Just throwing this out there--it would be interesting to see if a block chain model might enable everyday citizens to groupfund publication of important (underrepresented) science. It would be an incredible change of perspective where silenced research and study could find a voice, supported by a concerned public.
Sorry to hear about Liam's friend's unexpected tragedy.
The experimental rollout was somewhat justified for the most vulnerable - but seemed totally reckless when they started targeting younger & younger people...
Obviously, money was a big motivator, so was the opportunity to further develop the controversial mRNA platform en masse; which would have been difficult to justify per-crisis (a crisis which also seemed deliberately botched at every level...). Also, the Davos crowd saw the jabs as a way to move towards digital IDs via covid passes etc.
But with all these huge conflicts of interest (weaponised by sophisticated narrative control, weapons-grade applied-psychological spin & censorship of dissenting voices) - did anyone at the top actually evaluate the risk factor, or even care about possible consequences...? Or is there indeed darker malfeasance at work here...?
Just throwing this out there--it would be interesting to see if a block chain model might enable everyday citizens to groupfund publication of important (underrepresented) science. It would be an incredible change of perspective where silenced research and study could find a voice, supported by a concerned public.
"I would then throw 92% of the remainder of TED Talks into a dumpster and look around for an accelerant."
I have rarely understood the hype about TED talks. So thank you for this comment.
This is wicked.
Great discussion!
This is a fantastic discussion, thank you all <3
That video presentation by Kevin is gold as well, thank you for posting that Mathew
Sorry to hear about Liam's friend's unexpected tragedy.
The experimental rollout was somewhat justified for the most vulnerable - but seemed totally reckless when they started targeting younger & younger people...
Obviously, money was a big motivator, so was the opportunity to further develop the controversial mRNA platform en masse; which would have been difficult to justify per-crisis (a crisis which also seemed deliberately botched at every level...). Also, the Davos crowd saw the jabs as a way to move towards digital IDs via covid passes etc.
But with all these huge conflicts of interest (weaponised by sophisticated narrative control, weapons-grade applied-psychological spin & censorship of dissenting voices) - did anyone at the top actually evaluate the risk factor, or even care about possible consequences...? Or is there indeed darker malfeasance at work here...?
I find in particular censorship to a few technologies that work can make a difference and are not even mentioned anywhere.
And nobody dares to talk about them.
1) Cold Fusion.
Proven to work but Ignored by the Scientific Mainstream
2) Hydrogen from Water Splitting Fuelcells...
Invented By Stanleyx Meyers proven to work and Ignored by the Scientific Mainstream
3) Water as Energy Source
A Multitude of Technologies least of all Prof Daniel Nocera of MIT / Harvard Ignored by the Scientific Mainstream
https://fritzfreud.substack.com/p/prof-daniel-nocera-and-his-artificial
4) Hypersonic Zero Emission Transportation & theoretical Infinite Speed ignored by everyone
https://fritzfreud.substack.com/p/the-future-according-to-fritz-freud
These are solutions, proper solutions, not the Mickey Mouse solutions other people put out.
Why don't you invite me to talk?
I am Game!
Is this the same "Kevin" who is a founder member of this substack along with Wayne and Steve Kirsch, or another Kevin?
Tell me more about the game with Peter McCulloch
Gene