy, it’s all the same guy. Circle within circle of knowledge and power and if you don’t participate by the rules of the inner circle, you don’t get invited by the inner circle. Kinda like the Masons. Another cult. Cults all the way down.
Its cults all the way down
I often ask myself did the Trump presidency hurt or help the cult behavior that’s prevalent today?
It’s a chicken-egg dilemma. Was Trump a victim of unfair persecution, was he his own worst enemy? Or, worse, was everything a show?
From the beginning he came out swinging at “the swamp.” A swamp that he actually surrounded himself with and never drained near as I can tell.
It all feels like it’s contrived. Like a WWE wrestling match. The fake good guys vs the fake bad guys mixing it up so we dig deep and buy a ticket to the show.
Pre-covid Trump was a shoe-in for reelection. But had he been re-elected his detractors made it clear they’d never take the “Trump vaccine.” So was his crashing and burning by design to achieve almost total “vaccine” compliance?
Is everything theatre?
Trump declared the pandemic a National emergency on the auspicious date of Fri the 13th of March 2020. He pushed through DARPAs Operation Warp Speed “vaccinations” and is still bragging about it.
Is his current victimization a theatrical production to garner sympathy because he’s being groomed by the so-called swamp for a return?
It is important to understand Trump Derangement Syndrome works both ways and can be used to manipulate both sides to achieve a predetermined agenda. Trump’s enemies ultimately lined up to get transfected. Everyone could be getting roped-in to an unpleasant script without realizing it.
If we’re not careful and so quick to embrace what appears to be obvious we can all be sucked into cults.
A Chess game. Hegelian Dialectic
Egg-Zactly
And now you toss RFK in the mix. Since they are playing games with us, they may as well give us a good showdown and have RFK talking all sorts of shit about vaccines, Trump trying to defend warp speed, and Joe just being like Hunter is the smartest guy i've ever met.
Someone I know recently said, “Presidential elections always come down to voting for the shinier turd.”
There is a lot to the presence of Moloch in our culture.
Here is Ginsberg's notorious take:
https://youtu.be/Nonab6djMAA
Any thoughts about tracing this back in time?
I'm neither as intelligent, nor as thorough, nor anywhere near as organized as you - but I've been dabbling in this for quite some time now, and much of this seems to have proximal roots in theosophy, freemasonry and illuminism, and before that Sabbataean-Frankism. Illuminism and communism were/are essentially the same idea, and theosophy appears to have played a significant role in the fascist movement too in both Germany (deep occult roots inside the nazi party) and Italy (e.g. Julius Evola). EDIT - I forgot to add that Rasputin is also linked to theosophy through his key lieutenant, son-in-law and successor (from memory name was maybe Boris Soloviev) who was a Blavatsky acolyte.
Theosophy appears to be the direct precursor of the New Age movement and both were/are heavily involved in the United Nations (e.g. Alice Bailey, Robert Muller, David Spangler. Also Lucis trust previously known as the Lucifer publishing company). There appear to be strong links to the Kabbalah and Gnosticism in all of this too.
Further to that, something called the Academy of Divine Knowledge (now UNIFYD) seemed to link together a lot of prominent early anti-vaxxers inside a new age cult, which is itself tied to the United Nations through an individual named Sacha Stone. Members/teachers included David Icke (who appears to be a freemason as well), Del Bigtree, RFK Jr, Robert David Steele, Carrie Madej and dozens of others. Clay Clarke's reawaken america tour seemed to be linked to this group as far as I remember too. The web-site has changed, and much is now hidden - but you can see what it used to look like from this video https://www.bitchute.com/video/qETEsG2QU7xY/. Amusingly membership used to cost $33 per period (I can't remember the length of the period - but it isn't important - the key is the 33, as numerology appears to be a recurring theme of these cults probably derived from the Kabbalah).
Other ancient cult/sects which appear to be related - Knights Templar/Rosicrucians, Assassins, Ismaili sect esp Abdullah ibn Maymun (eventually resulting in the Kharmathites. The current leader of the Ismaili sect is the Aga Khan whose followers refer to him as the "bringer of light").
More recently Nxium is, I think, part of this, and Richard Branson appears to have been involved with that group hosting their meetings on his private island (Necker island) curiously located in the Bristish Virgin Islands about 25 miles from Epstein's Little St. James.
