There's this article I wrote a while back too on the incomplete templates and %RNA integrity... I really wasn't 'on' during this talk. I would love to do a repeat performance. :)
World Government Summit 2022: What Pippa Malmgren is talking about is BLOCKCHAIN and digital currencies
“We are on the brink of a dramatic change where we are about to, and I’ll say this boldly,
we are about to abandon the traditional system of money and accounting and introduce a new one. And the new one; the new accounting is what we call blockchain…
It means digital, it means having an almost perfect record of every single transaction that happens in the economy, which will give us far greater clarity over what’s going on.”
Covid is NOT A VIRUS - it is oxidative stress caused by toxicity of graphene in masks, tests, flu shots, sprayed, in food, in water - it is being put in everything
Delta supplies ALC-0315; 2036272-55-4 only for scientific research and not for human treatment, drug development or other commercial use.
Delta supplies ALC-0159(CAS:1849616-42-7) for scientific research only and cannot be used for human treatment, drug development, or other commercial purposes.
However, the pregnant mice had abortions at all doses, and most pregnant mice died when the high dose of reduced graphene oxide (rGO) was injected during late gestation. Notably, the development of offspring in the high dosage group was delayed during the lactation period. The high dose of GO decreased the maternal mice’s water consumption by oral exposure, which reduced milk production and thus postponed the growth of offspring. Though the findings indicate that GFNs are potentially harmful to development, but data on reproductive and developmental toxicity are still deficient.
Graphene Oxide adhered to and was wrapped in the chorion of the zebrafish embryos, causing remarkable hypoxia and hatching delay.
Long Covid is simply oxidative stress caused by toxicity of used substances - graphene and all other toxic substances
And if you look at the page where the Chinese company lists ALC-0159 and ALC-0315, there is a mention (literally on the same page) what this company Delta-F produces, such as:
graphene or graphene oxide, carbon nanotubes, fullerenes, etc.
Over 140 killed in Halloween stampede in Seoul | ABS-CBN News
At least 153 people have been killed and 82 others were injured after the stampede in Seoul on Saturday night, according to local fire authorities.
Look at this contract from September 2021 between Pfizer/BioNTech and the Republic of Slovenia
“..the latest of these contracts (dated 28 of Sept 2021) contains the following statement in Article 1 (it's on page 17/25 of the scanned document)
"The ...State further acknowledges that the long-term effects and efficacy of the Vaccine are not currently known.”
It was NEVER a VIRUS that harmed people. They were poisoned with nanotechnology and that's why they died or got all the horrific "Covid" symptoms like blood clots, organ failure, etc. Because they had ACUTE OXIDATIVE STRESS!!!
Of course, in addition to graphene, there are other toxic substances and metals and peptides in these injections, but THAT IS DONE FOR BLOCKCHAIN for the Internet of Bodies, Viruses, Things and Everything, for a "carbon footprint" - based on graphene and other semiconductor-nano sensors
This is exactly why Ursula Von der Leyen bought 10!!!! TEN DOSES for every EU member, including just-born children - she bought 4.6 billion doses of Pfizer per head
Yes, it's quintessential, but there's a lot of detail in it on so many levels, and prosecutors should work on those many levels. Everything you look at is a crime
I watched this last night and I laughed my ass off when I came in with that hee-hee-hee... I swear. If for nothing else, the levity I brought to even myself was enough contribution from me! lol I also cut myself off with my Hallowe'en story. I ate at a seafood restaurant in Peniche at Supertubos and drank wonderful Portuguese wine. Very scary. How much we ate.
Mathew - Thank you again for your gracious summary and greasing the wheels of discussion, as well as providing the top-level view of a multi-modal model ...
I did not watch this particular talk yet, but did watch your previous interview with Marc and would offer three observations based on that and your summary comments (for quick background - I have not been vaccinated, have had COVID multiple times, and also work in a slightly novel area - I am a former military physician who works on how to identify and address and resolve locked/stuck fight or flight (survival or dissociative) states separate from clinical cognitive therapy or medications). I got into that because of being a military physician in Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (think of that like a mixture of Sports Medicine, Pain medicine, and Neurology), and seeing that some people recovered from concussions/TBI/amputations/etc ... different from others, and it seemed like those still stuck in a persistent/uncalibrated survival state didn't have as good physiologic regulation and continued with more issues (physical, emotional, and cognitive). Sometimes their survival state was from the proximate injury (explosion, amputation) and sometimes pre-existent from distant events (childhood, etc ...). Enough about me ... let's just say that I have more direct interactions with complex physical and psychological trauma than the average bear.
The reason I mention this is twofold (and will get back to observations on Marc's theory and multi-modal approach).
1) When I got COVID personally, one of the variants was the most visceral inflammatory illness I have ever experienced. I work with people all the time with visceral dysregulation and symptoms, and all I could say was ... wow, I was not mentally anxious, but the sensation of diaphragm or heart/lung inflammation was very unnerving. And separate from getting over the illness, it took a couple of weeks for me (with good skill set) to get my autonomic system back to what I would consider calibrated and normal. I say this because my personal experience is that COVID itself (whether spike, etc ...) can cause organ/vascular inflammation that causes some dysregulation for some people (including me, despite all my knowledge) AND there are all the concerns about the injections. These are likely to be both true.
- Because of the injection concerns, it is very appropriate to highlight Marc's theory about vascular injection and dosing (for that component), but I very much doubt it is everything related to that one factor. But, if true that is important because it is also relevant to other injections (not just COVID) and the most common categories of injections, such as vaccinations.
2) Professionally, I have seen and worked with people that appeared to me to actually be in persistent cellular shock and autonomic dysregulation (due to BOTH COVID and vaccine - I have seen what appear to be both) and who would be categorized as long-COVID. Including with things like heart arrythmias and other autonomic/visceral dysfunctions, suicidality, etc ...
- I have seen those items resolve with resolving the physiologic fight/flight response.
