Find out more about the Information Wars here.
Ask yourself the following question:
Do I suspect that some portion of the news and media-project world events are "fake" or staged?
While I'm not going to run a formal poll, I'm fairly certain that nearly all RTE readers are astute enough to answer, "Yes, at least some of them."
Now, consider the following story sent me by a friend and RTE reader:
Reading the headline quickly, you might subconsciously think "spike protein".
Try to suppress any bias that you have over whether or not this story is true. It might be entirely true. It might be partially true. It might be a complete fabrication. Without performing some sort of due diligence (assuming no direct involvement), we cannot say for certain.
What we can say is that, for some subset of readers, is this:Â
The story reveals a potentially existential threat.Â
If mRNA consumed this way has toxic or genetic effects, the results could be widely catastrophic. The potential for civilization-altering changes becomes wildly higher the moment we consider the invisible poisoning of the food supply (which already happens on a more modest scale, thanks to a not insubstantial portion of the food-industrial complex, but that's its own story).
Perhaps some subset of readers thinks those fears (regarding mRNA) are paranoid or overstated. Understand that my point is not to argue either way. In truth, I do not have a high level of understanding of the dangerous of mRNA introduced through all the different possible ways that it might enter a body. I'm perfectly aware there are things that are toxic if consumed in one way, and harmless when consumed by another. This is all beside the point.
The point is this:Â
We have now entered a world in which our levels of fear, uncertainty, and doubt (FUD) can be fully manipulated by the media to the point of engineering a necessity of action or despair in the minds of most people.
Most people seem to think they're helpless to act, so they will reach a point of despair.
Yes, I do think this is coming.
Then What?
We have already been hit with psychological operations for decades. Some may disagree, but I would put climate alarmism high on that list.
The rise of Hitler followed the despair of Germany.
No, don't think Trump. Sure, he may be a player on the grand stage, but the insertion of a younger leading man with less baggage seems likely—at some point. Trump may have been used to tire people out. It's hard to be vigilant daily over an accused Manchurian candidate year after year after year after year.Â
People will likely give power over to somebody whom we don't yet expect or know about. All of this will take place after craftily-arranged consolidation of power that has been ongoing during the Plandemonium. In fact, the Plandemonium may simply be part of a plan to lead us in that direction.
There is a way out, but that would require the whole world waking up to the way their education and subsequent media warped their minds, and primed them for emotional control.
How can you strictly regulate the dose of a vaccine included in any product intended for general consumption? You can't. This is why I think the milk story is intentional scaremongering, perhaps with the aim of cultivating a sense of inevitability in the populace that they WILL be vaccinated, one way or the other. Of course, the reduction or elimination of the consumption of dairy products from methane-farting cows is a key target of the climate alarmist agenda. So, scaring people off milk by telling them it's going to be 'spiked' with potentially killer vaccines might not be a bad idea in the long run.
I’ve also wondered if the vaccine side affects are possibly overblown for the same reason. Black magic