German MSM today 57% pop favour mandatory vaccination. It’s a matter of time. Memory loss perhaps one extra side effect you might want to put down there Mathew.
It’s a good thing I wasn’t drinking anything when I read your opening line because I would’ve done a spit take on my keyboard 🤣
I’ll be curious to learn more about the pandemic wiki project when you’re ready :-)
Meanwhile, in case you missed it, I referenced the work you did in collaboration with Dr. Jessica Rose and Steve Kirsch in my last article (https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/letter-to-a-holocaust-denier), and I wanted to specially thank you for your rigorous research on VAERS. I’ve already alerted Steve, but if you could relay my gratitude to Dr. Rose and share the article with her (I cited her work extensively), I would appreciate that very much.
In case if you wonder if there is any reaction in Germany to the "German news agency" that compiled a list: There is none, but that's normal because report24 is not a news outlet but a newsletter aggregator similar to substack.
I'M SORRY CALL ME DENSE...BUT I JUST CANNOT FOLLOW THE CHART ABOVE AND HOW IT WAS DEVELOPED. NEITHER CAN I FOLLOW THE "LET'S TALK ABOUT THE CHART..." IS THIS CASES AND DEATHS PER MILLION? IS IT NORMALIZED? IT MUST BE BUT WHERE DOES IT SAY THAT? HERE WHERE I AM WE'RE SEEING MANY HOSPITALIZATIONS DUE TO VACCINE ADVERSE EVENTS AND THOSE DEATHS ARE COUNTED AS UNVACCINATED BECAUSE THEY'RE UNDER 14 DAYS...SHOULD WE SAY THIS CHART DOES NOT ACCOUNT FOR THOSE BECAUSE THAT'S WHAT IT APPEARS.
With any medication or medical procedure, these three essential requirements must be objectively and properly satisfied:
1. Safety
2. Effectiveness
3. Necessity
Of course, in practice another requirement is cost!
It seems to be me that we have been battling their lies by focusing on safety and effectiveness, to the exclusion of necessity. However, necessity is easy to prove/disprove without resorting to "data and science", and "studies". The following are my questions that I sent to authorities and "experts" regarding the necessity element. None could rebut.
1. Why would govts need to force people, directly and via proxy, to take something if they can prove it is safe and effective?
2. If the vax is so important and urgent, how do you explain universities like Brown, Cornell, and Rutgers allowing religious exemptions? In contrast, UNC, Iowa, and Arizona do not even have the vaccination mandate? [That reminds me of the masking exemptions for blacks in certain States in USA; and for the public sector employees in DC.]
3. Are you aware that some countries (Sweden, Denmark, Norway, Romania, etc) and some States in USA don't have compulsory vaccination policies? Are those said jurisdictions care less about their residents than others who do?
Since no one could answer these three questions, it evidently follows that the vaccines are NOT necessary.
In most places it looks like first cases go up, then also deaths/vaccination go up. As if people see the cases curve, panic, and run to get vaccinated.
Assuming for a second that vaccines are useless (say it was a pat on the back rather than an injection: no harm, no benefit, silly assumption for sake of argument) wouldn't we still see deaths to correlate with vaccination as both would be driven by cases?
How could one falsify the alternative hypothesis that cases drive both deaths uptake and vaccination uptake?
Are you going to publish exactly how you got your table? I answered your challenge. You have failed to publish your detailed methods. By your own logic, your professional credentials are in question. Why should anyone trust your work, if you only publish the results which cannot be reproduced?
I looked at this tweet on the athletes and then tried to find the article, and of course came instead first upon a "fact check." Unfortunately, it had some valid points, even though the bigger picture is lost in it all (also, "of course") -- that we need to figure out what the heck is going on and nobody is. Factcheck got this right: looks like not all of these were deaths nor had vaccination status revealed (https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2021/nov/19/blog-posting/dozens-prominent-athletes-did-not-die-heart-attack/). Here's the original article:
I hope all those preparing suits to stop the latest mandate are aware of your work.
German MSM today 57% pop favour mandatory vaccination. It’s a matter of time. Memory loss perhaps one extra side effect you might want to put down there Mathew.
