I was polio-vaccinated around 1959. And I started using homeopathy for my skin around 2017. My polio vaccination was one of the last things on my mind. But, I think it was in summer or fall of 2018, about a year and a half after I started using homeopathy for my skin, my polio-vaccination scar erupted and cleared. Healing of other decades-long stuff happened too, but I'm mentioning my amazing polio-vaccination clearing because it's on-topic here.
I took a couple photos of the spot on my arm, and also of the drops on my bed-sheet. But I of course don't know, and probably never will know, if the vaccine ingredients were eliminated from ...anywhere -- that spot, my arm, my body.
I will say I know that the eruption and healing of the scar-spot was caused by homeopathy. I believe, but am not certain, that the homeopathic remedy that triggered the healing may have mostly been homeopathic thuja, aka arbor vitae, aka white cedar, aka other names. After 2020 -- so a couple years after my polio-vaccination scar healing -- I read that homeopathic doctors have used thuja since the 1800s to help people recover from all kinds of problems caused by vaccine poisoning. It's also used for healthy skin, which is what I used it for, so until recently, I hadn't been thinking about the power of homeopathy to help people recover from the biowar that really picked up speed in 2020.
I have a lot of hope that many of the people who have received these injections can be healed with homeopathy. Including, but not just, homeopathic thuja.
I've been reading Mathew's posts, and now your comments as well, with great interest and respect, and pointing people to both of you. Thank you for doing the work of laying out realities and facts. It's what we should all be doing. And for doing it so intelligently. I pass it on, since I can't crank it out like you guys do.
(At least I can say that, for my undergraduate B.A. years ago, I wrote my senior thesis on the topic of genetic engineering, "recombinant DNA," and bio-technology because I thought it would be a good idea if somebody gave some advance thought to how we were ever going to deal with the mess these DNA meddlers were getting us all into. I'm very sorry to say, I didn't have the brains or fortitude to stick with it.)
Thank you for screaming the truth that psycho-violent gangsters creating trans-humanist slaves with poisons disguised as vaccines theoretically legally turns people into a form of property. Natural law, legal theory, and judicial practice in countries all over the world are based on rights endowed by nature. The self-evident truth of this doesn't need to be backed up: "...endowed BY THEIR CREATOR with certain inalienable rights..." (Putting the tragedy of every trans-humanist criminal assault aside for a moment), maybe, in future legal-theory disputes and application, it'll also be self-evident that ownership of what was once a natural human being can never be altered by deception, force, or any other criminal means. (Maybe it'll be argued some day that people who voluntarily trans-humanize themselves are voluntarily relinquishing natural rights, because their "creator" would be their patent owner? I once seriously thought about bringing this subject up with trans-humanist wannabes on transhumanist-party.org. Must have been fantasizing that it might be possible to have a rational conversation with somebody there. It isn't. See: Human turns some of his own cells into what he calls “meat” and eats it
They're as twisted as it gets. The “Transhumanist Party” supports “Morphological freedom [Article VI, Section VI],” but does not approve of this particular “Ben Burger” or “BenZion Burger” monstrosity of theirs.
My one anecdote about my own experience with homeopathy and a very antique vaccination doesn't mean much, if anything. But homeopathy has helped a lot of people with injuries from antique vaccines like the one I got. Homeopathy can go very "deep." Not just surface. And I think the principles of homeopathy could continue to be of some help to some victims of government-ordered injections, maybe (really big maybe) even modern ones that alter RNA and DNA and are designed to be lethal. I know that sounds like a complete stretch and impossible in view of the facts and realities of graphene and gene deletion and so on, but ... the workings of biology, this universe, are beyond human comprehension. When I was younger, I never, never, ever thought I'd be someone trying to talk with people who are smarter than I am about something like "miracles" in a public forum. But here I am. Having an inkling of a sense of how much we will never understand about biology, energy, electricity and magnetism, consciousness, perception, language... ... ... has been another one of the profound awakenings of my getting-older life. My effort to understand how and why homeopathy works, which I don't think is possible, contributed to that awakening. Another topic for another day though.
I truly and deeply appreciate your posts here (and anywhere!), and your reply to mine.
I'm so glad you have never given up. Knowing what you know, you haven't given up. And I bet you have helped wake up thousands of people. Thousands. You will never know who they are. But I bet your messages have circulated so much that you've awakened THOUSANDS of people. As soon as enough people wake up, seems inevitable that the psychoviolants will be defeated.
Here's something related that I wrote to a friend today:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Yes, the tyrant-gangsters want to eliminate cash. They want to trace every penny.
They control the information channels that most people use still.
If you believe you own everything, and everyone, and you print the money-tickets the workers project value onto, so you have unlimited amounts of it to build the Googles, Twitters, Facebooks, NASAs, NATOs, TRWs, etc.... you'd also try to take over anything a gang-outsider might build that messes with your delusions of total ownership and control.
Technology makes it possible to decentralize pretty much every industry that's information/data based. Everything that can be digitized. Finance. Communications. A lot of business operations.
I think a big risk is the same sleep-marchers who don't seem to be able to see and rationally respond to evil are likely to believe whatever their favorite propaganda factories tell them to do with their money. I think we're a really long way from having a free press. Even one single TV channel that's not pure propaganda doesn't seem within reach anymore. I don't understand this. We have anti-trust laws, and I've heard that technology that would let any individual have as many TV channels as they might want has existed for a long time already. Does it seem to you though that millions of people have dumped the MSM? More and more every day. Psychopaths are not known for being rational; and what psychopath has ever said about themselves, "I'm crazy to the point of incredibly stupid."