- Think of this like a bad case of COVID or injection as a bad compound fracture (you can have a compound bone fracture and no cellular shock, or both). Depending on the combination, you may just need the fracture fixed (COVID treated or vascular injury repaired; you may just need the autonomic/survival issues resolved; or you may need both). It has some nuance. And the cellular shock is something that can occur with any physiologically intense or inflammatory event, not just COVID/vaccine.
- I have seen what to me clearly suggests cellular shock. Interestingly, two other groups that I see this in (separate from COVID, but related in terms of vascular connections) would be concussions and brain hemorrhages. There are some good studies from the University of Buffalo/Leddy in concussions about the mechanisms of vascular carbon dioxide, which I personally believe are related to the body's attempts to confine the injury (create vasoconstriction during the acute phase to limit bleeding or toxin spread). The problem is that some people's blood vessels never stop vasoconstricting/spasming around points of injury even after the acute phase, and they tend to have chronic problems without effective intervention.
- I mention all of these things as at a higher echelon than COVID/vaccine. ANY physically, emotionally or mentally intense event can produce shock and dissociation. When physiologic, it is accompanied by autonomic system dysregulation and often blood vessel spasms, especially in blood vessel injury around critical organs. So I believe this could be a higher echelon item - related in cause/effect but not confined to only occur after COVID.
3) I thought that Marc's comment (in the initial interview) about people with midwives and insurance suggested a very poor understanding of that group relative to my extensive experiences with that group. So that flippancy suggested he wasn't understanding that data point correctly. I did not take it personally, but it was frankly inaccurate and would be offensive to many ... as a physician who is now self-employed, uninsured due to the cost (I use a healthshare for my insurance and pay cash and try to be healthy), and I have paid (on my own) for multiple midwives because I thought that was best, not trying to game the system ... I simply found that component of his analysis as likely false, although I appreciated the other general remarks and think the theory has value in discussion and as a potential piece (and even potentially significant piece).
So, thanks again for facilitating, and I would summarize to say that my personal and professional experience suggest multiple mechanisms, and that we might even have to consider a further mechanism outside of COVID/vaccine as injuring agents, and include the possibility of cellular shock and survival mechanisms that can occur after any intense injury (but which is non-COVID/injection specific). So, sorry to add another layer of potential complexity or mechanisms, but I believe it produces a more accurate model consistent with reality and physiology.
"Up to date, the exact LNP composition has not been released therefore, we analyze earlier data and virtual screening research, attempting to “fill-in” the blanks."
If that's true about their composition (I wish I could confirm it, but haven't found much discussion at all), it would make it hard to analyze what those LNPs are doing and, like you said, they could have been altered.
Also, if these charts from South Korea are accurate, adverse events per 1,000 shots have gone down. That seems to indicate the big problem is manufacturing. Or, they changed the contents of the shots, or the data is bad.
Yes, it's true that the LNP formulation is proprietary and has not been made public. Neither the finished product nor a reformulation of it can therefore be subjected to independent testing. It is amazing how well the masses have been brainwashed to follow along.
Nailed it: "intellectual anchoring of the spike protein model of vaccine harm". That was MY reaction when first hearing Marc's hypothesis, but in my case it was "emotional" anchoring. I felt like I was, IDK...losing something precious if what he said were true? I guess I felt robbed of my rage for a second (OK, more than a second). Based on a few reactions I've read, I'm not the only one. And many of the stacks I follow reacted by ignoring the whole hypothesis, unlike "it's in the water-snake venom" dude, who got a LOT of attention.
I used to believe that truth is inevitable. I know longer believe that. But truth IS possible! And people like Marc are the types of people that get us there, sometimes against our will.
It has been a time of strange events; the arrest of Professor Leiber from Harvard along with two Chinese spies was one of the strangest. Has he been involved directly in this LNP technology?
Apparently he is very keen on growing giant pumpkins.
My oh my, from the video to the article to these comments. When I keep seeing such a melange of ideas, many of which demonstrate a clear lack of underlying principles, I fear that there is little hope. The public educational system has undermined basics of logic & critical thinking so it shouldn’t be surprising that people can be convinced of anything! And I included convinced by Pharma.gov as well as its opposition.
Graphene microchip operating systems controlling your mind! Come on, this reflects so little understanding of physics, of neuropsychiatry, and of philosophy it makes my head spin ... but let me move on.
I previously challenged Marc about the specific issue of a “bolus” injection occurring deep within the deltoid. There are no veins of sufficient size within the body of the muscle! You simply are not going to get a needle much larger than capillaries & venules to somehow inject said vessels. Now I have little doubt about the toxicity of the LNPs because of permeability into far too many places. They are delivering the toxic mRNA (frags & complete strands) all over the body, with widely varying effects. Is there variation in the individual rate of absorption between different people? Well of course, but this rests on a multiplicity of factors ... gee, just like how the viruses have differential impact on people!
Also unaddressed in the “it’s the LNP, stupid” hypothesis is the massive commonality of pathology the virus caused (past tense - current variants are pretty benign) and that of the jab. Yes, there are new things with the jab. But remember this: there are relatively few thorough autopsies from COVID deaths. So the 1’+ clots being seen from the jab MAY have even been present. Perhaps not, as it is also clear that a wider array of pathology is being seen from the jab. The elongated time course of spike exposure likely causes this, as well as another essential pathophysiologic element that is not appreciated by many non-physicians (or scientists working with viral diseases). Which is?
That viremia (widespread blood borne virus) did not seem all that common), as the virus couldn’t really even get into the blood until it was down in the lung. At that point clots & inflammation were mostly killing people, the virus was generally waning by that point. Other than viral penetration through the cribiform plate allowing entrance to the brain, there wasn’t much mechanism for invasion of other tissues. The LNP takes mRNA places so spike CAN present & do it’s various nasties.
Yes, the LNP constituents appear to be toxic, & collectively are likely part of the jab pathology. But there are far too many logical-mechanistic problems for a “LNP bolus into blood vessels” to be THE etiology of harm of the jab.