Also there's a fair bit of info out there regarding the infiltration of the catholic church which seems to have occurred relatively recently. The permanent instruction of the alta vendita (Italian freemasonry's plan to infiltrate the church) is a matter of record as is the pope's response at the time. Subsequently Vatican 2, various papal banking scandals, Malachi Martin's account (subsequently corroborated by the confession of a participant) of the enthronement of Lucifer in the vatican, the curious death of John Paul 1, the (forced?) partial abdication of Benedict, the idol worship of Francis (pacha mama) etc.
PS Random observation: Dr. David Martin has an eye of horus tattoo, as well as a very curious globalist background and a web-site littered with masonic symbology.
PPS Trump sports a fair bit of masonic symbology too.
I have also previously read (but done nothing to confirm) that scientology was developed from theosophy.
There are certainly many parallels. See here: https://www.jasoncolavito.com/blog/theosophy-scientology-and-ancient-aliens. And you can see the influence on David Icke too.
Here's William Cooper on Icke from way back in the 1990s. Cooper was known for predicting a rash of school shootings in 1991 and tied them to prescription meds and MK Ultra-type programs. He thought the purpose of them was to take down 2A. He also predicted a terrorist event that would be blamed on Bin Laden in the summer of 2001. A couple of months after 9/11, he died in a mysterious and still-disputed shootout with local law enforcement...something else he said was likely to happen.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1I8ZZ0g6mL0
Yes. Cooper is a legend.
"Behold a pale horse" can be found here for anyone who is interested: https://www.docdroid.net/oSSjjeB/william-cooper-behold-a-pale-horse1991-pdf#page=8
Interesting. Thanks for the information.
Apologies for responding here, but you seem to have closed your comments to non-paying subscribers, and - having quit my job as part of my general refusal to comply with "the system" - I am not really in a position to subscribe :-(.
I have read subsequent articles in this series with interest - you are doing an excellent job.
May I suggest you read Nesta Webster's "Secret Societies and Subversive Movements"? She is a controversial author, and some of her claims are disputed, but she does, I think, provide a good understanding of how secret societies function, and points to historical examples of what has been achieved and how.
In particular
(a) she describes the mechanism of circles of deception where
(i) recruiters are instructed to initially pretend to be whatever the potential recruit is likely to accept (be a jew to a jew, a christian to a christian, and a muhammedan to a muhammedan)
(ii) each level of a secret society believes they have been told the truth and are part of a group of elect working secretly towards a noble aim (or at least one to which they are sympathetic). And as a member is selected for promotion to the next level, a "new truth" is revealed to them.
(iii) Thus a large organization can be maintained which works towards a goal where hardly any of the members understand the true goal because they have all been deceived. The example of Abdullah ibn Maymun is very powerful - recruits were invited to join an organization whose goal, they were told, was the glory of Allah. they were gradually introduced to "new truths" until promotion to the final, ninth (I think) circle where it was revealed that there was no God, and that these ninth level initiates were enitiled to act as Gods themsleves and need be restrained by no morality except their own will.
It's also worth noting that a similar mechanism is now commonly used in military/intelligence "need to know" and has been used to maintain secrecy for vast projects - e.g. the Manhattan project where only a handful of people knew what the project's goal actually was. And the fact that this method for maintaining secrecy has been proven to work over millenia (webster provides examples going back to the first millenium) draws the teeth of one of the most common objections to conspiracies "they'd never be able to keep it secret - too many people would have to know and someone would spill the beans".
(b) she documents the Rothschild involvement with Adam Weishaupt who seems to have
(i) assumed control of pretty much all of freemasonry in the late eighteenth century through infiltration (the structure of secret societies makes them very vulnerable to infiltration).
(ii) codified communism decades before Marx under the title "Illuminism" - Marx seems to have used many of these ideas in his own work and there are direct links between Rothschild and Weishaupt, Rothschild and Marx, and indirectly between Marx and Weishaupt through Moses Hess. * It is possible that this point (b) actually came from a different author and I have misremembered it as Webster, in which case - sorry.