It's kind of a see-saw. A lot of whistle-blowers are locked up. But a lot of us KNOW about it because of technology. And not all of them are locked up. Search engines and social media companies ex-communicate info sources that tell the truth. But a lot of us KNOW that they do that because of technology, and we have alternatives. And more alternatives are being built and improved-on every day. And because we know and have these communications technologies that can't be stamped out, more and more people are more awake than ever before. Sometimes I think that a lot of what "the desperates" (as Pam Popper calls them; I can't bear to call them "Elites") do to try to hold on to their disappearing grip on power over liars and mis-info systems, is exactly what is waking people up. To hold and develop their tyranny, they've tried to use the same technologies that are slowly exposing and thereby destroying them.
Seems like the sleepers are in the middle, the desperates are pulling them one way, and the awake are pulling them another. The desperates are also lobbing grenades at the awake. The awake are getting more creative and resourceful than ever before. Seems like what the young people are building now is destined to collapse and replace the old way.
Yes, transparency!!! That would change everything! What if all records of all tax money and exactly where it goes were published to publicly accessible websites!? World changer!
The evil that's being done and has been going strong for several decades after centuries of the same, but much more limited, effort... this evil is all being done by people. They sit in front of desks and computers. Hands on keyboards and phones and mice. They haven't finished automating their global prison YET. Close, but it's not finished. They still consist of, according to some estimates, about 30,000 individual people. That seems like a number the gentle majority can manage. And I believe — just a hunch, just intuitively — that at least 30,000 individuals who aren't psychopaths are in comet-speed action working on doing exactly what needs to be done to tear the old system from limb to limb. We know some of them; they're very public. Others are probably getting huge amounts of work done behind the scenes.
There are people like YOU out there! That gives me great hope!!!
That's very curious. What say you Andrew Hill? Oh that's right. He's not speaking publicly. Hopes to by February, even though it's now March. We really need a people's court because I'm not sure even the Republicans will do anything (NOT speaking about you Sen Johnson!). Plus this is global. Is Guantanamo still full?
The problem with mistakes as big as Andrews, is there is absolutely no way for him to back down from his error. If he admits he was wrong, and admits he was influenced, that means that ordinary people died, watched their family members die while being restricted from spending the final moments of their loved ones lives, all because he was influenced monetarily.
You cannot back down from that once you've done that. Once the deed is done, if you ever admit error, someone somewhere will still be distraught enough to try to kill you, even years later. Once you admit that you did something like that, your life goes from protected scumbag, to trying to change your name, your address, your families names and addresses, and signing up for plastic surgery. Once you admit you are that kind of slimeball, your life becomes forfeit in the eyes of people who are still emotionally raw from the consequences of your decision.
This is why the (hypothetical) multigenerational poisoner oligarchs behind these crimes dare not stop, but feel compelled to press on with killing those of us aware of their crimes, no?
It's not a matter of whether most people are non-violent enough to not do what I suggested. It's a matter of the fact that enough people in the population are potentially violent enough to commit murder that is precisely why someone in his position will never be able to back down and admit corruption/error.
Once you've caused enough damage to a population, true forgiveness is impossible because enough of the population has been affected for the chances that someone psychotic will want your head approaches 1.
Admission and apology are not impossible in this case, but you're right about the forces that make it difficult.
It could be engineered that with apologies coming out, he could be allowed to slip his in, and then step away into the shadows while the rest of the world focuses on the bigger picture. That would be something that would have to be engineered by *us* as a community, to some degree.
I agree it's not impossible, but I think the headwind is strong. I've no idea how to make people who have essentially committed crimes against humanity feel comfortable confessing what they did. I'm certain that would take persuasion skills I could only hope to fathom.
Considering how well people look the other way in all of this I doubt the majority would even be aware of the magnitude of the impact . It’s more of a blow over while exposing the fraud . If anything the people involved will make him disappear
That preparation includes understanding the scope of what's being forgiven. This man was willing to let >600k people die until others published data proving a point he already knew to be true. That's aiding and abetting on a scale only few in history have surpassed. His actions gave cover to forces that roll on now independent of him and his confession now would have little to no effect in stemming that tide. Does that excuse me from forgiving him? No, of me it is required to forgive all men. It's just easier to do so for some than for others. He sold his soul and his Ultimate Judge reserves the right of final forgiveness.
Screw Gitmo. Inject these people with Covid, preferably Delta, and offer them a choice: publicly own up to their deceit and lies, and get Ivermectin before they get really ill, or stay silent and get unlimited mRNA-boosters.
Because I think they will very rapidly concede, once their own life is on the line.
People usually relent when their own balls are on the anvil.
If they really believe Ivermektin or other similar curse don't work, they would say no. If they really believe the mRNA-jabs work, they can't bluddy well refuse to get boost after boost now can they?
There's to better test for honesty than putting someone making a claim on the spot. Permanent, unavoidable consequences what cannot be pawned off on others. Same reason we should bring back holmgång for slander and libel, especially for journos and pundits: imagine one of the twitchy twigs on CSMBC or somesuch having to fight naked bareknuckles on a 10*10 feet reef off the coast, in full view. Somehow I think we'd see lots and lots of journos being much more honest...
Did you see this short movie ? Featuring Dr Tess Lawrie; also featuring contributions from Dr Pierre Kory and Dr Paul Marik who worked closely with Dr Hill during the same time frame. Tess begs him to reveal who got involved & changed his opinion. Its a must watch. only 17 mins long. We need to get Alexandros, yourself etc all connected to share the findings. Bring all the bits together. Tess Lawrie really needs the info, if it has been passed on already
Great. We need to contact her. I feel like there is all bits of information coming out, but with people baying for space or to be heard in a crowded room its not all coming together like it should, to create one counter attack to uncover the truth, thanks Matt for responding.
Thanks I will bookmark that page. After the hell of the last 2 years (Australia ) & all the mandates, curfews, going broke through lockdowns I now want to fight for answers, plus Covid is again taking off here & people are dying. Thanks to people like you , we may actually change things
He will probably use it for his next grant request with big pharma. They know they can count on him. Wish it was in VHS form so I could slap it across the face of everyone who said the author pulled their endorsement of the ivermectin meta analysis. Tess is a HERO!