Again, as I have said before this is based on a faulty understanding of humans! We are not machines that you can “plug in” as Sci-Fi has posited. Thoughts are immaterial objects. Your mind is not physical. While there is an interaction between brain & mind, they are NOT THE SAME THING!
No question that the science of ‘brainwashing’ has accomplished much. Persuasion, influence, ‘selling an idea’ (marketing), and similar topics are constantly being explored to help people accomplish their goals. No supreme dictator means that some level of agreement & cooperation must be obtained for those seeking rule or control. The corruption of educations has made it so much easier. People do not understand the classical idea of language: vocabulary, grammar, logic, & rhetoric. There is no critical thinking possible in such people, making other forms of influence much easier. Chemical can play a role, as well as other external factors. We are all experiencing elements of this onslaught.
After watching and listening (great conversation!), and reading Marc’s blog faithfully for the last several years, I’ve reaffirmed my opinion that this is likely a both/and situation—I think that BOTH Marc’s model works extremely well in terms of accounting for the serious immediate events (especially days, up to a week or two following injection) AND there are serious impacts stemming from transfection and endogenous spike production.
I did also have these observations:
While we don’t truly know what is being injected (or if the contents are even consistent), if mRNA is indeed being delivered, and spike does get endogenously produced (even somewhat crippled by fragmentation or replication error) the production could realistically compound over time. As JJ pointed out, the replication doesn’t have to be good to be dangerous. I may be missing something, but I don’t think we really have good long term data on this. Longer term studies might bear this out.
It also occurs to me that there may also be jab dynamics (not discussed) which are ‘dose-dependent’, as the conditions are different following the each round of injections (and presumably, jab timing would have an impact).
Following inoculation, circulating antibodies increase dramatically for several months, increasing the likelihood of ADE. ADE (antibody dependent disease enhancement) has been demonstrated to facilitate infection when there are circulating neutralizing antibodies. Immune cells with ACE2, TMPSSR2, and Fc receptors are most affected by ADE.
This facilitating dynamic presumably would increase likelihood for serious disease with doses taken after the first jab, as well as hinder/damage the immune response potential. This might also be a compounding influence as time goes by, and additional rounds of jabs are taken; and, which would impact the kinds of damage and disease (due to natural challenge) seen in the months/years following uptake.
Simple question: if the LNPs are responsible for a significant percentage, most or even all of the vaccine adverse events with mRNA products, what is responsible for the clinically very similar adverse events associated with the viral vector injections?
The principle difference in ingredients is the absence of LNPs in the viral vector vaccines. Looking at a very concerning and far too common side effect of mRNA vaccines in young people - myocarditis. This serious adverse reaction is not confined solely to mRNA (LNP delivery) vaccines; it occurs also with the viral vector vaccines:
"The myocarditis (inflammation of the heart muscle) has been reported so far with the mRNA CoViD vaccines (Pfizer and Moderna), however, the MHRA’s adverse event report lists many cases of myocarditis, suggesting a strong signal for both AstraZeneca (viral vector) and Prizer (mRNA) CoViD vaccines [8]. The MHRA adverse event report including data up until 2nd June 2021 listed 31 cases of myocarditis (1 fatal) with AstraZeneca and 34 cases with Pfizer. Moreover, there were 55 cases of pericarditis (inflammation of the membrane around the heart) with AstraZeneca and 26 cases (1 fatal) with Pfizer. In addition, there were 330 myocardial infarctions (55 fatal) with AstraZeneca and 123 with Pfizer (24 fatal) [8]."
Similarly, with VITT and blood clots. Common to mRNA and VV. What is causing the inflammation in blood vessels caused by the administration of the viral vector products, because it's not LNPs?
Understand that I'm not asking for "in principle" information. I'm asking for data and links. I have a good sense of what the AEs are, but I gather that we interpret the data very differently. Any subset of the data is not what I'm interested in. As I said, the spike may sometimes be the variable and sometimes not.
And I'd like to see the ingredient lists specifically, because there will be other variables there to examine (not that we have complete lists).
Please understand that I'm not an expert but do realise that the ingredients of these vaccines are many and varied, any of which may be contributing to adverse side effects. But the subject of this post is the hypothesis that the LNPs are responsible for most or all of these ADRs. I simply pointed you to the evidence of very similar ADRs in viral vector vaccines (specifically Oxford AZ), occurring at a similar rate to mRNA, where LNPs cannot be the cause, because they are not used as the vehicle for the delivery of the spike-coded DNA. In my layperson's opinion, this suggests strongly that the hypothesis advanced by Marc Girardot is in error. That is all. I'm not even saying that the spike protein is the dominant cause of adverse events, only that it is present in viral vector vaccines and mRNA products, whereas LNPs are not. I would invite any commenter here to critique my simple observation based on its merits or otherwise, then perhaps ask for more data and links.
I think Marc is also pointing out that many of the reactions are common to many injection campaigns, regardless of LNP content. He’s written specifically about this. I don’t have the link to the article, but it’s on his stack.
Correction: VIT (vaccine induced thrombocytopenia) is common to administration of both products; VITT appears to be a unique feature of the viral vector vaccines and is probably the result of two biological mechanisms of action, involving the spike protein and the viral vector itself.
What does Marc have to say about the incidence of myocarditis (& other adverse events) reported with the Novavax spike antigen vaccine? It's not zero although the low uptake, due to its late "approval"and continued preference for the mRNA agents, means that reports of all adverse events will be much lower than that of the gene therapy transfection agents.
I am not emotionally attached any certain theory. So here's my theory on the vial contents. The contents are variable on purpose to delay the public's awareness of the malicious agenda. 90% may be somewhat harmless or even just be saline. The other 10% contain many different malicious mRNA codes, toxins. or maybe even parasites. While the spike alone could cause all the problems I think it is likely they have invented other mRNA with targeted purposes. All bad. There are so many mRNA garbage fragments in the mix that it would be difficult to find the evil ones. There are even some reports that there is also DNA in some. What a mess. The cationic lipids are known to be toxic. How much it takes to cause problems is a good question.