There are other points worth addressing:
1. It is not clear to me whether the primary goal of these societies is political or spiritual.
If you assume the primary goal is political, and reject the spiritual as mumbo-jumbo, you must answer the question as to why these societies always seem to feature evil magic/religion. I think the answer is that the process of slow introduction to such ideas allows both the corruption of and individual's morals and/or the selection of those whose morals are already corrupted to advance through the levels - because it is necessary to identify or create people willing to act in a way which the vast majority of people would reject and expose. And the use of multiple levels allows a gradual process which avoids too much damage should anyone rebel once initiated to a new level as only a very few truly understand all the secrets.
All that said, I rather suspect that at the very heart of these societies is truly Satan himself, and the fundamental purpose of the society's existence is the creation of hell on earth with political power merely a byproduct.
Both explanations work.
2. I think that these societies have been so successful that they have essentially co-opted the whole of society and we are all living in a lie (well possibly except a few of us who have begun to see through some of the lies - but even then one can never be sure that one has penetrated every veil and discerned what is truly truthful). They metastasized from freemasonry to government intelligence agencies and government bureaucracies (whose function is not what the majority of people within them believe, and never was - even though it may have appeared so initially). And the whole population at almost every level is controlled by "narratives" (lies) like climate change, peak resources/overpopulation, financial collapse etc. which again serve to co-opt society to work towards a goal which they believe is good, but which actually serves to enrich and empower a small group of insiders and encourages the "moral majority" to impose tyranny (spiritual harm) on dissenters.
3. I did find a link between Blavatsky and Rasputin. Boris Soloviev was a Blavatsky disciple who became a close adviser to rasputin, succeeded him as adviser to the Tsar after Rasputin's muder and posthumously married Rasputin's daughter. Make of that what you will.
4. Hitler appears to have been an illegitimate grandson of a Rothschild. See Koehler, "Inside the Gestapo".
5. General Flynn appears to be a Theosophist. A citizen journalist who goes by the moniker Blz No Psyop has posted some thought provoking stuff (this one shows Flynn reciting a Luciferian prayer and juxtaposes it with the theosophist Clare Elizabeth Prophet reciting a very similar prayer): https://rumble.com/v30gj9c-the-organized-disinformation-flynn-network.html (prayer starts at 2:59). Many other members of the medical freedom movement were associated with Flynn and/or Clay Clark and the Theosophist/New Age Academy of Divine Knowledge (see video at this link): https://truthinplainsight.com/some-prominent-anti-vaxers-may-have-masonic-ties/.
6. Finally there are reasons to at least suspect that Nesta Webster and Blz No Psyop were/are both "limited hangouts" themselves. Nevertheless the information they provide is interesting and useful, but - as with everyone - caution is advised and not all conclusions should be accepted.
Aleister Crowley OTO Jack Parsons L Ron Hubbard.
You got occult, jet propulsion and the founder of Scientology all cuddled up together. Hubbard even ended up with Parsons wife.
I looked into Jack Parson a few years ago, after Fox did a TV show about him. Some very weird and evil stuff about him..a satanist at the very least. Makes one wonder what NASA is really all about.
It's the latter: ["world's largest ever theatrical production aimed at convincing the world to accept a lesser level of rights and freedom (along with a series of market manipulations and grifts that result in little real organized opposition with the resources to push back)." ]
or maybe an unplanned and fractioned parallel timeline of the two possibilities.
Yes, I am mad at everyone who is so easily nudged in any direction by ultimately tax payer financed incentives. People need to become so much more aware of these manipulation attempts anf These attempts need to be shunned, morally condemned throughout an aware public, so that this "invisible hand" does not work any more.
Don’t believe there’s any “What If” about this whole rotten s**t show. And it obviously runs even deeper that I had previously thought.
I remember talking with some Twitter folks awhile back about the whole snarled mess (this was during Trumps four years). We agreed that the tangle was deliberate…erected to obfuscate who exactly was connected to whom, and influencing (at the very least, but I think also coordinating) the evil that has suddenly come out front and center, everywhere and all at once.
God bless your labors to pull back the curtain. May God guard and guide you and shine His grace upon on you.