That Tess Lawrie video was the thing that first opened me up to the idea that official Covid Policy was and continues to be straight up murder. Gross medical malpractice the extent of which has not been seen for about 80 years.
I see Unitaid is now pushing for Molnupiravir, which I am no expert, but a risk benefit analysis for that drug is arguably worse than Remdesivir, and I think Remdesivir killed a lot of Covid patients.
Molnupiravir is also fabulously expensive. It is as if even now, the ONLY measure of Covid Policy is how much money can be made.
Some reference links for Gates NGO network including Hayden.. side note from an infiltration perspective based on Rockefeller pesticide/gmo science.. the roots grow through "Land Grant University" system w Harvard -Yale -Cornell - Johns Hopkins atop the public system.
From 2006-2008 he was a medical officer in the Global Influenza Program at the World Health Organization (WHO) and continues to serve as a WHO consultant. During 2008-2012, Dr. Hayden was influenza research coordinator at the Wellcome Trust in London - Director - Jeremy Farrar
Fun Microsoft patent -Cryptocurrency system using body activity data
Human body activity associated with a task provided to a user may be used in a mining process of a cryptocurrency system. A server may provide a task to a device of a user which is communicatively coupled to the server. A sensor communicatively coupled to or comprised in the device of the user may sense body activity of the user. Body activity data may be generated based on the sensed body activity of the user. The cryptocurrency system communicatively coupled to the device of the user may verify if the body activity data satisfies one or more conditions set by the cryptocurrency system, and award cryptocurrency to the user whose body activity data is verified.
Could this "patent" be a strategy to slow rushes to crypto that things like freezes on Russian rubles cause? (BTW, as you all know, anybody can file a patent. A patent filing means absolutely nothing.)
I had not seen Dr. Nass's excellent article. There were a few pieces in there that I wasn't aware of, and I have a pretty good set of notes at this point. Thank you.
So much of what these vulture capitalist and psycho scientists are involved with is mind blowing on a full spectrum of horrible, terrible, very bad ideas.
My only critique of your excellent piece is that you demean prostitutes by comparing them to the likes of these global crooks who have destroyed hundreds of millions of lives and are still going.
Mar 9, 2022·edited Mar 9, 2022Liked by Mathew Crawford
Regarding Hayden: Recall that the first influential study conducted on HCQ in the US was co-authored by several individuals affiliated with the University of Virginia.
The study was used by the mainstream media to bash HCQ. Its scientific merits are, shall we say, scant…
Interestingly, the corresponding author )J. Ambati) is affiliated with the University of Virginia. But his specialty is opthalmology and macular degeneration.
So why was Ambati (apparently) leading a paper devoted to how hospitalized patients in the Veteran’s Administration fared with/without HCQ in the early days of Covid? Could it be that Hayden (and Gilead/Gates) provided a hidden helping hand?
Thank you for this. I am so beside myself over all of this. I never in my wildest dreams ever imagined we would be here. Your work is important. I was glad to see you mention Boulware. I came across an article in (of all places) Market Watch very soon after Sen. Johnson's Second Opinion panel that was intent on discrediting HCQ, and which mentioned him prominently. I had never heard of him, so putting into practice some of the things you have taught me, I found the over-dosing problem, the lack of inclusion of the complete protocol that is used by those advocating for HCQ use and most importantly the glaring conflict of interest with the very coincidentally timed announcement of his welcoming to the board of a Canadian pharmaceutical company which had its own 'promising' Covid-19 therapeutic that it hoped to bring to market.
Note: Boulware's trials were not among the overdose trials, but that was a serious issue in the WHO trials. Boulware's trials...I wish I had time to write about all that. It's several chapters worth in a book. I've talked with Dr. David Wiseman about it, and Wiseman went to the mat with the NEJM over it with a reevaluation that showed that with a corrected time to treatment, Boulware's early treatment trial showed a statistically significant effect size.
The trial that I read with Boulware’s name on it showed patients dosed 1400 mg on day one. Isn’t that significantly higher than say what Dr. Zelenko recommends, or the FLCCC’s MASK+ protocol?
Boulware's loading dose was not that high. His dosage was fine. It was the Solidarity and Recovery trials (also one early Chinese one and a fairly early Brazilian trial on CQ that got halted when people started dying) that used large doses.
The whole Covid saga has been a life lesson on the compromised state of essentially all of our Western institutions. Those paying attention have grown up. This -- sadly -- is how the big boys play the game.
I would write a similar letter to Donald Trump asking why declare the emergency, platform fauci, roll money out to democrat governors to lockdown, "father" (own word) warp speed. Buck stopped there.
I am referring to the implicit shield trump seems to be wieldng that it was Fauci's and other "experts" fault and not his own for the lockdown.
I agree, there is undoubtedly someone he has allowed to control his own actions like a puppet. That the nation can be remote controlled has been amply demonstrated under Biden.
As someone who received the trust of the presidency, trump should properly acknowledge that it was he who sold his own office down the river by allowing the remote control.
I agree that he should properly acknowledge such. I see little reason to think he has the moral fiber to do so. If he were a man of such moral fiber, I doubt he'd have been allowed to gain the office in these thoroughly corrupt times. I judge he may have been a force that helped more of Our People to awaken and see behind some curtains. I'm curious what Matthew's hypotheses are.
