Referring to ingroup critique in the MFM as a "circular firing squad" is rhetorical, and a bad argument.
But understand also that it's deeply offensive. We have seen a number of murders, and weirdly the theater is for everyone to pretend they aren't happening (which is one of the reasons I don't trust much of the MFM leadership).
Be a little more sensitive to a reality that is different from the cartoon you might have in your head if you have never met any of the people you choose as leaders in person.
... We have seen a number of murders, and weirdly the theater is for everyone to pretend they aren't happening. ..."
Matthew C., please what are the names of the ones likely murdered to whom you refer? Are u referring to the millions killed by the original bioweapon and the untold thousands now dying suddenly/unexpectedly from the jabs?
Or do you mean people like Dr. Thomas Jengdes, managing director of East Germany’s largest municipal hospital -- the Chemnitz clinic -- who "fell" from the hospital roof approx December 1, 2021?
I havn't run into ANY news or information on Dr. Plummer's death. Not even a "Still under investigation" deflection in response to news people asking. I wonder if there have been African based journaists asking, but we do not hear anything here. Or perhaps people have gotten the message there, "Do NOT Ask."
And Brandy Vaughan, 44, a Big Pharma whistleblower and advocate for the vaccine injured, was found dead at home by her son. She previously worked for Merck ... may Brandy R.I.P.
I saved this story about Philip Haney (linked below). His death was likely a political murder. Terribly upsetting how the good are murdered. Yet the wicked prosper.
Thank you. I remember reading it when it was first published. I read Haney’s book when it first came out, and found him intriguing. I was delighted to hear that he was close to publishing again, and then he was suddenly dead. No way was it suicide.
Another in the list of disappearing computers that end up in the possession of the FBI, and disappear. Seth Rich, Anthony Weiner, Phil Haney, Hunter Biden, Etc.
Yes! The Amador County officials announced that they were handing over all their evidence to the FBI, and that they looked forward to hearing back. Later, they expected news in a few weeks. After a few weeks, they again expected news in a few weeks. And then, no news. Ever.
Provided AIDS treatment and contraception, of course he had to go. Our unelected Uber Lords want a rapid reduction of humans. They are overlooking the fact that if you lift women out of poverty they choose to have 1 or 2 children.
Boris Johnson, 2007 - "You can see it as you fly over Mexico City, a vast checkerboard of smog-bound, low-rise dwellings stretching from one horizon to the other; and when you look down on what we are doing to the planet, you have a horrifying vision of habitations multiplying and replicating like bacilli in a Petri dish."
@Katarina, who wrote, "... he was shot in the head ..."
Dr. Andreas Noack collapsed at home. There's no mention of a gun involved in his death. It was reported that his wife was with him in their kitchen when he was stricken.
Barry and Honey Sherman, Billionaire couple, Founder of Apotex Pharmaceutical, found strangled by belts next to indoor pool of their home in December 2017. 35 million dollar reward. Police still have nothing.
35 million pound reward? Hydroxychloroquine anyone?
“The branded drug companies hate us. They have hired private investigators on us all the time,” Sherman said in a 2001 book titled Prescription Games. “The thought once came to my mind, why didn’t they just hire someone to knock me off? For a thousand bucks paid to the right person you can probably get someone killed. Perhaps I’m surprised that hasn’t happened.”
I see that Crawford 'liked' this comment. Meaning, perhaps, that he is endorsing the list of victims?
If so, I can well understand why there is a "theater to pretend they aren't happening"; or at least, I can see why there's nothing much to say. There's a lot of speculation about what might have happened, but no real proof of foul play; much less any evidence of who in particular might have been responsible if these deaths weren't accidental. In the absence of any evidence, wild accusations tend to look like irresponsible conspiracy talk.
I endorse the attempt, if incomplete, of reasonable coincidences to investigate. I have specific beliefs about some, but not all of the pandemic slayings.
I asked Steve in his comment section yesterday why he is ignoring your DMED numbers. He said “because the VAERS numbers are out there for all to see.”
I said “nobody is out perusing VAERS nunmbers. They read about them when you write about them.” Why wouldnt it be the same for DMED numbers?”
No answer.
I didnt think you were right about him at first--he seems too obsessed with proving the vax is deadly--but its becoming obvious he is not willing to get to the bottom of the DMED story for whatever reason. Sorry i doubted you. Wish i could help.
It clearly makes no sense to think of VAERS as a set of numbers that couldn't use some support, or to discard the DMED. The VaST workgroup and every other org that ever wanted to study young healthy people used the DMED, and it often provides extremely clean signals due to a lack of need for disaggregation.
Ive been a big fan of Steve but there is no reasonable explanation for him to all of a sudden not be interested in DMED and Unissant. Im blown away by the whole thing.
Miles Mathis estimates the amount of people on an intelligence payroll in the US numbers into the millions. Every group, from 2nd amendment rights to the kennel club, is infiltrated with agents, observers, and provocateurs, why would a movement with such important ramifications not be?
Trying to remember the name of the program the FBI used where they recruited civilian "partners" among businesses, community leaders, neighbors, etc., I searched "fbi citizen spying operation," and the results are mind-boggling, and that's just for the FBI. We never left the Hoover era, it has steadily intensified.
Mathew: in the dialog with 'Abigail Stark' and 'Shasta' below, I believe you're making a clear accusation that Elon Musk is organizing a faction within the MFM movement, including the San Juan Declaration backers (including Urso, Malone, Kory, Cole, and Tyson.) You state that this group is organizing a business empire that will be worth hundreds of billions if not trillions of dollars in the future. You state that Musk is "a central figure in a global civil war."
We are left to conjecture as to who you think is on the other side of this civil war. Perhaps the other side is folks like Klaus Schwab, Bill Gates, the WHO, WEF, CDC, FDA etc? If so, then: without giving up my own agency, it's easy for me to say that I would prefer for Musk, Urso, Malone & Kory to win the war.
If you're trying to say that Musk is on the same team with Schwab and Gates, then I don't see that there is any war, because there is no one to oppose them -- aside from random, disorganized individuals and whatever personal agency they might have remaining.
Also, are you trying to say that Musk and the Puerto Rico doctors are somehow responsible for murdering your family members and burning down your house? Or are you accusing the other side, whoever that is? Why aren't you willing to name the victims?
I don't think anyone who reads this blog, is trying to belittle your concerns. But speaking only for myself, at a very deep level I don't understand what you're talking about.
If you're going to write a whole fiction book and ask me to answer questions line-by-line about how it applies to real life, don't be shocked if I'm going to ignore you.
I'm not unwilling to name victims, but if you're complaining that I don't spend 18 hours on command performing a task for you, you're goofy.
Wow. You're the one who appears to be writing the book of fiction. I'm only quoting back at you, what you said yourself. It doesn't take 18 hours to name a few names.
No, you're not merely quoting back at me. You are creating one of many continuations as a fiction in order to discredit any notion of a true continuation. Most neutral observers are smart enough to tell the difference.
Both you and Steve have become utterly boring and irrelevant because you repeat the same thing ad nauseam. Here another study, another survey, another agent of chaos, and another petty dispute borne out of hubris. Move on please.
Why are you picking on me Mathew. I have not filed a single freedom of information act request myself. Other people have. There is nothing to stop anyone from filing A freedom of information act request. There are hundreds of people in the anti-VAX movement. Why are you picking on me? Why aren’t you pointing out that anyone else in the anti-VAX movement could’ve done it as well? I don’t have a resource who specializes in freedom of information act request that can do my bidding. It’s a very special skill. Otherwise you risk getting nothing. Aaron, Siri could file such a request. But he doesn’t work for me. Why don’t you pick on Del Bigtree and ask him that question?
1. Always read the article before commenting. I'm telling people not to trust Del unless his people will file a FOIA (edit: if prompted by the test).
2. The only sense in which I'm "picking on" you is the sense in which you told me multiple times you'd have one of your lawyers contact me to perform the FOIA. That's a true statement, is it not?
3. As I mentioned in the article, you can likely fix at no cost (low up front, but likely profitable).
4. If you're compromised, blink twice. Give the pedophile back all his money.
"I'm telling people not to trust Del unless his people will file a FOIA (edit: if prompted by the test)."
1. So, ONLY trust people who do what YOU tell them to do?
2. If some of the lawyers Steve knows are NOT interested, willing, or available to do YOUR bidding, you're blaming STEVE?!!?
3. "Here, Steve, let me tell you how to spend YOUR money on my behalf, instead of continuing to spend YOUR money on the projects YOU are most interested in funding."
(Really. The whining you're doing here makes it pretty clear why Steve's lawyers -- and anyone else's -- who run across you will pretend they don't see you and hurry away to continue with their own work!)
And 4 is just a stupid petty insult from a bitchy child who is stamping his foot cause he can't make 'sugar-daddy' do what he wants! (And Steve is SOOOOOOO not your sugar daddy!)
*IF* you expect anyone to consider you a sound source for information OR someone to be trusted and considered an ALLY in our fight... then start ACTING LIKE IT! If you just must have a FOIA filed -- then LEARN how yourself, or find someone ELSE to importune for money.
We're all REALLY frustrated at how slowly the uncovering is going. But we're NOT insulting and trying to cajole (in the same msg, as the same time?!) someone into doing what WE wish they would do first! Everyone has their own 'tasks' in this war; and most of us are buckling down and doing OUR task(s). We are for 100% SURE not turning and shooting at OUR ALLIES who are doing their parts!!
If the task you've assigned yourself is one you cannot complete by yourself, then find a NEW task, and pass what you've managed to get done so far over to someone who HAS the skills and abilities (and money, if need be) to get it done; and YOU go do what is within your skills and abilities.
Because shooting at your ALLIES in the middle of battles is EITHER a sign of a stupid
"fellow soldier" or a traitor/enemy in our midst!
This Crawford guy is whining because Steve hasn't *FOUND HIM* a lawyer. Does Crawford not own a phone or computer? Is he an adult who can manage his own affairs? And if, say, he has a biz lunch with someone who says, on parting, "this was fun, we should do it again" and then never calls to do it again -- does Crawford begin insulting and complaining IN PUBLIC that the guy never called him for lunch? My conclusion is: who would WANT to have lunch with that guy again?"
And I'm not answering FOR Steve; I'm pointing out the piss-poor PUBLIC behavior by Crawford, in a group that gathers here to keep up WITH Steve and what he's doing!! (Sheesh! Go to a cocktail party at a man's "house" and then begin insulting him in front of his guests.)
And many are 'defending' Steve because we rely on him to do WHATEVER work he chooses to do. He has not yet wasted our time -- or our support -- by doing whatever it is HE thinks will best serve. Am I thrilled he's still trying to get debates? Not really -- but if THAT hunt helps keeps him digging and doing all his mathy-magic on such data as he's able to get? BRAVO! Go Steve GO!
Steve, I'm going to assume your response was to ME, since it's appended to my message. So, you're very welcome. Your work is why I send you $. It ain't much, but it's what I can do! You and Kory.
All blog (now substack) comment sections get what we call ankle-biters. The standing rule on the blog I used to frequent had several sharp moderators; and the rule became "DON'T feed the trolls." I apologize for feeding your trolls for so long -- it's been more than two years since comments ended on that blog, and I forgot that rule/am out of the habit. Back to reading and I'll try not to White Knight (too much...) {wink}.
You're welcome BUT where is the response! I'd love to know what is going on. Matt is likely telling the truth. Can't you just explain what happened exactly so we can all put it to bed?
I'm very time constrained nowadays working on things that move the needle.
1. I don't always have time to do that.
2. I don't recall doing that. Do you have a specific email where I made that offer?
3. Likely fix what?
4. You are making accusations about people that I was not aware of. I certainly did not know he is a pedophile. Was there a court determination that that was the case? Or is that your opinion? Did he serve time in jail? Is he now out of jail and trying to lead a more moral life? If he donates $100M to VSRF now that he's served his time, is it unethical to accept? Is there a societal rule that you are a bad person if you accept? How do you make the tradeoff of the lives saved vs. accepting the money from someone who now reformed? Is he still a pedophile? How do you know that? Has he admitted it? Should I be dropping everything to investigate this and spend time on it so I get the right answer? Is focusing on this issue really the best use of my time?
You can resort to all the name calling you want and insult me. That's not the way to get what you want.
I'm going back to writing my substack. There are people dying and being injured by these vaccines and the upcoming articles I think will make a huge difference.
So convince me that responding to your insults is more important than saving lives.
Have you run a survey showing which activities do and don't move the needle?
Haven't you wondered in singular focus continues to move the needle at the margins?
On 4: Do you really need proof of a conflict of interest to stop and take a look? One this major? If this is related to the pandemic, and I believe strongly that it is, it seems like a great use of time. The pandemic took children out of school who were then used to make billions, and some of that money was put in your hands. It's the equivalent of blood money. That's NOT trivial and it's baffling anyone would act like it is.