Interesting that Dr. Malone, in his interview with Mappin, recognizes that the expression of normal proteins that should be "self" are treated as "non-self" by the immune systems of patients treated with such gene therapy, yet he has remained silent about the autoimmune origins of many of the "vaccine" adverse events like myocarditis. The video is evidence that he MUST have been aware of autoimmune problems we were warned about by Prof Dr Dolores Cahill in early 2021 and the biodistribution reported by Dr. Byram Bridle by summer 2021 along with the lack of aspiration reported by John Campbell. Yet he did not become an outspoken expert on such dangers, preferring instead to spend his time suing Dr. Breggin while at the same time agreeing with Breggin on demonizing the China for its role in the scam.
Complicit
He just posted something on myocarditis about 20 minutes ago.
In Dr. Malone's defense, he may not have been aware of the use of pseudouridine to increase the durability of the mRNA, and he was in fact vaccinated himself. Still, a bit of a mystery.
Malone claimed even though he knew the risks better than almost anyone he took the vax to travel. Really? Would you take poison to travel? I’m not buying it. He’s a very smooth salesman though.
Was he vaccinated? Did he tell you that himself?
I do not know Dr. Malone personally, so no he did not tell me that. He has been quoted in multiple sources as saying he took the vax to travel, and at the time it was difficult to travel without. As it was very early, he may not have known about the pseudouridine or the biodistribution. I'm willing to take his word that he was vaccinated, just as Steve Kirsch was. However, the clip with Mappin proves he was aware of the potential for autoimmune problems.. He's a very bright guy, but if he truly was vaxxed as he claims, it shows a large gap in his wiring.
Malone's prior relations with government are also inconsistent with his professed libertarianism. I'll reserve judgement on his overall sincerity, but there's certainly reason to doubt specific policy positions he espouses.
My point was that
(a) You appeared to be implying that his vaccination status was an additonal datapoint which could be used as evidence in assessing his integrity and sincerity
(b) Since the source of the information regarding his vaccination status is the gentleman himself, there is no useful, additional evidence contained in his assertion.
Another way of expressing this might be: "Well, he would say that, wouldn't he?"
If your knowledge of his vaccination status originated with a trusted third party then that might be different.
Exactly, and this claim to being vaxxed shows up over and over among probable fake leaders in the so-called MFM. Kirsch is another one. The weird thing is that so many otherwise awake, like-minded fall for it. It just goes to show how well-conditioned (i.e., brainwashed, we all are)!
If you want to know about the man, read his Substack.( As is true of many of the people now who are continuously being called out as being untrustworthy and worse ) He got the vaccine and had a serious adverse reaction with the second shot.He has admitted this. At the time he didn't think it would be dangerous. Yes, he needed to travel for work, like so many that got the shot. He wasn't anti vax. He trusted them. He had managed vaccine trials and other aspects of vaccines for years. He didn't invent the vaccine. He discovered the platform that it was eventually created from 30 years ago. He has 9 patents to prove this but has never gotten recognition. He has had to explain and defend this and the many other of the seemingly constant attacks to his credibility and integrity on a regular basis. And he is just one of many who have been working so hard to find and speak the truth who have had to endure this abuse. People have become so quick to judge. It is so counter productive and devisive. I wish people would do some research before making accusations.
Various points:
(1) I didn't attack him. I merely pointed out what I perceived as a logical flaw in the argument anti-republocrat put forward suggesting that his vaccination status was an additional datapoint that could usefully be used in making a judgment. Purely as a matter of logic, it isn't - and that was all I said here.
(2) I've read his substack, and other substacks. I know plenty about him.
(3) I understand that you deplore the apparent division within "the movement". Most of us deplore it. You would like everyone to get along and work together. So would I. However the problem is that we are fighting a battle that has been going on a very long time. The "enemy" infiltrates and attempts to both divide and control any movement that forms to oppose it. So - whether you and I like it or not, it is absolutely the case that there will be many figures within the movement whose goal is to destroy it. In that context, it is clear that we cannot just all get along, because quite a few of the leading figures have the goal of co-opting, splintering, and/or destroying the movement themselves.
(4) Given (3), it is unfortunately necessary to try and identify which figures are actually working for the enemy. If we do not, we have zero chance of being successful. Following leaders who are trying to lose the battle will not lead to victory.
(5) Whether Malone is one such, you must decide for yourself. But even if he is not, there absolutely will be many who are. And we do need to try and discover who they are and avoid wasting our energy on them.
(6) There are several reasons to be suspicious of Malone.