It’s a good thing I wasn’t drinking anything when I read your opening line because I would’ve done a spit take on my keyboard 🤣
I’ll be curious to learn more about the pandemic wiki project when you’re ready :-)
Meanwhile, in case you missed it, I referenced the work you did in collaboration with Dr. Jessica Rose and Steve Kirsch in my last article (https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/letter-to-a-holocaust-denier), and I wanted to specially thank you for your rigorous research on VAERS. I’ve already alerted Steve, but if you could relay my gratitude to Dr. Rose and share the article with her (I cited her work extensively), I would appreciate that very much.
In case if you wonder if there is any reaction in Germany to the "German news agency" that compiled a list: There is none, but that's normal because report24 is not a news outlet but a newsletter aggregator similar to substack.
Court-Ordered Pfizer Documents They Tried To Have Sealed For 55 years Show 1223 Deaths, 158,000 Adverse Events in 90 Days Post EUA Release
The Most Shocking Document Release Of The Last 100 years
Celia Farber1 hr ago https://celiafarber.substack.com/p/court-ordered-pfizer-documents-they.
Das ist schrecklich!
I'M SORRY CALL ME DENSE...BUT I JUST CANNOT FOLLOW THE CHART ABOVE AND HOW IT WAS DEVELOPED. NEITHER CAN I FOLLOW THE "LET'S TALK ABOUT THE CHART..." IS THIS CASES AND DEATHS PER MILLION? IS IT NORMALIZED? IT MUST BE BUT WHERE DOES IT SAY THAT? HERE WHERE I AM WE'RE SEEING MANY HOSPITALIZATIONS DUE TO VACCINE ADVERSE EVENTS AND THOSE DEATHS ARE COUNTED AS UNVACCINATED BECAUSE THEY'RE UNDER 14 DAYS...SHOULD WE SAY THIS CHART DOES NOT ACCOUNT FOR THOSE BECAUSE THAT'S WHAT IT APPEARS.
Thank you! I've been meaning to do this same thing state by state in the US and then county by county! Have you already done that?
With any medication or medical procedure, these three essential requirements must be objectively and properly satisfied:
1. Safety
2. Effectiveness
3. Necessity
Of course, in practice another requirement is cost!
It seems to be me that we have been battling their lies by focusing on safety and effectiveness, to the exclusion of necessity. However, necessity is easy to prove/disprove without resorting to "data and science", and "studies". The following are my questions that I sent to authorities and "experts" regarding the necessity element. None could rebut.
1. Why would govts need to force people, directly and via proxy, to take something if they can prove it is safe and effective?
2. If the vax is so important and urgent, how do you explain universities like Brown, Cornell, and Rutgers allowing religious exemptions? In contrast, UNC, Iowa, and Arizona do not even have the vaccination mandate? [That reminds me of the masking exemptions for blacks in certain States in USA; and for the public sector employees in DC.]
3. Are you aware that some countries (Sweden, Denmark, Norway, Romania, etc) and some States in USA don't have compulsory vaccination policies? Are those said jurisdictions care less about their residents than others who do?
Since no one could answer these three questions, it evidently follows that the vaccines are NOT necessary.
I wonder how you can control for time lag.
In most places it looks like first cases go up, then also deaths/vaccination go up. As if people see the cases curve, panic, and run to get vaccinated.
Assuming for a second that vaccines are useless (say it was a pat on the back rather than an injection: no harm, no benefit, silly assumption for sake of argument) wouldn't we still see deaths to correlate with vaccination as both would be driven by cases?
How could one falsify the alternative hypothesis that cases drive both deaths uptake and vaccination uptake?
OH MY GOSH. 75 deaths of European Athletes in past 5 months? Is that a typo?
When we will get a comparison to pre-COVID athlete deaths? I'm "dying" to know.
Bill also understood female waistlines!
Are you going to publish exactly how you got your table? I answered your challenge. You have failed to publish your detailed methods. By your own logic, your professional credentials are in question. Why should anyone trust your work, if you only publish the results which cannot be reproduced?
https://loren-56681.medium.com/for-mathew-crawford-ccc0c556ab09
Included this one in my free list of daily anti-mandate newslinks: https://patrick.net/links
I looked at this tweet on the athletes and then tried to find the article, and of course came instead first upon a "fact check." Unfortunately, it had some valid points, even though the bigger picture is lost in it all (also, "of course") -- that we need to figure out what the heck is going on and nobody is. Factcheck got this right: looks like not all of these were deaths nor had vaccination status revealed (https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2021/nov/19/blog-posting/dozens-prominent-athletes-did-not-die-heart-attack/). Here's the original article:
This is really perfect!