50 Comments
User's avatar
Monika Ullmann's avatar

Astute, well written and well argued. Eventually, you will even be believed, but not yet...articles like this are the beginning of a flood of vaccine info that will shake everyone...

Tessa Lena's avatar

What a fantastic article, Mathew! Thank you

Guttermouth's avatar

I'm pretty sure drinking too much water causes myocarditis.

What do young, energetic athletes do during intense sessions of sportsball?

EHHHHHHH????

Science, bitch. Boom.

Mathew Crawford's avatar

Breathing causes cancer.

Cite. One. Counterexample.

Guttermouth's avatar

Everyone I've ever known who is into crypto DIES.

Game, set, and MATCH.

Mathew Crawford's avatar

Almost everyone who ever died did so without owning a Bitcoin.

Game on.

Guttermouth's avatar

Oh, yeah?

Almost everyone who ever died ate gluten. And had SEX.

Mathew Crawford's avatar

I'm actually not certain that's true.

Guttermouth's avatar

Well, I can flex "almost." But yeah, I remembered rice doesn't have gluten. So maybe that one doesn't land.

DC Lovell's avatar

I read through this back and forth. My contention: Guttermouth causes eye rolls and visions of a young person entering puberty. Prove me wrong.

Mathew Crawford's avatar

He is just being goofy entertaining himself. No harm.

DC Lovell's avatar

I get the impression he is entertaining himself on the internet in ways that require a cupped hand.

Guttermouth's avatar

Oooh, yeah, you show that internet stranger joking around with an admired writer who's boss with totally unprovoked abuse! DOMINATE that high ground, mister!

Remi Steele's avatar

Well done research and article.

I am wondering if the increase in articles re: myocarditis pre-jab rollout were meant to be pre-emptive based on the clinical trials. As if to ensure the blame would/could be placed on the virus and deflect from the harm they knew the jabs would cause. In other words, they knew and were already running the coverup.

Motsumi5150's avatar

Thank you M.C. This made me think about the Dr. Peter McCullough clearly distinguishing between "Myocarditis as a result of C19 infection" and "Myocarditis/Pericarditis caused by vaccines"... in the Youtube video he explains how there is a distinct difference, and the vax causes a condition much worse than what is seen in naturally acquired infection.

Mathew Crawford's avatar

Which one is "the" Youtube video? I watch very few videos lately strictly due to time.

Motsumi5150's avatar

OH boy lol, I will need to try and find it. That was some time ago, let me give it a shot.

Motsumi5150's avatar

BTW I am Teresa C. on the BTC edu. signal :). Loving that group! Amazing minds have populated that group, feel blessed to read their thoughts.

Mathew Crawford's avatar

I'm very glad you're finding it valuable.

Moon Diamond's avatar

I wonder if myocarditis from Novavax is similarly mild as myocarditis from natural infection. Can we have Dr. Peter look into that?

Loving Mom's avatar

Bravo, Mathew Awesome job figuring out this page in their playbook! I can imagine their condescending sneers as they schemed how to increase uptake in football country.

buddhi's avatar

Over the past year I've occasionally compared the most vaxxed states with their excess death rate. There seems to be a rough correlation. The highly vaxxed New England states have current spikes in excess deaths. Vice versa with the least vaxxed states.

Vermont, Maine, Connecticut, and Rhode Island stick out. Compare them to Alabama, Wyoming, Mississippi, Louisiana, and Georgia.

Nothing nationally, though. Note the drop-down box for state selection.

https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid19/excess_deaths.htm

Vax/100,000:

https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#vaccinations_vacc-people-additional-dose-totalpop

buddhi's avatar

Hmmm... so those higher-income higher-vaxxed states should actually be having fewer excess deaths. Which means that if they do not, then the apparent deadly vax effect is even more apparent than apparent.

Mathew Crawford's avatar

I suspect that Pharma has long known that income disparity presents speciation of results and creates Simpson's paradoxes in the data that they can exploit at will.

buddhi's avatar

Pharma is taking advantage of the uncertainty principle. Is not the Uncertainty Principal (which is, by the way, in the data, not the observer) Simpson's paradox - if you think about it? The logic may be subtle but it's airtight.

Bird's avatar

At a small cardiologist conference in Austria, the experts were discussing this openly and had been keeping track. Their own numbers found a 1 in 6 rate for young guys showing up with myocarditis, and they wondered if perhaps everyone was affected but just didn't recognize the symptoms -- harder climbing up stairs -- and therefore never came to the doctor. They weren't sure what was happening with girls because the tests come back negative and nobody knows why.