Spike protein should not be discounted from being toxic and causing health issues...
There are too many studies and observations made by scientists, doctors etc. I've read over the months that point to the spike causing various health problems ..
I'm not discounting that nano particles too could be wrecking havoc.
Marc no doubt is a smart guy.. however he's basically a data guy- not a medical expert...
I agree with you up to the "stay in his lane" part. Good generalists outside of a field are often the ones responsible for straightening a field out. And who is to say whose lane is which? It's an arrogant and obnoxious judgment where not backed by a cogent deconstruction of the skilled process. The fact that Marc saw past the warring narratives is in itself a feat that, even were he entirely wrong, would at least be commendable.
Tho many aspects of the harm the jabs cause are certainly open to discussion and debate the consensus today is that the spike is toxic and causes internal damage.
(That does not discount the dangers of the LNP)
Oh...BTW .... No arrogance here.
Just discerning about the scientific knowledge a person possesses.
The endothelium in COVID-19 complications and in the regulation of vascular tone. New research reveals a potential mechanism for blood clot formation in response to Spike. Exposure to Spike protein alone causes endothelial cells to release von Willebrand Factor (VWF) within 5 minutes. —> VWF mediates platelet recruitment/activation and clot formation.
Thank you everyone …..Very excited to open my mail and see an interview with Marc. I can’t believe more people aren’t listening to him - I imagine that will change quickly in the future.
Great interview …. Whatever gets added to the Spike affair, Marc’s explanations feel like they logically answer so many basic questions I’ve been wondering about and for that reason I find it fascinating. Someone? once said that most complex things are at their core simple….
I’m now wondering about general anaesthetics, penicillin injections, cortisol / epidurals, intrathecal chemotherapy, injectable biologics for auto immune diseases? ….…. Are any of these dangerous in the same way (bolus - artery/Capillary/lymphatic system risk for AE?/ breaking endothelium barriers) Marc is explaining? Is it possible some of the DVTs aneurisms blamed on flying are actually from pre - flight vaccines? My friend (precovid) had some vaccines before flying and two days before the flight had severe pain, rushed for scans and was diagnosed with MS like lesions. No one made a connection. Also precovid - a friend had a brain biopsy and a few days later told was left with tics and a stutter but told nothing to do with the biopsy, probably the high dose prednisone???
Also - even if the reason for stopping aspiration was pain - who exactly decided to stop this and when was this decision made? Have some doctors continued to do this because they know there is increased harm?
FYI - Italian microbiologist who thinks spike a fairytale - I have no idea but another voice you may be interested in.
There's this article I wrote a while back too on the incomplete templates and %RNA integrity... I really wasn't 'on' during this talk. I would love to do a repeat performance. :)
https://jessicar.substack.com/p/evidence-of-connection-between-severe
I'll email you about this. Happy to carve out a spot for you.
Dear Jessica, this is the quintessence of this crime:
This is done for GRAPHENE BLOCKCHAIN because CBDC is BASED on this:
https://outraged.substack.com/p/world-government-summit-2022
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hQvTLtz67wM
World Government Summit 2022: What Pippa Malmgren is talking about is BLOCKCHAIN and digital currencies
“We are on the brink of a dramatic change where we are about to, and I’ll say this boldly,
we are about to abandon the traditional system of money and accounting and introduce a new one. And the new one; the new accounting is what we call blockchain…
It means digital, it means having an almost perfect record of every single transaction that happens in the economy, which will give us far greater clarity over what’s going on.”
But - THIS TECHNOLOGY IS TOXIC!!!!!!!!!!
https://outraged.substack.com/p/a-dream-of-perfection-and-control
Covid is NOT A VIRUS - it is oxidative stress caused by toxicity of graphene in masks, tests, flu shots, sprayed, in food, in water - it is being put in everything
https://outraged.substack.com/p/can-toxic-substances-be-mandated
All these are toxic, including these:
These DECLARED ingredients are for RESEARCH USE ONLY (RUO)!!!
http://www.delta-f.com/details/894778 ALC-0315; 2036272-55-4
Delta supplies ALC-0315; 2036272-55-4 only for scientific research and not for human treatment, drug development or other commercial use.
Delta supplies ALC-0159(CAS:1849616-42-7) for scientific research only and cannot be used for human treatment, drug development, or other commercial purposes.
https://www.caymanchem.com/news/sm-102-statement
SM-102 for research use only (RUO)
Products in the RUO class, such as SM-102 (item no. 33474), are intended for in vitro or animal (exploratory or preclinical) use only.
PEG
Graphene is toxic for pregnancies and in higher doses causes sterilization:
https://particleandfibretoxicology.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12989-016-0168-y
However, the pregnant mice had abortions at all doses, and most pregnant mice died when the high dose of reduced graphene oxide (rGO) was injected during late gestation. Notably, the development of offspring in the high dosage group was delayed during the lactation period. The high dose of GO decreased the maternal mice’s water consumption by oral exposure, which reduced milk production and thus postponed the growth of offspring. Though the findings indicate that GFNs are potentially harmful to development, but data on reproductive and developmental toxicity are still deficient.
Graphene Oxide adhered to and was wrapped in the chorion of the zebrafish embryos, causing remarkable hypoxia and hatching delay.
Long Covid is simply oxidative stress caused by toxicity of used substances - graphene and all other toxic substances
Same for amyloidosis:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0013935118306935?via%3Dihub
How graphene affects the misfolding of human prion protein: A combined experimental and molecular dynamics simulation study
They're hiding ingredients, call is a military secret but the reason behind this scam is simply CBDC
https://outraged.substack.com/p/alc-0315-and-alc-0159-and-undeclared
And if you look at the page where the Chinese company lists ALC-0159 and ALC-0315, there is a mention (literally on the same page) what this company Delta-F produces, such as:
graphene or graphene oxide, carbon nanotubes, fullerenes, etc.