This is clearly NOT about name calling. This is substantial. And the people who may die moving forward relates to these issues more than the people who already died.
Have you passed this through anything like a counsel you trust?
(Maybe accusations of pedophilia can be misunderstood these days? Not sure where that's coming from, but, um, maybe I don't want to know .. (pedophilia all over the elites, and it's probably impossible to be a liberal millionaire and not know any pedophiles, OK (not OK as in OK, OK as in, yes, that's the sad reality) ... but if implying anything more direct than that(??)
I wrote again to ICAN, I don't know if they are not acting on this because they are swamped, including with requests to look at things not worth looking at, and have not taken the time to truly understand this? To believe Stew Peters is a chaos agent is one thing, but Aaron Siri? That's not possible ...
I'm actually giving Steve the chance to do the right thing before explaining the pedophile any further, but understand there seem to be a substantial number of pedophile billionaires running pandemic profiteering operations, and with relationships among the MFM. I will make the polite assumption that Steve didn't know, but he is now on notice.
So, you throw an really brutal INSULT -- but refuse to back it up "until he does what I want him to do"? Just WHO is not doing the right thing? Just WHO is acting exactly like controlled opposition, trying to get people to look askance at Steve for something you are baselessly accusing him of? I might even recommend Steve get one of his "stable of lawyers" sitting waiting for Steve to "pick me! pick me!" to think about your intentional libel?
"I might even recommend Steve get one of his "stable of lawyers" sitting waiting for Steve to "pick me! pick me!" to think about your intentional libel?"
Go for it, asshole. How many millions of words have I written without a libel suit? Think it through.
Do you work for Malone? This sounds a lot like the mind that launched the $25M suit against the Breggin's. I don't have a dog in the fight. I'm just trying to figure out what is going on. You sound like someone who is trying to prevent honest people from learning truth. Shut up your threats!
No I don't work for Malone; never met him, never seen him live; I don't even support his substack. The Breggins are NOT telling the truth about Malone! Did you not listen to "poor old" Peter whining and snuffling that Malone was evil bad on the enemy's side -- and his BOOK was even selling better than Peter's!! ooohooohoooh! Sounded to me like it was jealousy (or dementia?) on Breggin's part -- no matter HOW expert he is in psychology (and I freely admit that); he CLEARLY has never worked in govt or big corporate!!
(At the risk of eliciting a total recoil: He SOUNDED exactly like Shylock in a well-done "Merchant of Venice." Even seen the play *done well*? Can't see it today at all... too anti-semetic to be allowed. But the whining and wailing and nasty pointing fingers FIT Breggin to a T! (And surprised me very much! I REALLY expected BETTER of him based on his reviews around.)
What TRUTH did Breggin have about Malone? Because Malone worked for govts, and was involved in high-level medical research, that therefore he was evil? WHO BETTER to ask for help and information than someone who KNOWS the system and the people in it and what went on. When Breggin lost his composure and began squealing and whining and accusing and complaining... I finally had to turn him off! He was 'working himself up' into a frenzy of hate and jealousy (it sounded to me).
I have listened to, watched, and read pretty much everything Malone has posted (have you? Clearly Breggin has not AT ALL! He was making all kinds of accusations out of the air, some of them truly ridiculous!) I have found Malone to be thoughtful, well-spoken, (WAY too liberal for MY tastes, no matter how much cynicism he feels he has learned), and NOTHING he has said or shown strikes a false note. (And I'm ex-Navy, ex-Boeing, ex-govt employee -- so I, too, know stuff about "reality" that protected academic Breggin likely would not)
I DO have a slight ... caution ... merely because I don't trust anyone all the way. I am keeping watch, and would NOT wholeheartedly follow any suggestion of Malone's, any more than I would my number one hero Pierre Kory, whom I stalk across the web, and also read everything HE says or does or writes. Like Malone and Kory, so many once-liberal-idiots have been forcibly awakened to the lies of their side: yes, even Kory is one such! As are Naomi Wolf, Steve Kirsch, Chris Martenson, I think Ed Dowd, I don't know about Paul Marik; so very MANY of them... and as down-to-the bone once-liberals, they STILL have a lot of really stupid shit stuck in their brains and their world views. So I ALWAYS look askance at some new position or idea they put forth, and challenge myself to validate it or research in other venues. Pierre half-jokes with Martenson: every time he THINKS he is finally really truly deeply cynical, something pops up that proves he's STILL naïve as hell! I think in some few areas (mainly govt, bioweapons, bioweapon labs, and the like) Malone is WAY less naïve than Kory.... but he's STILL too much of a peace-love-dove-kumbaya-DESIRING part-liberal for my tastes.
Their underlying beliefs and expectations has not yet been cleared out fully enough, clearly enough, and safely enough for full trust.
Mathew, do you have any actual evidence that Kirsch told you multiple times, that he'd have one of his lawyers contact you to perform the FOIA? Because he says, just above, that he doesn't have a lawyer on tap who specializes in FOIA requests. If there's no evidence, then it's just "he said, no he said".
Elsewhere, if my memory serves correctly, you've said that some sort of word has gone out to all lawyers everywhere, not to pursue this. It could be true, and if so, such a message could be very powerful. Lawyers everywhere threatened with losing their license, or worse, if they pursue this? If that's the story, maybe it's not Kirsch's fault. For all we know, he might have called all his favorite lawyers, and they turned them down.
I know you're ignoring me, so maybe it isn't worth the bother of saying this. But maybe some lawyers have called you, and given up in frustration because you're so rude to people who are trying to understand, and trying to help?
"Mathew, do you have any actual evidence that Kirsch told you multiple times, that he'd have one of his lawyers contact you to perform the FOIA?"
You don't consider the chat I posted in this article such evidence?
Okay, so what if that chat log didn't exist? We had phone conversations, too. And those conversations were talked about within his steering committee circle. Is he or anyone else questioning whether we talked about the FOIAs and said he would have his lawyer(s) contact me to help?
"I know you're ignoring me"
Huh? I have thousands of communications a day and get to 1% of them. If I "ignored" something, it is because I don't have 200 hours to read them.
"But maybe some lawyers have called you, and given up in frustration because you're so rude to people who are trying to understand, and trying to help?"
Ah, here we are on the attack: let's shame and blame the gas lighting victim. Do you have evidence of me being rude to a lawyer? I'm fairly polite with them. I think if you have some email exchange between me and a lawyer, I'm close to 100% certain it will look polite. Please post it.
Nobody has claimed or mentioned to me anything like a lawyer losing status or work for these FOIAs in particular. If that's been discussed, which I doubt, please email me a pointer link.
Mathew, I don't know Steve other than being on a Zoom call with him eons ago where he wanted people to organize their own teams to spread the word, and then we sent him our team info that was in a document that he was going to share on Substack, which he then dropped the ball on, and then I was also going to volunteer to lead one of his other "Steve" teams, but the communication got messed up and someone else who also wanted to volunteer was just handed the gig kind of by default...so I ended up being part of that "team" but just a member. We got nothing done. Here's why.
The guy who ended up running the team (Paolo, just a volunteer, has his own business, and lives in Mexico) has been in contact either with Kirsch and/or Kirsch's people in the past...and a while back...we were going to work on doing some sort of survey, but then Steve got super busy and Paolo had a hard time getting a hold of him. Now Paulo is VERY organized, and would contact Steve's people, and then would be told that they had something for us to do, and sometimes literally months would go by without the communication we needed from Steve to move forward.
And at that point I was building my own Substack and told Paolo that I would rather spend my time working on my Substack than promoting Steve's. Paolo went and focused his energies on creating a podcast about the vaccines. Paolo is a great guy who I trust, BTW. There was never any thought of Steve being "compromised" - just that Steve is very very busy and not able to follow through on everything he wants to do.
Short version of all that is...and based on my gut feeling...Steve is VERY sincere but he is EXTREMELY disorganized and distracted by a gazillion things. In other words, yeah, he probably told you that about the FOIA, but he's promising a lot of people a lot of stuff he doesn't deliver, but that doesn't mean he's a chaos agent...it just means he's IN chaos. BIG difference. :-)
This is not a Sage Hana situation where Steve is pretending to be someone he is not. Steve's just overwhelmed in my opinion.
Now...does Steve have contacts and connections within the government and the military? Likely. Does that make him controlled opposition by default? No.
I'd just chalk this one up to Steve having too may fingers in too many pies...he's got blueberry all over his face but it's because he's got too much going on, not because he's actively malicious.
Sorry Steve, believe it or not I'm trying to help out here.
I'd like to believe the best of Steve, but when this issue got tough, and I pressed him, it certainly felt as if he started gas lighting me on all accounts. That's what our interview felt like the other day. The majority of what he said in that interview was different from what he had told me or led me to believe prior. Maybe that's due to being overwhelmed?
So, along the way during the DMED journey, I got a communication saying that there was some sort of order to dump me and my story. It's unclear if this came from Johnson, military intelligence, CIA, elsewhere, but it seemed legitimate. I invited some of Steve's steering committee into a meeting with intelligence officials to discuss what was doing on, but neither showed up for the meeting.
I got a step too far to think "good faith" at some point, but the interview just enraged me. It sounded like a moving target of fabricated standards, which in my experience says there is a story behind it.
It could be due to overwhelm...but the other thought that has occurred to me is this...if some people at the top of the MFM movement start acting cagey or weird another reason could be that they and/or their family members have been warned or threatened. It's just something to consider.
I'm too small fry to get any negative attention but honestly, lately, my feeling has been that's a good thing, my being low profile. I feel like all of this vaccine stuff is about to bust open, and the big money that wants it covered up might react like a caged animal now.
I like both you and Steve and do not get bad vibes from either of you, so I hope that I'm right in that this is just Steve being crazy overwhelmed...and not that he's a fake or even worse, he's being threatened about some areas related to the military and can't speak publicly about it.
I've never met or spoken to Steve, but the sense of him I get from his writings and interviews is exactly this. The volume of his articles, how he speaks so quickly, and often over people ... The amount of activity in that brain, that puts out multiple articles a Day, and everything else, yet with gaps in the amount of output and the foundation of being grounded and centered, with ability to pause and take stock of where one is. (I hope if he ever gets a serious debate challenger that he would ask Byram Bridle or someone else more experienced in medicine and with less chaotic energy, to do the talking).
But as far as integrity ... being in this for the right reasons ... I always got a good sense of him (unlike Stew Peters).
Stephanie put well what I was trying to say, although my perspective is not from personal interactions - "and based on my gut feeling...Steve is VERY sincere but he is EXTREMELY disorganized and distracted by a gazillion things. In other words, yeah, he probably told you that about the FOIA, but he's promising a lot of people a lot of stuff he doesn't deliver, but that doesn't mean he's a chaos agent...it just means he's IN chaos. BIG difference. :-)"
Thanks, Ellen. I myself tend to be a bit like Steve so I can relate. Lots of big ideas, lots of projects in the fire, not so good at organization and follow-through. People like us can be *very frustrating* to a highly organized person, which I bet Mathew Crawford is. :-)
Great post, Stephanie. I think we were on the same team as I was also reading Paolo's posts and had the same opinion as you. I had a similar experience at that time when a project was floated that was going to expose Fraudci. I, along with others, got involved in that, spent some time on it, and then it all just petered out and ran into the sand. Total loss of time. Was it deliberate? Perhaps. I don't know.
The quote from Kirsch in the posted chat is "I'll be sending out an email asking for various resources to lawyers will be among them." The syntax is a little disjointed. But the way I read that, he was offering to contact lawyers and let them know about the case. He wasn't promising to follow up with them, or make sure that one of them would get on it. So: no, that isn't evidence of your claim.
"I know you're ignoring me". Don't you recall: you just told me that if I ask difficult questions, I shouldn't be surprised if you ignore me?
As I remember, what you claimed is that some sort of word had gone out to lawyers, advising them not to take the case. You didn't say that there was any threat of losing status or work; that was my conjecture -- that some sort of threat must have been implied, otherwise why would any lawyer take said "word" seriously? Do you recall saying that lawyers had been warned not to take the case? If not, I'll try to find the link.
I don't know whether you've been rude to lawyers. I only know that you're rude to me, and to several other commenters here who are trying to make sense of this.
"The quote from Kirsch in the posted chat is "I'll be sending out an email asking for various resources to lawyers will be among them." The syntax is a little disjointed."
You're right that the syntax is a little disjointed. Obviously, I'm posting this for Steve to see, and I doubt he is going to say we weren't talking about the FOIAs. It's not the only conversation I can share where we talked about them and other related matters.
Understand that I wouldn't dare post that or fabricate a story that wasn't true. His steering committee can obviously testify to the fact that I talked about essentially nothing but correcting the DMED story in meetings for months.
Because one is a fraud? Matt has posted proof. Now what? I don't trust Steve. I never have and I too have subscribed to both . Steve hasn't replied but was super quick to post. He doesn't add up to me.
