At his age, what is he worried about? Why does he want the video removed? At my age, I feel an obligation to speak out...if I lose my job, I could retire if I had to...on a lean budget.
I know some of those who have been outspoken, have been threatened. When the money doesn't cut it, threatening one's family will likely seal the deal. Some politicians in Canada often look like deer in the headlights when announcing some of their draconian measures.
I am not defending them, but I can see how that would be terrifying for them. I don't think many of us could stand up against threats to our family (children in particular). As for the money/bribes: no excuses.
Blackmail, bribery, coercion, once you've given in, you are owned.
I hope that those who had their children threatened can sleep at night watching others have their children die from the vaxx because they, "The Leaders" failed to stand.
I am working on an article on bribery stories. I had that link saved, but I also my own story and somebody else's who didn't realize that they were being offered a bribe until we talked about it. Some of the bribes get clever.
You're a lot nicer than me who would tell him to go pound sand making such an outrageous request to erase history and help protect the liars that buried early treatment. It's a valuable and honest report, done freely with consent and captures so much of the problem that paralyzed the planet. It strikes me like asking to burn books to assuage tyrannical political actors.
It's kind of surprising coming from someone who held such a reasonable view of hackers from the early days. When politicians were hyping the threat posed by hackers he reported HOPE Conferences with the ethical human angle and real portraits of folks who were there. It's reasonable for views to evolve but to rewrite history only serves liars.
As he notes early in the interview people have different motives for distorting the truth and obviously some outside pressure is being applied here. While you may have agreed to his his request to aid the destruction of the historical record it doesn't extend to the broader population who are dedicated to preserving censored content and live by the mantra, see something save something.
An error becomes an irreparable harm when it cannot be corrected; to help Silicon Valley drown us in propaganda like a virtual Ministry of Truth doesn't serve the fundamental aims of a free and open society. Betcha a nickle you can guess what the resistors will do. :~)
I believe that what I am doing here does more to tell the whole story than if I left it up and never mentioned it. I haven't advertised these old videos. I never intended to fill in the gap of media and never thought this would all go on for so long.
I have my own copy of the video, of course. I could repost it at any time. YouTube could also remove it at any time.
In the end, I felt it best to allow my guests to self-define their participation. I worry that the video could affect his ability to make a living. That's a tricky concern. But that doesn't mean I'm not documenting the decisions where I feel it's important.
"I believe that what I am doing here does more to tell the whole story than if I left it up and never mentioned it."
Very true and valid assumption, quite reasonable for you to take. Again you are far nicer than me in heavily weighing the impact on the guest.
"I never intended to fill in the gap of media and never thought this would all go on for so long."
What we see depends very much on where we stand. As someone who has been censored for well over a decade, virtually erased from the Internet and banned from Twitter in 2020 it looks like the continuation of a process driven by the Rockefeller-Gates petrochemical cabal that have waged war on truth with increasing success for a century. Add a pinch of Irish temper and we land in different places but still share the same goal of letting truth prevail. Fingers crossed the combined effect gets us there.
Wow. I missed this one. So much corruption, in every aspect, of everything.
I have personal experience with gov't/industry corruption in the oil and pharma industries and consumer manufacturing. The casual lack of caring (to the point of death), the corner cutting, and the requirement for essential bribes was a constant in every industry we consulted, worldwide. Then there was the scary lack of competence and job protection. Have to confess to poking a few bears, and getting some "feedback". That was 15 years ago, and it hasn't improved.
I am grateful to you, Mathew (only just realized you don't use two t's), and all the vocal dissidents for standing firm and continuing to shine the light.
If you or any of the dissidents ever need a volunteer to proofread, edit, research, write, organize, and generally dig, please reach out. I'm ready.
Thank you for pointing us in the direction of your videos, which I never knew existed. I hope you also post them at Rumble and Odysee to avoid the shadow ban or outright censorship. I would ask this reporter if he's ever allowed a source to retract.
Yes, you are right. I was too judgmental. We can't know his circumstances. I was listening to Jordan Peterson's interview with Andy Ngo. Andy has had to go to England for safety. They discussed the mob at length and Dr. Peterson said the only protection we have is the truth even if it takes a long while to assert itself. Some people are not in the position to hold out due to personal pressures.