“Fear is the most elegant weapon, your hands are never messy. Threatening bodily harm is crude. Work instead on minds and beliefs, play insecurities like a piano. Be creative in approach. Force anxiety to excruciating levels or gently undermine the public confidence. Panic drives human herds over cliffs; an alternative is terror induced immobilization. Fear feeds on fear. Put this efficient process into motion. Manipulation in not limited to people. Economic, social and democratic institutions can be shaken. It will be demonstrated that nothing is safe, sacred or sane. There is no respite from horror. Absolutes are quicksilver. Results are spectacular.” -Jenny Holzer, “Inflammatory Essays”, 1979-82. https://www.tate.org.uk/art/artworks/holzer-inflammatory-essays-65434/10
Once again, reading TRAF proves itself absolutely necessary if one wants to figure out what has been happening over the last couple of years. More importantly, it is required if you want to figure out what has happened to the integrity of western health care over the last forty years or so. And if you have always been curious about Bill Gates' involvement in health, TRAF is your huckleberry. Spoiler alert: it makes for very unpleasant reading.
I knew all I needed to about Andrew Hill when I read the Hill / Lawrie transcript in the first chapter of TRAF. As for HCQ, my first clue about Gates / Fauci / Pharma skullduggery there came from France in early '20. I follow French news pretty closely and it was clear that something was up when 1) the entire French medical and media establishment rose as one to demonize Didier Raoult for advocating HCQ use, and 2) Agnes Buzyn, then French Minister of Health, decided to remove it from French pharmacies (where it was OTC!) in February of '20. That is when I knew that medical corruption was a worldwide phenomenon.
Let me make a general observation. I subscribe to a number of Substacks (Greenwald, Taibbi, Malone, Kirsch, Rose and some others) and for a long time gave this one relatively little attention. But I now recognize this as the gem that it is. I am busy catching up. I did not appreciate the breadth of the author's background (I also have been on Wall Street and share his perspective on its denizens) and anyone who could train for the Math Olympiad has my respect.
Many thanks for this link. As I said, I am still catching up. In the linked article you link to a web24 page which takes an exculpatory view of Buzyn's actions. To wit:
"It was after this file review [late '18] that the status of the two drugs was harmonized. So it had nothing to do with the Covid-19 epidemic.
Will this January decree make it more difficult to obtain plaquenil [HCQ]? In theory, yes, since a prescription is now mandatory. But in reality, there will be little change. Professor Zahir Amoura believes that “The order came to formalize an existing practice: generally, no pharmacist dispensed plaquenil to a patient without a prescription.”
Of course, the real story is a little more complicated than that. In addition to making HCQ prescription only, there was a separate edict a bit later in '20 that restricted its use to hospital physicians. That is, the French equivalent of your internist or GP could not prescribe it for home use when - as an antiviral - it would be most effective. So clearly the claim above that "there will be little change" in HCQ availability was false.
But back to that article of yours that you linked to. Very interesting. I had no idea that the origins of Covid were potentially as early as '18. That would explain the sewage evidence from around the world which showed the presence of covid, as well as the blood evidence from the early fall of '19 in Italy (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B0k-riiGtUw ). It would also explain the precocious appearance of the 'vaccines' in '20. Combine this with Event 201 as laid out in TRAF and the picture comes into a bit better focus.
Clearly the MSM narrative around covid is one big pile.
"the Recovery scientists terminated a trial of the anti-malarial hydroxychloroquine, once touted by U.S. President Donald Trump as a potential “game changer," calling it "useless" for treating COVID-19 patients. "
However...
...the published paper on RECOVERY's treatment with HCQ specifically stated that their results don't apply to "community care"--that is, to outpatient treatment.
Back in February 2020, Vladimir Zelenko was treating his high risk covid outpatients with a HCQ cocktail and stating publicly that early treatment is essential. Some other docs were chiming in, too, in support, saying that their results also showed benefit.
Somehow the CDC and FDA never got around to putting together a RCT sufficiently powered to establish a statistically conclusive outcome, either for or against, with the necessary characteristics of:
HCQ
early treatment
cocktail (zinc, vitamin C, vitamin D)
high risk outpatients.
But trials of covid vaccines were put on Warp Speed.
Mathew, not sure if it’s been done already but do you think Liverpool University need to be informed of Andrew Hills actions? Specifically that he published a paper whereby (as he acknowledged on camera) that individuals not credited in the authors influenced the conclusion to the paper? If this is indeed true then surely it is enough for Liverpool U to strip him of his academic appointment don’t you think?
The publishers have committed to the lie. Yes, somebody with academic standing should write a letter for record, but we're in a time economic crisis as it is, and I don't know who that person would be.
I hope, one day, we'll find out the truth of what happened. Thank you for doing what you can to help expose it.
I was polio-vaccinated around 1959. And I started using homeopathy for my skin around 2017. My polio vaccination was one of the last things on my mind. But, I think it was in summer or fall of 2018, about a year and a half after I started using homeopathy for my skin, my polio-vaccination scar erupted and cleared. Healing of other decades-long stuff happened too, but I'm mentioning my amazing polio-vaccination clearing because it's on-topic here.
I took a couple photos of the spot on my arm, and also of the drops on my bed-sheet. But I of course don't know, and probably never will know, if the vaccine ingredients were eliminated from ...anywhere -- that spot, my arm, my body.
I will say I know that the eruption and healing of the scar-spot was caused by homeopathy. I believe, but am not certain, that the homeopathic remedy that triggered the healing may have mostly been homeopathic thuja, aka arbor vitae, aka white cedar, aka other names. After 2020 -- so a couple years after my polio-vaccination scar healing -- I read that homeopathic doctors have used thuja since the 1800s to help people recover from all kinds of problems caused by vaccine poisoning. It's also used for healthy skin, which is what I used it for, so until recently, I hadn't been thinking about the power of homeopathy to help people recover from the biowar that really picked up speed in 2020.
I have a lot of hope that many of the people who have received these injections can be healed with homeopathy. Including, but not just, homeopathic thuja.
Spot on. Every point. Thank you.
I've been reading Mathew's posts, and now your comments as well, with great interest and respect, and pointing people to both of you. Thank you for doing the work of laying out realities and facts. It's what we should all be doing. And for doing it so intelligently. I pass it on, since I can't crank it out like you guys do.
