Mathew, I don't know if your book project includes looking at the DTRA DOMANE exercise as a key part of suppression of HCQ and promotion of IVM. If it doesn't, it should. I will be publishing on it in the next few days. Also, here is a link to the FDA powerpoint discussing EUA countermeasures, and they have a slide on HCQ there (p.17). https://public4.pagefreezer.com/browse/FDA/15-09-2022T08:43/https://www.fda.gov//media/154536/download
They issued EUA for it and then quickly removed it. All of these maneuvers (DOMANE and EUA for HCQ) were specifically designed to fool medical professionals and give the FDA the fig leaf of legitimacy in suppressing HCQ.
I have a nearly full draft from 2020, but was unaware of DOMANE at the time, but I will add some discussion on it. And if you're willing, I'd like to get on the phone or zoom and talk some about it after I do a bit more reading. Thank you for the documentation.
Note: My current [partial] reading of DOMANE is that it's part of erecting a false binary between HCQ and remdesivir, and that pepcid was Malone's talking point out.
Yes. The objective of this DOMANE fake science (it was totally fake science) was to create false legitimacy for remdesivir, and produce a peer reviewed paper with a bunch of big names validating remdesivir as a treatment choice for covid. Doctors do not read science papers, and don't know how to decipher bullshit in them, and don't care. They only read headlines, and do whatever the hospital "protocol" they are told to administer. So all of this was to give legitimacy to the murder protocol by remdesivir. Remdesivir was funded by DTRA (it's a military asset, a chemical weapon, laundered via Gilead).
"Doctors do not read science papers, and don't know how to decipher bullshit in them, and don't care. They only read headlines, and do whatever the hospital "protocol" they are told to administer."
This is certainly true of my former colleagues. Some would read NEJM ( I don't know which bits), many here look at CMAJ and the local provincial magazines. Most believe Cochrane reviews without looking at the selection criteria.
The research science is difficult if one hasn't done it, and even reading it does not allow one to critique papers reliably. Various Substack authors help with this (Thank you, Mathew and Kevin) but there is still a calibration and trust issue (Steve and Robert?)
Why should they? Doctors by and large are not scientists. They work in a top down dictatorial business model. They are expected to follow orders not question them. This started in a big way decades ago when insurance companies started dictating care. We saw what happened when doctors stepped out of line with covid. If you’re a family doc just test for strep and influenza, treat seasonal allergies, do your physicals, squeeze some lymph nodes, wield your stethoscope and sphygmomanometer, tap a knee or two, read blood tests, write a few ‘scripts and do the Hokey Pokey on the ‘ol moon river. If you find anything suspicious just pass ‘em along to a specialist. Next! Theres your modern doctoring in a nutshell.
of Run Death is Near is that it was definitely a MCM meant to be used prophylactically by soldiers entering areas known to be permeated with bio logical Weapons. It had to be used in advance for very limited periods because of serious side effects like destroying kidneys. Apparently it didn't that very well and I think most here know what happened
in the Ebola trials with already infected subjects.
"a MCM meant to be used prophylactically by soldiers entering areas known to be permeated with bio logical Weapons"
How can a poison that shuts down kidneys be used "prophylactically" against other poisons?? Kidneys are the major detox organ. How is damaging it going to make anything prophylactically better?
"I am giving thought to taking a vacation where I can spend half of each day in total relaxation and half of each day writing" - Go for it. While we'll miss your writings we'll catch up after you get the book done.
In March of 2020, a friend who worked in corporate communications at Memorial Sloan Kettering shared with me a recording of a webinar MSK conducted to keep employees abreast of how they were responding to "covid". One of the physicians identified himself as a member of the task force advising the president. He mentioned they were having success treating their covid patients with a number of repurposed drugs, particularly chloroquine. A week later, Trump gave his press conference where he pronounced HCQ to be a possible "game changer" only to be thrown under the bus by Fauci.
I later asked my friend if Dr's at MSK were still using chloroquine, but she had no interest in talking about it. I'll be looking forward to reading your book. Good luck with this project.
