May 4, 2022·edited May 4, 2022Liked by Mathew Crawford
The convergent pattern across countries are so bleak in their implications. But the mounting data, along with the tranches of Pfizer fraudulent data go a long way to provide explanatory context for the suicidal self-destruction of Western economies and distraction of war and its propaganda perpetrated by the same politicians who brought us the bioweapon and the vaccines.
Yep, 'suicidal self destruction' is the word. And for two years I've been watching in disbelief the almost total apathy and disinterest of the masses. I still can't believe it. But it's real, very real.
Here in Aus (that's Karentopia Australia, not Austria) the govts are going for re-election. Loud publicity everywhere. Papers, tv, all media, pasted to lamp posts, whatever, new parties publicising themselves, etc, loud obtrusive publicity all about - but nowhere anything about the covid debacle, the absence of any real pandemic, the farcical published statistics, the killing of democratic elemental rights such as free speech and freedom of movement and association, etc, etc. and the piling up of 600 BILLION dollars worth of debt in two short years!
Not, it seems, an election issue.
None of it ever happened.
???
I was going to say I'm nonplussed but that's by far too faint a word. I'm staggered and gobsmacked. I'm amazed and astounded. I'm flabbergasted and bewildered. I'm astounded and shocked and dismayed and full of doubt and uncertainty and a growing inner dread of what all this might portend....
' Suicidal self destruction ' You said it.
I think perhaps I'm the odd man out. And they're all ahead of me. Could easy be. I've never been too smart. Perhaps all of the 'ordinary' people out there see it all far more plainly than I do and saw it earlier and comprehend it more.
Just, perhaps, as the jews and proscribed persons in germany in wwii saw it plainly and comprehended it in its awful finality. And numbly, dumbly, silently walked into the cattle wagons, into the camps, into annihilation.
Could that be it? I'm the last one to know? It's all a done deal and we're finished?
The collapse is happening everywhere in every way. It is as if the forces that hold society together have gone on strike collectively to tell us that the choices we have made in the last century were the wrong direction and to start afresh. Too much corruption, hate, greed, war, destruction of the planet's ecosystem leads to the present situation. Hopefully we can gather ourselves and rebuild quite differently.
I am not sure that as much has happened as we think has happened.
It could be that we're simply seeing what has always been there in a lot of instances.
Because it comes newly to our attention and understanding we tend to think of it as 'new' when in fact it is not.
From that angle we could perhaps glean a bit of comfort in the thought that we are finally seeing clearly. Our vision, at least, is improving.
There is another factor, too, of course: the internet and the smartphone access to it.
This makes for a completely new 'human race'. You can't define the human race as a social organism as we've been accustomed to be able to define it for thousands of years.
Can we?
For now it more or less acts like simply 'one mind'. Not really, but trending, tending, leaning moving in that direction without doubt.
Instant communication between any two individuals on the planet.
Instant broadcast from any one individual to ALL the rest.
And so on. Heap and heaps more of course, accessibility of all the world's data, computational abilities... it just goes on and on..
So we are dealing with a different context for all the 'social ills' that occupy us so much.
So thinking of exactly what's happened and is happening is no longer as simple as it was because of those two things.
It's a bit chaotic. We need someone with clear vision to make sense of it all. I see no one. Please tell if you do. The 'traditional' or even current gurus don't do it to my mind, people like perhaps Peterson, Chomsky, Sowell, Hanson would be some popular ones I think. They don't get to it. And then there's lots more of course and sometimes I go looking for them and read something of what they say. Mostly I find it unintelligible ( I'm basically as thick as a brick ) but quite often it's no secret they're not addressing this 'needed overview' that I'm looking for in any case so I put them aside.
Perhaps it would be to our benefit if our insane vicious warmongering freedom and rights killing conceited egotistical amoral simple minded stupid monstrous overlords shared the same obsessions.
Wow. It seems like every time a country is handling the virus well without using the clot shots the WHO comes in and forces the shots which then kills the population. Rinse and Repeat. Such incredible EVIL.