(At least I can say that, for my undergraduate B.A. years ago, I wrote my senior thesis on the topic of genetic engineering, "recombinant DNA," and bio-technology because I thought it would be a good idea if somebody gave some advance thought to how we were ever going to deal with the mess these DNA meddlers were getting us all into. I'm very sorry to say, I didn't have the brains or fortitude to stick with it.)
Thank you for screaming the truth that psycho-violent gangsters creating trans-humanist slaves with poisons disguised as vaccines theoretically legally turns people into a form of property. Natural law, legal theory, and judicial practice in countries all over the world are based on rights endowed by nature. The self-evident truth of this doesn't need to be backed up: "...endowed BY THEIR CREATOR with certain inalienable rights..." (Putting the tragedy of every trans-humanist criminal assault aside for a moment), maybe, in future legal-theory disputes and application, it'll also be self-evident that ownership of what was once a natural human being can never be altered by deception, force, or any other criminal means. (Maybe it'll be argued some day that people who voluntarily trans-humanize themselves are voluntarily relinquishing natural rights, because their "creator" would be their patent owner? I once seriously thought about bringing this subject up with trans-humanist wannabes on transhumanist-party.org. Must have been fantasizing that it might be possible to have a rational conversation with somebody there. It isn't. See: Human turns some of his own cells into what he calls “meat” and eats it
https://transhumanist-party.org/2020/06/24/ustp-statement-ben-zion/
They're as twisted as it gets. The “Transhumanist Party” supports “Morphological freedom [Article VI, Section VI],” but does not approve of this particular “Ben Burger” or “BenZion Burger” monstrosity of theirs.
My one anecdote about my own experience with homeopathy and a very antique vaccination doesn't mean much, if anything. But homeopathy has helped a lot of people with injuries from antique vaccines like the one I got. Homeopathy can go very "deep." Not just surface. And I think the principles of homeopathy could continue to be of some help to some victims of government-ordered injections, maybe (really big maybe) even modern ones that alter RNA and DNA and are designed to be lethal. I know that sounds like a complete stretch and impossible in view of the facts and realities of graphene and gene deletion and so on, but ... the workings of biology, this universe, are beyond human comprehension. When I was younger, I never, never, ever thought I'd be someone trying to talk with people who are smarter than I am about something like "miracles" in a public forum. But here I am. Having an inkling of a sense of how much we will never understand about biology, energy, electricity and magnetism, consciousness, perception, language... ... ... has been another one of the profound awakenings of my getting-older life. My effort to understand how and why homeopathy works, which I don't think is possible, contributed to that awakening. Another topic for another day though.
I truly and deeply appreciate your posts here (and anywhere!), and your reply to mine.
I'm so glad you have never given up. Knowing what you know, you haven't given up. And I bet you have helped wake up thousands of people. Thousands. You will never know who they are. But I bet your messages have circulated so much that you've awakened THOUSANDS of people. As soon as enough people wake up, seems inevitable that the psychoviolants will be defeated.
Thank you for never giving up! Here's a video somebody made to help us all stick with it: https://t.me/c/1667136072/65027
Here's something related that I wrote to a friend today:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Yes, the tyrant-gangsters want to eliminate cash. They want to trace every penny.
They control the information channels that most people use still.
If you believe you own everything, and everyone, and you print the money-tickets the workers project value onto, so you have unlimited amounts of it to build the Googles, Twitters, Facebooks, NASAs, NATOs, TRWs, etc.... you'd also try to take over anything a gang-outsider might build that messes with your delusions of total ownership and control.
Technology makes it possible to decentralize pretty much every industry that's information/data based. Everything that can be digitized. Finance. Communications. A lot of business operations.
I think a big risk is the same sleep-marchers who don't seem to be able to see and rationally respond to evil are likely to believe whatever their favorite propaganda factories tell them to do with their money. I think we're a really long way from having a free press. Even one single TV channel that's not pure propaganda doesn't seem within reach anymore. I don't understand this. We have anti-trust laws, and I've heard that technology that would let any individual have as many TV channels as they might want has existed for a long time already. Does it seem to you though that millions of people have dumped the MSM? More and more every day. Psychopaths are not known for being rational; and what psychopath has ever said about themselves, "I'm crazy to the point of incredibly stupid."
It's kind of a see-saw. A lot of whistle-blowers are locked up. But a lot of us KNOW about it because of technology. And not all of them are locked up. Search engines and social media companies ex-communicate info sources that tell the truth. But a lot of us KNOW that they do that because of technology, and we have alternatives. And more alternatives are being built and improved-on every day. And because we know and have these communications technologies that can't be stamped out, more and more people are more awake than ever before. Sometimes I think that a lot of what "the desperates" (as Pam Popper calls them; I can't bear to call them "Elites") do to try to hold on to their disappearing grip on power over liars and mis-info systems, is exactly what is waking people up. To hold and develop their tyranny, they've tried to use the same technologies that are slowly exposing and thereby destroying them.
Seems like the sleepers are in the middle, the desperates are pulling them one way, and the awake are pulling them another. The desperates are also lobbing grenades at the awake. The awake are getting more creative and resourceful than ever before. Seems like what the young people are building now is destined to collapse and replace the old way.
Yes, transparency!!! That would change everything! What if all records of all tax money and exactly where it goes were published to publicly accessible websites!? World changer!
The evil that's being done and has been going strong for several decades after centuries of the same, but much more limited, effort... this evil is all being done by people. They sit in front of desks and computers. Hands on keyboards and phones and mice. They haven't finished automating their global prison YET. Close, but it's not finished. They still consist of, according to some estimates, about 30,000 individual people. That seems like a number the gentle majority can manage. And I believe — just a hunch, just intuitively — that at least 30,000 individuals who aren't psychopaths are in comet-speed action working on doing exactly what needs to be done to tear the old system from limb to limb. We know some of them; they're very public. Others are probably getting huge amounts of work done behind the scenes.