Over 140 killed in Halloween stampede in Seoul | ABS-CBN News
At least 153 people have been killed and 82 others were injured after the stampede in Seoul on Saturday night, according to local fire authorities.
Look at this contract from September 2021 between Pfizer/BioNTech and the Republic of Slovenia
https://d7694293-ffb8-4ed0-a014-3581d49070e4.usrfiles.com/ugd/d76942_5af19ff7389d405585ae0c9db50eb306.pdf
“..the latest of these contracts (dated 28 of Sept 2021) contains the following statement in Article 1 (it's on page 17/25 of the scanned document)
"The ...State further acknowledges that the long-term effects and efficacy of the Vaccine are not currently known.”
It was NEVER a VIRUS that harmed people. They were poisoned with nanotechnology and that's why they died or got all the horrific "Covid" symptoms like blood clots, organ failure, etc. Because they had ACUTE OXIDATIVE STRESS!!!
Of course, in addition to graphene, there are other toxic substances and metals and peptides in these injections, but THAT IS DONE FOR BLOCKCHAIN for the Internet of Bodies, Viruses, Things and Everything, for a "carbon footprint" - based on graphene and other semiconductor-nano sensors
This is exactly why Ursula Von der Leyen bought 10!!!! TEN DOSES for every EU member, including just-born children - she bought 4.6 billion doses of Pfizer per head
https://rumble.com/v1pjm05-ursela-van-der-leyen-you-must-resign.html
HOW LONG WILL WE PUT UP WITH THIS CRIME???????? How long will they keep murdering people for their crazy plans?
Let them show the full list of ingredients - here is the causal link to these "vaccines" and injuries lies
STOP THE CRIME!!!! STOP THIS GENOCIDE!!!
I loved that article—other than the fact that it scared the shit out of me.
Yes, it's quintessential, but there's a lot of detail in it on so many levels, and prosecutors should work on those many levels. Everything you look at is a crime
I watched this last night and I laughed my ass off when I came in with that hee-hee-hee... I swear. If for nothing else, the levity I brought to even myself was enough contribution from me! lol I also cut myself off with my Hallowe'en story. I ate at a seafood restaurant in Peniche at Supertubos and drank wonderful Portuguese wine. Very scary. How much we ate.
Excellent. I was hoping a conversation like this would happen. Looking forward to watching and listening. Thank you!
Mathew - Thank you again for your gracious summary and greasing the wheels of discussion, as well as providing the top-level view of a multi-modal model ...
I did not watch this particular talk yet, but did watch your previous interview with Marc and would offer three observations based on that and your summary comments (for quick background - I have not been vaccinated, have had COVID multiple times, and also work in a slightly novel area - I am a former military physician who works on how to identify and address and resolve locked/stuck fight or flight (survival or dissociative) states separate from clinical cognitive therapy or medications). I got into that because of being a military physician in Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (think of that like a mixture of Sports Medicine, Pain medicine, and Neurology), and seeing that some people recovered from concussions/TBI/amputations/etc ... different from others, and it seemed like those still stuck in a persistent/uncalibrated survival state didn't have as good physiologic regulation and continued with more issues (physical, emotional, and cognitive). Sometimes their survival state was from the proximate injury (explosion, amputation) and sometimes pre-existent from distant events (childhood, etc ...). Enough about me ... let's just say that I have more direct interactions with complex physical and psychological trauma than the average bear.
The reason I mention this is twofold (and will get back to observations on Marc's theory and multi-modal approach).
1) When I got COVID personally, one of the variants was the most visceral inflammatory illness I have ever experienced. I work with people all the time with visceral dysregulation and symptoms, and all I could say was ... wow, I was not mentally anxious, but the sensation of diaphragm or heart/lung inflammation was very unnerving. And separate from getting over the illness, it took a couple of weeks for me (with good skill set) to get my autonomic system back to what I would consider calibrated and normal. I say this because my personal experience is that COVID itself (whether spike, etc ...) can cause organ/vascular inflammation that causes some dysregulation for some people (including me, despite all my knowledge) AND there are all the concerns about the injections. These are likely to be both true.
- Because of the injection concerns, it is very appropriate to highlight Marc's theory about vascular injection and dosing (for that component), but I very much doubt it is everything related to that one factor. But, if true that is important because it is also relevant to other injections (not just COVID) and the most common categories of injections, such as vaccinations.
2) Professionally, I have seen and worked with people that appeared to me to actually be in persistent cellular shock and autonomic dysregulation (due to BOTH COVID and vaccine - I have seen what appear to be both) and who would be categorized as long-COVID. Including with things like heart arrythmias and other autonomic/visceral dysfunctions, suicidality, etc ...
- I have seen those items resolve with resolving the physiologic fight/flight response.
- Think of this like a bad case of COVID or injection as a bad compound fracture (you can have a compound bone fracture and no cellular shock, or both). Depending on the combination, you may just need the fracture fixed (COVID treated or vascular injury repaired; you may just need the autonomic/survival issues resolved; or you may need both). It has some nuance. And the cellular shock is something that can occur with any physiologically intense or inflammatory event, not just COVID/vaccine.
- I have seen what to me clearly suggests cellular shock. Interestingly, two other groups that I see this in (separate from COVID, but related in terms of vascular connections) would be concussions and brain hemorrhages. There are some good studies from the University of Buffalo/Leddy in concussions about the mechanisms of vascular carbon dioxide, which I personally believe are related to the body's attempts to confine the injury (create vasoconstriction during the acute phase to limit bleeding or toxin spread). The problem is that some people's blood vessels never stop vasoconstricting/spasming around points of injury even after the acute phase, and they tend to have chronic problems without effective intervention.