I saw your tweet on farms today. I stopped commenting on Twitter, but lurk for now until Elon Musk takes it over and we see it what becomes of that space. Perhaps a Substack post on the question of what we all do now and how we go forward would be timely. In under 3 years dark revelations on bioweapons, vaccines, large scale political corruption, threat of hostile global dominance, and the most dangerous war ever waged now in full progress are a lot of new realities to bear. How do we live? Communicate? Find like communities in person? Cope?
The kind of corruption in the Global nations that produces Party uniformity is radically different from the corruption in marginalized communities, where individual thugs and warlords and awful neighbors who live down to their vices could never affect the millions, even billions, of lives the Global Party has now captured. Lawful Evil has such a dark and pervasive reach across all the places afflicted with the Global Terror, whereas Chaotic Evil ruins lives so immediately, as a neighbor or a stranger brutally ignoring a fence.
If the rampant wealth and material splendor of hundreds of billions of dollars showering down on three hundred thousand people was not enough to shake off the mandate, live free of the transfection, doesn't that tell us something amazing about the true stakes, the massive scale, the Party has upon even these people with their wealth, their slaves, their opulence, their decadence?
Doesn't it encourage you to think even more deeply about who and what you are in a world that has such an overwhelming Global Terror that it isn't even fazed by social wealth or political connection? Asymmetric warfare sees the value in co-opting and misdirecting organizations through corrupted agents, whether the corruption is personal vice or endless greed, making the Party a very skilled interpreter of people's potential for corruption. The incorruptible, even just the highly principled, are as dangerous to the Party as the chaotic evil thugs, villains, shambling addicts plaguing many communities, but one is useful and the other is not.
Some of the highly principled, not knowing any better and being trustworthy people, underwent transfection to save and heal their communities. "I got the vaccine to do my part for my sick niece, my coworker who had cancer, my community." You kill them with their love.
Some of the highly principled know exactly their role and their mission. Think Hank Schrader in Breaking Bad. Great story ark, turning a cynic into a hero. You can only kill them.
The rest of the highly principled: is that you? If you think of yourself as someone who wants to undo, unwork, struggle against the unfolding plans of the Global Party, do you also think of yourself as someone who has principles, has not given into corruption, and knows enough of your self, that you will be someone whom others can depend on? Do you fear death, or do you think it won't ever come to that, as we're not in a war where no one follows the rules but the rule of victory?
I've also been reading Linh Dinh's travelogues, following him from Unz to his own substack, seeing from reading his streetwise perspective what happens in various places of the world. It's helpful to combine that with these statistical models, to allow both to inform the other. Each of these tales of these other nations, leads me to this. More and more, you see that it doesn't matter, it never really mattered, how much wealth or power to create islands out of ocean you have. Whatever the real war, the deepest game, it clearly has nothing to do with money, power, influence, opulence, or celebrity. It has a lot to do with why you love the things you do, why you kill the things you do, and how you make distinctions between your reasons. Make —as in, literally, how you live out the distinction in your intentions, actions, and exertion or lack of any of these; what you make with the tools, concepts, body you have.
Sorry for rambling, but hopefully this makes sense to someone who will say it much better.
"I got the vaccine to do my part for my sick niece, my coworker who had cancer, my community." - That is not highly principled but highly gullible, and lacking common sense. Such line of humanity shall not survive, which is only natural. Delusions carry a cost, in this instance fatal. I take succumbing to lies as a sign of underlying godlessness for faith would easily dispose of the spewings of the father of lies.
That's a bit harsh or world-weary. You sincerely don't know any kind-hearted people who trust the authorities, the parents, the head-of-the-class, because they see these other people as good-natured and as considerate as themselves? It's easy to see how the miscreants, the faithless, the cynical see the rest of the world's people as they see themselves, but it should also be easy to see how those filled with love for their neighbor would be willing to risk harm for others. Is that lacking common sense? Maybe, but then what does one have in common with the world and what with the gods?