The effectiveness of the mandates, restrictions, quarantines, etc. depends on the willingness of selected groups to enforce them. These groups include the military, law enforcement, business owners, etc. Unlike past authoritarian regimes (e.g., the Third Reich), where the enforcers and their families did not suffer from the repressive measures, COVID-19 and its "vaccines" are very different. In the present case, prolonging the mandates means that not only will the enforcers get the "vaccines", but their families, friends, and colleagues will be required to get the "vaccines" as well. What the enforcers are doing is contributing to their own early demise (in plain terms, suicide) and the early demise of their children, parents, siblings, other relatives, friends, etc (also known as accessory to homicide) by allowing these mandates and other destructive measures to continue. Why would anyone want to do this, if they understood the consequences of their actions?
Worse, it is now a proven fact the "vaccines" do not work to prevent getting the virus, and may, in fact, make someone more susceptible by tamping down the immune system. There are also the many serious side effects of the "vaccines," some lethal VAERS only picks up 1 percent of adverse reactions yet what has been reported is seriously sobering. There may be more unknown side effects in years to come. The "vaccines" cause changes to the DNA and may cause some cancers, birth defects and miscarriages. Fear and ignorance are driving the vaccine mandates.
Because the risks are much greater in NOT speaking up. I know, believe me. I get threats. I’m not slightly scared because what’s coming is definitely much worse than death.
“Life free or die: death is not the worst of evils”.
I really believe this is as true now as in any just war.
Please don’t go quiet, any of you. That’s when they come for you & your family.
sure, but the video had like 10-100 views on a dead channel when he asked to delete it. the cost-benefit analysis is not good for drug companies to pay him to do it. especially due to the Streisand effect (video has thousands of views now)
Mar 30, 2022·edited Mar 30, 2022Liked by Mathew Crawford
It's the little things like this, that make me wonder on the progress we think we (as unwilling (at least for me!) Anti-narrative, rebels, invaders, purebloods, what eves you like to call yourself, are actually making on this?
A few other innocuous little tidbits (like independent evidence from multiple sources, confirming the presence of graphene hydroxide and self assembling tech within Pfizers spikeshots, with chain of custody level evidence that was sent to the NZ government and is met with ....silence.) that make me just, honestly, get fairly concerned that we are out maneuvered and a day late, dollar short.
Silence from a government tells me they are not surprised....
People on both sides are battening the hatches....
I hear you. I've been trying to tell those on "our side" of the debate that we're getting slaughtered. I'm not hearing much back, which worries me. For the most part, they won't have conversations with me about it, and I have no sense at all as to why. It's actually pretty bizarre and further concerning. Yet, some of them say or seem to think that we're making progress or turning a corner. I worry that it feels like a script.
There is a massive divide between the new dissidents and the old dissidents. Not in every case, but in many cases. The new dissidents seem to think that the old dissidents with stories from their own domains are "conspiracy theorists", which is ironic. It's hard to get them all in the same room to talk. Then the old dissidents stop trusting the new dissidents, and think some of them are controlled opposition (I suspect there is at least a little of that going on, but I wouldn't worry about it given the situation and the way I see the schism resolving), and that makes the conversations even harder to organize. I've been shunned by a few on both sides just for trying to organize the conversations, or sharing the domain puzzle across specialist boundaries. It's too much more many people, and that's precisely why the facade has worked for so long.
We know the denial of truth in communities of towering intellectuals has happened throughout history. The towering intellectuals all know this. The human craving to conform to the herd is far greater than any drive to hold forth for truth, even among people who should know better. You, Mathew, pop into my head from time to time when I find myself grappling with my own struggles to not delude myself about ... pretty much everything... because you are such a superb mentor for skillfully finding assumptions, biases, errors, etc., in a relentless dedication to truth. Thank you for that. And thank you for never giving up. Maybe there's a David-and-Goliath strategy for mass awakening somewhere that we haven't thought of.
Oh that's never a good sign...means the bad? Mean?? Stupid??! (Oh Bollocks!! What is the correct term for a person wanting to psychologically cage you like an animal and ultimately profit from your still breathing but medically induced life-less corpse via modern tech? Asking for a friend.😐)
Anyway, the people that want to do not nice things to anyone, are winning....when they sow distrust amongst the rebels, well then they usually can just step back and let the discord begin.
Trust. That needs to be the new currency of the good guys/parallel society.