Let's go. Steve you're suspect to me and have been even before this post. I look forward to ypur answers.The Anti Vax term is tough too. All vaccines are indeed bullshit as the statistics denote. No vaccine stopped anything ever. Polio was basically eradicated when the vaccine came out. It's been a scam and a plan for decades. They are way way ahead. It feels like to dance around the topics and don't really go deep. This may sound contradictory because I am anti vax but without further explanation anti vax term doesn't seem right.
You all are doing amazing and important work. Please don't go after each other this way. We all have our short comings. I hope you can stop looking at the specks in each other's eyes when we all have planks in our own. Recognize the gifts each of you have and contribute to the movement, apologize if you have said or done something against your brother, find someone who will help with FOIA, if eg Steve doesn't want to do so. I hope you gentlemen can forgive each other, stop insulting each other, and continue you're important work. Someone else will step up to find the information you just have to extend the reach asking for help through the many stacks out there.
Take it up with the crowd that destroyed my home, assaulted me, threatened my wife, and laughed about it. It all goes weirdly unacknowledged. They are courageous white knights when they get shadowbanned on Twitter, but they're putting the knife to my throat. Why? Think it through. How do you know who represents your interests and why?
Why have heroes. Just learn and move forward. Your family is your guiding star.
How do you expect anyone to "take it up with the crowd that destroyed my home, assaulted me, threatened my wife, and laughed about it" when we have no idea who exactly you're talking about?
Sure. But what I think he's saying is. He's not all who he seems. That's what he's asking him. Let's see Steve respond. Seems more like a spirited discussion.
I'm rather Steve stick to digging into the numbers.... This a DISTRACTION away from saving lives... Why are you also doing this? Do not your posts make YOU seem like controlled opposition? Certainly by Crawford's definition of "how to assign unvalidated guilt" ...
Steve's numbers are mostly bunk, and the most solid ones came from me and Norman Fenton. Steve left me high and dry when I could have been feeding him more numbers. I'm literally incomplete on the most important stats project of proving the vaccines useless (presenting to Pandata today) because of it. Would have been done six months ago without this headache. You have no idea what's going on, but you're so certain that you do.
And by the way, you did just state the accusation that Steve Kirsch is taking money from a pedophile. Seems to me he could sue you for $25 million if he wanted to.
Mathew, did you know that you will stand before God (Revelation 20:11-15 KJV). I would choose my words wisely for you will hear them again from the master. Choose wisely whom you target for you will answer... whatsoever a man soweth that shall he reap. Choose wisely!
I think it's just an extremely Bible-obsessed person ... I'm not religious, but if I was, I'd think God would give you a high five and a nice time upstairs for all the important work you've done, and also Steve. (Editing comment - seeing how many GOD comments hoss has posted, I have no idea if this is a sincere Bible obsessed person or a chaos agent. Seems like people who hold very firmly to beliefs without seeking solid proof, and repeat them constantly can often be unwitting chaos agents. But I don't see Steve or Del or Aaron Siri in that light.)
I am a born again child of the KING JESUS. He died for my sins, my sins put him on the cross. The least I can do is tell others of his great love he has for those who are his. JESUS said " no man comes to the FATHER, but, by him. (JESUS)
Do you not read your Bible? Do you not know you will stand before GOD and give account for EVERY word you say AND the thoughts and intent of the heart. Do you know that JESUS CHRIST died so you could have eternal life with him? You know now. You will have no excuse before GOD so GOD says not
Have I made a claim that you think relates to it? It seems nonsensically placed.
I recommend going to the substacks of the pedophiles and the people who work with them or are funded by them and ask them about their relationships with god. There's some work to be done, preacher.
Steve: I didn't get the impression from the interview that Mathew was picking on you. He did an enormous amount of work diving into the DMED data, but was ignored, so, of course, he's not happy about it. You are doing good work, and I don't question your motives. Keep on doing what you are doing. It helps.
If he has done work on the DMED data why is he trying to get STEVE to follow-up? Why not Naomi Wolf or Thomas Renz? This sounds like, to continue my analogy: Crawford is a TANK driver, trying to get the 'officer in charge' of the AIR WING to do things for him! And then throwing a fit because the AIR WING has things more important to their part of the 'war' to handle! Not more important -- more important to THEIR part! See the diff?
Has Steve even done much with the DMED data? I have not seen much from him on that; and I read everything he posts... I know Renz has HIS folks working on it, including court cases. Not sure Naomi has folks looking at the DMED stuff, but if Crawford HAS found important info in his DMED work -- she might have folks who WOULD be interested in following that path; or she might know where to point him to for 'TANK' work.
{shrug} I DID get that impression. If "he was ignored" he seems to have gone to the wrong office to try to get his work taken up?
This test of veracity is clearly a good one because it raised the heckles of the white knighting trolls.
It's simple. Your hero has a button.
Press: Get info about DoD health database contractor after what looks like a period of suspiciously manipulated data relating to the vaccine rollout.
Don't press.
The cost would be paid by the crowd. The net cost is a single call to an assistant to have the lawyer work it up. Okay, perhaps slightly higher, but the several hundred hours of research was already paid for. By me.
We're back to: Steve should spend HIS money the way *I* want him to becauase I have spent my money on what *I* wanted to. And if he doesn't he's an evil bad man who is working for the enemy -- who lies? ("lack of veracity" = liar, yes? That's how you're describing him?)
Look Crawford - -if you HAVE found yet another 'smoking gun' in this attack on the people of the world -- find the RIGHT people to get it to! It's a good thing you've found more important info. It's a BAD thing you've decided to STOP working on that info and finding to whom you should hand it off and begin/continue attacking one of the people working on OTHER important info!
I disagree, i think that even if this was a test of veracity, it isn't anymore. In other words, if people rallied behind this test, the CIA would deem the risk to outweigh the benefit of keeping the FOIA off the table.
There may be a relationship here. Behind the scenes, it is clear that there is almost an expectation of a victory, and businesses are being put in place very quickly. It's distasteful in some respects, though I can get over the parts that may be necessary. And yet, and I have the distinct feeling that many of these people knew the outcome from the start.
In 2021, I wrote an article about Type II COVID. I got a phone call that day saying, "Don't spread this around, but...VAIDS," as if there was an already chosen naming convention for a problem that was supposedly just emerging.
There is a LOT of creepy shit like that in the MFM.
Is this victory they expect something we would consider a victory? Dismantling the media, and all agencies and organizations involved in this travesty?
If intelligence agencies are steering the controlled factions of the MFM (which of course they are, because who else would it be?), then I promise you their idea of victory will not line up with our idea of victory. The mainstream media IS intelligence, so there's not a chance in hell intelligence will dismantle the MSM. And of course no intelligence agency is going to dismantle itself. Any agents who attempt to go rogue will be... dealt with. We'll be told they "committed suicide" or "died from covid", if we even hear anything at all. It's somewhat depressing, but it is what it is.
The opposition (aka the government) has used controlled opposition for decades, but everyone kind of seems to forget that as soon as some prominent figure steps forward and says the things we want to hear. They'll be used to corral, discredit, control, and confuse the medical freedom/vaccine truth movement. We just need to keep that in mind, and not fall for these false heroes/saviors.
100% agree. DeSantis...has he had a talking to yet and is playing his role or are they waiting to do exactly that to him? Threaten with death of self or family or jail? Do we think they're not doing this? Of course they are it's all a charade.
I recall an interview Robert Malone gave early on in the Covid Era, wherein he mentioned that he had been very involved in early mRNA research, but then got away from it. He said something about never being able to get beyond vaccine induced acquired immune deficiency.
Have you been called or threatened by the powers that be? I think once one gets big enough they get a talking too. Die, be jailed, or do what we say. Has rhat happened to you?
"No, it's not. I'm mostly word-blind and have panic attacks and flashbacks when I handle legal documents. What you can do in an hour will make me sick for days."
Hi Mathew,
I completely understand how you feel - some of these make me paralyzed too, while I'm very successful in other areas. But I think many of your readers don't understand that kind of obstruction, so "why don't you do it yourself?" is a question reflecting genuine curiosity, and I think we have the answer now.
Regarding the lack of traction re DMED, I have been thinking of something. You are intelligent on a whole another level than the rest of us, and perhaps your message about DMED would be getting through better if it were presented in a way that is more clear to people who are not quite in your league (myself included, even though I often have to translate what I think is obvious for other people to understand (including likes of CROs and CFOs of the companies)).
To illustrate my point, I made an edit of the graphs you posted numerous times, in a way that makes the issue clear. I can't post it in the comments though. If there is a way for me to pass it through and you are interested in my point, do let me know how
"Regarding the lack of traction re DMED, I have been thinking of something. You are intelligent on a whole another level than the rest of us, and perhaps your message about DMED would be getting through better if it were presented in a way that is more clear to people who are not quite in your league (myself included, even though I often have to translate what I think is obvious for other people to understand (including likes of CROs and CFOs of the companies))."
It was 100 hours a week of work during those early months. I needed help, and begged for it. Meanwhile, those around me were acting as if they were taking legal steps based on my work, so I moved forward with my own. In fact, I didn't even finish a succinct summary article because I was also gas lighted about sending my findings to Congress. I believe there was a coordinated effort to steer my work while I was nose down in the spreadsheets.
"acting as if" "I was gaslighted" "a coordinated effort to steer my work"
These are your FEELINGS... they are how you FELT when your pleas for help did not get the response you felt you *deserved* (there's another clue!) ... above all the HUNDREDS of folks also pleading for help in THEIR digging.
"I needed help, and begged for it."
You begged for it from people who were ALSO buried, swamped, and deep in their own rabbit holes... And when they did not drop THEIR work to help you carry yours, you decided to try to get people to mistrust the people you asked for help from?
Does that seem like it's furthering the uncovering of the attack on the humanity?
"You begged for it from people who were ALSO buried, swamped, and deep in their own rabbit holes... And when they did not drop THEIR work to help you carry yours, you decided to try to get people to mistrust the people you asked for help from?"
Wow.
I gave over a thousand hours of my time when asked to volunteer. Others around me stated that they would help, then sabotaged that process. My home was invaded, I was assaulted, and a vehicle made up to look like law enforcement tried to run my off the highway, and that's only a small part of the story.
That you choose to describe this like whining demonstrates that your goal is not to understand, but to attack. That tells me that my criticisms were long overdue, so thank you for speaking up.
If you present something as «the greatest fraud in the history of the world», people might elect not to touch it for the fear of it being true, and simple unwillingness to put themselves in the crosshairs. Arkancide might be real after all, or they might think it is. People may look brave but in reality few of them are, and I wouldn't blame them for that.
Perhaps presenting it as a mystery and weird unexplained artifact might be more productive – e.g. «look at this! your worldview cannot be complete until you figure this out».
I approve of your mystery idea, and took some of those steps along the way. But a lot unfolded in real time. If I magically reclaim time for the project, perhaps I'll create a documentary this way, but the MFM leadership would be BLASTED along the way.
"If you present something as «the greatest fraud in the history of the world»,"
... in the MIDST of all these folks ALSO investigating what they *too* know is that greatest attack on humanity ever, most are likely to discard your requests for help as EITHER enemy propaganda or a massive exaggeration. Or as something they haven't time to you with.
Rat, suggesting the people like Steve and all the docs standing up and presenting the truth and losing licenses and jobs and enduring many attacks, "are not brave" is, like, Crawford, maligning people who have done NOTHING to deserve it! We have literal hundreds of people who HAVE looked brave and proven themselves to BE brave. Steve is one of those.
Because one of our brave folks is seen by Crawford as having let him (personally) down -- and therefore, instead of continuing to try to find the RIGHT people to help him get his work out, Crawford has taken to attacking SPECIFICALLY Steve. What this the purpose of that? For whom is he doing it? If Crawford controlled oppo? WHY is he trying to tear down Steve, out of all the folks working to save humanity? Is that his assignment from our enemies? Why isn't Crawford attacking Ed Dowd? Is Ed not the target he was assigned to attack by our enemies?
(See? I , TOO, can try to plant seeds of doubt about someone doing work for our side. ***Those are NOT real questions*** and, while I very much look askance at Crawford's attempts to HARM (only?) one of our own, it very much doesn't feel good to attack, and I can't (and wouldn't try to) back it up because while Crawford's attacks on Steve are dismaying -- and useless to those of us (whom he derides as white knights) who have SEEN and acknowledge Steve's work - - and his commitment to OUR side -- since Crawford believes he has done good work, he SHOULD continue to find the RIGHT people to get it to. Instead, he's flinging *** at Steve and trying to elicit support against Sreve and for himself.
Why was it sponsored by the other American (aside from Steve) who funded the first HCQ trial in the U.S. that completely sabotaged the first and simplest step of early treatment research?
