Mistakes Were Not Made - by the Society of Actuaries?
The Vaccine Wars, Part 69
Other Vaccine Wars articles can be found here. The RTE Locals community is here.
I was glad to have the opportunity to speak with Michael Nevradakis at CHD earlier this week. I'd felt as though my reanalysis from last year of the Society of Actuaries data and their dubious claim of vaccine effectiveness (VE) in their data was overlooked. It's hard to be responsible for what feels like a hundred stories and analyses while the information avalanche follows the influencers.
Understand that this is not simply about analyzing the data, but about what we know from what the SOA told us. They made a clear and inexcusable…mistake?
As I hopefully made clear in the interview, I strongly believe that, as Margaret Anna Alice put it, that mistakes were not made by the actuaries. Whatever you might believe about what the data tells us, a group of professional statisticians worth their salt should never look at the following graph and not think "Simpson's Paradox":
If you want to fully understand why, read my original re-analysis, soak up my articles on Healthy User Bias, or watch the video at CHD.
Congratulations on finally getting a major alt outlet to listen to your side of the story and review the evidence, Mathew!
And thank you for your brave willingness to say Mistakes Were NOT Made. It is becoming increasingly impossible for rational people to continue toeing the “mistakes were made” exculpatory verbiage the more evidence mounts for intentionality (https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/letter-to-robert-malone). If they aggressively resist even considering the possibility, it is worth asking why.
For those unfamiliar with the origin of this phrase, you can read the poem and learn about its inspiration here:
• “Mistakes Were NOT Made: An Anthem for Justice” (https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/mistakes-were-not-made-an-anthem)
MC makes a very good (but stunningly obvious) point here.
“We have excess deaths, we should investigate, but we’re not”.
If TPTB are SO sure it ISN'T the vaccine - then what is it?
The water supply could be tainted.
The food supply could be tainted.
There may be invisible, excessively high contaminants in the air.
But they're not investigating any of that.
This is confirmation by omission and absence.
They're not investigating alternatives, because they already know exactly what's causing excess deaths.
They could have looked at least a LITTLE credible if they'd made a show of diving down a few avenues of enquiry.
As it is, the lack of investigation confirms they know there is no need to.