Professor Crawford, I so appreciate your detailed analysis of the the whole HCQ protocol. I believe you are correct that there is a place for both HCQ and IVM in an early treatment and preventative protocol. Dr. Mobeen Syed has looked at both and has no problem with my wife and I using them as part of a prophylactix protocol. We have been doing it for over a year now. No side effects and no colds, flu or COVID. Keep up the good work!
I am very grateful for your work. Word is getting out there thanks to the efforts of many brave and honest scientists, doctors, journalists and researchers like you. The power of Big Pharma is a terrifying sight to behold so I am grateful so many folks are waking up.
“Method: Most commonly used three data mining algorithms (DMAs) (Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR), Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR) and Information Component (IC)) were selected and
applied retrospectively in USFDA Adverse Event Reporting System database to detect five confirmed Drug Event Combinations.
Result: Among the three data mining algorithms, Information Component was found to have a
maximum sensitivity (100%) followed by Reporting Odds Ratio (60%) and Proportional Reporting Ratio (40%)“
These seem to be variants of Bayesian statistics, another test could be made by comparing the number of side effects in Republicans or Democrats compared with the general population. Point is: everything is political. I don’t believe anything unless it conforms to my confirmation bias.
I'm not necessarily disagreeing with your hypothesized connection between the French Minister's October 2019 decision and her marriage to the former INSERM CEO, but could you help me understand better why the INSERM CEO might have an interest in burying news of successful treatment agents? To advance what goal?
Professor Crawford, I so appreciate your detailed analysis of the the whole HCQ protocol. I believe you are correct that there is a place for both HCQ and IVM in an early treatment and preventative protocol. Dr. Mobeen Syed has looked at both and has no problem with my wife and I using them as part of a prophylactix protocol. We have been doing it for over a year now. No side effects and no colds, flu or COVID. Keep up the good work!
Good stuff. I actually still think HCQ may turn out to be a better drug than IVM.
I am very grateful for your work. Word is getting out there thanks to the efforts of many brave and honest scientists, doctors, journalists and researchers like you. The power of Big Pharma is a terrifying sight to behold so I am grateful so many folks are waking up.
“Method: Most commonly used three data mining algorithms (DMAs) (Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR), Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR) and Information Component (IC)) were selected and
applied retrospectively in USFDA Adverse Event Reporting System database to detect five confirmed Drug Event Combinations.
Result: Among the three data mining algorithms, Information Component was found to have a
maximum sensitivity (100%) followed by Reporting Odds Ratio (60%) and Proportional Reporting Ratio (40%)“
These seem to be variants of Bayesian statistics, another test could be made by comparing the number of side effects in Republicans or Democrats compared with the general population. Point is: everything is political. I don’t believe anything unless it conforms to my confirmation bias.
Have you read this? https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/science/articles/hydroxychloroquine-morality-tale
Great work!
I'm not necessarily disagreeing with your hypothesized connection between the French Minister's October 2019 decision and her marriage to the former INSERM CEO, but could you help me understand better why the INSERM CEO might have an interest in burying news of successful treatment agents? To advance what goal?