As long as no smiths or rocks are round😂🤣, you can slap me sidewise, if I don't feel better about our prospects after reading his words. I don't know how... but I know we will win. #itsjustabattle #winthewar
I think we'd be AI if we didnt have moments of doubt. I think that if your instincts are sending you messages, it's for a reason. I have a feeling, maybe it's purely hope, but I think things are going to get weird and dark but then also wonderful. Perhaps, it's a script. I'm not on the inner circle. But IF I was, I would be playing the best Canasta (see history of canasta for reference) game of my life! #hiddencanasta #pokerface #whatsurtell
Hydroxychloroquine DID work successfully with hospitalized patients too, in India, Turkey, Greece, and in one US study, wherever it was tried at low therapeutic doses with other treatments needed for late-stage patients. However, HCQ was given in lethally high dosages in hospitalized studies organized by the WHO in order to make it appear as though it were ineffective and dangerous. See http://www.kathydopp.info/COVIDinfo/COVIDTreatments/PharmaVsHCQ
He mentioned some things privately, but I'm not going to say specifically. I did not ask to share his email, and while I'm disappointed, I will allow him his privacy here.
If he is getting cold feet now, I would like to suggest that he's trying to get the monkey off his own back, by passing it on to you. Taking the video down, could be regarded as the civil thing to do. An alternative POV is that by agreeing to accommodate the request you are colluding to alter the historical record yourself. That is, you in effect accept the monkey as your pet.
It is disappointing. I am sure I would do the same as you and take it down. In the beginning, these discussions were a normal accepted response to this none sense. You could easily accidently step in a mess and not realize it. Then slowly come to the realization it takes great amounts of courage to keep walking. I know for myself and many others these steps forward STILL are having a cost. At times my emotions cause me to question this path and this new surreal dystopian existence. But then my rational side again walks through the logic, data and my values and I keep me moving forward.
This censoring which can include bribes, and if they don't work, threats. Of course, there have been firings, discrediting, lying, etc. But at the end of the line, murder, or rather, mysterious deaths. It would be good to back and look at the history of pharma censoring, and see where we are today. I recently have been going back and started rereading documentation on the use of Vitamin C. When Dr Klenner wrote his article on Vit. C treating polio in 1949, he was already talking about censoring. I think there is more chatter today about censoring, because of internet, I think more people know about it and are standing up against it, so that gives me some hope. And there are too many people speaking up to try to disappear all of you without suspicion. Yes, the new dissidents need to go back and read the history. We need God on our side for this fight.
The 4918th example of people saying they’ve read 1984 but they never actually read it! Sad. Thankfully it was part of my English exam at school and I studied it inside and out, and it left life long impression on me. To be fair it was 1985 when we studied it, a different time to now.
I could tell you were old skool cool by the awesome Substack handle. So very "unwoke" of you but well deserved hats and handclaps from me - I loved phooey as a kid!!!
On another note I need to go back to look at the list of Chloriquine uses dating back to 1899 because from here in Bedrock it seems that not only has C19 taught us that we shouldn't dare use novel gene therapies as a pseudo-vaccine but that HCQ (or Quercitin) + Zinc negates the need for the annual flu shot.
I think your compromising solution to post this blog and then take the video down is very wise. And we should probably thank Mr. Platt for having spoken up for truth at all.
At his age, what is he worried about? Why does he want the video removed? At my age, I feel an obligation to speak out...if I lose my job, I could retire if I had to...on a lean budget.
I know some of those who have been outspoken, have been threatened. When the money doesn't cut it, threatening one's family will likely seal the deal. Some politicians in Canada often look like deer in the headlights when announcing some of their draconian measures.
Principles are called principles for a reason, they aren't called "guidelines for sunny, non-windy days".
I am not defending them, but I can see how that would be terrifying for them. I don't think many of us could stand up against threats to our family (children in particular). As for the money/bribes: no excuses.
Blackmail, bribery, coercion, once you've given in, you are owned.
I hope that those who had their children threatened can sleep at night watching others have their children die from the vaxx because they, "The Leaders" failed to stand.
I agree!
Especially in BC, almost like a hostage video at times, with our “Health” Minister Adrian Dix appearing nervous … 😳
Exactly!
👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👌❤🙏🤗
Not saying it's related to your story... I'm just going to leave this here:
Pfizer Offers Millions in Bribes To Buy the Silence of Outspoken Doctors
https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/pfizer-offers-millions-in-bribes
I am working on an article on bribery stories. I had that link saved, but I also my own story and somebody else's who didn't realize that they were being offered a bribe until we talked about it. Some of the bribes get clever.