On the "Ask a doctor" chat forum on Reddit, one of the questions recently was asking fellow doctors what they would do if a patient showed up with a couple symptoms that are classic of myocarditis. The responses included "test for acid reflux", "check vitamin levels", "do an X-Ray" -- none of which would recognize myocarditis. I was quite surprised at this because these people need an Echo to visualize the heart. Therefore, if you know anyone with these symptoms or are working in medicine yourself, always get an Echo. This non-invasive ultrasound of the heart takes 10 minutes and could save someone's life by identifying the problem. There is no reason not to give an Echo.

Mathew Crawford's avatar

I'm glad to hear that there are places in Europe where the doctors are talking openly. That's a big step forward.

Bird's avatar

Yes, it's a curious point in time. Looking at the avalanche of publications coming out, I'm not sure if or how anyone with an alert mind isn't on the same page.

Conway Judge's avatar

Dr MoBeen just spoke on spike protein toxicity in heart cells.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NUS15lyMqKQ

DC Lovell's avatar

From the article: One might also be concerned that she was wrong with a smile, but I'll leave that one for the psychiatrists. The smile is the weapon of the con "person". I love all this data and particularly the astute analysis. Here is my heuristic take away. When listening to the people that foisted this crime on humanity, whatever they say, my action is to register the opposite as the truth.

John Cave's avatar

Really appreciate you writing on this topic. My brother’s girlfriend (triple vaxxed) now has heart problems however they came about after a recent COVID infection. I’m still trying to understand if the vax/infection combo introduces unique risk for cardiac issues.

Mathew Crawford's avatar

I hope she has a speedy recovery.

Regardless of infection status, I think the vaccine is dangerous for the heart. And repeated exposure to any or multiple versions of the spike protein cannot possibly help.

Ashmedai's avatar

I was wondering about all the case reports of myocarditis concomitant or post covid infection, of course they're all written assuming that covid was at least a/the precipitating etiological factor, but I noticed they never seemed to consider really the point you raised whether a preexisting condition predisposed them to both covid & myo, happy to see that I'm not crazy lol :)

My instinct was generally to regard the covid injury case reports as probably genuinely attributable to covid for the most part, because they are largely paralleling the vaccine case reports, which is expected to some degree at least because they share the same basic biological antagonists (not the LNP's obviously)

cm27874's avatar

In Germany, there is a register for children with myocarditis, founded in 2013: https://mykke.de/

They have also started a survey on myocarditis following Covid vaccination: https://mykke.de/?page_id=789

Let's hope that they manage to get the full picture. I'm a little skeptical, due to the involvement of the Paul-Ehrlich-Institut.

Jerms 9654's avatar

Godamn Matt please dont let the Welenskies get away with this. Keep fighting the good fight.

Jeremy's avatar

Has anyone even proven that "long-covid" is real? All the numbers I've seen about the percentage of people claiming to have "long covid" are LESS than the percentage of people presumed to be hypochondriacs in the population. I'm inclined to believe that long-covid is mostly just hypochondriacs unless someone can point me to some hard data and not just "claimed symptom" data.

Mathew Crawford's avatar

Understand that essentially *every* viral infection involves a subset of the population who has long term sequelae. They're not all hypochondriacs. Just as there are people with auto-interferon antibody disorders who fare poorly with COVID, it is likely that various states of health and biochemical variations fare better or worse. There may also be interactions with other viruses, bacteria, or conditions.

Old_Mainer's avatar

Pierre Kory in a recent interview on Epoch TV discusses in detail the clusters of symptoms he hears about over and over from his long haul and vaccine injured patients. The consistency says to him that either these are real diseases or that his patients are all talking to each other. He concludes these are real diseases.

Moon Diamond's avatar

I'm a hypochondriac who suffers panic attacks at the slightest chemical or nutritional imbalance. I had COVID just two weeks ago. Worst symptoms were gone in three days, lost my sense of smell around day 6 but it fully recovered a week later. No long COVID yet, I feel as healthy and energetic as I did before I got sick. And even while I was sick I didn't have heightened anxiety levels, if anything the reverse. The psychological effect was stronger than the physical effect; though I had energy I didn't feel like using it, I didn't really want to do anything except sleep all day but I didn't feel like I was dying at all and I felt a strong certainty that if I just slept I would get better.

Guttermouth's avatar

Couple days after the fact on this, but I'm finding some very interesting correlation with vax status and the quickly-becoming-infamous "paxlovid rebound."

Evidently, Pfizer somehow limited their treatment group in trials to the unvaccinated, which would obscure (or straight-up intentionally hide) vax interference due to (my current working theory) antigenic fixation- in other words, the antiviral effect of the paxlovid is INTENDED (with a non-fixated immune system) to buy your body time to mount a stronger, normal immune response, but is a time-limited treatment course. This lines up with their own bullshit excuse of rebound as being "the immune system didn’t have a chance to see the full extent of the virus, since Paxlovid suppressed replication early in disease."

I have heard of NO ONE with a non-tampered immune system experiencing this.