I never called Steve out for that, but having seen his pattern of obtuseness, I think it's fair game. That moment did 1000x more damage than he could ever possibly undo. I can forgive a massive accident, but if that's due to either a terrible behavioral pattern flaw or sabotage, both are horrific.
Steve acting as if examining his relationships is something like "off the wall" is obtuse. He should be expected to speak more seriously about these relationships.
Who was "that other American" Mathew? This is important! Are you talking about the Surgisphere debacle or the other HCQ trial that used lethal doses on sick ICU patients?
Thank you for that, sir! That was very important info imo. Steve needs to explain that one. And for that matter, he pushed fluvoxamine relentlessly even though it was never a first line therapy for Covid, was an SSUI with all the possible serious side effects. I only used it on a couple of patients I treated because of my concern. I cautioned them repeatedly to stop immediately if they noticed a mood effect and I didn't see a positive effect from it so I stopped using it. Come on, Steve Kirsch, tell us if you accepted sponsorship by Rockefeller Philanthropy (annual revenue $425M) and why!
Jan 16, 2023·edited Jan 16, 2023Liked by Mathew Crawford
I've been reading your articles here and at campfire for the last couple of hours, getting up to speed with what you meant by MFM. Medical Freedom Movement i take it?
Agree with a lot of your insights especially regarding #5GW and am shocked to realize how much the DMED travesty dropped off my radar. Practically forgot about it entirely since I saw u on Kevin McCairn's group livestream months and months ago.
That 5GW shit is very effective and even the most aware of us can fall privy to it.
FWIW, I do not believe heroes carry flags into battle on my behalf in this plandemic calamity, especially when all these heroes do is string you along...
tune in next week, check back tomorrow for latest revelation... SLAM, TRUTH, SHOCKING, BUST, WILD..
Only chatbots, sock puppets, hollowed out doom scrollers and COINTELPRO scum can continue engaging in hope baiting like this in perpetuity.
You have my deepest gratitude and beliefs in what you are doing and I marvel at your wealth of informative works, pursuit of DMED and education of your audience. Inspires me to jump back onto the too little hours sleep a night saddle and get whip crackin'
I've been sharing this around heavily over the last few weeks and it works like a flea bomb against shills and clowns.
1. COINTELPRO Techniques for dilution, misdirection and control of a internet forum
2. Twenty-Five Rules of Disinformation
3. Eight Traits of the Disinformationalist
4. How to Spot a Spy (Cointelpro Agent)
5. Seventeen Techniques for Truth Suppression
And here's a little bonus discovered today which confirmed my intuitive distrust over a year ago.
"Kirsch was working on developing central bank digital currency (CBDC) infrastructure services through M10, where he served as co-founder and appears to be CEO."
*rolls eyes* oh apparently he resigned as CEO in September 2021 according to this:
> "Over the summer, the conflict reached his most recent startup, M10. Its board told him that if he wanted to remain part of the company he would have to stop making public anti-vaccine statements. In September, he resigned as CEO and gave up his board seat."
This Solzhenitsyn quote might be appropriate: "The line separating good and evil passes not through states, nor between classes, nor between political parties either – but right through every human heart…even within hearts overwhelmed by evil, one small bridgehead of good is retained. And even in the best of all hearts, there remains…an uprooted small corner of evil."
Mat...that skillset might be as close as you get right now. I would suggest taking her up on that. I personally understand the skillset she's referencing because it parallels my own. I'm just very much not Retired.
"My favored hypothesis is that the larger portion of the MFM leadership is controlled/compromised in one way or another." - That is a reasonable assumption for ALL movements. Remember the instructions from Lenin I think it was: "If you want to control the opposition, lead it". All other totalitarian systems operate the same.
Mathew: Do you have a question that can be posted on other Substack, Twitter sources? Something short and sweet like: "Can we get a FOIA submitted for ..." where the "..." would be the specific stuff? I'm not sure what to put in there. "The Unissant data" ?
I'll post it until I'm banned. Hell, I'll even sign up for Twitter (for the first time ever) just to post it.
Mathew I hate that you (and anyone sincere in this fight) find yourself in this position with your critical analysis skills. My hope is that we are a big enough, diverse enough, and decentralized enough group of sincere freedom fighters for us to not fall into the trap of hero worship. We should know better right? Just like the larger society, MFM is likely also, per Chris Bray’s insight, sick from the top down and healthy from the bottom up. Local local local local local local local. Reach out if you’re ever in the pnw. I’ll throw you a potluck style party w our local health freedom community 🥳
Why not file your own FOIA request? You don't have to be a lawyer to fill it out. You may need one to enforce it if the government summarily ignores you, which seems to be the MO of the Biden administration.
I'm testing a more important hypothesis, which is for consistency of principles/aims among the MFM leadership.
This is like asking somebody why they choose to wear a red shirt than a black shirt. At some point, there is symmetry breaking that we call "preference". I have a preference.
So, rather than going after our ENEMIES who have literally murdered MILLIONS, you're going to set traps and play games trying to prove OUR people are corrupt?
But, you're made ILL by reading documents, AND you spent some length of time and hundreds of your own dollars working out FROM READING DMED DOCUMENTS how the DMED data is corrupted. BUT you're made too ill to do anything else with your data except harass Steve because he won't do what you asked him to do. AND you're here working VERY hard to try to get people to think ill of him.... AND some nice lady tried to help you find the money so you can DO your FOIA -- pointing out the EXACT problems that we can all see -- and you shut her down... No, I'll ONLY accept the exact specific help I am demanding -- because doing it myself would make me sick for days...
This is EXACTLY what an enemy agent would do. How is it MORE important to weed out which of OUR people meet YOUR criteria for validity; than supporting our people as they work to figure out if we can SAVE our people?
Pile it on, Crawford. Your words and choices have put you -- for me at least -- in the enemy camp. I do not find you trustworthy. YOU have cast more than all the doubts I need to declare you an enemy. Keep going, I hope more people look closely at WHAT you are insisting on, rather than what you are saying is '... maybe possibly so.
Somebody will eventually file the FOIA. You. Any reader here. Somebody.
But the test is unique. It led me through all my notes on Kirsch at which point I realized that I'd missed a history of him telling me contradictory stories or stories I should have checked first.
I wonder if Steve got himself into trouble when he claimed to have actual vials and tried to get them analyzed. I don't know if the state needs an excuse to blatantly violate his civil rights, but there was probably an excuse in that.
I'm nonplussed that anybody would think for a second that all so-called leaders of the MFM are not false leaders, agents of the Kulangeta, or what-have-you. The information that has been brought forward by many, many contributors, has been extremely important inasmuch as the first go-round with vaxx poisons was not entirely successful. Obviously a lot of people, myself included, did not need anyone's help to understand that the injections should be resisted. But many people didn't know too much and as they absorbed the anti-Narrative they became stronger in resisting, whether it came from a false or honest "leader." Mark Crispin Miller wrote an article about this a couple of days ago and it resonated with me because we had the same problem while fighting the Vietnam War. E.g., Tom Hayden, if you remember that expletive, was a typical example of a false leader that many admired, and probably followed down the path of do-nothingness. I had occasion to watch Hayden duck out of a demonstration before the police arrived, despite having said he would be there "to the end." As Miller points out, it is the message, not the personality, that is important. Critically analyze the message. If there is false logic or the message is leading falsely in other ways, just remember who was saying/writing it. Eventually it will become clear whether to listen any more or just discard that individual. I stopped listening to Malone a long time ago after I became convinced that he was probably controlled Opposition with a capital O. My jury is still out most of the "leaders." Like Avalanche, with whom I don't agree on a lot I think, I do tend to trust Pierre Kory and that is because as an MD I can easily verify a lot of what he is writing about.
That the MFM leadership may be compromised - which affects everything - is an important hypothesis, possibly pointing to something more important than the DMED data glitch. If determined to be true, it would add further weight to the DMED data being consciously manipulated, and a FOIA could still be filed.
The question is Why would the MFM leaders not file a FOIA?? Because not doing so makes no sense. Is there any reason other than being infiltrated by an intelligence operation intent on controlling the narrative?
The average American outside the Intelligence Community has no idea, which is by design, how embedded they are in our everyday lives. There are deeper levels of mind control than nudging. Furthermore, because intelligence is compartmentalized with need-to-know classification, there are well-funded operational programs, programs within programs, that the Intelligence Community itself does not know about.
Liberal use is made of outside contractors from aerospace companies to satanic cults to control the minds of both adversaries and American citizens, with the collateral damage swept under the rug.
Here's a red pill on mind control methodology everyone might want to consider. The goal is control of your thinking, willing, and remembering.
It's not just the covid narrative where things are not as they seem. That the Medical Freedom Movement leadership may be compromised is a possibility that should be tested.
In 2014, the Defense Health Agency (DHA) awarded Bimethods, Inc. $14M for "Pharmacy Operation Program Support" and $25M in 2019 for "Labor Pharmacy Operation quality and cost-appropriate analytical, technical, and program management services". It's strange that I could not find any press on these contracts, yet their data management contracts with DoD were publicized.
The root problem causing most of our other problems is that our main operating system (government/schools/media) have been corrupted.
If you tell us the kind of systems that govern over you, we can accurately predict your quality of life. If those systems are corrupted then so are you (and your families).
It is time to organize with other like minded individuals and fix them.
We know the solutions. Decentralize everything. Demand transparency in systems. And most efficiently, weaponize the tyranny of the masses back onto the people corrupting our systems to end this Global Agenda.
This is why I left finance (where I could have built a dominating career...I have still never designed a losing account or even one that averaged less than three-digits on an annualized basis even in bear markets): decentralized education is the everything solution. I desperately need to get back to that work when feasible.
Referring to ingroup critique in the MFM as a "circular firing squad" is rhetorical, and a bad argument.
But understand also that it's deeply offensive. We have seen a number of murders, and weirdly the theater is for everyone to pretend they aren't happening (which is one of the reasons I don't trust much of the MFM leadership).
Be a little more sensitive to a reality that is different from the cartoon you might have in your head if you have never met any of the people you choose as leaders in person.
... We have seen a number of murders, and weirdly the theater is for everyone to pretend they aren't happening. ..."
Matthew C., please what are the names of the ones likely murdered to whom you refer? Are u referring to the millions killed by the original bioweapon and the untold thousands now dying suddenly/unexpectedly from the jabs?
Or do you mean people like Dr. Thomas Jengdes, managing director of East Germany’s largest municipal hospital -- the Chemnitz clinic -- who "fell" from the hospital roof approx December 1, 2021?
[https://www.europereloaded.com/germany-chief-medical-doctor-of-a-major-hospital-thomas-jendges-falls-from-the-roof-of-the-hospital-suicide-or-murder-video/]
[https://rightsfreedoms.wordpress.com/2021/11/22/germany-dr-thomas-jendges-head-of-clinic-commits-suicide-covid-19-vaccine-is-a-genocide/]
Or would you be referring to persons such as Dr. Andreas Noack, who died 11/29/21 mysteriously 3 days after putting out a video exposing graphene hydroxide "razor blades" as an ingredient of the Covid shots? Interesting video IMO (18 min) included in link (below) about Dr. Noack's death. [https://expose-news.com/2021/12/07/did-german-chemist-dr-andreas-noack-die-after-direct-energy-weapon-attack/]
Or perhaps the plane crash that almost killed Dr. Carrie Madej?
And PCR inventor- Mullis!
And I also can't forget the strange death of Frank Plummer in Kenya:
"Frank Plummer – Canadian Scientist Key To Coronavirus Investigation Assassinated In Africa?"
https://greatgameindia.com/frank-plummer-canadian-lab-scientist-key-to-coronavirus-investigation-assassinated/
I havn't run into ANY news or information on Dr. Plummer's death. Not even a "Still under investigation" deflection in response to news people asking. I wonder if there have been African based journaists asking, but we do not hear anything here. Or perhaps people have gotten the message there, "Do NOT Ask."
And Brandy Vaughan, 44, a Big Pharma whistleblower and advocate for the vaccine injured, was found dead at home by her son. She previously worked for Merck ... may Brandy R.I.P.
"The Overt and Covert Intimidation of Brandy Vaughan" (12 min) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fuTXlCGjqMc/
What about Philip Haney?
"What about Philip Haney?"
I saved this story about Philip Haney (linked below). His death was likely a political murder. Terribly upsetting how the good are murdered. Yet the wicked prosper.
https://www.frontpagemag.com/who-killed-philip-haney-lloyd-billingsley/
Thank you. I remember reading it when it was first published. I read Haney’s book when it first came out, and found him intriguing. I was delighted to hear that he was close to publishing again, and then he was suddenly dead. No way was it suicide.
Another in the list of disappearing computers that end up in the possession of the FBI, and disappear. Seth Rich, Anthony Weiner, Phil Haney, Hunter Biden, Etc.
Yes! The Amador County officials announced that they were handing over all their evidence to the FBI, and that they looked forward to hearing back. Later, they expected news in a few weeks. After a few weeks, they again expected news in a few weeks. And then, no news. Ever.