Looking forward to reading it!
Get Paul Alexander, he broke this when he was offered the Pfbribe to shut down his criticism at the trucker events.
A million seems insultingly cheap these days, no? What'll that be worth in a week?
Yes, I have his story in my documentation.
You're a lot nicer than me who would tell him to go pound sand making such an outrageous request to erase history and help protect the liars that buried early treatment. It's a valuable and honest report, done freely with consent and captures so much of the problem that paralyzed the planet. It strikes me like asking to burn books to assuage tyrannical political actors.
It's kind of surprising coming from someone who held such a reasonable view of hackers from the early days. When politicians were hyping the threat posed by hackers he reported HOPE Conferences with the ethical human angle and real portraits of folks who were there. It's reasonable for views to evolve but to rewrite history only serves liars.
As he notes early in the interview people have different motives for distorting the truth and obviously some outside pressure is being applied here. While you may have agreed to his his request to aid the destruction of the historical record it doesn't extend to the broader population who are dedicated to preserving censored content and live by the mantra, see something save something.
An error becomes an irreparable harm when it cannot be corrected; to help Silicon Valley drown us in propaganda like a virtual Ministry of Truth doesn't serve the fundamental aims of a free and open society. Betcha a nickle you can guess what the resistors will do. :~)
I believe that what I am doing here does more to tell the whole story than if I left it up and never mentioned it. I haven't advertised these old videos. I never intended to fill in the gap of media and never thought this would all go on for so long.
I have my own copy of the video, of course. I could repost it at any time. YouTube could also remove it at any time.
In the end, I felt it best to allow my guests to self-define their participation. I worry that the video could affect his ability to make a living. That's a tricky concern. But that doesn't mean I'm not documenting the decisions where I feel it's important.
"I believe that what I am doing here does more to tell the whole story than if I left it up and never mentioned it."
Very true and valid assumption, quite reasonable for you to take. Again you are far nicer than me in heavily weighing the impact on the guest.
"I never intended to fill in the gap of media and never thought this would all go on for so long."
What we see depends very much on where we stand. As someone who has been censored for well over a decade, virtually erased from the Internet and banned from Twitter in 2020 it looks like the continuation of a process driven by the Rockefeller-Gates petrochemical cabal that have waged war on truth with increasing success for a century. Add a pinch of Irish temper and we land in different places but still share the same goal of letting truth prevail. Fingers crossed the combined effect gets us there.
I was never naive, but the pharma rabbit hole is larger than anyone thinks when they first notice it in the garden.
https://www.fiercepharma.com/pharma/appeals-court-revives-lawsuit-against-pfizer-roche-astrazeneca-and-johnson-johnson-claims
Wow. I missed this one. So much corruption, in every aspect, of everything.
I have personal experience with gov't/industry corruption in the oil and pharma industries and consumer manufacturing. The casual lack of caring (to the point of death), the corner cutting, and the requirement for essential bribes was a constant in every industry we consulted, worldwide. Then there was the scary lack of competence and job protection. Have to confess to poking a few bears, and getting some "feedback". That was 15 years ago, and it hasn't improved.
I am grateful to you, Mathew (only just realized you don't use two t's), and all the vocal dissidents for standing firm and continuing to shine the light.
If you or any of the dissidents ever need a volunteer to proofread, edit, research, write, organize, and generally dig, please reach out. I'm ready.
Thank you for pointing us in the direction of your videos, which I never knew existed. I hope you also post them at Rumble and Odysee to avoid the shadow ban or outright censorship. I would ask this reporter if he's ever allowed a source to retract.
You are an honorable man. He is a coward for whatever reason.
I think he’s less a coward than misreading the relative risks of speaking out vs remaining silent.
No question, the latter is the more likely to wind up with your family dead or enslaved, you also.
So speak up. Loudly.
If enough of us do it, we swamp their censoring activities by making it unavoidably obvious.
Smearing only works when the numbers of alleged cranks is small.
When it’s large & includes those with no conceivable motive than truth & who sound competent, then they’re driven onto dangerous rocks.
Best wishes
Mike
Yes, you are right. I was too judgmental. We can't know his circumstances. I was listening to Jordan Peterson's interview with Andy Ngo. Andy has had to go to England for safety. They discussed the mob at length and Dr. Peterson said the only protection we have is the truth even if it takes a long while to assert itself. Some people are not in the position to hold out due to personal pressures.
