Excellent. My Wednesday night is sorted. I’ll be extra interested in this discussion since I watched the cowardly attacks of him on Twitter. Don’t they realise that it just makes people more determined to prove their case?
One thought I had today are what are the mathematical odds of having excess deaths at basically the same 16-17% for the UK, Australia & the EU in 2022 ? They claim it’s lockdown induced, much of Australia wasn’t locked down only Victoria & occasionally NSW yet we have the same figures as EU & UK ? Seems odd that different countries, with different timelines would have exactly the same results.
I happen to think that our government was behind this. I never subscribed to the narrative. Thankfully, I live in Texas. Husband got sick. Home test was positive. Doc in the box test wasn’t. Nurse said he had Covid pneumonia. Took the cocktail they offered. Got Ivermetcin and Hyd. He recovered.
This was indeed a great discussion. My internet crapped out on me while it was live but watching the rest this morning tipped me over the edge into a monthly subscription. You guys are doing excellent work dissecting and presenting these complex issues. Looking forward to seeing how this all grows :)
Nov 2, 2022·edited Nov 2, 2022Liked by Mathew Crawford
Well that was fantastic Mat, thanks to the others as well. Exactly how I think re probabilities & overlayed by known information ! Which I just assumed was how normal people think & run their lives . Now that I know the slices/ pieces are neat, organised for repeatability & fit with sars I know my initial assessment is definitely correct. Very interesting that the proposed vaccines for the bats also fits too. It’s was like every jigsaw piece came together like a magnet.
This is as you said, the full picture until it can be proved wrong. We all know that they will never find the original intermediate “animal“
"It is noteworthy that YouTube demonetized our video just minutes into the livestream."
Any idea Why demonetized? ("lab-created" seems disappointingly stale) outside the generalized "Repeated violations of the Community Guidelines or Terms of Service," a purposely conflicted totalitarian-speak keeping people up on their toes cuz, like a kicked dog, they never know when or why it's coming, causing a terminal state of consternation, self-censorship, and mind control. Which also, by the way, spotlights slow learners scheduled for phase-two attention or simple elimination.
A statistical analysis could provide insight into their thinking, that is, what they want us to think and what not. Purposely presenting degrees of prohibited thought would quantify their trigger threshold. I assume Google's algorithm is continually updated with our email data processed through artificial intelligence, possibly individually and personally targeted.
Can an Ai be hacked, or is it too smart for that? Shouldn't we be developing a counterintelligence program rather than just taking their slaps? Those slaps are good data going to waste.
Our totalitarian State in full swing won't have a list of prohibited thoughts, instead we'll have a list of solely approved thought reinforced by individualized billboards and media programming which can't be turned off. Luckily, by then, it won't matter because our brain structure will have physically changed and we will be happy.
I need to ask, why the move to locals? Why the "insider" access?
I see some substacks put up a big scary post of "you need to see this!!!11!" but the lock it behind a paywall. if it is that important, they should be willing to post it purely for the benefit of society/spreading knowledge. Is this what your doing with your move to locals and insider access? I'm not interested in a parallel society that is still based on one sided profit/worship on currency(read: not real money).
I’m with J. Couey on this, that while knowing it was a lab leak is important, we shouldn’t let that distract us from the fact that they are still pushing the at-best useless shots., and all the other nonsense they are burdening us with.
The booster rocket gets the payload to space. Once that’s accomplished, demolishing the booster no longer affects the outcome of the mission.
So encouraging to see so many substackers attacking this issue from such a variety of angles. Thank you for your work!
Excellent. My Wednesday night is sorted. I’ll be extra interested in this discussion since I watched the cowardly attacks of him on Twitter. Don’t they realise that it just makes people more determined to prove their case?
One thought I had today are what are the mathematical odds of having excess deaths at basically the same 16-17% for the UK, Australia & the EU in 2022 ? They claim it’s lockdown induced, much of Australia wasn’t locked down only Victoria & occasionally NSW yet we have the same figures as EU & UK ? Seems odd that different countries, with different timelines would have exactly the same results.
Do Alex and Kevin believe that we had a viral pandemic with a novel pathogen?
I happen to think that our government was behind this. I never subscribed to the narrative. Thankfully, I live in Texas. Husband got sick. Home test was positive. Doc in the box test wasn’t. Nurse said he had Covid pneumonia. Took the cocktail they offered. Got Ivermetcin and Hyd. He recovered.
This was indeed a great discussion. My internet crapped out on me while it was live but watching the rest this morning tipped me over the edge into a monthly subscription. You guys are doing excellent work dissecting and presenting these complex issues. Looking forward to seeing how this all grows :)
Well that was fantastic Mat, thanks to the others as well. Exactly how I think re probabilities & overlayed by known information ! Which I just assumed was how normal people think & run their lives . Now that I know the slices/ pieces are neat, organised for repeatability & fit with sars I know my initial assessment is definitely correct. Very interesting that the proposed vaccines for the bats also fits too. It’s was like every jigsaw piece came together like a magnet.
This is as you said, the full picture until it can be proved wrong. We all know that they will never find the original intermediate “animal“
"It is noteworthy that YouTube demonetized our video just minutes into the livestream."
Any idea Why demonetized? ("lab-created" seems disappointingly stale) outside the generalized "Repeated violations of the Community Guidelines or Terms of Service," a purposely conflicted totalitarian-speak keeping people up on their toes cuz, like a kicked dog, they never know when or why it's coming, causing a terminal state of consternation, self-censorship, and mind control. Which also, by the way, spotlights slow learners scheduled for phase-two attention or simple elimination.
A statistical analysis could provide insight into their thinking, that is, what they want us to think and what not. Purposely presenting degrees of prohibited thought would quantify their trigger threshold. I assume Google's algorithm is continually updated with our email data processed through artificial intelligence, possibly individually and personally targeted.
Can an Ai be hacked, or is it too smart for that? Shouldn't we be developing a counterintelligence program rather than just taking their slaps? Those slaps are good data going to waste.
Our totalitarian State in full swing won't have a list of prohibited thoughts, instead we'll have a list of solely approved thought reinforced by individualized billboards and media programming which can't be turned off. Luckily, by then, it won't matter because our brain structure will have physically changed and we will be happy.
I need to ask, why the move to locals? Why the "insider" access?
I see some substacks put up a big scary post of "you need to see this!!!11!" but the lock it behind a paywall. if it is that important, they should be willing to post it purely for the benefit of society/spreading knowledge. Is this what your doing with your move to locals and insider access? I'm not interested in a parallel society that is still based on one sided profit/worship on currency(read: not real money).
I’m with J. Couey on this, that while knowing it was a lab leak is important, we shouldn’t let that distract us from the fact that they are still pushing the at-best useless shots., and all the other nonsense they are burdening us with.
The booster rocket gets the payload to space. Once that’s accomplished, demolishing the booster no longer affects the outcome of the mission.
Where is Tiffany Dover? Solve that one!