Professor Crawford, I so appreciate your detailed analysis of the the whole HCQ protocol. I believe you are correct that there is a place for both HCQ and IVM in an early treatment and preventative protocol. Dr. Mobeen Syed has looked at both and has no problem with my wife and I using them as part of a prophylactix protocol. We have been doing it for over a year now. No side effects and no colds, flu or COVID. Keep up the good work!
I think there is that chance, but they may each have best uses at different stages. Ivermectin may defeat some bacteria that could have effects on the heart, for instance. That may be good for long haulers or post vac.
I am very grateful for your work. Word is getting out there thanks to the efforts of many brave and honest scientists, doctors, journalists and researchers like you. The power of Big Pharma is a terrifying sight to behold so I am grateful so many folks are waking up.
“Method: Most commonly used three data mining algorithms (DMAs) (Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR), Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR) and Information Component (IC)) were selected and
applied retrospectively in USFDA Adverse Event Reporting System database to detect five confirmed Drug Event Combinations.
Result: Among the three data mining algorithms, Information Component was found to have a
maximum sensitivity (100%) followed by Reporting Odds Ratio (60%) and Proportional Reporting Ratio (40%)“
These seem to be variants of Bayesian statistics, another test could be made by comparing the number of side effects in Republicans or Democrats compared with the general population. Point is: everything is political. I don’t believe anything unless it conforms to my confirmation bias.
I'm not necessarily disagreeing with your hypothesized connection between the French Minister's October 2019 decision and her marriage to the former INSERM CEO, but could you help me understand better why the INSERM CEO might have an interest in burying news of successful treatment agents? To advance what goal?
Agreed. Actually I don't think we can trust anyone with power. The existence of vectors of high-voltage power in the form of organizations and institutions seems like a basic problem in and of itself. When, once established, has it ever NOT been hijacked and used by apex social/economic predators to increase the power of apex social/economic predators.
Professor Crawford, I so appreciate your detailed analysis of the the whole HCQ protocol. I believe you are correct that there is a place for both HCQ and IVM in an early treatment and preventative protocol. Dr. Mobeen Syed has looked at both and has no problem with my wife and I using them as part of a prophylactix protocol. We have been doing it for over a year now. No side effects and no colds, flu or COVID. Keep up the good work!
Good stuff. I actually still think HCQ may turn out to be a better drug than IVM.
I think there is that chance, but they may each have best uses at different stages. Ivermectin may defeat some bacteria that could have effects on the heart, for instance. That may be good for long haulers or post vac.
I am very grateful for your work. Word is getting out there thanks to the efforts of many brave and honest scientists, doctors, journalists and researchers like you. The power of Big Pharma is a terrifying sight to behold so I am grateful so many folks are waking up.
“Method: Most commonly used three data mining algorithms (DMAs) (Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR), Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR) and Information Component (IC)) were selected and
applied retrospectively in USFDA Adverse Event Reporting System database to detect five confirmed Drug Event Combinations.
Result: Among the three data mining algorithms, Information Component was found to have a
maximum sensitivity (100%) followed by Reporting Odds Ratio (60%) and Proportional Reporting Ratio (40%)“
These seem to be variants of Bayesian statistics, another test could be made by comparing the number of side effects in Republicans or Democrats compared with the general population. Point is: everything is political. I don’t believe anything unless it conforms to my confirmation bias.
Have you read this? https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/science/articles/hydroxychloroquine-morality-tale
Great work!
I'm not necessarily disagreeing with your hypothesized connection between the French Minister's October 2019 decision and her marriage to the former INSERM CEO, but could you help me understand better why the INSERM CEO might have an interest in burying news of successful treatment agents? To advance what goal?
What was the WHO'S motivation in using a 4x dose on late stage patients in isolation instead of Raoult' or Tyson's protocols?
What was Sepan Desai's motivation in faking a paper that claimed HCQ killed substantially more than COVID alone?
I could ask a hundred such questions, but oir answers will be speculative.
Maybe it was all to establish pharma as heroes with vaccines? Profit? Maybe it was to cull expensive old people?
Societal control and reorganization?
What we do know is that the result looks like intentional killing of millions and that these are not the people to trust with power.
Agreed. Actually I don't think we can trust anyone with power. The existence of vectors of high-voltage power in the form of organizations and institutions seems like a basic problem in and of itself. When, once established, has it ever NOT been hijacked and used by apex social/economic predators to increase the power of apex social/economic predators.