77 Comments
Jun 3, 2022Liked by Mathew Crawford

The first thing that comes to mind is the people questioning the defense department narrative, have been threatened. The military have always vaxxed the living daylights out of their soldiers and exposed them to pathological agents. Soldiers are simply collateral damage. A friend was given anthrax vaccine. He suffered leukaemia. Another served in Viet Nam and died from agent orange exposure. We are all witnessing, the experimental biologicals, causing severe adverse events and deaths. Going after the DOD, regarding cooking the books, will never be an easy task and may involve certain dangers for those pursuing the truth. Your efforts are admirable.

Expand full comment

Jeff Childer?

Expand full comment

My prayers are with you, Matthew. This sounds intense. May God protect you, your family, your data. May he continue to give you wisdom and discernment. May his favor shine on you and your quest for truth.

Expand full comment

They're not going to give you any VaST or VAERS data. I have been in a FOIA battle for nearly a year now, and the latest statement from CBER's FOIA worker is that CBER's Office of Biostatistics and Pharmacovigilance cannot query the VAERS database to return one field of data (say, race) for a range of VAERS ID numbers. The FOIA worker said that each record would have to be downloaded individually and then redacted, line by line.

You might get the emails, but they'll pretend (as they did during the PHMPT hearings) that they don't have any data in digital format, but need to take screenshots of everything, one at a time.

FOIA is pretend. I don't know how to put it any better than that. It's like Harvey Weinstein: Everybody knows the truth, but no one will say it out loud. I can count five prima facie violations of 5 U.S. Code § 552 in FDA's interaction with me, all of which are actionable. I am currently exhausting my administrative remedies (a request to OGIS and my senator's active Congressional inquiry), and after that, I'll be suing, which will be complicated because I am a journalist for a very small paper. But there is not even the pretense of honoring FOIA within HHS. I imagine DoD is the same.

Expand full comment

My suggestion would be to start with a plaintiff. Ideally a spokesperson or model case for a class of other plaintiffs. There is plenty of evidence of damage in the DMED data, but as far as I can see we don't have a starting complainant.

Ultimately, it's the DoD that are responsible for indemnifying Pfizer through the Other Transaction Authority procurement method and then falsifying the data to cover it up. Whilst at first instance it looks like the drug companies have no liability, it's only because they've been indemnified by the DoD as the contracting party. It should be a dream case for any trial lawyer to sue the government on this basis, but we'll probably have to nicely package it for them before the phone starts ringing off the hook. All roads lead back to the DoD as the party ultimately responsible for all vaccine damages.

But this needs to start with somebody that's suffered injury we can then present to an attorney. They are then duty bound to consider the case on its merits. It will be interesting to see what objections if any they throw up. From there we can start to fill in the gaps.

I would suggest making a shortlist of attorneys that have had previous success in suing the DoD for medical malpractice. Ideally those that have had success in the other military vaccine cases. We need to present our package of evidence along with our plaintiff to them and show in the DMED data that there are plenty more where they came from. Baum Hedlund Aristei & Goldman are an example of a firm that represented plaintiffs in the Gardasil lawsuit. It's an example we could start with.

If necessary, it may be a good idea to form a non-profit organization to raise a legal fund and publicize this legal action on its own. The more we can demonstrate an unassailable case with a growing class of plaintiffs that have suffered irreparable damages from an organization with seemingly limitless funds, then it's a much stronger incentive for a firm to consider.

I'm not convinced the politically connected lawyers will take this on. Robert Barnes may look like your friend but he's eyeing up the future Trump administration and Trump's all in on the vaccines. I suggest starting with the basic facts and running this like any other class action suit.

Expand full comment
Jun 3, 2022Liked by Mathew Crawford

The other thing that muddies the data waters is the ongoing transition from AHLTA to MHS GENESIS. If everyone was still on AHLTA, conducting analysis on vaccine injuries in the DoD would be trivially easy. I hate having hypotheses that are difficult/nearly impossible to prove, but if there is negative absolute risk reduction for COVID vaccines in the active duty military population then this transition is making that much more difficult to investigate. Of course, this transition began before COVID with the first pilots being conducted in 2017-2018, but with that EVALI hypothesis and your consideration that the DoD may have been more intimately involved in GoF etc. I won't say anything further, I just had to make the point that if the entire DoD was still on AHLTA and this transition wasn't underway, finding out how many cases of myocarditis across the DoD were related to vaccination would be trivially easy. Now, not so much. Bug, or feature?