The effectiveness of the mandates, restrictions, quarantines, etc. depends on the willingness of selected groups to enforce them. These groups include the military, law enforcement, business owners, etc. Unlike past authoritarian regimes (e.g., the Third Reich), where the enforcers and their families did not suffer from the repressive measures, COVID-19 and its "vaccines" are very different. In the present case, prolonging the mandates means that not only will the enforcers get the "vaccines", but their families, friends, and colleagues will be required to get the "vaccines" as well. What the enforcers are doing is contributing to their own early demise (in plain terms, suicide) and the early demise of their children, parents, siblings, other relatives, friends, etc (also known as accessory to homicide) by allowing these mandates and other destructive measures to continue. Why would anyone want to do this, if they understood the consequences of their actions?
Worse, it is now a proven fact the "vaccines" do not work to prevent getting the virus, and may, in fact, make someone more susceptible by tamping down the immune system. There are also the many serious side effects of the "vaccines," some lethal VAERS only picks up 1 percent of adverse reactions yet what has been reported is seriously sobering. There may be more unknown side effects in years to come. The "vaccines" cause changes to the DNA and may cause some cancers, birth defects and miscarriages. Fear and ignorance are driving the vaccine mandates.
I didn’t understand why the retraction.
Is it fear?
Because the risks are much greater in NOT speaking up. I know, believe me. I get threats. I’m not slightly scared because what’s coming is definitely much worse than death.
“Life free or die: death is not the worst of evils”.
I really believe this is as true now as in any just war.
Please don’t go quiet, any of you. That’s when they come for you & your family.
Best wishes
Mike
Dr Mike Yeadon
He’s being paid would be my guess. It’s going around. Ask Paul Alexander.
sure, but the video had like 10-100 views on a dead channel when he asked to delete it. the cost-benefit analysis is not good for drug companies to pay him to do it. especially due to the Streisand effect (video has thousands of views now)
Maybe it wasn’t about just the one video but part of a deal that said “shut up and remove all materials”.
It's the little things like this, that make me wonder on the progress we think we (as unwilling (at least for me!) Anti-narrative, rebels, invaders, purebloods, what eves you like to call yourself, are actually making on this?
A few other innocuous little tidbits (like independent evidence from multiple sources, confirming the presence of graphene hydroxide and self assembling tech within Pfizers spikeshots, with chain of custody level evidence that was sent to the NZ government and is met with ....silence.) that make me just, honestly, get fairly concerned that we are out maneuvered and a day late, dollar short.
Silence from a government tells me they are not surprised....
People on both sides are battening the hatches....
I hear you. I've been trying to tell those on "our side" of the debate that we're getting slaughtered. I'm not hearing much back, which worries me. For the most part, they won't have conversations with me about it, and I have no sense at all as to why. It's actually pretty bizarre and further concerning. Yet, some of them say or seem to think that we're making progress or turning a corner. I worry that it feels like a script.
There is a massive divide between the new dissidents and the old dissidents. Not in every case, but in many cases. The new dissidents seem to think that the old dissidents with stories from their own domains are "conspiracy theorists", which is ironic. It's hard to get them all in the same room to talk. Then the old dissidents stop trusting the new dissidents, and think some of them are controlled opposition (I suspect there is at least a little of that going on, but I wouldn't worry about it given the situation and the way I see the schism resolving), and that makes the conversations even harder to organize. I've been shunned by a few on both sides just for trying to organize the conversations, or sharing the domain puzzle across specialist boundaries. It's too much more many people, and that's precisely why the facade has worked for so long.
We know the denial of truth in communities of towering intellectuals has happened throughout history. The towering intellectuals all know this. The human craving to conform to the herd is far greater than any drive to hold forth for truth, even among people who should know better. You, Mathew, pop into my head from time to time when I find myself grappling with my own struggles to not delude myself about ... pretty much everything... because you are such a superb mentor for skillfully finding assumptions, biases, errors, etc., in a relentless dedication to truth. Thank you for that. And thank you for never giving up. Maybe there's a David-and-Goliath strategy for mass awakening somewhere that we haven't thought of.