Provided AIDS treatment and contraception, of course he had to go. Our unelected Uber Lords want a rapid reduction of humans. They are overlooking the fact that if you lift women out of poverty they choose to have 1 or 2 children.
Boris Johnson, 2007 - "You can see it as you fly over Mexico City, a vast checkerboard of smog-bound, low-rise dwellings stretching from one horizon to the other; and when you look down on what we are doing to the planet, you have a horrifying vision of habitations multiplying and replicating like bacilli in a Petri dish."
https://www.boris-johnson.com/2007/10/25/global-population-control/
Dr Andreas Noack was highly suspicious. Yeadon gave it to the Met Police, they ignored it.
Did not know Dr. Yeadon got involved.
It was a bullet point mention in the letter. Oh poor choice of words he was shot in the head...
@Katarina, who wrote, "... he was shot in the head ..."
Dr. Andreas Noack collapsed at home. There's no mention of a gun involved in his death. It was reported that his wife was with him in their kitchen when he was stricken.
I've read a couple of different stories, you're right, my apologies he wasn't shot, but the German armed police raided his flat just before he died... https://shiftfrequency.com/dr-noack-murdered-amid-proof-of-heart-inflammation-from-vax/
Barry and Honey Sherman, Billionaire couple, Founder of Apotex Pharmaceutical, found strangled by belts next to indoor pool of their home in December 2017. 35 million dollar reward. Police still have nothing.
Link to "Was Apotex Owner Barry Sherman Murdered For Interfering In Big Pharma Profits?" below:
https://capforcanada.com/was-apotex-owner-barry-sherman-murdered-for-interfering-in-big-pharma-profits/
Interesting cheers!
35 million pound reward? Hydroxychloroquine anyone?
“The branded drug companies hate us. They have hired private investigators on us all the time,” Sherman said in a 2001 book titled Prescription Games. “The thought once came to my mind, why didn’t they just hire someone to knock me off? For a thousand bucks paid to the right person you can probably get someone killed. Perhaps I’m surprised that hasn’t happened.”
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/jan/26/billionaires-barry-and-honey-sherman-were-murdered-canada-police-say
"$10 million questions in unsolved slayings of billionaires Barry and Honey Sherman" by author Joe Warmington, link below:
https://torontosun.com/news/local-news/warmington-10-million-questions-in-unsolved-slayings-of-billionaires-barry-and-honey-sherman
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8294953/Married-coronavirus-researcher-killed-murder-suicide-lengthy-love-triangle-feud.html
I see that Crawford 'liked' this comment. Meaning, perhaps, that he is endorsing the list of victims?
If so, I can well understand why there is a "theater to pretend they aren't happening"; or at least, I can see why there's nothing much to say. There's a lot of speculation about what might have happened, but no real proof of foul play; much less any evidence of who in particular might have been responsible if these deaths weren't accidental. In the absence of any evidence, wild accusations tend to look like irresponsible conspiracy talk.
I endorse the attempt, if incomplete, of reasonable coincidences to investigate. I have specific beliefs about some, but not all of the pandemic slayings.
I asked Steve in his comment section yesterday why he is ignoring your DMED numbers. He said “because the VAERS numbers are out there for all to see.”
I said “nobody is out perusing VAERS nunmbers. They read about them when you write about them.” Why wouldnt it be the same for DMED numbers?”
No answer.
I didnt think you were right about him at first--he seems too obsessed with proving the vax is deadly--but its becoming obvious he is not willing to get to the bottom of the DMED story for whatever reason. Sorry i doubted you. Wish i could help.
It clearly makes no sense to think of VAERS as a set of numbers that couldn't use some support, or to discard the DMED. The VaST workgroup and every other org that ever wanted to study young healthy people used the DMED, and it often provides extremely clean signals due to a lack of need for disaggregation.
Ive been a big fan of Steve but there is no reasonable explanation for him to all of a sudden not be interested in DMED and Unissant. Im blown away by the whole thing.
Miles Mathis estimates the amount of people on an intelligence payroll in the US numbers into the millions. Every group, from 2nd amendment rights to the kennel club, is infiltrated with agents, observers, and provocateurs, why would a movement with such important ramifications not be?
Trying to remember the name of the program the FBI used where they recruited civilian "partners" among businesses, community leaders, neighbors, etc., I searched "fbi citizen spying operation," and the results are mind-boggling, and that's just for the FBI. We never left the Hoover era, it has steadily intensified.
Mathew: in the dialog with 'Abigail Stark' and 'Shasta' below, I believe you're making a clear accusation that Elon Musk is organizing a faction within the MFM movement, including the San Juan Declaration backers (including Urso, Malone, Kory, Cole, and Tyson.) You state that this group is organizing a business empire that will be worth hundreds of billions if not trillions of dollars in the future. You state that Musk is "a central figure in a global civil war."
We are left to conjecture as to who you think is on the other side of this civil war. Perhaps the other side is folks like Klaus Schwab, Bill Gates, the WHO, WEF, CDC, FDA etc? If so, then: without giving up my own agency, it's easy for me to say that I would prefer for Musk, Urso, Malone & Kory to win the war.
If you're trying to say that Musk is on the same team with Schwab and Gates, then I don't see that there is any war, because there is no one to oppose them -- aside from random, disorganized individuals and whatever personal agency they might have remaining.
Also, are you trying to say that Musk and the Puerto Rico doctors are somehow responsible for murdering your family members and burning down your house? Or are you accusing the other side, whoever that is? Why aren't you willing to name the victims?
I don't think anyone who reads this blog, is trying to belittle your concerns. But speaking only for myself, at a very deep level I don't understand what you're talking about.
If you're going to write a whole fiction book and ask me to answer questions line-by-line about how it applies to real life, don't be shocked if I'm going to ignore you.
I'm not unwilling to name victims, but if you're complaining that I don't spend 18 hours on command performing a task for you, you're goofy.
Wow. You're the one who appears to be writing the book of fiction. I'm only quoting back at you, what you said yourself. It doesn't take 18 hours to name a few names.
No, you're not merely quoting back at me. You are creating one of many continuations as a fiction in order to discredit any notion of a true continuation. Most neutral observers are smart enough to tell the difference.
Both you and Steve have become utterly boring and irrelevant because you repeat the same thing ad nauseam. Here another study, another survey, another agent of chaos, and another petty dispute borne out of hubris. Move on please.
Why are you picking on me Mathew. I have not filed a single freedom of information act request myself. Other people have. There is nothing to stop anyone from filing A freedom of information act request. There are hundreds of people in the anti-VAX movement. Why are you picking on me? Why aren’t you pointing out that anyone else in the anti-VAX movement could’ve done it as well? I don’t have a resource who specializes in freedom of information act request that can do my bidding. It’s a very special skill. Otherwise you risk getting nothing. Aaron, Siri could file such a request. But he doesn’t work for me. Why don’t you pick on Del Bigtree and ask him that question?
1. Always read the article before commenting. I'm telling people not to trust Del unless his people will file a FOIA (edit: if prompted by the test).
2. The only sense in which I'm "picking on" you is the sense in which you told me multiple times you'd have one of your lawyers contact me to perform the FOIA. That's a true statement, is it not?
3. As I mentioned in the article, you can likely fix at no cost (low up front, but likely profitable).
4. If you're compromised, blink twice. Give the pedophile back all his money.
"I'm telling people not to trust Del unless his people will file a FOIA (edit: if prompted by the test)."
1. So, ONLY trust people who do what YOU tell them to do?
2. If some of the lawyers Steve knows are NOT interested, willing, or available to do YOUR bidding, you're blaming STEVE?!!?
3. "Here, Steve, let me tell you how to spend YOUR money on my behalf, instead of continuing to spend YOUR money on the projects YOU are most interested in funding."
(Really. The whining you're doing here makes it pretty clear why Steve's lawyers -- and anyone else's -- who run across you will pretend they don't see you and hurry away to continue with their own work!)
And 4 is just a stupid petty insult from a bitchy child who is stamping his foot cause he can't make 'sugar-daddy' do what he wants! (And Steve is SOOOOOOO not your sugar daddy!)
*IF* you expect anyone to consider you a sound source for information OR someone to be trusted and considered an ALLY in our fight... then start ACTING LIKE IT! If you just must have a FOIA filed -- then LEARN how yourself, or find someone ELSE to importune for money.
We're all REALLY frustrated at how slowly the uncovering is going. But we're NOT insulting and trying to cajole (in the same msg, as the same time?!) someone into doing what WE wish they would do first! Everyone has their own 'tasks' in this war; and most of us are buckling down and doing OUR task(s). We are for 100% SURE not turning and shooting at OUR ALLIES who are doing their parts!!
If the task you've assigned yourself is one you cannot complete by yourself, then find a NEW task, and pass what you've managed to get done so far over to someone who HAS the skills and abilities (and money, if need be) to get it done; and YOU go do what is within your skills and abilities.
"So, ONLY trust people who do what YOU tell them to do?"
I only trust people who, when given the chance to press a button that reveals truth at the snap of a finger, do so.
TYPING AT ME IN BIG BOLD LETTERS DOESN'T MAKE PEOPLE WHO CHOOSE TO OBSCURE THE TRUTH THEY CLAIM TO BE INTERESTED IN MORE TRUSTWORTHY.
The Steve army leaves me to believe something is indeed wrong with Steve. You responded to him hours ago, still nothing it seems
You want to answer for Steve? Isn't he capable? Why so many Steve body guards?
Because shooting at your ALLIES in the middle of battles is EITHER a sign of a stupid
"fellow soldier" or a traitor/enemy in our midst!
This Crawford guy is whining because Steve hasn't *FOUND HIM* a lawyer. Does Crawford not own a phone or computer? Is he an adult who can manage his own affairs? And if, say, he has a biz lunch with someone who says, on parting, "this was fun, we should do it again" and then never calls to do it again -- does Crawford begin insulting and complaining IN PUBLIC that the guy never called him for lunch? My conclusion is: who would WANT to have lunch with that guy again?"
And I'm not answering FOR Steve; I'm pointing out the piss-poor PUBLIC behavior by Crawford, in a group that gathers here to keep up WITH Steve and what he's doing!! (Sheesh! Go to a cocktail party at a man's "house" and then begin insulting him in front of his guests.)
And many are 'defending' Steve because we rely on him to do WHATEVER work he chooses to do. He has not yet wasted our time -- or our support -- by doing whatever it is HE thinks will best serve. Am I thrilled he's still trying to get debates? Not really -- but if THAT hunt helps keeps him digging and doing all his mathy-magic on such data as he's able to get? BRAVO! Go Steve GO!
"This Crawford guy is whining because Steve hasn't *FOUND HIM* a lawyer."
That's a clearly incorrect description. If the story is unclear, I recommend reading the back articles on the DMED story.
I REEEEEEALY don't care your reasons for showing up and whining... Waste of everyone's time.
Right on Avalanche. Crawford is incredibly petty. Why all the whingeing about Stave not doing his bidding?
Great response. Thank you!!!
Steve, I'm going to assume your response was to ME, since it's appended to my message. So, you're very welcome. Your work is why I send you $. It ain't much, but it's what I can do! You and Kory.
All blog (now substack) comment sections get what we call ankle-biters. The standing rule on the blog I used to frequent had several sharp moderators; and the rule became "DON'T feed the trolls." I apologize for feeding your trolls for so long -- it's been more than two years since comments ended on that blog, and I forgot that rule/am out of the habit. Back to reading and I'll try not to White Knight (too much...) {wink}.
You're welcome BUT where is the response! I'd love to know what is going on. Matt is likely telling the truth. Can't you just explain what happened exactly so we can all put it to bed?
I'm very time constrained nowadays working on things that move the needle.
1. I don't always have time to do that.
2. I don't recall doing that. Do you have a specific email where I made that offer?
3. Likely fix what?
4. You are making accusations about people that I was not aware of. I certainly did not know he is a pedophile. Was there a court determination that that was the case? Or is that your opinion? Did he serve time in jail? Is he now out of jail and trying to lead a more moral life? If he donates $100M to VSRF now that he's served his time, is it unethical to accept? Is there a societal rule that you are a bad person if you accept? How do you make the tradeoff of the lives saved vs. accepting the money from someone who now reformed? Is he still a pedophile? How do you know that? Has he admitted it? Should I be dropping everything to investigate this and spend time on it so I get the right answer? Is focusing on this issue really the best use of my time?
You can resort to all the name calling you want and insult me. That's not the way to get what you want.
I'm going back to writing my substack. There are people dying and being injured by these vaccines and the upcoming articles I think will make a huge difference.
So convince me that responding to your insults is more important than saving lives.
Have you run a survey showing which activities do and don't move the needle?
Haven't you wondered in singular focus continues to move the needle at the margins?