If it really were the case that what you call gullibility leads to a natural extinction, why is it still manifest in a species that's hundreds-of-thousands-years-old with social eugenic roles cultivating its clade for millions more? Or, if you do believe that overstanding Godfulness guides and sustains our existence, why would you say that God has no use for those who risk their lives for the betterment of their fellows, their neighbors —and so will let these people, children of loving mothers, die out to be maximally replaced by the liars, the children of the lying father? Is God a model for how to love and die, or a model for how to abandon people to annihilation? Maybe it's a complex thing to believe the natural course of God's sweet world is a slow extinction of all the people who think highly of other humans. The sweet are not dead yet.
I'm a little puzzled by the claim that the people of Qatar are healthy. They have significant problems with obesity (worse than the U.S.), diabetes, birth defects and other genetic disorders.
As I understand the opulent Middle East setup, the slaves are imported initially, and then exported back to their place of origin. Counting them into the Qatari statistics (if that is the case) would make all the figures worthless.
You won't isolate viruses the same way as with bacteria, so lung lavage won't work the same way. Isolation takes place through the use of intermediate cells. We might use those from African green monkeys, IIRC. But I'm not a virologist...just recalling what I've read. My wife is a biochemist, however, and has studied some viruses.
Here is a new interview with Dr. Michael Yeadon on "The Delingpod" who has now fled to the US. In part of the interview he discusses his open mindedness about the reality of a virus being a thing or not a thing. His point is that he is an immunologist and there is immunity to something that is consistent and seems transmissable and follows these rules we ascribe to a virus construct. But ultimately that construct could change. I like how he frames the controversy in the way to leave the door open but to stay to the science he knows. It is a great interview about his whole story.
Somewhere, not long ago, Dr. Yeadon stated that at that point, he had come to the conclusion that the whole covid thing was a fraud. If the whole, then its parts, too, I would gather, and why not every single part?
He makes clear in this interview his view on the government response and its facets being lies. His views on what a virus is or isn't treated separately in this interview.
You're trolling, Mr. Crawford. Sending Koch heads to a fact check that says "Covid-19 PCR tests are generally very accurate" is pouring gasoline on a fire, LOL.
Kevin McKernan did a great thread on isolation in Dec 2020. I'd send ppl there while it's still up, especially since he knows the nuances of PCR.
Nobody has ever isolated any purified virus. The word means poison in Latin. The proof that no SARSCov2 virus has ever been isolated can be found here:
Frances Leader, I hope you calm down and stick around.
I see you are a British geopolitics blogger. I just recently discovered the two Alex's on The Duran, covering the Ukraine NATO conflict with Russia. They are a treasure.
I think people are quite aware that it is intriguing to question what a virus really is. Lots of great minds tossing this around. Nothing is settled and bringing up the question may eventually alter the field for the better. For example, it appears that the virus parts are immunogenic in and of themselves (Long Haul COVID, see Bruce Patterson work). This happens in Lyme disease. In fact dead borrelia parts are more immunogenic, allergenic, inflammatory and stick to key receptors than the live form. That is fascinating. Viruses can be cooked up in computers and 3-D printed according to some sources. To the extent that can be done, the more we might come to know.
Re: borrelia. Someone who suffered from borreliosis was duly treated at a clinic, then repeatedly called for checkups, and the findings were still positive. She decided to try her luck with a doctor who did a bioresonance analysis of her condition. His conclusion was there was just dead borrelia remaining in the system, and that was ultimately resolved by bioresonance.
You need to closely time the switching on of 5g to the outbreaks, and ideally get past the correlations with finer grained data, like proximity to towers, amount of cumulative exposure, and metered proof of levels of radiation that are connected to disease.
I am familiar with this work and those who talk about this issue extensively. There are meaningful correlations and reasonable mechanisms of action for 5g impact on human health and infectious disease promotion. But it makes sense, and it suggests so in this article, that the outcome is what is known statistically as an interaction effect not a main effect. Terrain issues (the body background health and immune system and the environment) will interact with a pathogen to create an illness or health condition. The vast majority of people infected with SARS-COV-2 did just fine. (Good terrain was protective). What is the urgent concern is that the vaccines are clearly destroying terrain--background health-- to increase vulnerability to the pathogen. The vaccines may even increase vulnerability to 5g radiation, through a variety of proposed mechanisms. So it is complex. Not an either or argument.