Oh that's never a good sign...means the bad? Mean?? Stupid??! (Oh Bollocks!! What is the correct term for a person wanting to psychologically cage you like an animal and ultimately profit from your still breathing but medically induced life-less corpse via modern tech? Asking for a friend.😐)
Anyway, the people that want to do not nice things to anyone, are winning....when they sow distrust amongst the rebels, well then they usually can just step back and let the discord begin.
Trust. That needs to be the new currency of the good guys/parallel society.
I feel better after reading Corbett's report....https://corbettreport.substack.com/p/your-guide-to-fifth-generation-warfare?s=r
As long as no smiths or rocks are round😂🤣, you can slap me sidewise, if I don't feel better about our prospects after reading his words. I don't know how... but I know we will win. #itsjustabattle #winthewar
I think we'd be AI if we didnt have moments of doubt. I think that if your instincts are sending you messages, it's for a reason. I have a feeling, maybe it's purely hope, but I think things are going to get weird and dark but then also wonderful. Perhaps, it's a script. I'm not on the inner circle. But IF I was, I would be playing the best Canasta (see history of canasta for reference) game of my life! #hiddencanasta #pokerface #whatsurtell
Hydroxychloroquine DID work successfully with hospitalized patients too, in India, Turkey, Greece, and in one US study, wherever it was tried at low therapeutic doses with other treatments needed for late-stage patients. However, HCQ was given in lethally high dosages in hospitalized studies organized by the WHO in order to make it appear as though it were ineffective and dangerous. See http://www.kathydopp.info/COVIDinfo/COVIDTreatments/PharmaVsHCQ
It’s all documented in RFK Jr.’s Fauci book too!
I’d be interested to know the why ? Did he change his mind on being pro treatment or is he concerned about people knowing he was ?
I’m guessing the latter.
He mentioned some things privately, but I'm not going to say specifically. I did not ask to share his email, and while I'm disappointed, I will allow him his privacy here.
If he is getting cold feet now, I would like to suggest that he's trying to get the monkey off his own back, by passing it on to you. Taking the video down, could be regarded as the civil thing to do. An alternative POV is that by agreeing to accommodate the request you are colluding to alter the historical record yourself. That is, you in effect accept the monkey as your pet.
Did he say why he wanted it removed? I cannot imagine you have not asked him. Would be a relevant factoid.
Yes. He emailed and asked for it to be removed.
It is disappointing. I am sure I would do the same as you and take it down. In the beginning, these discussions were a normal accepted response to this none sense. You could easily accidently step in a mess and not realize it. Then slowly come to the realization it takes great amounts of courage to keep walking. I know for myself and many others these steps forward STILL are having a cost. At times my emotions cause me to question this path and this new surreal dystopian existence. But then my rational side again walks through the logic, data and my values and I keep me moving forward.
Downloaded, will be on Bitchute soon.
This censoring which can include bribes, and if they don't work, threats. Of course, there have been firings, discrediting, lying, etc. But at the end of the line, murder, or rather, mysterious deaths. It would be good to back and look at the history of pharma censoring, and see where we are today. I recently have been going back and started rereading documentation on the use of Vitamin C. When Dr Klenner wrote his article on Vit. C treating polio in 1949, he was already talking about censoring. I think there is more chatter today about censoring, because of internet, I think more people know about it and are standing up against it, so that gives me some hope. And there are too many people speaking up to try to disappear all of you without suspicion. Yes, the new dissidents need to go back and read the history. We need God on our side for this fight.
It’s alarming that at this point in the pandemic he would be concerned about this interview. I will definitely be watching it. Thank you.
streissand effect
The 4918th example of people saying they’ve read 1984 but they never actually read it! Sad. Thankfully it was part of my English exam at school and I studied it inside and out, and it left life long impression on me. To be fair it was 1985 when we studied it, a different time to now.
I could tell you were old skool cool by the awesome Substack handle. So very "unwoke" of you but well deserved hats and handclaps from me - I loved phooey as a kid!!!
I did too! That karate chopping cartoon dog was outta sight!
What are you referring to, specifically? (I watched 10 min of the interview today, but cannot recall exactly what was said 17 months ago.)
On another note I need to go back to look at the list of Chloriquine uses dating back to 1899 because from here in Bedrock it seems that not only has C19 taught us that we shouldn't dare use novel gene therapies as a pseudo-vaccine but that HCQ (or Quercitin) + Zinc negates the need for the annual flu shot.
I think your compromising solution to post this blog and then take the video down is very wise. And we should probably thank Mr. Platt for having spoken up for truth at all.