Expand full comment
Jun 3, 2022Liked by Mathew Crawford

Not sure if he’s retired, but he definitely has had success battling conspirators: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_F._Pepper

Expand full comment
Jun 3, 2022·edited Jun 3, 2022

Sidney Powell is a place to start. Simone Gold. There is another woman, retired military and practicing lawyer. I believe her first name is Lynn. I can remember her face and blonde hair but not her name. They might know who might know who would be interested. There's Tom Fitton of Judicial Watch and they have a specialized and well oiled team of retired federales. I realize you're trolling for a champion, but you might do more reaching out. I would suspect what you need here is as specialized as it is important. Good luck with this important work. Most will have great difficulty grasping the gestalt of what you're onto. The better you can describe it, the better your chances to find the person you are looking for.

What is so shocking is the generational component. It is as if our government and its institutions are being staffed by an administrative culture that lies promiscuously with depraved indifference, protected and empowered by an institutionally depraved indifference toward their acts of depraved indifference. It's like the cohort has become infested with hack lawyer/admins moronic minions who studied and mastered the arts of prevarication on their way through university, fabricating and plagiarizing willy nilly along the way.

It's not just what they do. It's "the thing" the most know how to do and promote those who help them do the same whereby a conspiracy of mediocrity takes form an arises as an aggressively self-protective superior culture dominating the institutional workplace.

A society and government that shelters and protects people who will do this will not well endure the institutional performance costs of unrelenting malignant duplicity.

Everywhere I look in government institutional culture today, I see peak entropy being reached as once honorable institutions are being spun out of the control by the rampages of psychopathy afflicting the executive, fiduciary, trustee and supervising human persons employed therein. The trustee culture has been systematically gutted and subsumed by the prevaricating classes.

It's more than scandal. It's terrifying to watch unfold. They act as if they are gaming their way through school manufacturing simile, affect and subterfuge on their way to somewhere magically successful where they get wealthy and really important.

We are besieged with an epidemic of the impressively credentialed high-functioning mentally ill working in critical institutions where they screen for guns but not for psychopathy.

Expand full comment

Matthew - Please shoot me an email; I'm very interested. I have other actions pending, and not a lot of time, but I'm absolutely interested. I know some of the people you've mentioned.

Expand full comment

You are messing with the people who brought us Joe Biden. They are making their world go around their way, and they have gotten used to it. They are good at destroying things. They destroyed the database, and it is now useless, to us and to them. They do not care, they like it that way, and they are happy to see you spend the rest of your life on it. They obviously do not care how many people they kill. Stalin didn’t.

Protect your data, and your hardware, and be your own cloud.

The regime has violated international law and US code. That is clear. They are guilty of crimes against humanity. Clearly. What they have just recently done in Ukraine is a small thing in comparison. However, it is certainly enough to remove them from power. The states need to act against the US Federal Government, and not just a few of them, but a majority of them. This is the only way to win.

Expand full comment

Warner Mendenhall Law Group here in Ohio. He presented at the Ohio Chapter of Children’s Health Defense meeting at the Columbus, OH statehouse on May 4th.

Expand full comment

Firstly, I hope you succeed in your endeavours. Fingers crossed for you.

Secondly, I am getting the popcorn ready as Steve and Callander sort their shit out after the little spat.

They might both find mutual ground if they are diplomatic. If they drag you into this as well. The three of you have a fine team. Strong data. A lawyer. And apparently Steve has a red pilled Attorney general up his sleeve to boot.

Also I just heard the UK dropped everything covid mandate related. I'm not sure what to make of that yet. But it doesn't sound like a bad thing.

Expand full comment

Mathew, anybody can file a FOIA, no lawyer necessary. Reporters do it all the time. The lawyer is needed if (when) the government refuses your request on bogus grounds. I have info on how somewhere, I'll look.

Expand full comment

I think the only thing that has a chance of being noticed unavoidably are lots more deaths. Once that really gets their attention, (or they die too), well, then some actual discussions can get underway, and all your work can be used to back up the assertions. I came to the realization that people are more concerned with what kind of milk is in their latte than what they are being injected with just a few days ago, sad but true. When I talk of the deaths, and impending deaths, my ex partner scoffs and has no idea what is coming, or what is already here. If you were going to die soon, would you want to know?

Expand full comment

Keep at it. Don't get discouraged.

Expand full comment

I have not personally deleted any of your comments Mathew.

You did not provide a detailed explanation in the comments, and I do not see the breakdown I asked for in this post either.

Kindly explain in detail what you would like conveyed to Todd Callender and I will review it.

Thanks,

2SG

Expand full comment