Hello, me, Betty, Fred and Wilma were debating this virus isolation just last night. Well we don't really debate Fred, we just laugh at him (he's a hell of bowler however). We didn't come to a written in stone conclusion, obviously, but what we can conclude, in this case, is that it is somewhat irrelevant. Cleary, in black and white documentation, they did not isolate CoV2 to create the assay panels to test for CoV2. Its undeniable. Contrived is the phrase the FDA coined. Nevertheless, plenty O peeps succumbed to the propaganda and got themselves a Free, safe and effective vaccine that was formulated virtually overnight or maybe several weeks ago whichever came 1st and was documented by that Nov 2019 tech transfer license. Anyway, whether or not any viruses have been isolated is not terribly important in the fact that this biologic gene therapy masquerading as a vaccine is down right dangerous and deadly. More so than all vaccines previously combined. Thats what this analysis by Matt shows us. Oh, and also that HCQ works well against respiratory illness until the mainstream miscreants® tell us it doesn't.
It's because an mRNA vaccine that contains N1-methylpseudouridine substitutions ERASES immunity to the coded antigen. Hence making you invulnerable to severe inflammatory effects but at the same time vulnerable to asymptomatic infection. Typhoid Mary basically. Probably also why getting the shot cures some people of long COVID. I go into detail about it here:
Lower death rate == higher false positive case rate? Or is the age distribution mostly at work there? I’d think something like PCR cranked to the gills ought to make the shots more likely to come up as positive cases, which then puts those shot caused deaths in the covid+ bin…
Not a higher false positive "rate", but possibly more false positives in proportion with more testing. But also more true positives in proportion with testing. Ultimately, I think the story stands as it is, which is to say that I think Dr. Al Kuwari is basically correct that Qatar's case curve likely looks more like those from other nations after testing differentials are taken into account. I disagree with some of her assertions about public health measures, but I think there is truth to the "testing finds cases" story. That said, I doubt it made much difference, and having people stay inside [most of the time] may have resulted in greater infection more quickly around the world.
Yes higher testing rate scales it up definitely. Staying inside + lots of international mixing to stir things up? Though could see mixing being suppressed too.
The thing about mixing is that it can spread to nodes that take it home and spread again, so there is a weird equilibrium problem to determine how maximal spread takes place.
Most large scale mixing that was dodged was likely outdoors where little spread takes place.
I do not think the domestic transmission is a valid claim. I have never seen data about infection from one household member to the next surpassing 20 percent. From memory: One study claimed 16.7%, another ca 10%. The never-ending series of mysteries surrounding covid as an infectious respiratory disease.
Well done again! Thanks!
#safeandeffective
well you don't come right out and say it but the message is: vaccines induced covid cases and deaths, right?
It would look that way.
The story seems to be consistent across quite a large number of nations.
The convergent pattern across countries are so bleak in their implications. But the mounting data, along with the tranches of Pfizer fraudulent data go a long way to provide explanatory context for the suicidal self-destruction of Western economies and distraction of war and its propaganda perpetrated by the same politicians who brought us the bioweapon and the vaccines.
Yep, 'suicidal self destruction' is the word. And for two years I've been watching in disbelief the almost total apathy and disinterest of the masses. I still can't believe it. But it's real, very real.
Here in Aus (that's Karentopia Australia, not Austria) the govts are going for re-election. Loud publicity everywhere. Papers, tv, all media, pasted to lamp posts, whatever, new parties publicising themselves, etc, loud obtrusive publicity all about - but nowhere anything about the covid debacle, the absence of any real pandemic, the farcical published statistics, the killing of democratic elemental rights such as free speech and freedom of movement and association, etc, etc. and the piling up of 600 BILLION dollars worth of debt in two short years!
Not, it seems, an election issue.
None of it ever happened.
???
I was going to say I'm nonplussed but that's by far too faint a word. I'm staggered and gobsmacked. I'm amazed and astounded. I'm flabbergasted and bewildered. I'm astounded and shocked and dismayed and full of doubt and uncertainty and a growing inner dread of what all this might portend....