There are people like YOU out there! That gives me great hope!!!
Don't wrap it velvet Richard! :-)
That's very curious. What say you Andrew Hill? Oh that's right. He's not speaking publicly. Hopes to by February, even though it's now March. We really need a people's court because I'm not sure even the Republicans will do anything (NOT speaking about you Sen Johnson!). Plus this is global. Is Guantanamo still full?
I think the FDA says he'll give a talk about the matter in 55 years.
HAH. Thanks. Good to laugh.
Feb *2021* he was talking about, we’re now in March 2022 (for readers unfamiliar)
Thank you! I totally spaced on that, thinking it was a late last year conversation. January 18, 2021 Zoom call.
The problem with mistakes as big as Andrews, is there is absolutely no way for him to back down from his error. If he admits he was wrong, and admits he was influenced, that means that ordinary people died, watched their family members die while being restricted from spending the final moments of their loved ones lives, all because he was influenced monetarily.
You cannot back down from that once you've done that. Once the deed is done, if you ever admit error, someone somewhere will still be distraught enough to try to kill you, even years later. Once you admit that you did something like that, your life goes from protected scumbag, to trying to change your name, your address, your families names and addresses, and signing up for plastic surgery. Once you admit you are that kind of slimeball, your life becomes forfeit in the eyes of people who are still emotionally raw from the consequences of your decision.
I think you're right. I call this "commitment to the lie" and it goes to the point of the narcissistic, murderous parent.
https://roundingtheearth.substack.com/p/the-narcissistic-murderous-parent
This is why the (hypothetical) multigenerational poisoner oligarchs behind these crimes dare not stop, but feel compelled to press on with killing those of us aware of their crimes, no?
No, if he were to do that he would be showered with praise and offered every possible protection from harm.
The picture is much bigger and the harm that awaits far greater . It’s not effective to be wanting Justice when we are facing murder .
It's not a matter of whether most people are non-violent enough to not do what I suggested. It's a matter of the fact that enough people in the population are potentially violent enough to commit murder that is precisely why someone in his position will never be able to back down and admit corruption/error.
Once you've caused enough damage to a population, true forgiveness is impossible because enough of the population has been affected for the chances that someone psychotic will want your head approaches 1.
Admission and apology are not impossible in this case, but you're right about the forces that make it difficult.
It could be engineered that with apologies coming out, he could be allowed to slip his in, and then step away into the shadows while the rest of the world focuses on the bigger picture. That would be something that would have to be engineered by *us* as a community, to some degree.
I agree it's not impossible, but I think the headwind is strong. I've no idea how to make people who have essentially committed crimes against humanity feel comfortable confessing what they did. I'm certain that would take persuasion skills I could only hope to fathom.
Considering how well people look the other way in all of this I doubt the majority would even be aware of the magnitude of the impact . It’s more of a blow over while exposing the fraud . If anything the people involved will make him disappear
Hey, let’s be hopeful Andrew hill comes forward . It’s not too late . And be prepared to forgive
That preparation includes understanding the scope of what's being forgiven. This man was willing to let >600k people die until others published data proving a point he already knew to be true. That's aiding and abetting on a scale only few in history have surpassed. His actions gave cover to forces that roll on now independent of him and his confession now would have little to no effect in stemming that tide. Does that excuse me from forgiving him? No, of me it is required to forgive all men. It's just easier to do so for some than for others. He sold his soul and his Ultimate Judge reserves the right of final forgiveness.
Screw Gitmo. Inject these people with Covid, preferably Delta, and offer them a choice: publicly own up to their deceit and lies, and get Ivermectin before they get really ill, or stay silent and get unlimited mRNA-boosters.
Because I think they will very rapidly concede, once their own life is on the line.
People usually relent when their own balls are on the anvil.
Point was make them own up to their words.
If they really believe Ivermektin or other similar curse don't work, they would say no. If they really believe the mRNA-jabs work, they can't bluddy well refuse to get boost after boost now can they?
There's to better test for honesty than putting someone making a claim on the spot. Permanent, unavoidable consequences what cannot be pawned off on others. Same reason we should bring back holmgång for slander and libel, especially for journos and pundits: imagine one of the twitchy twigs on CSMBC or somesuch having to fight naked bareknuckles on a 10*10 feet reef off the coast, in full view. Somehow I think we'd see lots and lots of journos being much more honest...
Did you see this short movie ? Featuring Dr Tess Lawrie; also featuring contributions from Dr Pierre Kory and Dr Paul Marik who worked closely with Dr Hill during the same time frame. Tess begs him to reveal who got involved & changed his opinion. Its a must watch. only 17 mins long. We need to get Alexandros, yourself etc all connected to share the findings. Bring all the bits together. Tess Lawrie really needs the info, if it has been passed on already
https://www.oraclefilms.com/alettertoandrewhill
I have seen it, and should have included it in the article. I'll edit now.
Great. We need to contact her. I feel like there is all bits of information coming out, but with people baying for space or to be heard in a crowded room its not all coming together like it should, to create one counter attack to uncover the truth, thanks Matt for responding.
This is why I created campfire.wiki, but not enough people have jumped in to help out.
Thanks I will bookmark that page. After the hell of the last 2 years (Australia ) & all the mandates, curfews, going broke through lockdowns I now want to fight for answers, plus Covid is again taking off here & people are dying. Thanks to people like you , we may actually change things
He will probably use it for his next grant request with big pharma. They know they can count on him. Wish it was in VHS form so I could slap it across the face of everyone who said the author pulled their endorsement of the ivermectin meta analysis. Tess is a HERO!