Fauci didn’t throw just Trump under the bus. At that time Ferguson was predicting 2-3 million covid deaths over the next several months. These deaths didn’t ultimately materialize, but I interpreted it as he just threw millions under the bus without ANY alternative therapies available to use until the jabs rolled out. I knew from that moment forward that everything that followed under Fauci’s technical leadership was totally and unimaginably f’ked. So I immediately procured a small mountain of the hcq therapy from overseas. Never did anything like that before in my life. I hope to see the day Fauci swings from a rope.
I have numerous book ideas, but the most fully fleshed out (and partially written) is The Chloroquine Wars. I may choose to write up The Efficacy Illusion after that.
I seem to remember you asking us if we wanted a book rather than the online articles. I said I would pre-order a paper book as I don't like reading off of a phone screen. Please look after yourself, I worry you work too hard. ❤️🇬🇧 Edit: this clearly Is the book I was thinking of. Please excuse my dimness.
Matthew - Go for it (vacation time). This is a long war and you are one of the main warriors. It is critical to pull the best troops off the line for some well deserved R & R. They come back stronger.
Sasha is great. There is also some info out there on Malone and Domane on George Webb's site.
Something else to be aware of is the following post about Malone being financed by a Nursing Home Sugar Daddy and avoiding uncomfortable related subjects, like fraudulent Death Certificates. Early nursing home treatments may also fall into that category. Take care.
Jeff Hanson's Finance of the Malone's Medical Freedom World Tour
Mathew, I don't know if your book project includes looking at the DTRA DOMANE exercise as a key part of suppression of HCQ and promotion of IVM. If it doesn't, it should. I will be publishing on it in the next few days. Also, here is a link to the FDA powerpoint discussing EUA countermeasures, and they have a slide on HCQ there (p.17). https://public4.pagefreezer.com/browse/FDA/15-09-2022T08:43/https://www.fda.gov//media/154536/download
They issued EUA for it and then quickly removed it. All of these maneuvers (DOMANE and EUA for HCQ) were specifically designed to fool medical professionals and give the FDA the fig leaf of legitimacy in suppressing HCQ.
I have a nearly full draft from 2020, but was unaware of DOMANE at the time, but I will add some discussion on it. And if you're willing, I'd like to get on the phone or zoom and talk some about it after I do a bit more reading. Thank you for the documentation.
yes, absolutely!
Note: My current [partial] reading of DOMANE is that it's part of erecting a false binary between HCQ and remdesivir, and that pepcid was Malone's talking point out.
Yes. The objective of this DOMANE fake science (it was totally fake science) was to create false legitimacy for remdesivir, and produce a peer reviewed paper with a bunch of big names validating remdesivir as a treatment choice for covid. Doctors do not read science papers, and don't know how to decipher bullshit in them, and don't care. They only read headlines, and do whatever the hospital "protocol" they are told to administer. So all of this was to give legitimacy to the murder protocol by remdesivir. Remdesivir was funded by DTRA (it's a military asset, a chemical weapon, laundered via Gilead).
"Doctors do not read science papers, and don't know how to decipher bullshit in them, and don't care. They only read headlines, and do whatever the hospital "protocol" they are told to administer."
Most important two sentences I've read, anywhere.
This is certainly true of my former colleagues. Some would read NEJM ( I don't know which bits), many here look at CMAJ and the local provincial magazines. Most believe Cochrane reviews without looking at the selection criteria.
The research science is difficult if one hasn't done it, and even reading it does not allow one to critique papers reliably. Various Substack authors help with this (Thank you, Mathew and Kevin) but there is still a calibration and trust issue (Steve and Robert?)
Why should they? Doctors by and large are not scientists. They work in a top down dictatorial business model. They are expected to follow orders not question them. This started in a big way decades ago when insurance companies started dictating care. We saw what happened when doctors stepped out of line with covid. If you’re a family doc just test for strep and influenza, treat seasonal allergies, do your physicals, squeeze some lymph nodes, wield your stethoscope and sphygmomanometer, tap a knee or two, read blood tests, write a few ‘scripts and do the Hokey Pokey on the ‘ol moon river. If you find anything suspicious just pass ‘em along to a specialist. Next! Theres your modern doctoring in a nutshell.