' Suicidal self destruction ' You said it.
I think perhaps I'm the odd man out. And they're all ahead of me. Could easy be. I've never been too smart. Perhaps all of the 'ordinary' people out there see it all far more plainly than I do and saw it earlier and comprehend it more.
Just, perhaps, as the jews and proscribed persons in germany in wwii saw it plainly and comprehended it in its awful finality. And numbly, dumbly, silently walked into the cattle wagons, into the camps, into annihilation.
Could that be it? I'm the last one to know? It's all a done deal and we're finished?
The collapse is happening everywhere in every way. It is as if the forces that hold society together have gone on strike collectively to tell us that the choices we have made in the last century were the wrong direction and to start afresh. Too much corruption, hate, greed, war, destruction of the planet's ecosystem leads to the present situation. Hopefully we can gather ourselves and rebuild quite differently.
I am not sure that as much has happened as we think has happened.
It could be that we're simply seeing what has always been there in a lot of instances.
Because it comes newly to our attention and understanding we tend to think of it as 'new' when in fact it is not.
From that angle we could perhaps glean a bit of comfort in the thought that we are finally seeing clearly. Our vision, at least, is improving.
There is another factor, too, of course: the internet and the smartphone access to it.
This makes for a completely new 'human race'. You can't define the human race as a social organism as we've been accustomed to be able to define it for thousands of years.
Can we?
For now it more or less acts like simply 'one mind'. Not really, but trending, tending, leaning moving in that direction without doubt.
Instant communication between any two individuals on the planet.
Instant broadcast from any one individual to ALL the rest.
And so on. Heap and heaps more of course, accessibility of all the world's data, computational abilities... it just goes on and on..
So we are dealing with a different context for all the 'social ills' that occupy us so much.
So thinking of exactly what's happened and is happening is no longer as simple as it was because of those two things.
It's a bit chaotic. We need someone with clear vision to make sense of it all. I see no one. Please tell if you do. The 'traditional' or even current gurus don't do it to my mind, people like perhaps Peterson, Chomsky, Sowell, Hanson would be some popular ones I think. They don't get to it. And then there's lots more of course and sometimes I go looking for them and read something of what they say. Mostly I find it unintelligible ( I'm basically as thick as a brick ) but quite often it's no secret they're not addressing this 'needed overview' that I'm looking for in any case so I put them aside.
Nothing matters to the "masses" except weed and porn.
Perhaps it would be to our benefit if our insane vicious warmongering freedom and rights killing conceited egotistical amoral simple minded stupid monstrous overlords shared the same obsessions.
Wow. It seems like every time a country is handling the virus well without using the clot shots the WHO comes in and forces the shots which then kills the population. Rinse and Repeat. Such incredible EVIL.
I saw your tweet on farms today. I stopped commenting on Twitter, but lurk for now until Elon Musk takes it over and we see it what becomes of that space. Perhaps a Substack post on the question of what we all do now and how we go forward would be timely. In under 3 years dark revelations on bioweapons, vaccines, large scale political corruption, threat of hostile global dominance, and the most dangerous war ever waged now in full progress are a lot of new realities to bear. How do we live? Communicate? Find like communities in person? Cope?
Great questions
The kind of corruption in the Global nations that produces Party uniformity is radically different from the corruption in marginalized communities, where individual thugs and warlords and awful neighbors who live down to their vices could never affect the millions, even billions, of lives the Global Party has now captured. Lawful Evil has such a dark and pervasive reach across all the places afflicted with the Global Terror, whereas Chaotic Evil ruins lives so immediately, as a neighbor or a stranger brutally ignoring a fence.
If the rampant wealth and material splendor of hundreds of billions of dollars showering down on three hundred thousand people was not enough to shake off the mandate, live free of the transfection, doesn't that tell us something amazing about the true stakes, the massive scale, the Party has upon even these people with their wealth, their slaves, their opulence, their decadence?