That Tess Lawrie video was the thing that first opened me up to the idea that official Covid Policy was and continues to be straight up murder. Gross medical malpractice the extent of which has not been seen for about 80 years.
I see Unitaid is now pushing for Molnupiravir, which I am no expert, but a risk benefit analysis for that drug is arguably worse than Remdesivir, and I think Remdesivir killed a lot of Covid patients.
Molnupiravir is also fabulously expensive. It is as if even now, the ONLY measure of Covid Policy is how much money can be made.
https://unitaid.org/news-blog/unitaid-statement-on-who-guidelines-for-covid-19-antiviral-molnupiravir/#en
And ironically it started as a horse drug.
Some reference links for Gates NGO network including Hayden.. side note from an infiltration perspective based on Rockefeller pesticide/gmo science.. the roots grow through "Land Grant University" system w Harvard -Yale -Cornell - Johns Hopkins atop the public system.
From 2006-2008 he was a medical officer in the Global Influenza Program at the World Health Organization (WHO) and continues to serve as a WHO consultant. During 2008-2012, Dr. Hayden was influenza research coordinator at the Wellcome Trust in London - Director - Jeremy Farrar
https://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Frederick_G._Hayden
https://web.archive.org/web/20200301162325/https://www.restorbio.com/about/#modal-432
https://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Wellcome_Trust
https://web.archive.org/web/20220308150222/https://www.researchgate.net/scientific-contributions/Frederick-G-Hayden-39190989
Aussie COVID investigation w lots of reference articles...
https://www.academia.edu/71822249/The_Corruption_Report
Fun Microsoft patent -Cryptocurrency system using body activity data
Human body activity associated with a task provided to a user may be used in a mining process of a cryptocurrency system. A server may provide a task to a device of a user which is communicatively coupled to the server. A sensor communicatively coupled to or comprised in the device of the user may sense body activity of the user. Body activity data may be generated based on the sensed body activity of the user. The cryptocurrency system communicatively coupled to the device of the user may verify if the body activity data satisfies one or more conditions set by the cryptocurrency system, and award cryptocurrency to the user whose body activity data is verified.
https://web.archive.org/web/20200422084324/https://patents.google.com/patent/WO2020060606A1/en
Wow. Interesting.
Could this "patent" be a strategy to slow rushes to crypto that things like freezes on Russian rubles cause? (BTW, as you all know, anybody can file a patent. A patent filing means absolutely nothing.)
Horby and the criminal manipulation of the Recovery Trial as per Dr. Nass:
https://anthraxvaccine.blogspot.com/2021/06/jeremy-farrar-director-of-wellcome.html
"FranceSoir further revealed how the two Recovery Principal Investigators went back and made changes to the trial documents to cover themselves."
I had not seen Dr. Nass's excellent article. There were a few pieces in there that I wasn't aware of, and I have a pretty good set of notes at this point. Thank you.
That patent - the mind boggles with criminal possibilities.
So much of what these vulture capitalist and psycho scientists are involved with is mind blowing on a full spectrum of horrible, terrible, very bad ideas.
My only critique of your excellent piece is that you demean prostitutes by comparing them to the likes of these global crooks who have destroyed hundreds of millions of lives and are still going.
WTF already.
Four year old kids concoct more convincing lies.
Regarding Hayden: Recall that the first influential study conducted on HCQ in the US was co-authored by several individuals affiliated with the University of Virginia.
The study was used by the mainstream media to bash HCQ. Its scientific merits are, shall we say, scant…
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.04.16.20065920v1.full.pdf
Good eye. At the time that I read that paper, I wasn't yet familiar enough with what connections to look at and why.
Interestingly, the corresponding author )J. Ambati) is affiliated with the University of Virginia. But his specialty is opthalmology and macular degeneration.
So why was Ambati (apparently) leading a paper devoted to how hospitalized patients in the Veteran’s Administration fared with/without HCQ in the early days of Covid? Could it be that Hayden (and Gilead/Gates) provided a hidden helping hand?
https://med.virginia.edu/faculty/faculty-listing/ja9qr/
Thank you for this. I am so beside myself over all of this. I never in my wildest dreams ever imagined we would be here. Your work is important. I was glad to see you mention Boulware. I came across an article in (of all places) Market Watch very soon after Sen. Johnson's Second Opinion panel that was intent on discrediting HCQ, and which mentioned him prominently. I had never heard of him, so putting into practice some of the things you have taught me, I found the over-dosing problem, the lack of inclusion of the complete protocol that is used by those advocating for HCQ use and most importantly the glaring conflict of interest with the very coincidentally timed announcement of his welcoming to the board of a Canadian pharmaceutical company which had its own 'promising' Covid-19 therapeutic that it hoped to bring to market.
Note: Boulware's trials were not among the overdose trials, but that was a serious issue in the WHO trials. Boulware's trials...I wish I had time to write about all that. It's several chapters worth in a book. I've talked with Dr. David Wiseman about it, and Wiseman went to the mat with the NEJM over it with a reevaluation that showed that with a corrected time to treatment, Boulware's early treatment trial showed a statistically significant effect size.
I should also mention that this study did not include Azithromycin, Zinc or any other components of the other protocols.
The trial that I read with Boulware’s name on it showed patients dosed 1400 mg on day one. Isn’t that significantly higher than say what Dr. Zelenko recommends, or the FLCCC’s MASK+ protocol?
Boulware's loading dose was not that high. His dosage was fine. It was the Solidarity and Recovery trials (also one early Chinese one and a fairly early Brazilian trial on CQ that got halted when people started dying) that used large doses.
The whole Covid saga has been a life lesson on the compromised state of essentially all of our Western institutions. Those paying attention have grown up. This -- sadly -- is how the big boys play the game.
I would write a similar letter to Donald Trump asking why declare the emergency, platform fauci, roll money out to democrat governors to lockdown, "father" (own word) warp speed. Buck stopped there.
