Mathew: It's been almost three months now since you wrote the following:
"I spent two weeks cleaning and organizing the data, and some time writing the paper. Here are the preliminary results .....
The next step for this research is to pass through the hands of some highly experienced and well published professionals as we shape the paper…
Mathew: It's been almost three months now since you wrote the following:
"I spent two weeks cleaning and organizing the data, and some time writing the paper. Here are the preliminary results .....
The next step for this research is to pass through the hands of some highly experienced and well published professionals as we shape the paper up for submission to medical journals."
If the results were as good as you are claiming, then this is literally some of the most important work on earth. Why haven't you published the paper (even if just on your Substack) so folks can analyze the underlying data?
Mathew: It's been almost three months now since you wrote the following:
"I spent two weeks cleaning and organizing the data, and some time writing the paper. Here are the preliminary results .....
The next step for this research is to pass through the hands of some highly experienced and well published professionals as we shape the paper up for submission to medical journals."
If the results were as good as you are claiming, then this is literally some of the most important work on earth. Why haven't you published the paper (even if just on your Substack) so folks can analyze the underlying data?
That's a very long story. The preprint draft is ready. One of my coauthors is being predatorially sued at the moment.
Several weeks were lost due to me wondering how to handle very bad advice from a would-be coauthor, which is unfortunate.
Let me know how I can make it happen faster. My first piece of advice is do not submit to Current Problems in Cardiology. hahaha