- I mention all of these things as at a higher echelon than COVID/vaccine. ANY physically, emotionally or mentally intense event can produce shock and dissociation. When physiologic, it is accompanied by autonomic system dysregulation and often blood vessel spasms, especially in blood vessel injury around critical organs. So I believe this could be a higher echelon item - related in cause/effect but not confined to only occur after COVID.
3) I thought that Marc's comment (in the initial interview) about people with midwives and insurance suggested a very poor understanding of that group relative to my extensive experiences with that group. So that flippancy suggested he wasn't understanding that data point correctly. I did not take it personally, but it was frankly inaccurate and would be offensive to many ... as a physician who is now self-employed, uninsured due to the cost (I use a healthshare for my insurance and pay cash and try to be healthy), and I have paid (on my own) for multiple midwives because I thought that was best, not trying to game the system ... I simply found that component of his analysis as likely false, although I appreciated the other general remarks and think the theory has value in discussion and as a potential piece (and even potentially significant piece).
So, thanks again for facilitating, and I would summarize to say that my personal and professional experience suggest multiple mechanisms, and that we might even have to consider a further mechanism outside of COVID/vaccine as injuring agents, and include the possibility of cellular shock and survival mechanisms that can occur after any intense injury (but which is non-COVID/injection specific). So, sorry to add another layer of potential complexity or mechanisms, but I believe it produces a more accurate model consistent with reality and physiology.
Regarding LNPs, I saw this in a recent article:
"Up to date, the exact LNP composition has not been released therefore, we analyze earlier data and virtual screening research, attempting to “fill-in” the blanks."
If that's true about their composition (I wish I could confirm it, but haven't found much discussion at all), it would make it hard to analyze what those LNPs are doing and, like you said, they could have been altered.
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphar.2022.995481/full
Also, if these charts from South Korea are accurate, adverse events per 1,000 shots have gone down. That seems to indicate the big problem is manufacturing. Or, they changed the contents of the shots, or the data is bad.
https://imgur.com/a/L3LkDn9
https://ncv.kdca.go.kr/board.es?mid=a11707010000&bid=0032&act=view&list_no=818&tag=&nPage=1
Yes, it's true that the LNP formulation is proprietary and has not been made public. Neither the finished product nor a reformulation of it can therefore be subjected to independent testing. It is amazing how well the masses have been brainwashed to follow along.
Nailed it: "intellectual anchoring of the spike protein model of vaccine harm". That was MY reaction when first hearing Marc's hypothesis, but in my case it was "emotional" anchoring. I felt like I was, IDK...losing something precious if what he said were true? I guess I felt robbed of my rage for a second (OK, more than a second). Based on a few reactions I've read, I'm not the only one. And many of the stacks I follow reacted by ignoring the whole hypothesis, unlike "it's in the water-snake venom" dude, who got a LOT of attention.
I used to believe that truth is inevitable. I know longer believe that. But truth IS possible! And people like Marc are the types of people that get us there, sometimes against our will.
It has been a time of strange events; the arrest of Professor Leiber from Harvard along with two Chinese spies was one of the strangest. Has he been involved directly in this LNP technology?
Apparently he is very keen on growing giant pumpkins.
I did not realize he was an LNP expert. Can you link?
He seems to be the worlds leading expert on nano technology with biological applications. Wikipedia is quite comprehensive...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_M._Lieber
My oh my, from the video to the article to these comments. When I keep seeing such a melange of ideas, many of which demonstrate a clear lack of underlying principles, I fear that there is little hope. The public educational system has undermined basics of logic & critical thinking so it shouldn’t be surprising that people can be convinced of anything! And I included convinced by Pharma.gov as well as its opposition.
Graphene microchip operating systems controlling your mind! Come on, this reflects so little understanding of physics, of neuropsychiatry, and of philosophy it makes my head spin ... but let me move on.
I previously challenged Marc about the specific issue of a “bolus” injection occurring deep within the deltoid. There are no veins of sufficient size within the body of the muscle! You simply are not going to get a needle much larger than capillaries & venules to somehow inject said vessels. Now I have little doubt about the toxicity of the LNPs because of permeability into far too many places. They are delivering the toxic mRNA (frags & complete strands) all over the body, with widely varying effects. Is there variation in the individual rate of absorption between different people? Well of course, but this rests on a multiplicity of factors ... gee, just like how the viruses have differential impact on people!
Also unaddressed in the “it’s the LNP, stupid” hypothesis is the massive commonality of pathology the virus caused (past tense - current variants are pretty benign) and that of the jab. Yes, there are new things with the jab. But remember this: there are relatively few thorough autopsies from COVID deaths. So the 1’+ clots being seen from the jab MAY have even been present. Perhaps not, as it is also clear that a wider array of pathology is being seen from the jab. The elongated time course of spike exposure likely causes this, as well as another essential pathophysiologic element that is not appreciated by many non-physicians (or scientists working with viral diseases). Which is?
That viremia (widespread blood borne virus) did not seem all that common), as the virus couldn’t really even get into the blood until it was down in the lung. At that point clots & inflammation were mostly killing people, the virus was generally waning by that point. Other than viral penetration through the cribiform plate allowing entrance to the brain, there wasn’t much mechanism for invasion of other tissues. The LNP takes mRNA places so spike CAN present & do it’s various nasties.
Yes, the LNP constituents appear to be toxic, & collectively are likely part of the jab pathology. But there are far too many logical-mechanistic problems for a “LNP bolus into blood vessels” to be THE etiology of harm of the jab.
For head-spinning, you might enjoy this (and associated articles): https://live2fightanotherday.substack.com/p/endgame-take-4-iont-in-jabs-turns
Pierre Gilbert 1995 lecture could provide some historical guidance.
Again, as I have said before this is based on a faulty understanding of humans! We are not machines that you can “plug in” as Sci-Fi has posited. Thoughts are immaterial objects. Your mind is not physical. While there is an interaction between brain & mind, they are NOT THE SAME THING!