On 4: Do you really need proof of a conflict of interest to stop and take a look? One this major? If this is related to the pandemic, and I believe strongly that it is, it seems like a great use of time. The pandemic took children out of school who were then used to make billions, and some of that money was put in your hands. It's the equivalent of blood money. That's NOT trivial and it's baffling anyone would act like it is.
This is clearly NOT about name calling. This is substantial. And the people who may die moving forward relates to these issues more than the people who already died.
Have you passed this through anything like a counsel you trust?
Steve, I got the above email, but, it was not me made comment. Thanks for all u do. hoss
(Maybe accusations of pedophilia can be misunderstood these days? Not sure where that's coming from, but, um, maybe I don't want to know .. (pedophilia all over the elites, and it's probably impossible to be a liberal millionaire and not know any pedophiles, OK (not OK as in OK, OK as in, yes, that's the sad reality) ... but if implying anything more direct than that(??)
I wrote again to ICAN, I don't know if they are not acting on this because they are swamped, including with requests to look at things not worth looking at, and have not taken the time to truly understand this? To believe Stew Peters is a chaos agent is one thing, but Aaron Siri? That's not possible ...
I'm actually giving Steve the chance to do the right thing before explaining the pedophile any further, but understand there seem to be a substantial number of pedophile billionaires running pandemic profiteering operations, and with relationships among the MFM. I will make the polite assumption that Steve didn't know, but he is now on notice.
So, you throw an really brutal INSULT -- but refuse to back it up "until he does what I want him to do"? Just WHO is not doing the right thing? Just WHO is acting exactly like controlled opposition, trying to get people to look askance at Steve for something you are baselessly accusing him of? I might even recommend Steve get one of his "stable of lawyers" sitting waiting for Steve to "pick me! pick me!" to think about your intentional libel?
"I might even recommend Steve get one of his "stable of lawyers" sitting waiting for Steve to "pick me! pick me!" to think about your intentional libel?"
Go for it, asshole. How many millions of words have I written without a libel suit? Think it through.
Do you work for Malone? This sounds a lot like the mind that launched the $25M suit against the Breggin's. I don't have a dog in the fight. I'm just trying to figure out what is going on. You sound like someone who is trying to prevent honest people from learning truth. Shut up your threats!
No I don't work for Malone; never met him, never seen him live; I don't even support his substack. The Breggins are NOT telling the truth about Malone! Did you not listen to "poor old" Peter whining and snuffling that Malone was evil bad on the enemy's side -- and his BOOK was even selling better than Peter's!! ooohooohoooh! Sounded to me like it was jealousy (or dementia?) on Breggin's part -- no matter HOW expert he is in psychology (and I freely admit that); he CLEARLY has never worked in govt or big corporate!!
(At the risk of eliciting a total recoil: He SOUNDED exactly like Shylock in a well-done "Merchant of Venice." Even seen the play *done well*? Can't see it today at all... too anti-semetic to be allowed. But the whining and wailing and nasty pointing fingers FIT Breggin to a T! (And surprised me very much! I REALLY expected BETTER of him based on his reviews around.)
What TRUTH did Breggin have about Malone? Because Malone worked for govts, and was involved in high-level medical research, that therefore he was evil? WHO BETTER to ask for help and information than someone who KNOWS the system and the people in it and what went on. When Breggin lost his composure and began squealing and whining and accusing and complaining... I finally had to turn him off! He was 'working himself up' into a frenzy of hate and jealousy (it sounded to me).
I have listened to, watched, and read pretty much everything Malone has posted (have you? Clearly Breggin has not AT ALL! He was making all kinds of accusations out of the air, some of them truly ridiculous!) I have found Malone to be thoughtful, well-spoken, (WAY too liberal for MY tastes, no matter how much cynicism he feels he has learned), and NOTHING he has said or shown strikes a false note. (And I'm ex-Navy, ex-Boeing, ex-govt employee -- so I, too, know stuff about "reality" that protected academic Breggin likely would not)
I DO have a slight ... caution ... merely because I don't trust anyone all the way. I am keeping watch, and would NOT wholeheartedly follow any suggestion of Malone's, any more than I would my number one hero Pierre Kory, whom I stalk across the web, and also read everything HE says or does or writes. Like Malone and Kory, so many once-liberal-idiots have been forcibly awakened to the lies of their side: yes, even Kory is one such! As are Naomi Wolf, Steve Kirsch, Chris Martenson, I think Ed Dowd, I don't know about Paul Marik; so very MANY of them... and as down-to-the bone once-liberals, they STILL have a lot of really stupid shit stuck in their brains and their world views. So I ALWAYS look askance at some new position or idea they put forth, and challenge myself to validate it or research in other venues. Pierre half-jokes with Martenson: every time he THINKS he is finally really truly deeply cynical, something pops up that proves he's STILL naïve as hell! I think in some few areas (mainly govt, bioweapons, bioweapon labs, and the like) Malone is WAY less naïve than Kory.... but he's STILL too much of a peace-love-dove-kumbaya-DESIRING part-liberal for my tastes.
Their underlying beliefs and expectations has not yet been cleared out fully enough, clearly enough, and safely enough for full trust.
Mathew, do you have any actual evidence that Kirsch told you multiple times, that he'd have one of his lawyers contact you to perform the FOIA? Because he says, just above, that he doesn't have a lawyer on tap who specializes in FOIA requests. If there's no evidence, then it's just "he said, no he said".
Elsewhere, if my memory serves correctly, you've said that some sort of word has gone out to all lawyers everywhere, not to pursue this. It could be true, and if so, such a message could be very powerful. Lawyers everywhere threatened with losing their license, or worse, if they pursue this? If that's the story, maybe it's not Kirsch's fault. For all we know, he might have called all his favorite lawyers, and they turned them down.
I know you're ignoring me, so maybe it isn't worth the bother of saying this. But maybe some lawyers have called you, and given up in frustration because you're so rude to people who are trying to understand, and trying to help?
"Mathew, do you have any actual evidence that Kirsch told you multiple times, that he'd have one of his lawyers contact you to perform the FOIA?"
You don't consider the chat I posted in this article such evidence?
Okay, so what if that chat log didn't exist? We had phone conversations, too. And those conversations were talked about within his steering committee circle. Is he or anyone else questioning whether we talked about the FOIAs and said he would have his lawyer(s) contact me to help?
"I know you're ignoring me"
Huh? I have thousands of communications a day and get to 1% of them. If I "ignored" something, it is because I don't have 200 hours to read them.
"But maybe some lawyers have called you, and given up in frustration because you're so rude to people who are trying to understand, and trying to help?"
Ah, here we are on the attack: let's shame and blame the gas lighting victim. Do you have evidence of me being rude to a lawyer? I'm fairly polite with them. I think if you have some email exchange between me and a lawyer, I'm close to 100% certain it will look polite. Please post it.
Nobody has claimed or mentioned to me anything like a lawyer losing status or work for these FOIAs in particular. If that's been discussed, which I doubt, please email me a pointer link.
Mathew, I don't know Steve other than being on a Zoom call with him eons ago where he wanted people to organize their own teams to spread the word, and then we sent him our team info that was in a document that he was going to share on Substack, which he then dropped the ball on, and then I was also going to volunteer to lead one of his other "Steve" teams, but the communication got messed up and someone else who also wanted to volunteer was just handed the gig kind of by default...so I ended up being part of that "team" but just a member. We got nothing done. Here's why.
The guy who ended up running the team (Paolo, just a volunteer, has his own business, and lives in Mexico) has been in contact either with Kirsch and/or Kirsch's people in the past...and a while back...we were going to work on doing some sort of survey, but then Steve got super busy and Paolo had a hard time getting a hold of him. Now Paulo is VERY organized, and would contact Steve's people, and then would be told that they had something for us to do, and sometimes literally months would go by without the communication we needed from Steve to move forward.
And at that point I was building my own Substack and told Paolo that I would rather spend my time working on my Substack than promoting Steve's. Paolo went and focused his energies on creating a podcast about the vaccines. Paolo is a great guy who I trust, BTW. There was never any thought of Steve being "compromised" - just that Steve is very very busy and not able to follow through on everything he wants to do.
Short version of all that is...and based on my gut feeling...Steve is VERY sincere but he is EXTREMELY disorganized and distracted by a gazillion things. In other words, yeah, he probably told you that about the FOIA, but he's promising a lot of people a lot of stuff he doesn't deliver, but that doesn't mean he's a chaos agent...it just means he's IN chaos. BIG difference. :-)
This is not a Sage Hana situation where Steve is pretending to be someone he is not. Steve's just overwhelmed in my opinion.
Now...does Steve have contacts and connections within the government and the military? Likely. Does that make him controlled opposition by default? No.
I'd just chalk this one up to Steve having too may fingers in too many pies...he's got blueberry all over his face but it's because he's got too much going on, not because he's actively malicious.
Sorry Steve, believe it or not I'm trying to help out here.
I'd like to believe the best of Steve, but when this issue got tough, and I pressed him, it certainly felt as if he started gas lighting me on all accounts. That's what our interview felt like the other day. The majority of what he said in that interview was different from what he had told me or led me to believe prior. Maybe that's due to being overwhelmed?
So, along the way during the DMED journey, I got a communication saying that there was some sort of order to dump me and my story. It's unclear if this came from Johnson, military intelligence, CIA, elsewhere, but it seemed legitimate. I invited some of Steve's steering committee into a meeting with intelligence officials to discuss what was doing on, but neither showed up for the meeting.
I got a step too far to think "good faith" at some point, but the interview just enraged me. It sounded like a moving target of fabricated standards, which in my experience says there is a story behind it.
It could be due to overwhelm...but the other thought that has occurred to me is this...if some people at the top of the MFM movement start acting cagey or weird another reason could be that they and/or their family members have been warned or threatened. It's just something to consider.
I'm too small fry to get any negative attention but honestly, lately, my feeling has been that's a good thing, my being low profile. I feel like all of this vaccine stuff is about to bust open, and the big money that wants it covered up might react like a caged animal now.
I like both you and Steve and do not get bad vibes from either of you, so I hope that I'm right in that this is just Steve being crazy overwhelmed...and not that he's a fake or even worse, he's being threatened about some areas related to the military and can't speak publicly about it.
FWIW - signing up large groups of volunteers and then wasting their time and effort is standard psyop procedure.
I've never met or spoken to Steve, but the sense of him I get from his writings and interviews is exactly this. The volume of his articles, how he speaks so quickly, and often over people ... The amount of activity in that brain, that puts out multiple articles a Day, and everything else, yet with gaps in the amount of output and the foundation of being grounded and centered, with ability to pause and take stock of where one is. (I hope if he ever gets a serious debate challenger that he would ask Byram Bridle or someone else more experienced in medicine and with less chaotic energy, to do the talking).
But as far as integrity ... being in this for the right reasons ... I always got a good sense of him (unlike Stew Peters).
Stephanie put well what I was trying to say, although my perspective is not from personal interactions - "and based on my gut feeling...Steve is VERY sincere but he is EXTREMELY disorganized and distracted by a gazillion things. In other words, yeah, he probably told you that about the FOIA, but he's promising a lot of people a lot of stuff he doesn't deliver, but that doesn't mean he's a chaos agent...it just means he's IN chaos. BIG difference. :-)"
Thanks, Ellen. I myself tend to be a bit like Steve so I can relate. Lots of big ideas, lots of projects in the fire, not so good at organization and follow-through. People like us can be *very frustrating* to a highly organized person, which I bet Mathew Crawford is. :-)
Great post, Stephanie. I think we were on the same team as I was also reading Paolo's posts and had the same opinion as you. I had a similar experience at that time when a project was floated that was going to expose Fraudci. I, along with others, got involved in that, spent some time on it, and then it all just petered out and ran into the sand. Total loss of time. Was it deliberate? Perhaps. I don't know.
The quote from Kirsch in the posted chat is "I'll be sending out an email asking for various resources to lawyers will be among them." The syntax is a little disjointed. But the way I read that, he was offering to contact lawyers and let them know about the case. He wasn't promising to follow up with them, or make sure that one of them would get on it. So: no, that isn't evidence of your claim.
"I know you're ignoring me". Don't you recall: you just told me that if I ask difficult questions, I shouldn't be surprised if you ignore me?
As I remember, what you claimed is that some sort of word had gone out to lawyers, advising them not to take the case. You didn't say that there was any threat of losing status or work; that was my conjecture -- that some sort of threat must have been implied, otherwise why would any lawyer take said "word" seriously? Do you recall saying that lawyers had been warned not to take the case? If not, I'll try to find the link.
I don't know whether you've been rude to lawyers. I only know that you're rude to me, and to several other commenters here who are trying to make sense of this.
"The quote from Kirsch in the posted chat is "I'll be sending out an email asking for various resources to lawyers will be among them." The syntax is a little disjointed."
You're right that the syntax is a little disjointed. Obviously, I'm posting this for Steve to see, and I doubt he is going to say we weren't talking about the FOIAs. It's not the only conversation I can share where we talked about them and other related matters.