My understanding
of Run Death is Near is that it was definitely a MCM meant to be used prophylactically by soldiers entering areas known to be permeated with bio logical Weapons. It had to be used in advance for very limited periods because of serious side effects like destroying kidneys. Apparently it didn't that very well and I think most here know what happened
in the Ebola trials with already infected subjects.
"a MCM meant to be used prophylactically by soldiers entering areas known to be permeated with bio logical Weapons"
How can a poison that shuts down kidneys be used "prophylactically" against other poisons?? Kidneys are the major detox organ. How is damaging it going to make anything prophylactically better?
Win win !👍🏼
I think Peter Navarro has talked about the sequence of events surrounding HCQ and EUA. That said, I doubt he realizes the legal nuances of the E UA.
"I am giving thought to taking a vacation where I can spend half of each day in total relaxation and half of each day writing" - Go for it. While we'll miss your writings we'll catch up after you get the book done.
I might still publish some of it here while I'm away. Because why not?
Exactly .... tease us and give us a little to keep us going... and stay healthy‼️Good Luck and Blessings ‼️🙋🏼♀️🥰
I’m happy to support you in any way I can, including, of course, continuing to subscribe while you write the book.
That is greatly appreciated.
Definitely take a vacation and get some much needed rest. Eat well, exercise, sleep well, and get some sunshine!
Have a blessed vacation.
Don’t agonize! It either works or it doesn’t. Tell the truth.
The agony is only in committing to one priority while there are many that are important.
There is Good, Better, and Best. Prioritize it all then focus on the Best. Save the rest for later.
In March of 2020, a friend who worked in corporate communications at Memorial Sloan Kettering shared with me a recording of a webinar MSK conducted to keep employees abreast of how they were responding to "covid". One of the physicians identified himself as a member of the task force advising the president. He mentioned they were having success treating their covid patients with a number of repurposed drugs, particularly chloroquine. A week later, Trump gave his press conference where he pronounced HCQ to be a possible "game changer" only to be thrown under the bus by Fauci.
I later asked my friend if Dr's at MSK were still using chloroquine, but she had no interest in talking about it. I'll be looking forward to reading your book. Good luck with this project.
Fauci didn’t throw just Trump under the bus. At that time Ferguson was predicting 2-3 million covid deaths over the next several months. These deaths didn’t ultimately materialize, but I interpreted it as he just threw millions under the bus without ANY alternative therapies available to use until the jabs rolled out. I knew from that moment forward that everything that followed under Fauci’s technical leadership was totally and unimaginably f’ked. So I immediately procured a small mountain of the hcq therapy from overseas. Never did anything like that before in my life. I hope to see the day Fauci swings from a rope.
Hey, Mat. Are you still planning on writing a paper book on your covid story? I do hope so. Peace and love from the UK.
What is my "covid story"?
I have numerous book ideas, but the most fully fleshed out (and partially written) is The Chloroquine Wars. I may choose to write up The Efficacy Illusion after that.
I seem to remember you asking us if we wanted a book rather than the online articles. I said I would pre-order a paper book as I don't like reading off of a phone screen. Please look after yourself, I worry you work too hard. ❤️🇬🇧 Edit: this clearly Is the book I was thinking of. Please excuse my dimness.
No worries. And thank you.
Matthew - Go for it (vacation time). This is a long war and you are one of the main warriors. It is critical to pull the best troops off the line for some well deserved R & R. They come back stronger.
Sasha is great. There is also some info out there on Malone and Domane on George Webb's site.
Something else to be aware of is the following post about Malone being financed by a Nursing Home Sugar Daddy and avoiding uncomfortable related subjects, like fraudulent Death Certificates. Early nursing home treatments may also fall into that category. Take care.
Jeff Hanson's Finance of the Malone's Medical Freedom World Tour
https://charleswright1.substack.com/p/jeff-hansons-finance-of-the-malones?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=800735&post_id=141563712&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=false&r=zf7o2&utm_medium=email
Interesting tree detective story, I'd read it all again.
That’s as good a place to start as any. Why prevent effective treatments, if not to kill patients?
The wisdom of the crowd is a real thing, and we harness it like this: https://joshketry.substack.com/p/human-swarm-intelligence-the-most