Why would the buck stop there? When did we have a president who was not controlled by hidden forces?
I am referring to the implicit shield trump seems to be wieldng that it was Fauci's and other "experts" fault and not his own for the lockdown.
I agree, there is undoubtedly someone he has allowed to control his own actions like a puppet. That the nation can be remote controlled has been amply demonstrated under Biden.
As someone who received the trust of the presidency, trump should properly acknowledge that it was he who sold his own office down the river by allowing the remote control.
I agree that he should properly acknowledge such. I see little reason to think he has the moral fiber to do so. If he were a man of such moral fiber, I doubt he'd have been allowed to gain the office in these thoroughly corrupt times. I judge he may have been a force that helped more of Our People to awaken and see behind some curtains. I'm curious what Matthew's hypotheses are.
“Fear is the most elegant weapon, your hands are never messy. Threatening bodily harm is crude. Work instead on minds and beliefs, play insecurities like a piano. Be creative in approach. Force anxiety to excruciating levels or gently undermine the public confidence. Panic drives human herds over cliffs; an alternative is terror induced immobilization. Fear feeds on fear. Put this efficient process into motion. Manipulation in not limited to people. Economic, social and democratic institutions can be shaken. It will be demonstrated that nothing is safe, sacred or sane. There is no respite from horror. Absolutes are quicksilver. Results are spectacular.” -Jenny Holzer, “Inflammatory Essays”, 1979-82. https://www.tate.org.uk/art/artworks/holzer-inflammatory-essays-65434/10
Is this the definitive Reader´s Guide to the Protocols of the Elders of Zion?
Thank you for this!! Such an important read.
Once again, reading TRAF proves itself absolutely necessary if one wants to figure out what has been happening over the last couple of years. More importantly, it is required if you want to figure out what has happened to the integrity of western health care over the last forty years or so. And if you have always been curious about Bill Gates' involvement in health, TRAF is your huckleberry. Spoiler alert: it makes for very unpleasant reading.
I knew all I needed to about Andrew Hill when I read the Hill / Lawrie transcript in the first chapter of TRAF. As for HCQ, my first clue about Gates / Fauci / Pharma skullduggery there came from France in early '20. I follow French news pretty closely and it was clear that something was up when 1) the entire French medical and media establishment rose as one to demonize Didier Raoult for advocating HCQ use, and 2) Agnes Buzyn, then French Minister of Health, decided to remove it from French pharmacies (where it was OTC!) in February of '20. That is when I knew that medical corruption was a worldwide phenomenon.
Let me make a general observation. I subscribe to a number of Substacks (Greenwald, Taibbi, Malone, Kirsch, Rose and some others) and for a long time gave this one relatively little attention. But I now recognize this as the gem that it is. I am busy catching up. I did not appreciate the breadth of the author's background (I also have been on Wall Street and share his perspective on its denizens) and anyone who could train for the Math Olympiad has my respect.
The French moves are even scarier when you realize that Buzyn filed the paperwork to remove HCQ from OTC in October, 2019.
https://roundingtheearth.substack.com/p/the-earlier-lab-leak-hypothesis
Many thanks for this link. As I said, I am still catching up. In the linked article you link to a web24 page which takes an exculpatory view of Buzyn's actions. To wit:
"It was after this file review [late '18] that the status of the two drugs was harmonized. So it had nothing to do with the Covid-19 epidemic.
Will this January decree make it more difficult to obtain plaquenil [HCQ]? In theory, yes, since a prescription is now mandatory. But in reality, there will be little change. Professor Zahir Amoura believes that “The order came to formalize an existing practice: generally, no pharmacist dispensed plaquenil to a patient without a prescription.”
Of course, the real story is a little more complicated than that. In addition to making HCQ prescription only, there was a separate edict a bit later in '20 that restricted its use to hospital physicians. That is, the French equivalent of your internist or GP could not prescribe it for home use when - as an antiviral - it would be most effective. So clearly the claim above that "there will be little change" in HCQ availability was false.
But back to that article of yours that you linked to. Very interesting. I had no idea that the origins of Covid were potentially as early as '18. That would explain the sewage evidence from around the world which showed the presence of covid, as well as the blood evidence from the early fall of '19 in Italy (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B0k-riiGtUw ). It would also explain the precocious appearance of the 'vaccines' in '20. Combine this with Event 201 as laid out in TRAF and the picture comes into a bit better focus.
Clearly the MSM narrative around covid is one big pile.
Nice sleuthing, sir!
"the Recovery scientists terminated a trial of the anti-malarial hydroxychloroquine, once touted by U.S. President Donald Trump as a potential “game changer," calling it "useless" for treating COVID-19 patients. "
However...
...the published paper on RECOVERY's treatment with HCQ specifically stated that their results don't apply to "community care"--that is, to outpatient treatment.
Back in February 2020, Vladimir Zelenko was treating his high risk covid outpatients with a HCQ cocktail and stating publicly that early treatment is essential. Some other docs were chiming in, too, in support, saying that their results also showed benefit.
Somehow the CDC and FDA never got around to putting together a RCT sufficiently powered to establish a statistically conclusive outcome, either for or against, with the necessary characteristics of:
HCQ
early treatment
cocktail (zinc, vitamin C, vitamin D)
high risk outpatients.
But trials of covid vaccines were put on Warp Speed.
Ka-ching!
Mathew, not sure if it’s been done already but do you think Liverpool University need to be informed of Andrew Hills actions? Specifically that he published a paper whereby (as he acknowledged on camera) that individuals not credited in the authors influenced the conclusion to the paper? If this is indeed true then surely it is enough for Liverpool U to strip him of his academic appointment don’t you think?
Lots of people need to be informed.
The publishers have committed to the lie. Yes, somebody with academic standing should write a letter for record, but we're in a time economic crisis as it is, and I don't know who that person would be.