Understand that I wouldn't dare post that or fabricate a story that wasn't true. His steering committee can obviously testify to the fact that I talked about essentially nothing but correcting the DMED story in meetings for months.
Jerry, I did not post that!
No, you didn't. I wonder if there's some sort of threading problem with Substack? I'm responding to Mathew.
Good possibility.
Why are you on Steve's jock? What dog do you have in this fight? Why don't you let Steve respond. Why are you speaking for him?
Mathew did keep a comment from Steve as a pinned comment, which I appreciate ...
That's what I mean Matt seems to want an open discussion. Steve does not? Why no answer?
I have paid subscriptions to both Steve and Mathew. One of them is going to get cancelled.
Because one is a fraud? Matt has posted proof. Now what? I don't trust Steve. I never have and I too have subscribed to both . Steve hasn't replied but was super quick to post. He doesn't add up to me.
As I commented above, I don't see that Matt's post of the chat with Kirsch is proof of anything.
Let's go. Steve you're suspect to me and have been even before this post. I look forward to ypur answers.The Anti Vax term is tough too. All vaccines are indeed bullshit as the statistics denote. No vaccine stopped anything ever. Polio was basically eradicated when the vaccine came out. It's been a scam and a plan for decades. They are way way ahead. It feels like to dance around the topics and don't really go deep. This may sound contradictory because I am anti vax but without further explanation anti vax term doesn't seem right.
You all are doing amazing and important work. Please don't go after each other this way. We all have our short comings. I hope you can stop looking at the specks in each other's eyes when we all have planks in our own. Recognize the gifts each of you have and contribute to the movement, apologize if you have said or done something against your brother, find someone who will help with FOIA, if eg Steve doesn't want to do so. I hope you gentlemen can forgive each other, stop insulting each other, and continue you're important work. Someone else will step up to find the information you just have to extend the reach asking for help through the many stacks out there.
"Please don't go after each other this way."
Take it up with the crowd that destroyed my home, assaulted me, threatened my wife, and laughed about it. It all goes weirdly unacknowledged. They are courageous white knights when they get shadowbanned on Twitter, but they're putting the knife to my throat. Why? Think it through. How do you know who represents your interests and why?
Why have heroes. Just learn and move forward. Your family is your guiding star.
How do you expect anyone to "take it up with the crowd that destroyed my home, assaulted me, threatened my wife, and laughed about it" when we have no idea who exactly you're talking about?
If you don't know that, you don't know enough to have heroes.
Sure. But what I think he's saying is. He's not all who he seems. That's what he's asking him. Let's see Steve respond. Seems more like a spirited discussion.
I'm rather Steve stick to digging into the numbers.... This a DISTRACTION away from saving lives... Why are you also doing this? Do not your posts make YOU seem like controlled opposition? Certainly by Crawford's definition of "how to assign unvalidated guilt" ...
Steve's numbers are mostly bunk, and the most solid ones came from me and Norman Fenton. Steve left me high and dry when I could have been feeding him more numbers. I'm literally incomplete on the most important stats project of proving the vaccines useless (presenting to Pandata today) because of it. Would have been done six months ago without this headache. You have no idea what's going on, but you're so certain that you do.
And by the way, you did just state the accusation that Steve Kirsch is taking money from a pedophile. Seems to me he could sue you for $25 million if he wanted to.
I DID NOT SAY THAT!!!!!!!!
Mathew, did you know that you will stand before God (Revelation 20:11-15 KJV). I would choose my words wisely for you will hear them again from the master. Choose wisely whom you target for you will answer... whatsoever a man soweth that shall he reap. Choose wisely!
Is this a threat?
Let me rephrase wisely: Is this *another* threat?
I think it's just an extremely Bible-obsessed person ... I'm not religious, but if I was, I'd think God would give you a high five and a nice time upstairs for all the important work you've done, and also Steve. (Editing comment - seeing how many GOD comments hoss has posted, I have no idea if this is a sincere Bible obsessed person or a chaos agent. Seems like people who hold very firmly to beliefs without seeking solid proof, and repeat them constantly can often be unwitting chaos agents. But I don't see Steve or Del or Aaron Siri in that light.)
I am a born again child of the KING JESUS. He died for my sins, my sins put him on the cross. The least I can do is tell others of his great love he has for those who are his. JESUS said " no man comes to the FATHER, but, by him. (JESUS)
Do you not read your Bible? Do you not know you will stand before GOD and give account for EVERY word you say AND the thoughts and intent of the heart. Do you know that JESUS CHRIST died so you could have eternal life with him? You know now. You will have no excuse before GOD so GOD says not
Do you drop this comment everywhere?
Have I made a claim that you think relates to it? It seems nonsensically placed.
I recommend going to the substacks of the pedophiles and the people who work with them or are funded by them and ask them about their relationships with god. There's some work to be done, preacher.
I'm no preacher. I am a PROCLAIMER. I proclaim to that will listen.
What a stupid comment. Stfu.
That seems not to be the Christian thing to say. Remember GOD does not forget. WE will answer for every word we speak. Tread carefully!
And I guess God made you judge and jury? Again STFU
Just quoting scripture. Take it up with GOD.
Don't understand, will you elaborate?
Steve: I didn't get the impression from the interview that Mathew was picking on you. He did an enormous amount of work diving into the DMED data, but was ignored, so, of course, he's not happy about it. You are doing good work, and I don't question your motives. Keep on doing what you are doing. It helps.
If he has done work on the DMED data why is he trying to get STEVE to follow-up? Why not Naomi Wolf or Thomas Renz? This sounds like, to continue my analogy: Crawford is a TANK driver, trying to get the 'officer in charge' of the AIR WING to do things for him! And then throwing a fit because the AIR WING has things more important to their part of the 'war' to handle! Not more important -- more important to THEIR part! See the diff?
Has Steve even done much with the DMED data? I have not seen much from him on that; and I read everything he posts... I know Renz has HIS folks working on it, including court cases. Not sure Naomi has folks looking at the DMED stuff, but if Crawford HAS found important info in his DMED work -- she might have folks who WOULD be interested in following that path; or she might know where to point him to for 'TANK' work.
{shrug} I DID get that impression. If "he was ignored" he seems to have gone to the wrong office to try to get his work taken up?
This test of veracity is clearly a good one because it raised the heckles of the white knighting trolls.
It's simple. Your hero has a button.
Press: Get info about DoD health database contractor after what looks like a period of suspiciously manipulated data relating to the vaccine rollout.
Don't press.
The cost would be paid by the crowd. The net cost is a single call to an assistant to have the lawyer work it up. Okay, perhaps slightly higher, but the several hundred hours of research was already paid for. By me.
We're back to: Steve should spend HIS money the way *I* want him to becauase I have spent my money on what *I* wanted to. And if he doesn't he's an evil bad man who is working for the enemy -- who lies? ("lack of veracity" = liar, yes? That's how you're describing him?)
Look Crawford - -if you HAVE found yet another 'smoking gun' in this attack on the people of the world -- find the RIGHT people to get it to! It's a good thing you've found more important info. It's a BAD thing you've decided to STOP working on that info and finding to whom you should hand it off and begin/continue attacking one of the people working on OTHER important info!
I disagree, i think that even if this was a test of veracity, it isn't anymore. In other words, if people rallied behind this test, the CIA would deem the risk to outweigh the benefit of keeping the FOIA off the table.
“Every great cause begins as a movement, becomes a business, and eventually degenerates into a racket.”
Eric Hoffer
There may be a relationship here. Behind the scenes, it is clear that there is almost an expectation of a victory, and businesses are being put in place very quickly. It's distasteful in some respects, though I can get over the parts that may be necessary. And yet, and I have the distinct feeling that many of these people knew the outcome from the start.
In 2021, I wrote an article about Type II COVID. I got a phone call that day saying, "Don't spread this around, but...VAIDS," as if there was an already chosen naming convention for a problem that was supposedly just emerging.
There is a LOT of creepy shit like that in the MFM.
Is this victory they expect something we would consider a victory? Dismantling the media, and all agencies and organizations involved in this travesty?
If intelligence agencies are steering the controlled factions of the MFM (which of course they are, because who else would it be?), then I promise you their idea of victory will not line up with our idea of victory. The mainstream media IS intelligence, so there's not a chance in hell intelligence will dismantle the MSM. And of course no intelligence agency is going to dismantle itself. Any agents who attempt to go rogue will be... dealt with. We'll be told they "committed suicide" or "died from covid", if we even hear anything at all. It's somewhat depressing, but it is what it is.
The opposition (aka the government) has used controlled opposition for decades, but everyone kind of seems to forget that as soon as some prominent figure steps forward and says the things we want to hear. They'll be used to corral, discredit, control, and confuse the medical freedom/vaccine truth movement. We just need to keep that in mind, and not fall for these false heroes/saviors.
Exactly.. so I wonder, just what is this "victory" they are anticipating?
I agree with Mathew... We all must do it ourselves, independently and decentralized.
100% agree. DeSantis...has he had a talking to yet and is playing his role or are they waiting to do exactly that to him? Threaten with death of self or family or jail? Do we think they're not doing this? Of course they are it's all a charade.
You'll know likely from the result of rhe FL grand jury. If it doesn't involve the OTA contracts then you have your answer.
I recall an interview Robert Malone gave early on in the Covid Era, wherein he mentioned that he had been very involved in early mRNA research, but then got away from it. He said something about never being able to get beyond vaccine induced acquired immune deficiency.
Have you been called or threatened by the powers that be? I think once one gets big enough they get a talking too. Die, be jailed, or do what we say. Has rhat happened to you?
"No, it's not. I'm mostly word-blind and have panic attacks and flashbacks when I handle legal documents. What you can do in an hour will make me sick for days."
Hi Mathew,
I completely understand how you feel - some of these make me paralyzed too, while I'm very successful in other areas. But I think many of your readers don't understand that kind of obstruction, so "why don't you do it yourself?" is a question reflecting genuine curiosity, and I think we have the answer now.
Regarding the lack of traction re DMED, I have been thinking of something. You are intelligent on a whole another level than the rest of us, and perhaps your message about DMED would be getting through better if it were presented in a way that is more clear to people who are not quite in your league (myself included, even though I often have to translate what I think is obvious for other people to understand (including likes of CROs and CFOs of the companies)).
To illustrate my point, I made an edit of the graphs you posted numerous times, in a way that makes the issue clear. I can't post it in the comments though. If there is a way for me to pass it through and you are interested in my point, do let me know how
"Regarding the lack of traction re DMED, I have been thinking of something. You are intelligent on a whole another level than the rest of us, and perhaps your message about DMED would be getting through better if it were presented in a way that is more clear to people who are not quite in your league (myself included, even though I often have to translate what I think is obvious for other people to understand (including likes of CROs and CFOs of the companies))."
It was 100 hours a week of work during those early months. I needed help, and begged for it. Meanwhile, those around me were acting as if they were taking legal steps based on my work, so I moved forward with my own. In fact, I didn't even finish a succinct summary article because I was also gas lighted about sending my findings to Congress. I believe there was a coordinated effort to steer my work while I was nose down in the spreadsheets.
"acting as if" "I was gaslighted" "a coordinated effort to steer my work"
These are your FEELINGS... they are how you FELT when your pleas for help did not get the response you felt you *deserved* (there's another clue!) ... above all the HUNDREDS of folks also pleading for help in THEIR digging.
"I needed help, and begged for it."
You begged for it from people who were ALSO buried, swamped, and deep in their own rabbit holes... And when they did not drop THEIR work to help you carry yours, you decided to try to get people to mistrust the people you asked for help from?
Does that seem like it's furthering the uncovering of the attack on the humanity?
"You begged for it from people who were ALSO buried, swamped, and deep in their own rabbit holes... And when they did not drop THEIR work to help you carry yours, you decided to try to get people to mistrust the people you asked for help from?"
Wow.
I gave over a thousand hours of my time when asked to volunteer. Others around me stated that they would help, then sabotaged that process. My home was invaded, I was assaulted, and a vehicle made up to look like law enforcement tried to run my off the highway, and that's only a small part of the story.
That you choose to describe this like whining demonstrates that your goal is not to understand, but to attack. That tells me that my criticisms were long overdue, so thank you for speaking up.
If you present something as «the greatest fraud in the history of the world», people might elect not to touch it for the fear of it being true, and simple unwillingness to put themselves in the crosshairs. Arkancide might be real after all, or they might think it is. People may look brave but in reality few of them are, and I wouldn't blame them for that.
Perhaps presenting it as a mystery and weird unexplained artifact might be more productive – e.g. «look at this! your worldview cannot be complete until you figure this out».
I approve of your mystery idea, and took some of those steps along the way. But a lot unfolded in real time. If I magically reclaim time for the project, perhaps I'll create a documentary this way, but the MFM leadership would be BLASTED along the way.