I know what you are saying, but the funnies keep coming. https://celiafarber.substack.com/p/celebrities-are-controlled-by-handlers
And I strongly suggest that you listen to James Lyons-Weiler at ca minute 58 here:
https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/chd-tv/shows/good-morning-chd/autism-lawsuit-with-james-lyonsweiler-phd--louis-conte/
No question that the science of ‘brainwashing’ has accomplished much. Persuasion, influence, ‘selling an idea’ (marketing), and similar topics are constantly being explored to help people accomplish their goals. No supreme dictator means that some level of agreement & cooperation must be obtained for those seeking rule or control. The corruption of educations has made it so much easier. People do not understand the classical idea of language: vocabulary, grammar, logic, & rhetoric. There is no critical thinking possible in such people, making other forms of influence much easier. Chemical can play a role, as well as other external factors. We are all experiencing elements of this onslaught.
After watching and listening (great conversation!), and reading Marc’s blog faithfully for the last several years, I’ve reaffirmed my opinion that this is likely a both/and situation—I think that BOTH Marc’s model works extremely well in terms of accounting for the serious immediate events (especially days, up to a week or two following injection) AND there are serious impacts stemming from transfection and endogenous spike production.
I did also have these observations:
While we don’t truly know what is being injected (or if the contents are even consistent), if mRNA is indeed being delivered, and spike does get endogenously produced (even somewhat crippled by fragmentation or replication error) the production could realistically compound over time. As JJ pointed out, the replication doesn’t have to be good to be dangerous. I may be missing something, but I don’t think we really have good long term data on this. Longer term studies might bear this out.
It also occurs to me that there may also be jab dynamics (not discussed) which are ‘dose-dependent’, as the conditions are different following the each round of injections (and presumably, jab timing would have an impact).
Following inoculation, circulating antibodies increase dramatically for several months, increasing the likelihood of ADE. ADE (antibody dependent disease enhancement) has been demonstrated to facilitate infection when there are circulating neutralizing antibodies. Immune cells with ACE2, TMPSSR2, and Fc receptors are most affected by ADE.
Dr. Bean did a great vid on this study:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36114224/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B-ve5hZmSnc
This facilitating dynamic presumably would increase likelihood for serious disease with doses taken after the first jab, as well as hinder/damage the immune response potential. This might also be a compounding influence as time goes by, and additional rounds of jabs are taken; and, which would impact the kinds of damage and disease (due to natural challenge) seen in the months/years following uptake.
Thanks again for this super roundtable!
Simple question: if the LNPs are responsible for a significant percentage, most or even all of the vaccine adverse events with mRNA products, what is responsible for the clinically very similar adverse events associated with the viral vector injections?
Can you lay out the clinical (and numerical) similarities, and the differences in ingredients?
I suspect that Marc would be happy to take a look.
If there are some differences in AEs (and I believe that's the case), then the spike would likely not be the variable.
The principle difference in ingredients is the absence of LNPs in the viral vector vaccines. Looking at a very concerning and far too common side effect of mRNA vaccines in young people - myocarditis. This serious adverse reaction is not confined solely to mRNA (LNP delivery) vaccines; it occurs also with the viral vector vaccines:
"The myocarditis (inflammation of the heart muscle) has been reported so far with the mRNA CoViD vaccines (Pfizer and Moderna), however, the MHRA’s adverse event report lists many cases of myocarditis, suggesting a strong signal for both AstraZeneca (viral vector) and Prizer (mRNA) CoViD vaccines [8]. The MHRA adverse event report including data up until 2nd June 2021 listed 31 cases of myocarditis (1 fatal) with AstraZeneca and 34 cases with Pfizer. Moreover, there were 55 cases of pericarditis (inflammation of the membrane around the heart) with AstraZeneca and 26 cases (1 fatal) with Pfizer. In addition, there were 330 myocardial infarctions (55 fatal) with AstraZeneca and 123 with Pfizer (24 fatal) [8]."
https://www.bmj.com/content/373/bmj.n1244/rr-10
Similarly, with VITT and blood clots. Common to mRNA and VV. What is causing the inflammation in blood vessels caused by the administration of the viral vector products, because it's not LNPs?
Understand that I'm not asking for "in principle" information. I'm asking for data and links. I have a good sense of what the AEs are, but I gather that we interpret the data very differently. Any subset of the data is not what I'm interested in. As I said, the spike may sometimes be the variable and sometimes not.
And I'd like to see the ingredient lists specifically, because there will be other variables there to examine (not that we have complete lists).
Please understand that I'm not an expert but do realise that the ingredients of these vaccines are many and varied, any of which may be contributing to adverse side effects. But the subject of this post is the hypothesis that the LNPs are responsible for most or all of these ADRs. I simply pointed you to the evidence of very similar ADRs in viral vector vaccines (specifically Oxford AZ), occurring at a similar rate to mRNA, where LNPs cannot be the cause, because they are not used as the vehicle for the delivery of the spike-coded DNA. In my layperson's opinion, this suggests strongly that the hypothesis advanced by Marc Girardot is in error. That is all. I'm not even saying that the spike protein is the dominant cause of adverse events, only that it is present in viral vector vaccines and mRNA products, whereas LNPs are not. I would invite any commenter here to critique my simple observation based on its merits or otherwise, then perhaps ask for more data and links.
I think Marc is also pointing out that many of the reactions are common to many injection campaigns, regardless of LNP content. He’s written specifically about this. I don’t have the link to the article, but it’s on his stack.
Thanks, I think it may be this article, which I will read.
https://covidmythbuster.substack.com/p/lifting-the-fog-over-decades-of-injuries
Correction: VIT (vaccine induced thrombocytopenia) is common to administration of both products; VITT appears to be a unique feature of the viral vector vaccines and is probably the result of two biological mechanisms of action, involving the spike protein and the viral vector itself.
What does Marc have to say about the incidence of myocarditis (& other adverse events) reported with the Novavax spike antigen vaccine? It's not zero although the low uptake, due to its late "approval"and continued preference for the mRNA agents, means that reports of all adverse events will be much lower than that of the gene therapy transfection agents.
