80 Comments

Interesting: Nobody seems to have received this article by email.

Expand full comment

Got it! 7:38 PST. And so grateful you are one of 20! I know you'll do it just right. Put them on notice!

Expand full comment

Just got it!

Expand full comment

got it at 7:37 pm PST on April 5 :-)

Expand full comment

Mine at 7:38 pm PST April 5.

Expand full comment

I got it too 10:38 pm NYC

Expand full comment

I got it by email. We’re blessed that you were chosen to speak. Thank you for all that you do!

Expand full comment

I did! Awesome news!!

Expand full comment

I got it

Expand full comment

Got the email 10:37 April 5th

Expand full comment

In my email!

Expand full comment

Matthew, We are all thrilled you are doing this. That record will likely not be erased. Any way we can be of assistance you need only ask. All limbs crossed that what you say is as impactful as it should be.

Expand full comment

Don't go full data-nerd. Trigger their emotions (a good bar graph can do that). Remember how much of the last presentation you remembered 5 minutes after it ended? Yet you still remember how that presenter impressed you.

Suggestions. 1) The question & answer session is far more important than your presentation. 2) Remember to talk to the back wall so everyone will hear you. 3) If you wear a suit, keep it buttoned or you look sloppy especially while pointing. 4) Take some nootropics. 5) During your presentation, pause to ask direct rhetorical questions to wake them up. 6) Know each attendee's primary interest. 7) Focus on the Leader. 8) Keep your slides to three points - or less! 9) Spike the refreshments with caffeine powder. 10) Flash "No-Vax" subliminal "No-Vax" messaging "No-Vax" in your data slides. 11) Pepper your presentation with yes sets and compliance sets. 12) Tell them there'll be a quiz at the end with a $10K prize. 13) Occasionally pause and put your hands on your hips. 14) Turn down the room temperature. 15) Wear your tie backwards - so the label faces out - throws a wrench into their critical processing opening them to direct programming.

(Guessing as an educator, you know these basics)

Expand full comment

I don’t! These are great tips, awesome!

Expand full comment

Am I wrong, but does he only have three minutes? He said 20 speakers between 1:30 and 2:30? Hope I’m wrong- Mathew deserves the entire time.

Expand full comment

Three minutes may be enough time to get a point across, but he needs to talk really loud.

Expand full comment

"This is gonna be great!"

Let us pray for there to be no cancellation.

Expand full comment

And that his testimony is well understood, well received, etc. that the fda is really interested in the truth and willing to correct their mistakes, etc

Expand full comment

Quit this shit, or I'm gonna have to start believing in a benevolent God!

Just kidding. Knock 'em dead. Or at least, lay some truth on them and watch them squirm.

Expand full comment

Wonderful news.

If they are willing to listen and seek to understand - your analysis and intelligence will undoubtedly confront the core of the existing narrative. Thank you for advocating with temerity and tenacity for truth and sanity for all of humanity. It’s a huge responsibility and hopefully an opportunity to save lives.

Expand full comment

Holy cow. Mathew, what a tremendous blessing. Godspeed, my friend.

Expand full comment

Looking forward to hearing some truth at one of those meetings

Expand full comment

There's plenty of truth at the hearings just not from FDA who don't even listen!

Expand full comment

They know that the vaccines don't work and are killing people. They've seen the numbers and they don't care. I don't think showing them pretty pictures that prove it are going to change anything. I believe your focus needs to be on the moral questions. Cite the numbers about waning efficiency and vaccine damage in general terms but also cite personal examples of injuries that have been proven to be vaccine related: Eric Clapton, Taylor Hawkins, Maddie de Garey, sports figures, etc. Cite the all cause mortality figures from insurance companies (cite your own background as an actuary). Challenge them to how they will be remembered in history, what they will say to their maker (assuming they believe in one), how they will face their friends and associates when one of them has a vaccine injury in their immediate family.

Stalin said one death is a tragedy. one million deaths is a statistic.

Expand full comment

I don't believe the "waning efficacy" story, so I don't promote it. What I believe is that efficacy is a statistical illusion, and that illusion fades over time, just as Professor Norman Fenton demonstrated in simulations.

Expand full comment

I think you’re right, from all of the data that I’ve seen reports about. The efficacy wasn’t ever there - illusion.

Expand full comment

Yes! "vaccine effectiveness" is the biggest lie of all from this. They have no way to determine this without intentionally infecting willing participants.

Expand full comment

Are you all aware of the late and quite anxious inclusion of Dr James Hildreth? https://www.fda.gov/media/157231/download

Based on Nashville news it sounds like he is quite compromised with his financial interests. https://fox17.com/news/ferrier-files/nashville-doctor-silent-on-18m-no-bid-contract-with-metro-schools-meharry-medical-college-port-report-beacon-center-of-tennessee

They claim he has special insight into lack of vaccine uptake among minorities, and that is one reason he is an important contributer.

Anyone else find this Sus or am I mistaken.

Good luck Matt! I hope the conversation around mass Vaccine driven Variants gets addressed.

Expand full comment

WO. Great find. Hildreth gets to vote, because “his expertise outweighs” his corruption?! BS He’s getting at least a couple million for his college to do a clinical trial. FDA pulls HIM in when all these front line docs fight for their licenses.

Expand full comment

Great for you, I hope to listen! .. and I'm glad you answered my question about why I wasn't receiving an email on of my subscriptions.

Expand full comment

Excellent. Serve up a judicious blend of both-barrels, evidence-based assertions, and politeness.

Expand full comment

Define "politeness".

Expand full comment

Assuming the best of people and treating them with civility even when the preponderance of carefully presented evidence demonstrates their malfeasance. It is the thinking, cunning person’s passive aggressive approach. No blowback, but maximum damage.

Expand full comment

I will aim for polite obliteration. Thank you.

Expand full comment

Intense, focused, yet profound brain-nuking. I like it.

Expand full comment

It would be polite to imply, but not threaten, legal liability for their continuing crimes against humanity.

Expand full comment

Subscribed, thanks.

Expand full comment

I'm a cynic about the process at this point, so my view is that it's more about getting all this on the record than actually having a shot of stopping this train. So glad it's going to be you doing it since I think your work is methodical, clear...and damning.

Expand full comment

Break a leg or whatever ever means to be awesome for data people. We all support you !

Expand full comment

Twenty speakers in one hour?!

Expand full comment