True...the clock is ticking.
"If you present something as «the greatest fraud in the history of the world»,"
... in the MIDST of all these folks ALSO investigating what they *too* know is that greatest attack on humanity ever, most are likely to discard your requests for help as EITHER enemy propaganda or a massive exaggeration. Or as something they haven't time to you with.
Rat, suggesting the people like Steve and all the docs standing up and presenting the truth and losing licenses and jobs and enduring many attacks, "are not brave" is, like, Crawford, maligning people who have done NOTHING to deserve it! We have literal hundreds of people who HAVE looked brave and proven themselves to BE brave. Steve is one of those.
Because one of our brave folks is seen by Crawford as having let him (personally) down -- and therefore, instead of continuing to try to find the RIGHT people to help him get his work out, Crawford has taken to attacking SPECIFICALLY Steve. What this the purpose of that? For whom is he doing it? If Crawford controlled oppo? WHY is he trying to tear down Steve, out of all the folks working to save humanity? Is that his assignment from our enemies? Why isn't Crawford attacking Ed Dowd? Is Ed not the target he was assigned to attack by our enemies?
(See? I , TOO, can try to plant seeds of doubt about someone doing work for our side. ***Those are NOT real questions*** and, while I very much look askance at Crawford's attempts to HARM (only?) one of our own, it very much doesn't feel good to attack, and I can't (and wouldn't try to) back it up because while Crawford's attacks on Steve are dismaying -- and useless to those of us (whom he derides as white knights) who have SEEN and acknowledge Steve's work - - and his commitment to OUR side -- since Crawford believes he has done good work, he SHOULD continue to find the RIGHT people to get it to. Instead, he's flinging *** at Steve and trying to elicit support against Sreve and for himself.
The work that you are doing is vital and I am so glad that you are here to do it.
Why was Steve Kirsch’s COVID 19 Early Treatment Fund sponsored by Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors?
https://www.treatearly.org/donate
Why was it sponsored by the other American (aside from Steve) who funded the first HCQ trial in the U.S. that completely sabotaged the first and simplest step of early treatment research?
I never called Steve out for that, but having seen his pattern of obtuseness, I think it's fair game. That moment did 1000x more damage than he could ever possibly undo. I can forgive a massive accident, but if that's due to either a terrible behavioral pattern flaw or sabotage, both are horrific.
Steve acting as if examining his relationships is something like "off the wall" is obtuse. He should be expected to speak more seriously about these relationships.
Who was "that other American" Mathew? This is important! Are you talking about the Surgisphere debacle or the other HCQ trial that used lethal doses on sick ICU patients?
Thank you for that, sir! That was very important info imo. Steve needs to explain that one. And for that matter, he pushed fluvoxamine relentlessly even though it was never a first line therapy for Covid, was an SSUI with all the possible serious side effects. I only used it on a couple of patients I treated because of my concern. I cautioned them repeatedly to stop immediately if they noticed a mood effect and I didn't see a positive effect from it so I stopped using it. Come on, Steve Kirsch, tell us if you accepted sponsorship by Rockefeller Philanthropy (annual revenue $425M) and why!
or Roblox CEO David Baszucki ?
I've been reading your articles here and at campfire for the last couple of hours, getting up to speed with what you meant by MFM. Medical Freedom Movement i take it?
Agree with a lot of your insights especially regarding #5GW and am shocked to realize how much the DMED travesty dropped off my radar. Practically forgot about it entirely since I saw u on Kevin McCairn's group livestream months and months ago.
That 5GW shit is very effective and even the most aware of us can fall privy to it.
FWIW, I do not believe heroes carry flags into battle on my behalf in this plandemic calamity, especially when all these heroes do is string you along...
tune in next week, check back tomorrow for latest revelation... SLAM, TRUTH, SHOCKING, BUST, WILD..
Only chatbots, sock puppets, hollowed out doom scrollers and COINTELPRO scum can continue engaging in hope baiting like this in perpetuity.
You have my deepest gratitude and beliefs in what you are doing and I marvel at your wealth of informative works, pursuit of DMED and education of your audience. Inspires me to jump back onto the too little hours sleep a night saddle and get whip crackin'
I've been sharing this around heavily over the last few weeks and it works like a flea bomb against shills and clowns.
> https://pastebin.com/raw/irj4Fyd5
1. COINTELPRO Techniques for dilution, misdirection and control of a internet forum
2. Twenty-Five Rules of Disinformation
3. Eight Traits of the Disinformationalist
4. How to Spot a Spy (Cointelpro Agent)
5. Seventeen Techniques for Truth Suppression
And here's a little bonus discovered today which confirmed my intuitive distrust over a year ago.
"Kirsch was working on developing central bank digital currency (CBDC) infrastructure services through M10, where he served as co-founder and appears to be CEO."
Bless!
https://twitter.com/stkirsch/status/1410813099376996353
$_$
*rolls eyes* oh apparently he resigned as CEO in September 2021 according to this:
> "Over the summer, the conflict reached his most recent startup, M10. Its board told him that if he wanted to remain part of the company he would have to stop making public anti-vaccine statements. In September, he resigned as CEO and gave up his board seat."
https://www.technologyreview.com/2021/10/05/1036408/silicon-valley-millionaire-steve-kirsch-covid-vaccine-misinformation/
He still wears the M10 shirts often.
This Solzhenitsyn quote might be appropriate: "The line separating good and evil passes not through states, nor between classes, nor between political parties either – but right through every human heart…even within hearts overwhelmed by evil, one small bridgehead of good is retained. And even in the best of all hearts, there remains…an uprooted small corner of evil."
Matthew,
In a recent post, you mentioned you need help. I can help if you need my skills. Semi-retired forensic financial auditor/accountant. J.Crawford
@bananajana5
Mat...that skillset might be as close as you get right now. I would suggest taking her up on that. I personally understand the skillset she's referencing because it parallels my own. I'm just very much not Retired.
"My favored hypothesis is that the larger portion of the MFM leadership is controlled/compromised in one way or another." - That is a reasonable assumption for ALL movements. Remember the instructions from Lenin I think it was: "If you want to control the opposition, lead it". All other totalitarian systems operate the same.
Mathew: Do you have a question that can be posted on other Substack, Twitter sources? Something short and sweet like: "Can we get a FOIA submitted for ..." where the "..." would be the specific stuff? I'm not sure what to put in there. "The Unissant data" ?
I'll post it until I'm banned. Hell, I'll even sign up for Twitter (for the first time ever) just to post it.
Mathew I hate that you (and anyone sincere in this fight) find yourself in this position with your critical analysis skills. My hope is that we are a big enough, diverse enough, and decentralized enough group of sincere freedom fighters for us to not fall into the trap of hero worship. We should know better right? Just like the larger society, MFM is likely also, per Chris Bray’s insight, sick from the top down and healthy from the bottom up. Local local local local local local local. Reach out if you’re ever in the pnw. I’ll throw you a potluck style party w our local health freedom community 🥳
Why not file your own FOIA request? You don't have to be a lawyer to fill it out. You may need one to enforce it if the government summarily ignores you, which seems to be the MO of the Biden administration.
"Why not file your own FOIA request?"
Best to read the article first.
I read your article. Your hypothesis is highly irrelevant to your end goal of getting an FOIA request filed.
I'm testing a more important hypothesis, which is for consistency of principles/aims among the MFM leadership.
This is like asking somebody why they choose to wear a red shirt than a black shirt. At some point, there is symmetry breaking that we call "preference". I have a preference.
Fair enough. Hopefully you get answers to both your FOIA request and your hypothesis.
Thank you. I hope we all get productive answers.
So, rather than going after our ENEMIES who have literally murdered MILLIONS, you're going to set traps and play games trying to prove OUR people are corrupt?
But, you're made ILL by reading documents, AND you spent some length of time and hundreds of your own dollars working out FROM READING DMED DOCUMENTS how the DMED data is corrupted. BUT you're made too ill to do anything else with your data except harass Steve because he won't do what you asked him to do. AND you're here working VERY hard to try to get people to think ill of him.... AND some nice lady tried to help you find the money so you can DO your FOIA -- pointing out the EXACT problems that we can all see -- and you shut her down... No, I'll ONLY accept the exact specific help I am demanding -- because doing it myself would make me sick for days...
This is EXACTLY what an enemy agent would do. How is it MORE important to weed out which of OUR people meet YOUR criteria for validity; than supporting our people as they work to figure out if we can SAVE our people?
Pile it on, Crawford. Your words and choices have put you -- for me at least -- in the enemy camp. I do not find you trustworthy. YOU have cast more than all the doubts I need to declare you an enemy. Keep going, I hope more people look closely at WHAT you are insisting on, rather than what you are saying is '... maybe possibly so.
Yes, certainly.
Somebody will eventually file the FOIA. You. Any reader here. Somebody.
But the test is unique. It led me through all my notes on Kirsch at which point I realized that I'd missed a history of him telling me contradictory stories or stories I should have checked first.
I wonder if Steve got himself into trouble when he claimed to have actual vials and tried to get them analyzed. I don't know if the state needs an excuse to blatantly violate his civil rights, but there was probably an excuse in that.
I'm nonplussed that anybody would think for a second that all so-called leaders of the MFM are not false leaders, agents of the Kulangeta, or what-have-you. The information that has been brought forward by many, many contributors, has been extremely important inasmuch as the first go-round with vaxx poisons was not entirely successful. Obviously a lot of people, myself included, did not need anyone's help to understand that the injections should be resisted. But many people didn't know too much and as they absorbed the anti-Narrative they became stronger in resisting, whether it came from a false or honest "leader." Mark Crispin Miller wrote an article about this a couple of days ago and it resonated with me because we had the same problem while fighting the Vietnam War. E.g., Tom Hayden, if you remember that expletive, was a typical example of a false leader that many admired, and probably followed down the path of do-nothingness. I had occasion to watch Hayden duck out of a demonstration before the police arrived, despite having said he would be there "to the end." As Miller points out, it is the message, not the personality, that is important. Critically analyze the message. If there is false logic or the message is leading falsely in other ways, just remember who was saying/writing it. Eventually it will become clear whether to listen any more or just discard that individual. I stopped listening to Malone a long time ago after I became convinced that he was probably controlled Opposition with a capital O. My jury is still out most of the "leaders." Like Avalanche, with whom I don't agree on a lot I think, I do tend to trust Pierre Kory and that is because as an MD I can easily verify a lot of what he is writing about.
That the MFM leadership may be compromised - which affects everything - is an important hypothesis, possibly pointing to something more important than the DMED data glitch. If determined to be true, it would add further weight to the DMED data being consciously manipulated, and a FOIA could still be filed.
The question is Why would the MFM leaders not file a FOIA?? Because not doing so makes no sense. Is there any reason other than being infiltrated by an intelligence operation intent on controlling the narrative?
The average American outside the Intelligence Community has no idea, which is by design, how embedded they are in our everyday lives. There are deeper levels of mind control than nudging. Furthermore, because intelligence is compartmentalized with need-to-know classification, there are well-funded operational programs, programs within programs, that the Intelligence Community itself does not know about.
Liberal use is made of outside contractors from aerospace companies to satanic cults to control the minds of both adversaries and American citizens, with the collateral damage swept under the rug.
Here's a red pill on mind control methodology everyone might want to consider. The goal is control of your thinking, willing, and remembering.
https://tinyurl.com/2s2jee8x
More?
https://tinyurl.com/253v7rm7
It's not just the covid narrative where things are not as they seem. That the Medical Freedom Movement leadership may be compromised is a possibility that should be tested.
That would not test the hypothesis.
Looks like Unissant is also known as Bimethods, Inc. which appears to be their data analytics division:
https://www.linkedin.com/company/bimethods-inc.
In 2014, the Defense Health Agency (DHA) awarded Bimethods, Inc. $14M for "Pharmacy Operation Program Support" and $25M in 2019 for "Labor Pharmacy Operation quality and cost-appropriate analytical, technical, and program management services". It's strange that I could not find any press on these contracts, yet their data management contracts with DoD were publicized.
The root problem causing most of our other problems is that our main operating system (government/schools/media) have been corrupted.
If you tell us the kind of systems that govern over you, we can accurately predict your quality of life. If those systems are corrupted then so are you (and your families).
It is time to organize with other like minded individuals and fix them.
We know the solutions. Decentralize everything. Demand transparency in systems. And most efficiently, weaponize the tyranny of the masses back onto the people corrupting our systems to end this Global Agenda.
Please, give this some thought: https://open.substack.com/pub/joshketry/p/weaponized-direct-democracy-the-kryptonite?r=7oa9d&utm_medium=ios&utm_campaign=post
This is why I left finance (where I could have built a dominating career...I have still never designed a losing account or even one that averaged less than three-digits on an annualized basis even in bear markets): decentralized education is the everything solution. I desperately need to get back to that work when feasible.