Doesn't it encourage you to think even more deeply about who and what you are in a world that has such an overwhelming Global Terror that it isn't even fazed by social wealth or political connection? Asymmetric warfare sees the value in co-opting and misdirecting organizations through corrupted agents, whether the corruption is personal vice or endless greed, making the Party a very skilled interpreter of people's potential for corruption. The incorruptible, even just the highly principled, are as dangerous to the Party as the chaotic evil thugs, villains, shambling addicts plaguing many communities, but one is useful and the other is not.
Some of the highly principled, not knowing any better and being trustworthy people, underwent transfection to save and heal their communities. "I got the vaccine to do my part for my sick niece, my coworker who had cancer, my community." You kill them with their love.
Some of the highly principled know exactly their role and their mission. Think Hank Schrader in Breaking Bad. Great story ark, turning a cynic into a hero. You can only kill them.
The rest of the highly principled: is that you? If you think of yourself as someone who wants to undo, unwork, struggle against the unfolding plans of the Global Party, do you also think of yourself as someone who has principles, has not given into corruption, and knows enough of your self, that you will be someone whom others can depend on? Do you fear death, or do you think it won't ever come to that, as we're not in a war where no one follows the rules but the rule of victory?
I've also been reading Linh Dinh's travelogues, following him from Unz to his own substack, seeing from reading his streetwise perspective what happens in various places of the world. It's helpful to combine that with these statistical models, to allow both to inform the other. Each of these tales of these other nations, leads me to this. More and more, you see that it doesn't matter, it never really mattered, how much wealth or power to create islands out of ocean you have. Whatever the real war, the deepest game, it clearly has nothing to do with money, power, influence, opulence, or celebrity. It has a lot to do with why you love the things you do, why you kill the things you do, and how you make distinctions between your reasons. Make —as in, literally, how you live out the distinction in your intentions, actions, and exertion or lack of any of these; what you make with the tools, concepts, body you have.
Sorry for rambling, but hopefully this makes sense to someone who will say it much better.
"I got the vaccine to do my part for my sick niece, my coworker who had cancer, my community." - That is not highly principled but highly gullible, and lacking common sense. Such line of humanity shall not survive, which is only natural. Delusions carry a cost, in this instance fatal. I take succumbing to lies as a sign of underlying godlessness for faith would easily dispose of the spewings of the father of lies.
That's a bit harsh or world-weary. You sincerely don't know any kind-hearted people who trust the authorities, the parents, the head-of-the-class, because they see these other people as good-natured and as considerate as themselves? It's easy to see how the miscreants, the faithless, the cynical see the rest of the world's people as they see themselves, but it should also be easy to see how those filled with love for their neighbor would be willing to risk harm for others. Is that lacking common sense? Maybe, but then what does one have in common with the world and what with the gods?
If it really were the case that what you call gullibility leads to a natural extinction, why is it still manifest in a species that's hundreds-of-thousands-years-old with social eugenic roles cultivating its clade for millions more? Or, if you do believe that overstanding Godfulness guides and sustains our existence, why would you say that God has no use for those who risk their lives for the betterment of their fellows, their neighbors —and so will let these people, children of loving mothers, die out to be maximally replaced by the liars, the children of the lying father? Is God a model for how to love and die, or a model for how to abandon people to annihilation? Maybe it's a complex thing to believe the natural course of God's sweet world is a slow extinction of all the people who think highly of other humans. The sweet are not dead yet.
NOTE:
Qatar has an epidemic of obesity
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/261759173_Obesity_Epidemic_in_Qatar
And inbreeding...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16490156/
I guess that can happen when your average citizen is sitting on $10M in oil reserves.
I'm a little puzzled by the claim that the people of Qatar are healthy. They have significant problems with obesity (worse than the U.S.), diabetes, birth defects and other genetic disorders.
https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2011/11/the-richest-fattest-nation-on-earth-its-not-the-united-states/248366/
Their life expectancies are among the highest in the world.
I am puzzled; quoting: 65 years and over: 1.19% (male 19,067/female 10,068) (2020 est.) /via the indexmundi link/
The smallest group across the age spectrum. Is this expectancy a futures contract?
Most of the population is imported to work in industries, like oil and tourism, while they're young and energetic.