(a) He is a wealthy deep-state creature with a lot of questionable connections, and both his and his wife's parents were swamp-creature intelligence agents.
(b) His wife (and supposed partner in this battle) continues to list Bill Gates, Melinda Gates and Richard Branson as three of her top six influencers on linkedin. I believe she used to list Justin Trudeau as well the last time I checked which was earlier this year, but it's possible I have remembered that incorrectly.
(c) It appears from a paper he published prior to the vaccine rollout that he must have been aware of how dangerous the vaccines were a long time before he spoke up.
(d) Malone has launched a completely unnecessary lawsuit against Breggins. This is exactly the type of action one would expect from someone who is attempting to infiltrate and destroy a movement.
(e) He has pushed the mass psychosis idea which in my view is another psy-op developed initially by Matthias Desmet who seems to be part of a questionable group of academics operating out of the University of Ghent (conveniently located right next to the heart of the EU power structure) pushing what in my view are dubious theories.
So - now that you have raised the issue - yes I think it is likely that Malone is an infiltrator working for the deep state (or whatever you want to call the enemy). Am I certain - no?
But do I think him saying he took the vaccine himself is an indicator of anything? No I don't. Either he is a good guy, in which case, he did take the vaccine and he is telling the truth. Or he is a bad guy in which case he didn't take the vaccine and he is lying about it. The fact that he says he took the vaccine doesn't alter the probability of either of those possibilities one whit.
Deleting this and reposting it as a reply to my comment below as it preserves the order and sense of my comments more clearly.
I ignore the mainstream media and corporate ESG along with all cults. So many people are so lost and thus become a member of this cult or that hoping to find themselves. Cults are nothing more that another name for collectives where you surrender your individual sovereignty in favor of becoming a slave to the cult leaders.
I've been feeling that vaccines themselves have been elevated to a cult status, such that the label "anti-vaxxer" carries the same weight as being labeled a blasphemer or Satan worshipper in 17th century Salem, MA. Or the same as any member of a latter-day cult questioning or challenging the words of the cult leader.
(Can someone tell me what MFM means? Thanks.)
I was at a wedding and spoke to an older Filipino couple who talked about vaccines with a reverence normally reserved for Holy Water. The strange part was they considered their belief system scientifically proven, but when I pointed out a couple of problems in the science, they immediately reverted to "I believe in the FDA" and "Doctors wouldn't hurt us", which gets them really close to the cult definition.
What a perfect example! It's also interesting how they, and others, seem to approach "science" as something to take on faith, like religion. Rather than the dynamic process of challenging orthodoxy and changing in response to new data ~ the very opposite of religion. Thanks for sharing this! (And I'm not putting down religion; just noting how the boundary between faith and science have become so blurred.)
Medical Freedom Movement
thank you!
As per Sage Hana, the Not A Movement. Recommend that Substack.
Notre Dame, that was no accident.
Not Muslim torched?
Well yes, operatively speaking probably that. But you know how easy it is to get someone to do something, someone wants something done, for reason A. Therefore he arranges it so that someone else does it for that someone else's reason, reason B. Same recipe with Muslim terror as with school, mall etc shootings. In any case no accident.
"But you know how easy it is to get someone to do something, someone wants something done, for reason A. Therefore he arranges it so that someone else does it for that someone else's reason, reason B"
Very well put. Much larger applications too. I think this is how the whole of society is now run. We're nearly all doing this.
Interesting timing about the mind control part since the Unabomber just died. He took part in MK Ultra-type experiments at Harvard. With your math background, I'd be curious of your thoughts on him. I've read parts of his manifesto, and his description of the left in the 80s and early 90s sounds like the more totalitarian woke of today. I've head his PhD thesis was similar to John Nash's but never looked into it.
Allison McDowell talks about a couple of Scientology connections (Tony Muhammad and Michael Baum) to the California chapter of children's health defense in minutes 23 through 43 or so of this video:
https://www.youtube.com/live/3FLhv02cyNc?feature=share
Yes, I've watched some of her discussion on Scientologists and added some of her observations to my own. I still haven't fully researched the Nation of Islam piece, but I have some information and thoughts about it. Many people don't recall that we are not 30 years removed from a foreign leader trying to send the Nation of Islam a billion dollars to use for an armed insurrection against U.S. government.