Marc needs to look into this.
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2021.746021/full
Also this one. Spikes do not need to be ‘concentrated’ to cause harm
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35891400/
and this one. Not every transfected cell will be killed by T-Lymphocytes
https://rupress.org/jem/article/220/2/e20220906/213689/SARS-CoV-2-Spike-protein-suppresses-CTL-mediated
I am not emotionally attached any certain theory. So here's my theory on the vial contents. The contents are variable on purpose to delay the public's awareness of the malicious agenda. 90% may be somewhat harmless or even just be saline. The other 10% contain many different malicious mRNA codes, toxins. or maybe even parasites. While the spike alone could cause all the problems I think it is likely they have invented other mRNA with targeted purposes. All bad. There are so many mRNA garbage fragments in the mix that it would be difficult to find the evil ones. There are even some reports that there is also DNA in some. What a mess. The cationic lipids are known to be toxic. How much it takes to cause problems is a good question.
Spike protein should not be discounted from being toxic and causing health issues...
There are too many studies and observations made by scientists, doctors etc. I've read over the months that point to the spike causing various health problems ..
I'm not discounting that nano particles too could be wrecking havoc.
Marc no doubt is a smart guy.. however he's basically a data guy- not a medical expert...
He should stay in his lane of expertise IMHO.
I agree with you up to the "stay in his lane" part. Good generalists outside of a field are often the ones responsible for straightening a field out. And who is to say whose lane is which? It's an arrogant and obnoxious judgment where not backed by a cogent deconstruction of the skilled process. The fact that Marc saw past the warring narratives is in itself a feat that, even were he entirely wrong, would at least be commendable.
You may find this presentation quite interesting:
Here is the English language translation of Prof. Arne Burkhardt’s presentation from the 2nd Pathology Conference:
http://docs.shortxxvids.com/burkhardt_analysis.html?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email:
Tho many aspects of the harm the jabs cause are certainly open to discussion and debate the consensus today is that the spike is toxic and causes internal damage.
(That does not discount the dangers of the LNP)
Oh...BTW .... No arrogance here.
Just discerning about the scientific knowledge a person possesses.
My choice.
Matthew....
As I'm sure you'll agree the medical field is highly technical, nuanced and specialized..
No arrogance here.. just discerning who holds the most credibility when discussing a complex subject .
I just listened to a presentation
( one of many over the months) where the pathologist and team identified spike proteins in numerous organs along with physical damage to tissue.
From Alberta Library:
The endothelium in COVID-19 complications and in the regulation of vascular tone. New research reveals a potential mechanism for blood clot formation in response to Spike. Exposure to Spike protein alone causes endothelial cells to release von Willebrand Factor (VWF) within 5 minutes. —> VWF mediates platelet recruitment/activation and clot formation.
Thank you everyone …..Very excited to open my mail and see an interview with Marc. I can’t believe more people aren’t listening to him - I imagine that will change quickly in the future.
Great interview …. Whatever gets added to the Spike affair, Marc’s explanations feel like they logically answer so many basic questions I’ve been wondering about and for that reason I find it fascinating. Someone? once said that most complex things are at their core simple….
I’m now wondering about general anaesthetics, penicillin injections, cortisol / epidurals, intrathecal chemotherapy, injectable biologics for auto immune diseases? ….…. Are any of these dangerous in the same way (bolus - artery/Capillary/lymphatic system risk for AE?/ breaking endothelium barriers) Marc is explaining? Is it possible some of the DVTs aneurisms blamed on flying are actually from pre - flight vaccines? My friend (precovid) had some vaccines before flying and two days before the flight had severe pain, rushed for scans and was diagnosed with MS like lesions. No one made a connection. Also precovid - a friend had a brain biopsy and a few days later told was left with tics and a stutter but told nothing to do with the biopsy, probably the high dose prednisone???
Also - even if the reason for stopping aspiration was pain - who exactly decided to stop this and when was this decision made? Have some doctors continued to do this because they know there is increased harm?
FYI - Italian microbiologist who thinks spike a fairytale - I have no idea but another voice you may be interested in.
https://off-guardian.org/2022/11/07/that-mrna-vaccines-cause-cells-to-produce-spike-proteins-is-a-fairy-tale/
I might repeat myself here but in this case it is a good thing.
Good to see you guys come round.Now for all to understand:
These programmable Nanoparticles of Graphene Oxide are developed by Klaus Schwab & Elon Musk together.
https://wyss.harvard.edu/technology/dna-nanotechnology-tools-from-design-to-applications/
https://wyss.harvard.edu/technology/nanorx-mechanically-activated-drug-targeting/
The Harvard Wyss Institute Founded by Hansjörg Wyss of the Escher Wyss Family is Klaus Schwab's Family.
They work together with Elon Musk DARPA CIA & Mossad.
The Technology i.e. the Nanoparticles in the Vxx Jbs are called NEURAL LACE.
Covid was a hoax to fear you into taking those jabs.
NEURAL LACE is a BCI (Brain Computer Interface).
It is part of a greater technology involving NEURAL LINK and STARLINK OPEN AI and Boston Dynamics.
All together it is a weapon.
A weapon against humanity by the Occult and the above.
NEURAL LACE is the Nanotechnology that causes all this deaths.
I write about this many times and explain it in detail.
Here
https://fritzfreud.substack.com/p/klaus-schwab-darpa-harvard-elon-musk
Here
https://fritzfreud.substack.com/p/ai-the-machine-learning-god
Here
https://fritzfreud.substack.com/p/mk-ultra-covid-19-unit8200-israel
Here
https://fritzfreud.substack.com/p/covid-19-mk-ultra-the-ultimate-divide
Here
https://fritzfreud.substack.com/p/the-creation-that-outgrew-the-creator
And here
https://fritzfreud.substack.com/p/franz-kafka-and-the-great-transhumanist