As I understand the opulent Middle East setup, the slaves are imported initially, and then exported back to their place of origin. Counting them into the Qatari statistics (if that is the case) would make all the figures worthless.
Forget viruses. They have never been isolated or proven to exist.
Look at the REAL cause of Covid19 and how it blossomed in Qatar!
https://www.gulf-times.com/story/623391/Ooredoo-drives-Qatar-to-5G-Global-Top-Five-Country
If Qatar is a top 5G country, but low on the COVID-19 illness charts...
Okay, okay, what is your standard for "proof" that viruses have or have not been isolated or exist?
https://fullfact.org/health/Covid-isolated-virus/
You won't isolate viruses the same way as with bacteria, so lung lavage won't work the same way. Isolation takes place through the use of intermediate cells. We might use those from African green monkeys, IIRC. But I'm not a virologist...just recalling what I've read. My wife is a biochemist, however, and has studied some viruses.
Here is a new interview with Dr. Michael Yeadon on "The Delingpod" who has now fled to the US. In part of the interview he discusses his open mindedness about the reality of a virus being a thing or not a thing. His point is that he is an immunologist and there is immunity to something that is consistent and seems transmissable and follows these rules we ascribe to a virus construct. But ultimately that construct could change. I like how he frames the controversy in the way to leave the door open but to stay to the science he knows. It is a great interview about his whole story.
https://rumble.com/v12rjg3-dr-mike-yeadon.html
Somewhere, not long ago, Dr. Yeadon stated that at that point, he had come to the conclusion that the whole covid thing was a fraud. If the whole, then its parts, too, I would gather, and why not every single part?
He makes clear in this interview his view on the government response and its facets being lies. His views on what a virus is or isn't treated separately in this interview.
You're trolling, Mr. Crawford. Sending Koch heads to a fact check that says "Covid-19 PCR tests are generally very accurate" is pouring gasoline on a fire, LOL.
Kevin McKernan did a great thread on isolation in Dec 2020. I'd send ppl there while it's still up, especially since he knows the nuances of PCR.
https://mobile.twitter.com/Kevin_McKernan/status/1344685979366514689
I'm not trolling. I'm spending time appropriately during 15 hour work days.
You cited what was perceived as an inflammatory article. Fits the definition imho. Sorry about the long days, thanks for all the good you do.
Nobody has ever isolated any purified virus. The word means poison in Latin. The proof that no SARSCov2 virus has ever been isolated can be found here:
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/fois-reveal-that-health-science-institutions-around-the-world-have-no-record-of-sars-cov-2-isolation-purification/
If this is what you consider "proof", I think you have a steep uphill climb convincing many people.
Do not sink to sneering. You may have to apologise when you find that Christine Massey and I are correct and that will be very embarrassing for you.
That is not my only proof, of course.
There is a great deal more but I do not cast pearls before swine.
"Do not sink to sneering."
"I do not cast pearls before swine."
Do not sink to trolling Substack. Sheesh.
Do not sink to calling "proof" and then depending on "more proof". That's not how "proof" works.
Yes, so far Substack has been a civil place with respectful disagreement and thoughtful questions and counterarguments.
OK. You make no sense. Unsubscribed.
Frances Leader, I hope you calm down and stick around.
I see you are a British geopolitics blogger. I just recently discovered the two Alex's on The Duran, covering the Ukraine NATO conflict with Russia. They are a treasure.
I think people are quite aware that it is intriguing to question what a virus really is. Lots of great minds tossing this around. Nothing is settled and bringing up the question may eventually alter the field for the better. For example, it appears that the virus parts are immunogenic in and of themselves (Long Haul COVID, see Bruce Patterson work). This happens in Lyme disease. In fact dead borrelia parts are more immunogenic, allergenic, inflammatory and stick to key receptors than the live form. That is fascinating. Viruses can be cooked up in computers and 3-D printed according to some sources. To the extent that can be done, the more we might come to know.
Re: borrelia. Someone who suffered from borreliosis was duly treated at a clinic, then repeatedly called for checkups, and the findings were still positive. She decided to try her luck with a doctor who did a bioresonance analysis of her condition. His conclusion was there was just dead borrelia remaining in the system, and that was ultimately resolved by bioresonance.
You need to closely time the switching on of 5g to the outbreaks, and ideally get past the correlations with finer grained data, like proximity to towers, amount of cumulative exposure, and metered proof of levels of radiation that are connected to disease.
For a start, Rubik & Brown, Oct., 2021: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8580522/
I am familiar with this work and those who talk about this issue extensively. There are meaningful correlations and reasonable mechanisms of action for 5g impact on human health and infectious disease promotion. But it makes sense, and it suggests so in this article, that the outcome is what is known statistically as an interaction effect not a main effect. Terrain issues (the body background health and immune system and the environment) will interact with a pathogen to create an illness or health condition. The vast majority of people infected with SARS-COV-2 did just fine. (Good terrain was protective). What is the urgent concern is that the vaccines are clearly destroying terrain--background health-- to increase vulnerability to the pathogen. The vaccines may even increase vulnerability to 5g radiation, through a variety of proposed mechanisms. So it is complex. Not an either or argument.
If the so-called interaction effect presents a trigger, it elevates to the main effect. QED.
Hello, me, Betty, Fred and Wilma were debating this virus isolation just last night. Well we don't really debate Fred, we just laugh at him (he's a hell of bowler however). We didn't come to a written in stone conclusion, obviously, but what we can conclude, in this case, is that it is somewhat irrelevant. Cleary, in black and white documentation, they did not isolate CoV2 to create the assay panels to test for CoV2. Its undeniable. Contrived is the phrase the FDA coined. Nevertheless, plenty O peeps succumbed to the propaganda and got themselves a Free, safe and effective vaccine that was formulated virtually overnight or maybe several weeks ago whichever came 1st and was documented by that Nov 2019 tech transfer license. Anyway, whether or not any viruses have been isolated is not terribly important in the fact that this biologic gene therapy masquerading as a vaccine is down right dangerous and deadly. More so than all vaccines previously combined. Thats what this analysis by Matt shows us. Oh, and also that HCQ works well against respiratory illness until the mainstream miscreants® tell us it doesn't.
https://readnational.com/national-animal-of-denmark/
It's because an mRNA vaccine that contains N1-methylpseudouridine substitutions ERASES immunity to the coded antigen. Hence making you invulnerable to severe inflammatory effects but at the same time vulnerable to asymptomatic infection. Typhoid Mary basically. Probably also why getting the shot cures some people of long COVID. I go into detail about it here:
https://moondiamond.substack.com/p/the-pseudouridine-question
Why don’t the CFR charts match? I know one’s a moving average, but it’s different enough to not make sense.
Lower death rate == higher false positive case rate? Or is the age distribution mostly at work there? I’d think something like PCR cranked to the gills ought to make the shots more likely to come up as positive cases, which then puts those shot caused deaths in the covid+ bin…
Not a higher false positive "rate", but possibly more false positives in proportion with more testing. But also more true positives in proportion with testing. Ultimately, I think the story stands as it is, which is to say that I think Dr. Al Kuwari is basically correct that Qatar's case curve likely looks more like those from other nations after testing differentials are taken into account. I disagree with some of her assertions about public health measures, but I think there is truth to the "testing finds cases" story. That said, I doubt it made much difference, and having people stay inside [most of the time] may have resulted in greater infection more quickly around the world.
Yes higher testing rate scales it up definitely. Staying inside + lots of international mixing to stir things up? Though could see mixing being suppressed too.
The thing about mixing is that it can spread to nodes that take it home and spread again, so there is a weird equilibrium problem to determine how maximal spread takes place.
Most large scale mixing that was dodged was likely outdoors where little spread takes place.
I do not think the domestic transmission is a valid claim. I have never seen data about infection from one household member to the next surpassing 20 percent. From memory: One study claimed 16.7%, another ca 10%. The never-ending series of mysteries surrounding covid as an infectious respiratory disease.
A condition with one per mille mortality does not call for any vax whatsoever. Why waste time making futile comparisons?
But these were more deadly, so you are looking at efficacy in a subgroup who survived the shot. Not a great bargain.